12-02-2010_11!53!29_68_Marrone Et Al_ 2009_ Different Fish Species

download 12-02-2010_11!53!29_68_Marrone Et Al_ 2009_ Different Fish Species

of 3

Transcript of 12-02-2010_11!53!29_68_Marrone Et Al_ 2009_ Different Fish Species

  • 8/7/2019 12-02-2010_11!53!29_68_Marrone Et Al_ 2009_ Different Fish Species

    1/3

    ABSTRACT

    Shelf life of different fish species stored with passive

    refrigeration (PRS)

    R. Marrone & L. Vollano & C. Chirollo & G. Palma &

    R. Mercogliano

    Published online: 10 July 2009# Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

    Keywords Fish species . PRS . Shelf life

    Abbreviations

    PRS passive refrigeration system

    QIM quality index method

    TMA trimethylamineTVN total volatile nitrogen

    Introduction

    Passive RefrigerationPRS- is a system developed for the preservation and transport of

    perishable products. Passive RefrigerationPRS technology is based on thermal accumu-

    lation (Thermal Charge) achieved through the freezing of eutectics obtained by circulating

    cold brine when power is available and/or has a competitive price. After the initial Thermal

    Charge

    the fusion enthalpy provides the energy necessary to absorb the released heatprogressively and proportionally to requirements, maintaining optimal preservation conditions

    for the specified period (Thermal Autonomy from 2 up to 30 days or more) without further

    use of energy and cooling groups. The large heat exchange surface and the minimum T

    between the air and the surface itself avoid dehumidification of the air, dehydration and weight

    loss of the products, and defrosting operations. The system guarantees perfect preservation

    through the maintenance of optimal temperature and relative humidity without the use of power

    during operation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of this technology in the

    storage of different fish products.

    Vet Res Commun (2009) 33 (Suppl 1):S241S243

    DOI 10.1007/s11259-009-9295-3

    R. Marrone (*) : L. Vollano : C. Chirollo : R. Mercogliano

    Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche ed Ispezione degli alimenti,

    Universit degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, via Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy

    e-mail: [email protected]

    G. Palma

    Mercato Ittico di Pozzuoli (NA), Pozzuoli, Italy

  • 8/7/2019 12-02-2010_11!53!29_68_Marrone Et Al_ 2009_ Different Fish Species

    2/3

    Materials and methods

    The research was conducted at the Fish Market in Pozzuoli (Naples-Italy).Thefollowing fish products were used for the experiments: Mytilus galloprovincialis

    (mussels), Chamelea gallina (clams), Merluccius merluccius (cod), Eledone moschata

    (moscardino) and Sepia officinalis (cuttlefish). A few hours after capture the samples

    were divided into two aliquots (one was stored in a PRSTM Thermobox set at 0C2C

    and one control aliquot in a normal refrigerator) and analyzed in the Fish Market

    laboratory immeditely and at daily intervals until spoiled. In particular, the Quality Index

    Method was used for the sensory evaluation (Baixas-Nogueras et al. 2003; Barbosa and

    Vaz-Pires 2004; Vaz-Pires and Seixas 2006) and the following physical and chemical

    parameters were determinated: pH (pH-meter Metrohm 691),TVN and TMA (Conway

    method). For mussels and clams the mortality rate, smell and quantity and characteristicsof the intervalvar liquid were also recorded.

    Results

    In the mussels mortality rates significantly lower than the controls (P< 0.05) were

    observed. Moreover, bivalve samples stored under the PRS showed a longer shelf life

    than controls (6 days vs. 5 days and 9 days vs. 11 days, respectively, for Mytilus

    galloprovincialis and Chamelea gallina). Bivalve TVN values were similar in samples

    of the two aliquots. The bivalve levels found were lower than those reported by Erkan(2005) for shelled mussels stored at 4C. In clams TVN values were not statistically

    different. In cod samples the sensory parameters declined sharply on the 9th day for

    controls and on the 12th day for the PRS aliquot. The TVN values were similar for both

    0

    5

    10

    1520

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    0 2 3 4 7 9 10 11 12 13

    Days

    mg

    /100g

    MeR

    MeC

    1 5 6 8

    Fig. 1 TVN values in cod

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    0 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

    Days

    m

    g/100g

    MeR

    MeC

    531

    Fig. 2 TMA values in cod

    S242 Vet Res Commun (2009) 33 (Suppl 1):S241S243

  • 8/7/2019 12-02-2010_11!53!29_68_Marrone Et Al_ 2009_ Different Fish Species

    3/3

    aliquots until the 6th day. The TVN limit set by Reg. Ce 2074/2005 was exceeded on the

    8th day in the control and on the 12th day in PRS samples, showing a good correlation

    with the sensory analysis (Fig. 1). TMA showed a similar trend and the limit of

    acceptability reported in the literature of 5 mg/100 g was exceeded on the 8th day in cod

    control and at 9th in cod stored under PRS. In the cephalopods the QIM for both speciesshowed a decline in sensorial characteristics on the 7th day and no differences between

    control and PRS aliquots were observed (Fig. 2).

    Discussion

    PRS technology was effective in extending the shelf life of shellfish and cod. Moreover, for

    shellfish lower mortality was observed. For the cephalopods the PRS proved less effective.

    In the cod only TVN showed a good correlation with the evolution of sensory parameters.

    The PRS can be a valuable tool for the storage of fish products, especially immediately aftercapture and during transport.

    Acknowledgements This work was supported by grants from the Campania Region.

    References

    Baixas-Nogueras S., Bover-Cid T., Veciana-Nogus M.L., Nunes M., Vidal-Carou M.C., 2003. Development

    of a Quality Index Method to Evaluate Freshness in Mediterranean Hake (Merluccius merluccius).

    Journal of food science, 68(3), 10671071.

    Barbosa A. and Vaz-Pires P., 2004. Quality index method (QIM): development of a sensorial scheme for

    common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Food Control, 15, 161168.

    Erkan N., 2005. Changes in quality characteristics during cold storage of shucked mussels (Mytilus

    galloprovincialis) and selected chemical decomposition indicators. Journal of the Science of Food and

    Agriculture, 85, 26252630.

    Vaz-Pires P. and Seixas P., 2006. Development of new quality index method (QIM) schemes for cuttlefish

    (Sepia officinalis) and broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii). Food Control, 17, 942949.

    Vet Res Commun (2009) 33 (Suppl 1):S241S243 S243