2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … ·...

35
Attachment 2 State Standard Summaries Questions 1-1 through 1-9 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases at LUST Sites, Heating Oil Tanks, and Out of Service Tanks

Transcript of 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … ·...

Page 1: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

Attachment 2

State Standard Summaries

Questions 1-1 through 1-9

2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases atLUST Sites, Heating Oil Tanks, and Out of Service Tanks

Page 2: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

1-1a&b. Does your state have action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards for MtBE?

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilAction

Level(s)(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X

AL X 20 20 0.008 0.008

The cleanup levels are allrisk-based determined ona site by site basis. Thecleanup level entered isthe initial screening level.

AR X

AZ X 20 320 320

Arizona does not have anenforceable drinking waterstandard. The USTprogram has limitedauthority in the USTCorrective Action Rulesthat allows determinationof a risk-based level ofcontaminants that do nothave a drinking waterstandard.

CA X 13 5

CO X 20 20 20

Petroleum storage tanksand cleanups from thesetanks are regulated by theDept. of Labor andEmployment, Division ofOil and Public Safety(OPS). Hazardous wastecleanups are regulated bythe Dept. of Public Healthand Environment(CDPHE).

CT X 70Soil cleanup levels: >direct exposure criteria,Residential = 500 ppm,Industrial/Commercial =1000 ppm > pollutantmobility criteria, GA = 2ppm, GB = 20 ppmGroundwater cleanuplevels: > pollutantmobility criteria = 100ppb

Page 3: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

Industrial/Commercial =1000 ppm > pollutantmobility criteria, GA = 2ppm, GB = 20 ppmGroundwater cleanuplevels: > pollutantmobility criteria = 100ppb

DE X 180 0.13 10gwcl - site specific, scl -site specific

FL X 20 0.09

There is no separateconcept of an action levelas distinguished from acleanup level. If achemical is detected abovethe cleanup target level itis consideredcontaminated and meansthat the contaminationneeds to be cleaned up.

GA X

MtBE is used as a leading-edge indicator of plumemovement and itspresence in a drinkingwater well sometimesresults in replacement ofthe well to prevent furthercontamination by benzeneand other substances thathave an MCL.l

HI X 20 20 0.005 0.005

Current HIDOH USTaction levels for MtBE:non-drinking waterthreatened soil: 20 ppmnon-drinking waterthreatened GW: 202,000ppb drinking waterthreatened soil: 0.005 ppmdrinking water threatenedGW: 20 ppb

Page 4: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

IA X

Sites must sample forMtBE during initialinvestigations/assessment.If MtBE is found abovethe detection level (15ppb) continued samplingfor MtBE is required.

ID X

Guidance is due to bereleased in late 2007-early2008. Cleanup levels arecurrently site-specific andrisk based.

IL X 70 70 0.32 0.32 70 20 20 20

IN X 40 40 0.18 0.18 20

Any detection of acontaminant requires aresponse. Detection limitsmust meet the residentialcleanup objective.Cleanup levels listed arefor residential closure. Thecommercial/industriallevels are 870 (gw) and3.9 (s).

KS X 20 20 2400 2400

KY X 50

When a release isconfirmed or when gw isencountered at a USTsystem removal, KYrequires MtBE analysis ofwater samples fromdrinking water sources(dom.-use wells, springs,cisterns) located within acertain distance from aUST system.

LA X 20 0.07

Cleanup levels are site-specific and based on atiered risk-based approachand depend on sourcelength, GW classification,and dilution factor.

Page 5: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

and dilution factor.

MA X 70 70 0.10 100 20 70GWAL =gw1=70,gw2=1.0 Soil S1=0.1S2=100 mg/kg

MD X 20 6501-1b non-residental soilaction level is 2700 ppm

ME X 25 35 35

MI X 40 800 240 40

MTBE was bannedeffective June 1, 2003.Criteria units are in pbb.Cleanup level depends onland use. Inhalation anddirect contact criteria aredeveloped as well. Note:program does notdesignate health-basedcriteria as primary. See Opmemo No. 1 on Web at :www.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X 70

MO X 146 0.453 20

Cleanup levels varydepending on the riskassessment and whether aTier 1 or Tier 2 cleanup isdone.

MS X 40 3910

The groundwater and soillevels listed are "screeninglevels" which, if exceeded,require further assessmentand/or remediation.

MT X 30 30 0.10 30

Action levels for MtBE insoil vary depending ondepth to groundwater andland use. 0.1 ppm is themost conservative valueassigned to groundwaterless than 10 feet verticalsperation and residentialuse.

Page 6: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

NC X 200 0.92 200 11.60

Cleanup levels based onassigned risk of site. High- (.92 ppm/200 ppb)Intermediate - (.92ppm/200000 ppb) Low -(156 or 4088 ppm/200000ppb) {(soil - ppm)(GW -ppb)}

ND X

NE X

Cleanup levels are site-specific levels determinedusing RBCA program.The following levels arethe lowest RBSLs: 20 ppbfor GW and 0.607 forSoil.

NH X 13 0.13 13 20

NJ X 70 3.10 70

NM X 100 100 100 40Soil action and cleanuplevels are risk-based andtherefore variable

NV X 20 20

Site-specific MtBE actionlevels are set to 20 ug/Lunless the site is locatedgreater than 500 feet fromprivate well; 1,000 feetfrom a municipal well,construction dewatering,or sensitive environment;1/2 mile from surfacewater intakes

NY X 10 0.12 10

Action levels for bothgroundwater and soil areany amount ofcontamination.

OH X 40 130The cleanup level is sitespecific so I can't tell youwhat it is.

OK X Although OK has noaction level or cleanuplevel for MtBE, we haveadopted EPA's "level ofinterest" for thiscontaminant ingroundwater. Thatconcentration level is 20

Page 7: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

action level or cleanuplevel for MtBE, we haveadopted EPA's "level ofinterest" for thiscontaminant ingroundwater. Thatconcentration level is 20ug/L.

OR X 6.40 130

PA X 20 20 2 2

If a water supply (privateor public) is affected by aUST petroleum release,regardless of contaminantlevel, the water supplymust be replaced eithertemporary or permanentlydepending on long-termimpact.

RI X 20 40 0.90 40

Standards for GA areasentered in table The soilstandard is a leachabilitystandard. Standards forGB areas: GroundwaterCleanup Level 5000 ppbLeachability CleanupLevel Soil 100 ppm

SC X 40 0.032 40

Soil action level based onEPA PRG Soil cleanupmay vary depending onland use. Cleanup levelsare site-specific risk-basedvalues.

SD X 40

TN X 20 39.60

*Ingestion, resident childor commercial worker-20ppb IndoorInhalation/vaporemissions, resident child-175000ppb, commercialworker-1610000ppb**Indoor Inhalation/vaporemissions, resident child-39.6ppm, commercialworker-364 ppm

Page 8: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

**Indoor Inhalation/vaporemissions, resident child-39.6ppm, commercialworker-364 ppm

TX X 240 15 0.62 0.62 240 15

MtBE action levels onlyapply to releases reportedafter September 1, 2003.Cleanup levels varydepending on the potentialfor receptors to beexposed. The mostconservative cleanup levelhas been provided.

UT X 200 200 0.30 0.30 200

VA X

VDEQ has zero tolerancefor petroleum andpetroleum-relatedadditives in privateDrinking water supplywells. Cleanup is site-specific and risk-based.Regulated water suppliesfollow EPA's MCLs.

VT X 1 40

MtBE cleanup levels aredetermined on a site-specific basis and are risk-based.

WA X 20 0.10

Washington's groundwatercleanup level is based onthe federal drinking wateradvisory level. Our soilcleanup level is based onprotection of groundwaterfor drinking water use.

WI X 60

WV X

WY X 40 40

Totals: 41 8 1

Page 9: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

1- 2a & b Does your state have action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards for tertiary-butylalcohol (TBA)?

State Yes No Don'tKnow

GroundwaterAction Level

(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanup Level

(ppb)

SoilActionLevel(ppm)

SoilCleanup

Level(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X

AL X

AR X

AZ X

CA X 12

CO X

CT X 100

CT only has a drinking water standardexpressed as a combined totalconcentration of TBA, MTBE, ETBE,TAME, DIPE.

DE X 140 0.05Action levels are draft. Cleanup levels aresite-specific

FL X 1400 5.70

The Florida petroleum cleanup programdoes not list TBA as a chemical of concern.so it is not normally required ingroundwater analyses at petroleumcontaminated sites. However there is acleanup target level as indicated.

GA X

HI X

The current HIDOH UST action levels donot have an action level for TBA.However, the newly revised 2006Environmental Action Levels adopted bythe Hawaii Dept of Health HEER Officedo. We are currently in the process ofadopting new levels

IA X

Page 10: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

ID X

IL X

IN X

There are no default response standards ordrinking water standards. Responsedecisions would be site-specific. and adefault closure level would be calculatedwhen needed.

KS X 43 43

KY X

There are no cleanup levels for TBA in KYUST regulations. However, the Division ofWater requires analyses for many morecompounds for public water systems;DOW may have some standards that arenot addressed by the KY UST Branch.

LA XValue is not listed in RECAP but would bedeveloped using RECAP algorithms.

MA X 1000 100 120GW1=1.0mg/l GW2=10mg/l S1=100mg/kgS2=1000mg/kg

MD X

ME X

MI X 3900 78000 3900Cleanup levels depend on land use. units inppb. See Op Memo No. 1 on Web at :www.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X

MO X 286 0.563Cleanup levels depend on risk assessmentand whether a Tier 1 or Tier 2 cleanup isdone.

MS X

MT XWill consider standard based on the resultsof EPA fuel testing.

NC X

Although no specific standards have beenestablished for this chemical, a violationoccurs if the constituent is even detected.Therefore, action levels, cleanup levels anddrinking water standards will become thedetection limit.

Page 11: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

ND X

NE X

NH X 40 Soil standards are under development.

NJ X 100 4.10

NM X

NV X

NY X 50

Action levels are any amount ofcontamination and the cleanup levels aresite-specific for both groundwater and soil.The drinking water standard for TBA isregulated as an Unspecified OrganicContaminant (UOC).

OH X

OK X

OR XIf TBA is detected, the cleanup level iscalculated at a 1 in a million cancer risk orat a hazard index of 1, whichever applies.

PA X

RI X

SC X 1400 1400Cleanup levels are site-specific risk-basedvalues

SD X

TN X

TX X

UT X

VA X

VDEQ has zero tolerance for petroleumand petroleum-related additives in privateDrinking water supply wells. Cleanup issite-specific and risk-based.

VT X 1

Vermont has recently begun to test forTBA. It is being detected at more and moresites. There are no standards yet for thiscompound.

WA X

Page 12: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

WI X

WV X

WY X 2200 2200

Totals 15 35 0

1-3a&b. Does your state have action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards for Ethanol?

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilAction

Level(s)(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X

AL X

AR X

AZ X

CA X

CO X

CT X

DE X

FL X 10000 40

GA X

HI X

IA X

ID X

IL X

IN XOur Risk Program is currentlydeveloping a default cleanup levels forethanol. Results are pending

KS X

Page 13: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

KY X

There are no cleanup levels for ethanol inKY UST regulations. However, theDivision of Water requires analyses formany more compounds for public watersystems; DOW may have some standardsthat are not addressed by the KY USTBranch.

LA XValue is not listed in RECAP but wouldbe developed using RECAP algorithms.

MA X 1000 100GW1=1.0mg/l GW2=10mg/lS1=100mg/kg S2-1000mg/kg

MD X

ME X

MI X 1.90 380 1.90cleanup levels are based on land use.units are in pbm. See Op Memo No. 1 onweb at www.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X

MO X 2260 3.39 Same as above.

MS X

MT X

NC X

Although no specific standards have beenestablished for this chemical, a violationoccurs if the constituent is even detected.Therefore, action levels, cleanup levelsand drinking water standards will becomethe detection limit.

ND X

NE X

NH X

NJ X

1-3b. Compounds (non-carcinogens) thatdon't have specific or interim specificGround Water Quality Standards defaultto 100 ppb.

NM X

NV X

NY X 50 Action levels are any amount ofcontamination and the cleanup levels aresite specific for both groundwater andsoil. The drinking water standard forEthanol is regulated as an UnspecifiedOrganic Contaminant (UOC).

Page 14: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

contamination and the cleanup levels aresite specific for both groundwater andsoil. The drinking water standard forEthanol is regulated as an UnspecifiedOrganic Contaminant (UOC).

OH X

OK X

OR X

PA X

RI X

SC X 10000 10000Cleanup Levels are site specific risk-based values

SD X

TN X

TX X

UT X

VA X

VDEQ has zero tolerance for petroleumand petroleum-related additives in privateDrinking water supply wells. Cleanup issite-specific and risk-based.

VT X 1

WA X

WI X

WV X

WY XTank program has no cleanup level forethanol.

Totals: 7 42 1

1- 4a & b. Does your state have action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards for tert-amylmethylether (TAME)?

State Yes No Don'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

SoilAction

Level(s)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

Page 15: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

Know ActionLevel(s)

(ppb)

CleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

ActionLevel(s)(ppm)

CleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

(healthbased)

(taste &odor)

(orother)

Advisory

Advisory(20-40ppb)

AK X

AL X

AR X

AZ X

CA X

CO X

CT X 100

CT only has a drinking water standardexpressed as a combined totalconcentration of TBA, MTBE, ETBE,TAME, DIPE.

DE X 750 3.60Action levels are draft numbers. Cleanupnumbers are site-specific.

FL XThere is no cleanup target level in Floridafor TAME

GA X

HI XThese may be in the new EALs, but myoffice has not approved their use.Currently in process of adopting.

IA X

ID X

IL X

IN X Same answer as for TBA

KS X

KY X

There are no cleanup levels for TAME inKY UST regulations. However, theDivision of Water requires analyses formany more compounds for public watersystems; DOW may have some standardsthat are not addressed by the KY USTBranch.

LA XValue is not listed in RECAP but wouldbe developed using RECAP algorithms.

Page 16: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

MA X 90Cleanup levels for GW & Soil due to bereleased 2/07

MD X

ME X

MI X 190 3900 190Cleanup levels are based on land use. .SeeOp Memo No. 1 on web atwww.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X

MO X 626 5.11 Same as above.

MS X

MT XWill consider standard based on the resultof EPA fuel testing.

NC X

Although no specific standards have beenestablished for this chemical, a violationoccurs if the constituent is even detected.Therefore, action levels, cleanup levelsand drinking water standards will becomethe detection limit.

ND X

NE X

NH X 140 Soil standards are under development.

NJ X

Compounds (non-carcinogens) that don'thave specific or interim specific GroundWater Quality Standards default to 100ppb.

NM X

NV X

NY X 50

Action levels are any amount ofcontamination and the cleanup levels aresite-specific for both groundwater andsoil. The drinking water standard forTAME is regulated as an UnspecifiedOrganic Contaminant (UOC).

OH X

OK X

Page 17: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

OR XIf detected, the cleanup level isestablished as 1 in a million cancer riskand/or a hazard index of 1.

PA X

RI X

SC X 128 128Cleanup levels are site specific risk-basedvalues

SD X

TN X

TX X

UT X

VA X

VDEQ has zero tolerance for petroleumand petroleum-related additives in privateDrinking water supply wells. Cleanup issite-specific and risk-based.

VT X 1

WA X

WI X

WV X

WY X 130 130

Totals: 11 39 0

1-5a. Does your state have action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards for ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE)?

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilActionLevel(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X

AL X

AR X

Page 18: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

AZ X

CA X

CO X

CT X 100

CT only has a drinkingwater standard expressedas a combined totalconcentration of TBA,MTBE, ETBE, TAME,DIPE.

DE X

FL X

GA X

HI X

IA X

ID X

IL X

IN X Same answer as for TBA

KS X

KY X

There are no cleanuplevels for EtBE in KYUST regulations.However, the Division ofWater requires analyses formany more compounds forpublic water systems;DOW may have somestandards that are notaddressed by the KY USTBranch.

LA X

Value is not listed inRECAP but would bedeveloped using RECAPalgorithms.

MA XCleanup levels for GW &Soil due to be released2/07

Page 19: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

MD X

ME X

MI X 49 980 49

Cleanup levels are basedon land use. Units in ppb.ETBE is subject to anaesthetic criterion,however a specific numberhas not been developed.See Op Memo No. 1 onthe web atwww.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X

MO X 15 0.11 Same as above.

MS X

MT XWill consider standardbased on the result of EPAfuel testing.

NC X

Although no specificstandards have beenestablished for thischemical, a violationoccurs if the constituent iseven detected. Therefore,action levels, cleanuplevels and drinking waterstandards will become thedetection limit.

ND X

NE X

NH X 40Soil standards are underdevelopment.

NJ X

Compounds (non-carcinogens) that don'thave specific or interimspecific Ground WaterQuality Standards defaultto 100 ppb.

Page 20: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

NM X

NV X

NY X 50

Action levels are anyamount of contaminationand the cleanup levels aresite specific for bothgroundwater and soil. Thedrinking water standard forETBE is regulated as anUnspecified OrganicContaminant (UOC).

OH X

OK X

OR X

If detected, the cleanuplevel is established as 1 ina million cancer riskand/or a hazard index of 1.

PA X

RI X

SC X 47 47Cleanup Levels are site-specific risk-based values

SD X

TN X

TX X

UT X

VA X

VDEQ has zero tolerancefor petroleum andpetroleum-related additivesin private Drinking watersupply wells. Cleanup issite-specific and risk-based.

VT X 1

WA X

WI X

WV X

Page 21: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

WY X 190 190

Totals: 10 40 0

1-6a&b. Does your state have action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards for diisopropyl ether(DIPE)?

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction Level

(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilAction

Level(s)(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X

AL X

AR X

AZ X

CA X

CO X

CT X 100

CT only has a drinking water standardexpressed as a combined totalconcentration of TBA, MTBE, ETBE,TAME, DIPE. If DIPE's concentrationalone, or the sum of all oxygenates in thedrinking water sample equals 100 ppb,additional action is recommend

DE X

FL X

GA X

HI X

IA X

ID X

IL X

IN X Same answer as for TBA

Page 22: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

KS X

KY X

There are no cleanup levels for DIPE inKY UST regulations. However, theDivision of Water requires analyses formany more compounds for public watersystems; DOW may have some standardsthat are not addressed by the KY USTBranch.

LA XValue is not listed in RECAP but wouldbe developed using RECAP algorithms.

MA X 1000 100

AL GW1 = 1.0mg/l AL GW2 = 10.0 mg/lAL S1=100mg/kg AL S2=1000mg/kgCleanup levels for GW & Soil due to bereleased 2/07

MD X

ME X

MI X 30 600 30Cleanup levels are based on land use.Units are pbb. See Op Memo No. 1 onWeb at www.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X

MO X 677 7.96 Same as above.

MS X

MT XWill consider standard based on the resultof EPA fuel testing.

NC X 70 0.37

Cleanup levels based on assigned risk ofsite: High - (.37 ppm/70 ppb)Intermediate - (.37 ppm/70000 ppb) Low- (156 or 4088 ppm/70000 ppb) {(soil -ppm)(GW - ppb)}

ND X

NE X

NH X 120 Soil standards are under development.

NJ X 20000

NM X

NV X

Page 23: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

NY X 50

Action levels are any amount ofcontamination and the cleanup levels aresite-specific for both groundwater andsoil. The drinking water standard forDIPE is regulated as an UnspecifiedOrganic Contaminant (UOC).

OH X

OK X

OR XIf detected, the cleanup level isestablished as 1 in a million cancer riskand/or a hazard index of 1.

PA X

RI X

SC X 150 150Cleanup Levels are site-specific risk-based values

SD X

TN X

TX X

UT X

VA X

VDEQ has zero tolerance for petroleumand petroleum-related additives in privateDrinking water supply wells. Cleanup issite-specific and risk-based.

VT X 1

WA X

WI X

WV X

WY X 1200 1200

Totals: 11 39 0

Page 24: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

1- 7 a & b. Please indicate below whether your state enforces the federal MCL for ethylene dibromide (EDB)(0.05 pbb) or has separate action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards.

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilAction

Level(s)(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK XWe will be adopting the federal MCL inthe near future.

AL X 0.05

The state drinking water program has anMCL for EDB of 0.00005 mg/l. Thisvalue is used as our reporting limit andinitial screening level. A site specificvalue could be developed through a riskassessment to determine actual cleanupvalues.

AR X 0.05MCL is used a a screening level forhuman health exposure. Clean-up level isusually not as stringent as MCL.

AZ X 0.05 Yes

CA X

CO X 0.05 0.05 0.05 Colorado standard = 0.05ppb

CT X 0.05

The current detection limit is 0.02 ppb.Detections between 0.02 and 0.05 ppbshould receive follow-up monitoring andcan be referred to DPH for site-specificbottled water determination.

DE X 0.05 0.01 0.05Cleanup levels are site-specific. DWstandard is enforceable for public wells.

FL X 0.02 0.02We have our own lower cleanup targetlevel (of .02) than the federal MCL. Wedo not routinely analyze for EDB in soil

GA X

HI X

The newly revised 2006 EALs do haveaction levels for EDB and I think theyalso have action levels for the previouslymentioned contaminants like TAME. Socertain depts in Hawaii Dept of Healthdo have action levels for EDB, but myoffice does not.

Page 25: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

certain depts in Hawaii Dept of Healthdo have action levels for EDB, but myoffice does not.

IA X

ID X 0.05 0.0001 0.05

IL X

IN 0.05Same answer as for TBA. However,IDEM uses the EPA SDWA MCL fordrinking water.

KS X

KY X

There are no cleanup levels for EDB inKY UST regulations. However, theDivision of Water requires analyses formany more compounds for public watersystems; DOW may have some standardsthat are not addressed by the KY USTBranch.

LA X

Standard is not listed in RECAP butfederal MCL would be used for GW-1sites. GW-2 and GW-3 sites would havestandards developed using RECAP.

MA X 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.02

MMCL for this chemical is morestringent than the federal MCL CL gw1= 0.02mg/l CL GW2=2.0mg/l CL Soil=0.1mg/kg

MD X

ME X 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20

The Maine maximum exposure guideline(drinking water) for EDB is 0.2 ppb: thisis higher than the 0.05 ppb federalstandard.

MI X 0.05 0.05 1.00 20.00 0.05

Units in pbb. Calculated soil criteriondefaults to target detection limit of 20ppb. See Op Memo No. 1 on web atwww.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X

MO X 0.05 0.00047 0.05 Same as above.

MS X 0.05 0.751 Levels are "screening levels" requiringfurther assessment and/or remediation.

Page 26: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

further assessment and/or remediation.

MT X 0.004 0.004 0.004Currently evaluating data from EPAEDB sampling survey.

NC X 0.0004 0.000002 0.05

Action Level - Soil (ppm): 0.000002Drinking Water Standards - Primary:0.05 Cleanup levels based on assignedrisk of site: High - (0.000002ppm/0.0004 ppb) Intermediate -(0.000002 ppm/50 ppb) Low - (0

ND X 0.05

NE X

EDB with the federal MCL is includedas a numerical standard in our GroundWater Standards. However, it is notincluded as a chemical of concern forpetroleum, is not included in our RBCAguidelines, and is not normallymonitored at LUST sites.

NH X 0.05 0.10 0.05

NJ X 0.03 0.05

NM X 0.10 0.10 0.051-7 EDB action levels in soil are riskbased and therefore variable

NV X 0.05 0.05 0.05 Federal MCL

NY X 0.0006 50.00

The action level for groundwater and soilis any amount of contamination. Thecleanup level for soil is site specific. Thedrinking water standard for EDB isregulated as an Unspecified OrganicContaminant (UOC).

OH X

OK X

OR X 0.00064 0.0074Cleanup levels are from the mostconservative RBDM pathway

PA X

RI X 0.025 0.05 0.0005 0.05

1-7 Standards are for GA groundwaterareas Reporting limit of analysienormally conducted is higher thanstandards

Page 27: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

SC X 0.05 0.05Cleanup Levels are site specific risk-based values

SD X

TN X

Ingestion, resident child or commercialworker-.05 ppb Indoor Inhalation/vaporemissions, (gw) resident child-.0855ppm,commercial worker-.499ppm Indoorinhalation/vapor emissions, (soil),resident child-.18ppm, commercialworker-1.05ppm

TX X1-7. The LUST program does notanalyze for EDB

UT X

VA X

Virginia standards are the same as theEPA standards. Virginia Department ofHealth enforces the primary andsecondary standards (MCLs).

VT X 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Soil is site-specific

WA X 0.01 0.005 0.05

Groundwater cleanup level based onconcentration derived using carcinogenicrisk equation and adjusted for thepractical quantitation limit (PQL). Soilcleanup level based on protection ofgroundwater for drinking water use andadjusted for the PQL.

WI X 0.05

WV X

WY XTank program has no cleanup levels forEDB.

Totals: 33 13 3

1- 8. Please indicate below whether your state enforces the federal MCL for 1,2 dichloroethane (1,2 DCA) (5pbb) or has separate action levels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards.

Page 28: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilAction

Level(s)(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X 5 0.01 5

This is the most restrictive of multiplesoil cleanup levels (ingestion, inhalation,migration to groundwater) and reflectsthe migration to groundwater pathway.

AL X 5 5 5Site-specific LUST cleanup levels wouldbe developed using a risk-based process.

AR X 5MCL is used as a human health screeninglevel. Cleanup level is usually not asstringent as MCL.

AZ X 2.50 2.50 5 Yes

CA X

CO X 0.38 0.38 0.38

CT X 1 1

DE X 9.40 0.40 5Cleanup levels are site-specific. DWstandard is enforceable for public wells.

FL X 3 0.01Our state has a lower cleanup target levelthan the federal MCL

GA X

HI X

IA X

ID X 5 0.008 5

IL X

IN X 5 5 0.024 0.024 5IDEM also has default closure levels forcommercial/industrial land use of 31 (gw)and 0.15 (s)

KS X

KY X

There are no cleanup levels for thiscontaminant in KY UST regulations.However, the Division of Water requiresanalyses for many more compounds forpublic water systems; DOW may havesome standards that are not addressed bythe KY UST Branch.

Page 29: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

some standards that are not addressed bythe KY UST Branch.

LA XFederal MCL used for GW1 sites. GW-2and GW3 sites would have standardsdeveloped in accordance with RECAP

MA X 5 5 0.10 10 5AL Soil = 0.1mg/kg CL S1 = 10 mg/kgCL S2 = 90.0mg.kg

MD X

ME X 2 4 4

MI X 5 5 15000 15000 5Units are pbb. See Op Memo No. 1 onweb at www.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X 4

MO X 5

MS X

MT X 4 4 4Evaluating data from state samplingsefforts at historic petroleum release sites.

NC X 0.38 0.0018 5

Action Level - Groundwater (ppb): 0.38Cleanup levels based on assigned risk ofsite: High - (0.00180 ppm/0.38 ppb)Intermediate - (0.00180 ppm/380 ppb)Low - (7 or 63 ppm/380 ppb) {(soil -ppm)(GW - ppb)}

ND X 5

NE X

1,2 DCA with the federal MCL isincluded as a numerical standard in ourGround Water Standards. However, it isnot included as a chemical of concern forpetroleum, is not included in our RBCAguidelines, and is not normally monitoredat LUST sites.

NH X 5 0.08 5

NJ X 2 1 2

NM X 10 10 5

NV X 5 5 5 Federal MCL

NY X 0.60 0.10 5The action levels are any amount ofcontamination in the groundwater and/orthe soil.

Page 30: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

the soil.

OH X

OK X

OR XIf detected, the cleanup level isestablished as 1 in a million cancer riskand/or a hazard index of 1.

PA X

RI X 2 5 0.10 5Responses in table are for GA areas GBareas: groundwater cleanup level 110 ppbleachability cleanup level soil 2.3 ppm

SC X 5 5Cleanup Levels are site-specific risk-based values

SD X

TN X 0.005.0076 for resident child soil vapor .0166for commercial worker soil vapor

TX XThe LUST program does not analyze for1,2 DCA

UT X

Division of Drinking Water enforces allMCLs for drinking water sources, but wedo not regulate this under the tankprogram

VA X

Virginia standards are the same as theEPA standards. Virginia Department ofHealth enforces the primary andsecondary standards (MCLs).

VT X 1 5

WA X 5 11 0.481Groundwater cleanup level based onapplicable state and federal law.

WI X 5

WV X 5

WY XTank program has no cleanup levels for1,2 DCA, but if found, would remediateto federal MCL.

Totals: 37 11 2

Page 31: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

1-9. Please indicate below whether your state enforces the federal MCL for lead (15 pbb) or has separate actionlevels, cleanup levels, or drinking water standards.

State Yes NoDon'tKnow

GroundwaterAction

Level(s)(ppb)

GroundwaterCleanupLevel(s)

(ppb)

SoilAction

Level(s)(ppm)

SoilCleanupLevel(s)(ppm)

Primary(healthbased)

Secondary(taste &

odor)

State(or

other)Advisory

EPAAdvisory

(20-40ppb)

Comments

AK X 15 400 15

AL X 15 4.43 4.43 15

Lead cleanup levels arerisk-based. Each site mayhave a different cleanuplevel. The levels quotedare the initial screeninglevels.

AR X

AZ X 400 400 50 Yes

CA X

CO X 50 50 50

CT X 15 15

Soil cleanup levels:Residential directexposure = 500 ppm,Industrial/commercial =1000 ppm, GA pollutantmobility = 0.015 ppm, GBpollutant mobility = 0.15ppm

DE X 15 15 400 400 15

FL X 15

We have our own cleanuptarget level for lead, whichhappens to be the same asthe federal MCL The levelfor soil would be site-specific based on SPLP orTCLP

GA X

HI X 5.60 5.60 400 400Our 400 ppm level for soilis based on directexposure concerns, andthe relatively high levelsof lead in our geologicallyyoung volcanic soils.

Page 32: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

exposure concerns, andthe relatively high levelsof lead in our geologicallyyoung volcanic soils.

IA X

ID X 15 50 15

IL X 7.50 7.50 0.0075 0.0075 7.50 100 7.50

IN X 15 15 81 81 15The default closure levelsfor commercial/industrialare 42 (gw) and 230 (s)

KS X

KY X 15

UST regulations use acleanup level of 0.015mg/L for lead ingroundwater.

LA X

Federal MCL's used forGW1 sites. GW2 andGW3 sites would havestandards developed usingRECAP

MA X 20 15 300 300 15

AL GW1 =.02mg/l ALGW2 =.01mg/l AL Soil =300mg/kg CL soil 300ppm

MD X

ME X

MI 4 400 4

Criteria for lead arederived using abiologically based model& is linked to residentialsoil direct contact contactcriterion. State action levelmax is 15ppb. Units arepbb. See Op Memo No. 1on web atwww.michigan.gov/deqrrd

MN X 300

Page 33: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

MO X 15 260 15 Same as above.

MS X

MT X 0.10 15 15

NC X 15 270 15

Cleanup levels based onassigned risk of site. High- (270 ppm/15 ppb)Intermediate - (270ppm/15000 ppb) Low -(400 ppm/15000 ppb){(soil - ppm)(GW - ppb)}

ND X 15

NE X

Lead with the federalMCL is included as anumerical standard in ourGround Water Standards.However, it is notincluded as a chemical ofconcern for petroleum, isnot included in our RBCAguidelines, and is notnormally monitored atLUST sites.

NH X 15 400 15

NJ X 15 5

15 ppb is an action level(not a MCL) under theSafe Drinking Water Actand takes into account thatsome plumbing and waterdistribution systems havelead components. 5 ppb isthe Ground Water QualityStandard.

NM X 50 50 15

NV X 15 15 15Your question includestwo mutually exclusiveresponses.

NY X 25 50The action levels areabove site background andthe cleanup levels are site-specific for soil.

Page 34: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

the cleanup levels are site-specific for soil.

OH X

OK X

Our agency does notenforce federal MCL forPb. However, OklahomaDepartment ofEnvironmental Quality, Ibelieve, does enforce Pbdrinking water standards.

OR X 15 400

PA X 5 5 450 450

RI X 7.50 15 0.04 15

Standards in table are forGA areas. Soil cleanuplevel is by a leachabilityprocedure (TCLP orSPLP) and the units aremg/l These are RIDEMstandards but are rarelyrequired for LUSTinvestigations. There areno standards for GB areas.

SC X 15 15

Must first determine iflead is naturally occuringor organic. If lead isorganic, cleanup levels aresite-specific risk-basedvalues.

SD X

TN X 15

TX XThe LUST program doesnot analyze for lead ingroundwater

UT X Federal MCls

VA X

Virginia standards are thesame as the EPAstandards. VirginiaDepartment of Healthenforces the primary andsecondary standards(MCLs).

Page 35: 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases … · 2014-12-15 · 2006 Survey of State Experiences with Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Releases

enforces the primary andsecondary standards(MCLs).

VT X 1.50 400 15

WA X 15 250The 15 ppb level is basedon an MCL TreatmentTechnique Action Level.

WI 15 50

WV X 15

WY X 15 15

Site-specific soil cleanuplevels for metals aredetermined from anenvironmental fate-and-transport risk-assessmentmodel.

Totals: 38 8 2