©2004 Prentice Hall6-1 Chapter 6: International Trade and Investment Theory International Business,...
-
Upload
james-bauer -
Category
Documents
-
view
239 -
download
4
Transcript of ©2004 Prentice Hall6-1 Chapter 6: International Trade and Investment Theory International Business,...
©2004 Prentice Hall6-1
Chapter 6:International Trade and Investment Theory
International Business, 4th Edition
Griffin & Pustay
©2004 Prentice Hall6-2
Chapter Objectives_1
Understand the motivation for international trade
Summarize and discuss the differences among the classical country-based theories of international trade
Use the modern firm-based theories of international trade to describe global strategies adopted by businesses
©2004 Prentice Hall6-3
Chapter Objectives_2
Describe and categorize the different forms of international investment
Explain the reasons for foreign direct investment
Summarize how supply, demand, and political factors influence foreign direct investment
©2004 Prentice Hall6-4
International Trade
Trade: voluntary exchange of goods, services, assets, or money between one person or organization and another
International trade: trade between residents of two countries
©2004 Prentice Hall6-5
Figure 6.2 Sources of the World’s Merchandise Exports, 2001
37%
12%7%
4%
40%
European UnionUnited StatesJapanCanadaOther countries
©2004 Prentice Hall6-6
The largest component of the
annual $1.5 trillion trade in
international services is
travel and tourism
©2004 Prentice Hall6-7
Classical Country-Based Trade Theories
Mercantilism Absolute Advantage Comparative Advantage Comparative Advantage with Money Relative Factor Endowments
©2004 Prentice Hall6-8
Mercantilism
A country’s wealth is measured by its holdings of gold and silver
A country’s goal should be to enlarge holdings of gold and silver by – Promoting exports
– Discouraging imports
©2004 Prentice Hall6-9
Modern Mercantilism
Neomercantilists or protectionists– American Federation of Labor-Congress
of Industrial Organizations
– Textile manufacturers
– Steel companies
– Sugar growers
– Peanut farmers
©2004 Prentice Hall6-10
Disadvantages of Mercantilism
Confuses the acquisition of treasure with the acquisition of wealth
Weakens the country because it robs individuals of the ability – To trade freely– To benefit from voluntary exchanges
Forces countries to produce products it would otherwise not in order to minimize imports
©2004 Prentice Hall6-11
Absolute Advantage
Export those goods and services for which a country is more productive than other countries
Import those goods and services for which other countries are more productive than it is
©2004 Prentice Hall6-12
Table 6.1 The Theory of Absolute Advantage: An Example
Wine 2 1
Clock radios
3 5
France JapanOUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR
©2004 Prentice Hall6-13
Absolute Advantage’s Flaw
What happens to trade if one country has an absolute advantage in both products?
No trade would occur
©2004 Prentice Hall6-14
Comparative Advantage
Produce and export those goods and services for which it is relatively more productive than other countries
Import those goods and services for which other countries are relatively more productive than it is
©2004 Prentice Hall6-15
Differences between Comparative and Absolute Advantage
Absolute versus relative productivity differences
Comparative advantage incorporates the concept of opportunity cost– Value of what is given up to get the good
©2004 Prentice Hall6-16
Table 6.2 The Theory of Comparative Advantage: An Example
Wine 4 1
Clock radios
6 5
France JapanOUTPUT PER HOUR OF LABOR
©2004 Prentice Hall6-17
Comparative Advantage with Money
One is better off specializing in what one does relatively best
Produce and export those goods and services one is relatively best able to produce
Buy other goods and services from people who are better at producing them
©2004 Prentice Hall6-18
Table 6.3 The Theory of Comparative Advantage with Money: An Example
French Made
Japanese Made
French Made
Japanese Made
Wine €3 €8 ¥375 ¥1,000
Clock Radios
€3 €1.6 ¥250 ¥200
Cost of Goods in France Cost of Goods in Japan
©2004 Prentice Hall6-19
Relative Factor Endowments
Heckscher-Ohlin Theory What determines the products for
which a country will have a comparative advantage?– Factor endowments vary among countries
– Goods differ according to the types of factors that are used to produce them
©2004 Prentice Hall6-20
Relative Factor Endowments_2
A country will have a comparative advantage in producing products that intensively use resources (factors of production) it has in abundance– China: labor
– Saudi Arabia: oil
– Argentina: wheat
©2004 Prentice Hall6-21
Figure 6.3 U.S. Imports and Exports, 1947: The Leontief Paradox
©2004 Prentice Hall6-22
Modern Firm-Based Trade Theories
Country Similarity Theory Product Life Cycle Theory Global Strategic Rivalry Theory Porter’s National Competitive
Advantage
©2004 Prentice Hall6-23
Growth of Firm-Based Theories
Growing importance of MNCs Inability of the country-based theories
to explain and predict the existence and growth of intraindustry trade
Failure of Leontief and others to empirically validate country-based Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
©2004 Prentice Hall6-24
Firm-Based Trade Theories
Incorporate additional factors into explanations of trade flows– Quality
– Technology
– Brand names
– Customer quality
©2004 Prentice Hall6-25
Country Similarity Theory
Explains the phenomenon of intraindustry trade– Trade between two countries of goods
produced by the same industry
• Japan exports Toyotas to Germany
• Germany exports BMWs to Japan
©2004 Prentice Hall6-26
Country Similarity Theory_2
Trade results from similarities of preferences among consumers in countries that are at the same stage of economic development
Most trade in manufactured goods should be between countries with similar per capita incomes
©2004 Prentice Hall6-27
Product Life Cycle Theory
Describes the evolution of marketing strategies
Stages– New product
– Maturing product
– Standardized product
©2004 Prentice Hall6-28
Figure 6.4 The International Product Life Cycle: Innovating Firm’s Country
©2004 Prentice Hall6-29
Figure 6.4 The International Product Life Cycle: Other Industrialized Countries
©2004 Prentice Hall6-30
Figure 6.4 The International Product Life Cycle: Less Developed Countries
©2004 Prentice Hall6-31
Global Strategic Rivalry Theory
Firms struggle to develop sustainable competitive advantage
Advantage provides ability to dominate global marketplace
Focus: strategic decisions firms use to compete internationally
©2004 Prentice Hall6-32
Sustaining Competitive Advantage
Owning intellectual property rights Investing in research and development Achieving economies of scale or scope Exploiting the experience curve
©2004 Prentice Hall6-33
Porter’s National Competitive Advantage
Success in trade comes from the interaction of four country and firm specific elements– Factor conditions
– Demand conditions
– Related and supporting industries
– Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry
©2004 Prentice Hall6-34
Figure 6.5 Porter’s Diamond of National Competitive Advantage
Firm Strategy, Structure,
and Rivalry
Related and SupportingIndustries
FactorConditions
DemandConditions
©2004 Prentice Hall6-35
The intense competitiveness
of Japanese market forces
manufacturers to continually
develop and fine-tune new products
©2004 Prentice Hall6-36
Figure 6.6 Theories of International Trade
Country-Based Theories Country is unit of analysis Emerged prior to WWII Developed by economists Explain interindustry trade Include
– Mercantilism– Absolute advantage– Comparative advantage– Relative factor endowments
Firm-Based Theories Firm is unit of analysis Emerged after WWII Developed by business school
professors Explain intraindustry trade Include
– Country similarity theory– Product life cycle– Global strategic rivalry– National competitive
advantage
©2004 Prentice Hall6-37
Types of International Investments
Does the investor seek an active management role in the firm r merely a return from a passive investment?– Foreign Direct Investment
– Portfolio Investment
©2004 Prentice Hall6-38
Figure 6.7 Stock of Foreign Direct Investment, by recipient
©2004 Prentice Hall6-39
Table 6.4 Sources of FDI for the U.S., end of 2002
United Kingdom 283.3
France 170.6
Netherlands 154.8
Japan 152.
Germany 137.0
Switzerland 113.2
Canada 92.0
Luxembourg 34.3
Bermuda, Bahamas, Caribbean islands 32.5
Other European countries 113.3
All other countries 65.0
Total 1,348.0
©2004 Prentice Hall6-40
Table 6.4 Destinations of FDI for the U.S., end of 2002
United Kingdom 255.4
Canada 152.5
Netherlands 145.5
Bermuda, Bahamas, Caribbean islands 98.1
Switzerland 70.1
Japan 65.7
Germany 64.7
Mexico 58.1
France 44.0
Other European countries 217.2
All other countries 349.7
Total 1,521.0
©2004 Prentice Hall6-41
International Investment Theories
Ownership Advantages Internalization Dunning’s Eclectic Theory
©2004 Prentice Hall6-42
Ownership Advantages
A firm owning a valuable asset that creates a competitive advantage domestically can use that advantage to penetrate foreign markets through FDI
Why FDI and not other methods?
©2004 Prentice Hall6-43
Internalization Theory
FDI is more likely to occur when transaction costs with a second firm are high
Transaction costs: costs associated with negotiating, monitoring, and enforcing a contract
©2004 Prentice Hall6-44
Dunning’s Eclectic Theory
FDI reflects both international business activity and business activity internal to the firm
3 conditions for FDI– Ownership advantage
– Location advantage
– Internalization advantage
©2004 Prentice Hall6-45
Table 6.5 Factors Affecting the FDI Decision
Supply Factors Demand Factors Political Factors
Production costs Customer access Avoidance of trade barriers
Logistics Marketing advantages Economic development incentives
Resource availability Exploitation of competitive advantages
Access to technology Customer mobility
©2004 Prentice Hall6-46
Ikea aggressively exports its furniture to
other countries