2010-2011 District Performance

Union County Public Schools

District Performance: All Students% Proficient & Distinguished

2010 2011 Improvement NCLBGoal

Reading 75.37% 74.63% - .74% 76.52%

Math 61.81% 69.35% 7.54% 69.84%

Science 57.54% 61.47% 3.93% -----

Social Studies

53.93% 59.67% 5.74% -----

Writing 42.74% 43.06% .32% -----

DISTRICT PERFORMANCE:• District did not meet AYP; has not ever made AYP• District was only .49% away from meeting Math NCLB Goal• As a district, made gain in every subject area, except -.74 in Reading• African American--met goals in Math• Special Education--met goals in Math• Free/Reduced--met goals in Math

NCLB Status: Title I Schools% Goals

Met 2010% Goals

Met 2011 ImprovementDistrict 81.3%

(13/16)81.3%

(13/16)All Schools Met AYP,

except SES-Math & UCMS-Reading

MES 100%(14/14)

100%(12/12)

Met AYP in All Areas-2nd Consecutive Year-

Out of Tier Status!UCMS 100%

(16/16)76.9%

(10/13)Met AYP in Math, but not

Reading(All, African-American &

Free/Reduced)UES 100% (9/9) 100% (9/9) Met AYP in All Areas-9

Consecutive Years

SES 100% (10/10) 91.7% (11/12)

Met AYP in All Areas, except Math (Disabilities)

UCHS 70%(7/10)

100%(10/10)

Met AYP in All Areas-First time since 2004!

District Performance: 4-Year Trend by Subject

% Proficient & Distinguished

2008 2009 2010 2011 % P&D Growth

Reading 59.07% 71.94% 75.37% 74.63% 15.56%

Math 45.38% 59.24% 61.81% 69.35% 23.97%

Science 46.28% 54.67% 57.54% 61.47% 15.19%

Social Studies 46.56 % 52.79% 53.93 % 59.67% 13.11 %

Writing 34.07% 40.29% 42.74% 43.06% 8.99%

% Proficient & Distinguished 4-Year Trend by Subject

2008 2009 2010 20110.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

Reading

Math

Science

Social Studies

Writing

Union Reading % P/D10-Year Trend

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

46.16 48.93 46.6

56.28 56.5160.56 59.07

74.92 75.37 74.63

Union Math % P/D10-Year Trend

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

26.11 25.69

38.1633.9 35.15

39.1845.38

59.2464.14 64.21

District Novice Reduction 4-Year Trend

2008 % Novice

2009 % Novice

2010 % Novice

2011 % Novice

% Novice Reduction

Reading 20% 8% 12% 9.5% 10.5%

Math 82% 56% 45% 28% 54%

Science 60% 32% 30% 18.5% 41.5%

Social Studies

52% 43% 37% 26.5% 25.5%

Writing 37% 18% 18% 15.7% 21.3%

Novice Reduction 4-Year Trend

2008 2009 2010 20110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Reading

Math

Science

Social Studies

Writing

MES % Proficient & Distinguished2010 2011 Gain/Loss NCLB Goal

Reading 76.73% 77.66% .93% 80.23%

Math 67.82% 80.32% 12.5% 70.92%

Science 69.49% 68.57% - .92% -----

Social Studies

54.79% 67.80% 13.01% -----

Writing 47.95% 66.10% 18.15% -----

•Exceeded NCLB Goal in Math

•Made gains in every area except Science

•Met AYP 2 Consecutive Years – Out of Tier Status!

SES % Proficient & Distinguished2010 2011 Gain/Loss NCLB Goal

Reading 85.57% 80.39% - 5.18% 80.23%

Math 76.29% 72.55% -3.74% 70.92%

Science 78.95% 70.59% -8.36% -----

Social Studies

75.93% 72.22% - 3.71% -----

Writing 62.96% 51.85% - 11.11% -----

•Exceeded NCLB Goal in Reading and Math

•Made AYP in Reading for all sub-groups

•1st Year since 2001 that SES did not make AYP. SES made AYP in all sub-groups except Math-(students with disabilities).

UES % Proficient & Distinguished2010 2011 Gain/Loss NCLB Goal

Reading 78.64% 83.18% 4.54% 80.23%

Math 68.93% 74.77% 5.84% 70.92%

Science 60.00% 77.27% 17.27% -----

Social Studies

56.67% 81.25% 24.58% -----

Writing 63.33% 46.88% - 16.45% -----

•Exceeded NCLB goals in Reading & Math

•Made significant gains in Science & Social Studies

•Highest overall % Proficient / Distinguished among all schools

•Met AYP in all areas for the 9th consecutive year

UCMS % Proficient & Distinguished2010 2011 Gain/Loss NCLB

GoalReading 75.25% 72.51% - 2.74% 79.60%

Math 62.07% 69.26% 7.19% 68.68%

Science 59.15% 71.97% 12.82% -----

Social Studies

51.53% 59.24% 7.71% -----

Writing 44.79% 39.49% - 5.30% -----

•Made AYP in Math

•Exceeded NCLB Goal in Math

•Made a gain in every area except Reading & Writing

UCHS % Proficient & Distinguished2010 2011 Improvement NCLB

GoalReading 57.14% 67.03 9.89% 69.72%

Math 34.78% 45.31 10.53% 69.91%

Science 41.85% 41.41 - .44% -----

Social Studies

47.83% 47.66 - .17% -----

Writing 27.39% 33.93 6.54% -----

•Met AYP in both Reading & Math- 1st time Since 2004

•Met other academic indicator (AFGR) - Increased graduation rate from the prior year by 10% toward the overall goal of 90%

•Made gain in every area except Science & Social Studies, less than .5% decrease

District Overall Transition Index Scores2008 2009 2010 2011 Gain/loss (1yr)

District 75.4 86 87.55 91.55 4UCMS 75.1 87 92 95 3UCHS 67.7 73 75 80 5Elementary (Total)

85.2 98 95.66 99.66 4

MES 74.7 91 94 99 5SES 88.5 101 99 98 -1

UES 92.4 102 94 102 8

Union KCCT Index--All Students13-Year Trend

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

67.5 66.6 66.7 67.9 70.6 74.5 75.9 75.8 76.7 75.485.56 87.71 91.55

Transition Index Scores started in 2007

Accomplishments

• District climbed from 161 to 87, 87 to 71, 71 to • Union County Trend-Continued Gains• MES met AYP in all areas for two consecutive years and is out of Tier

status!• UES met AYP in all areas for the 9th consecutive year!• High School met AYP in all areas -1st Time Since 2004!• Gaps between subgroups were significantly reduced• District has significantly reduced the number of students performing

Novice• District increased the percentage of P & D African American students in

both Reading & Math• District increased the percentage of P & D Special Education students in

Math

Reasons for Success

• Teachers• Instructional support staff• Students• Parent Involvement• Community’s continued support • Intentional focus of all stakeholders • District/School PLC (Professional Learning Communities)

• U. C. Vision- A Passion for Excellence

District Rankings2008 2008

%ile2009 2009

%ile2010 2010

%ile2011 2011

%ileDistrict 161/175 8% 87/174 47% 71/174 59% 52/173 70%

High School (DISTRICT)

165/175 6% 115/174 34% 93/169 45% 53/169 69%

Middle School(DISTRICT)

145/175 17% 99/174 43% 59/174 66% 53/174 70%

UES 247/713 65% 181/719 75% 397/717 45% 185/714 74%

SES 373/713 48% 198/719 72% 241/717 66% 284/714 60%

MES 671/713 6% 482/719 33% 397/717 45% 257/714 64%

Elem. TOTAL(DISTRICT)

147/175 16% 65/174 63% 74/174 57% 53/174 70%

Union County--State Ranking 12-Year Trend

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111

21

41

61

81

101

121

141

161

86

104 104 108 10696

125

143

161

8771

52

Chart Title

DistrictAfrican American (% P &D)

Reading 2009 2010 2011

District 54.34% 59.01% 61.39%

State 51.09% 53.77% 53.93 %

Math 2009 2010 2011

District 33.33% 41.82% 53.25%

State 41.32% 41.78% 45.32 %

DistrictSpecial Education – (% P &D)

Reading 2009 2010 2011

District 50.76% 54.49% 54.46%

State 43.33% 48.67% 45.50 %

Math 2009 2010 2011

District 34.34% 39.33% 45.16%

State 39.63% 43.37% 42.24 %

Unbridled Learning

Union County’s Response: Increase Average Freshman Graduation Rate from 78.84 % to 90%

by 2015 Increase percentage of students who are college/career ready from

31% to 67% by 2015

Kentucky’s Response: Increase Average Freshman Graduation Rate from 76% to 90% by

2015 Increase percentage of students who are college/career ready from

34% to 67% by 2015

College/ Career Readiness

College Ready: the level of preparation a first-time student needs to succeed in a credit-bearing course at a post-secondary institution.

Career Ready: the level of preparation a high school graduate needs to proceed to the next step in a chosen career:– post-secondary coursework; – industry certification; or– on the job training.

A Roadmap for the Future:

• College and Career Ready Graduates• High EXPECTATIONS for all stakeholders• Rigorous Curriculum• Enhance employees’ morale and their signature

strengths• Response to Intervention (RtI) at every level• Improved Instructional Processes and Strategies• Continue District Student Achievement Initiatives• Continue Special Education Improvement Plan