18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007...

13
18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK, Tsukuba, Japan Marc Ross GDE

description

DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 3 R & D Plan Prioritization based on expected ‘cost / benefit’ Top-3 identified: –High Gradient cavities –CFS ‘value engineering’ ◄ –Beam test facilities (7 each) ◄ (ATF, CESR-TA, …) Expect to update this list in next 2 months, leading up to the Tohoku GDE meeting Impact on DR plans

Transcript of 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007...

Page 1: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1

2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007

High Energy Accelerator Research Organization

KEK, Tsukuba, Japan

Marc RossGDE

Page 2: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 2

Role of R & D in the Engineering Design

Goals of the ED Phase:• Reduce cost and risk

– Technical• Facilitate governmental (and inter-

governmental) discussions– “…engineering design of the project in sufficient

technical detail that approval from all involved governments can be sought,…”

– Political

• Update the design, and the value estimate, and provide a project plan

Page 3: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 3

R & D Plan

• Prioritization based on expected ‘cost / benefit’

• Top-3 identified:– High Gradient cavities– CFS ‘value engineering’ ◄– Beam test facilities (7 each) ◄

• (ATF, CESR-TA, …)

• Expect to update this list in next 2 months, leading up to the Tohoku GDE meeting 03.03.2008

Impact on DR plans

Page 4: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 4

Prioritization of ED Phase R & D• Based on

– Direct ‘value estimate’ impact• Second e+ DR• CFS design

– Technical risk • Risk ‘register’ developed mid-2007

– Schedule• Which activities can provide guidance by the time EDR is

to be completed?– July 2010

• What do we really need?– What would be useful?

• What would be important as we get underway?

Page 5: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 5

ED Phase R & D Plan

• To be published 01.2008– Written by PM, with help from Group Leaders

(Wolski, Seryi,…) and regional/institutional managers

• Describes top-3, with schedule and etc• Lists resources hoped-for, worldwide

– Allows funding agency managers to compare• Describes management outline

– (not management detail for top-3)– (this should be developed in next 3 months)

Page 6: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 6

From R & D Plan – top 3: (1)

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 TOTAL FY11 FY12 Americas (actual) (actual) ED-P

Cavity orders 8 12 18 40 40 108 40 40 Total 'process and test' cycles 40 60 90 115 276 120 120

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Asia (actual) (actual)

Cavity orders 8 7 15 25 15 59 39 39 Total 'process and test' cycles 21 45 75 45 152 117 117

2004-08* 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Europe (actual) (actual) Cavity orders 60 838 898 Total 'process and test' cycles 14 15 30 100 109 354 354

Global totals Global totals - cavity fabrication 76 19 33 903 55 1065 79 79 Global totals - cavity tests 0 75 120 195 260 538 591 591

• Superconducting cavity testing:

Page 7: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 7

CFS Requirements and VE (2)

2008 2009N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S

2.1.1.1 - Final Criteria Development and Design EDR I Functional requirements template publicationFunctional requirements complete - Main linacFunctional requirements complete -BDS and IRFunctional requirements complete - Sources, DR, RTML

CFS - Update RDR Main Linac designCFS - Update RDR design other areas

2.2.2.1 Cost and Schedule Development - Baseline Value EngineeringProcess water value engineering - Main linacUnderground Space usage – Main linacAir Handling – all areasUnderground Space usage – non-linacSurface buildingsElectrical – all areasProject Schedule

Page 8: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 8

Beam Test Facility (3)

Test Facility Deliverable Date

ATF Generation of 1 pm-rad low emittance beam 2009

ATF2 35 nm beam size 2010

STF RF Unit demonstration 2011

FLASH Full 10mA, 1 GeV, high-repetition rate operation 2008

ILC-SLACESA Energy spectrometer, energy spread and collimator tests 2008

ILCTA-NML RF Unit demonstration 2012

CESR-TA Electron cloud mitigation tests 2010

Page 9: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 9

What will the above cost?

• Are these goals feasible• Group Leaders, WP coordinators must

answer– Answer must be supported by existing /

expected institutional and regional support

• What else is there that belongs on this list?– Kickers– Impedance

Page 10: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 10

For Tohoku GDE meeting:

• (from this workshop?)• Develop plan for 3 subtopics, including details

– Purpose, overall goal, how it fits in– Activities, Problems– Schedule– Milestones, deliverables– Resources– Priorities

• Review progress before GDE meeting

Page 11: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 11

UK groups – we support you:

• Excerpts from Barry’s letter to John Denham, Dec 15:

• (italics mcr)

• “A global effort has been organized toward these goals, involving an unprecedented collaboration of leading accelerator physicists from around the world working jointly on the R&D and design of this very challenging concept.”

Page 12: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 12

Emphasis on your leadership role

• “It is no accident that these UK accelerator physicists have risen to leadership roles in the ILC, based almost solely on their intellectual efforts. I strongly urge that the UK reconsider its role on the ILC, and especially in regard to preserving support for the intellectual effort that has been so effective.”

Page 13: 18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 1 2007 ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop 18-20 December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,

18.12.07 DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort 13

and on ‘consensus – based’ design

• “Our plan in the ILC global design effort is to pursue the R&D to develop the concepts for the ILC, so that it will be possible to propose such a machine in the future. Whenever the ILC is proposed, it will have uniquely been created as the product of a combined worldwide collaboration of accelerator scientists and particle physicists.”

• These are the marks of a multi-lateral collaboration with genuine international support.