1/25 Prepared by Argie Butler Texas A&M University PowerPoint Presentation to accompany...
-
Upload
isabella-mccoy -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of 1/25 Prepared by Argie Butler Texas A&M University PowerPoint Presentation to accompany...
1/25
Prepared by
Argie ButlerTexas A&M University
PowerPoint Presentation to accompany
Organizational Behavior11th Edition
Chapter 6—Motivation Through GoalSetting and Reward Systems
Don Hellriegel and John W. Slocum, Jr.
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.12/25
Learning Objectives for MotivationThrough Goal Setting and
Reward Systems
Explain how goal setting affects performance
State the effects of goal setting on job satisfaction and performance
Describe reward systems for fostering high performance
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.23/25
Importance of Goal Setting
Goals
Guide anddirect behavior
Providechallenges and
standards againstwhich performance
can be assessed
Justify tasksand the use of
resources
Definethe basis for theorganization’s
design
Servean organizing
function
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.34/25
Model of Goal Setting (Figure 6.1)
ChallengeGoal difficultyGoal claritySelf-efficacy
MediatorsDirectionEffortPersistenceTask strategy
Rewards SatisfactionPerformance
ModeratorsAbility
Goal commitment
Feedback
Task complexity
Conse-quences
Source: Adapted from Locke, E.A., and Latham, G.P. A Theory of Goal Setting And Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1990, 253.
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.45/25
WHEN GOALS AREPERFORMANCE
WILL TEND TO BE
Specific and clear
Vague
Difficult and challenging
Easy and boring
Set participatively
Higher
Lower
Higher
Lower
Higher
Impact of Goals on Performance(Table 6.1)
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.46/25
WHEN GOALS AREPERFORMANCE
WILL TEND TO BE
Set by management (top down)
Accepted by employees
Rejected by employees
Accompanied by rewards
Unrelated to rewards
Lower
Higher
Lower
Higher
Lower
Impact of Goals on Performance(Table 6.1) (continued)
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.57/25
Moderators in the Goal-Setting Model
Moderators
Ability Limits capacity to respond
to challenge
Goal Commitment Determination
to reach a goal
Feedback Provides information
on outcomes and performance
Complexity Simple versus
complex tasks
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.68/25
When Is Goal Commitment Strong?
Public commitment to achieve the goal
Strong need for achievement
Belief in personal control (internal locus of control)
Participates in setting the goal
Positive outcomes depend on goal achievement
Expects to be punished for not achieving goals
Perceives equitable distribution of rewards
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.79/25
Characteristics ofUseful Feedback
Descriptive rather than evaluative
Timely
Delivered personally, not via e-mail
Not judgmental
Focused
Concrete and specific
Graphic
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.810/25
Mediators in the Goal-Setting Model
Direction of attention Focuses on goal-directed
behavior
Effort Positively related
to challenge
Persistence Willingness to continue
working at a task
Task strategy Approach to
tackling a taskMediators
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.911/25
Advantages of Setting EthicalGoals
Advantages
Identifies what the organization recognizes as acceptable
behaviors
Legitimizes ethics as part of decision
making
Avoids uncertainties about right and wrong
Avoids inconsistencies
caused by a system that
appears to reward unethical behavior
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1012/25
Why Goal Setting MotivatesHigh Performance
Difficult but achievable goals promptpeople to focus on achieving the goals
Difficult goals motivate people to spendtime and effort on developing methodsfor achieving them
Difficult goals increase people’spersistence in achieving their goals
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1113/25
Why Goal Setting Works
Goal Setting
Serves as a directive function
Has an energizing function
Affects persistence and action positively
Commits people to behavior
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1214/25
Employees lack competencies to performat a high level
When a considerable amount of learning isneeded, successful goal setting takes longer
When the goal-setting system rewards thewrong behavior, major problems can result
Limitations to Goal Setting
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1315/25
Consequencesof
Dissatisfaction
Job avoidance
Absenteeism, lateness
Psychological defenses
Constructive protest
Defiance
Aggression
Potential Consequencesof Dissatisfaction
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1416/25
Implications of Goal-Setting Model for Employees, Managers and Teams
Provides framework for diagnosing potential problems with low-performing or average-performing employees
Provides advice on creating a high-performance work environment
Shows the system of factors affecting the achievementof high performance
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1517/25
Reward Factors Involved inMotivating High Performance
Reward Factors
AvailabilityTimeliness
Performancecontingency
Durability
Equity
Visibility
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1618/25
Reward System Strengths Limitations
Gain-sharing programs Rewards employeeswho reach specified production levels and control costs.
Formula can be complex; employees must trust management
Profit-sharing programs Rewards organizational performance.
Difficult for individuals and teams to impact overall organizational performance.
Reward Systems in High-PerformanceWork Settings (Table 6.3)
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1619/25
Reward System Strengths Limitations
Skill-based pay Rewards employee with higher pay for acquiring new skills.
Labor costs increase as employees master more skills. Employees can “top out” at the highest wage rate.
Flexible benefits Tailored to fit individual needs.
Administrative costs high and difficult to use with teams.
Reward Systems in High-PerformanceWork Settings (Table 6.3) (continued)
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1720/25
Less than 500 employees Controllable by employees Open, trusting Participative No union or supportive one
Size of organization Product costsOrganizational climate Style of managementUnion status
OrganizationalCharacteristic
FavorableCondition
Conditions Favoring Gain-SharingPlans (Table 6.4)
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1721/25
Financials shared Trusted, committed, articulate Competent, participative Knowledgeable, participative
Communication policy Plant manager Management Workforce
OrganizationalCharacteristic
FavorableCondition
Conditions Favoring Gain-SharingPlans (Table 6.4) (continued)
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1822/25
Flexible Benefit Plans: Advantages and Limitations
Advantages Limitations Permits employees’
discretion in matchingneeds with benefit plans
Helps organizationscontrol costs
Highlights economicvalue of benefits
Record keeping becomes more complicated
Difficulty in accuratelypredicting employees’benefit choices
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.1923/25
Deciding Among Alternative Reward Systems (Figure 6.2)
Are there accurate indicators of individual performance?Is the performance of one person independent from others?Are individual performance goals constant?Is the firm unionized?Is pay secrecy important?
Is the cost accounting system sophisticated?
Are employees accustomed to participating in decision making?
Will employees accept deferred payments?
Can managers measure performance objectively?
Is employee turnover high?
Is there a consensus on work goals?
* Profit-sharing programs* Flexible benefit plans
* Skill-based pay* Gain-sharing programs
Team Plans Individual Plans
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.2024/25
Cultures and Reward Systems(Table 6.5)
POWER DISTANCE
INDIVIDUALISM/COLLECTIVISM
Pay based on individual performanceStatus symbols are importantPay tied to level in the organization’s
hierarchyStock options to MBO
Pay based on team performanceProfit sharingLittle emphasis on extrinsic rewards
CULTURE REWARD SYSTEM
Chapter 6: PowerPoint 6.2025/25
Cultures and Reward Systems(Table 6.5) (continued)
GENDER ROLEORIENTATION
UNCERTAINTYAVOIDANCE
CULTURE REWARD SYSTEM
Extensive use of fringe benefitsGain sharingGoals set by participation linked to
team achievementsPay equality
Pay focuses on long-term orientationSeniority is important
Adapted from Tosi, J.L. and Greckhamer, T. Culture & CEO & CEO Compensation. Organization Science, 2004, 15, 657-670, and Hofstede, G. Cultures Consequences 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001