111714 Press Briefing Slides

8/10/2019 111714 Press Briefing Slides

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/111714-press-briefing-slides 1/25



Text

• Challenges and opportunities

• Trends to address

• New concepts for:

– Offensive sea control

– Sea‐based

AAW

– Weapons development

– Increasing offensive sea control capacity

– Addressing defensive and constabulary missions

• Capability and program implications



• In 2001, the Navy planned a new surface

warfare approach

– New family of CG(X), DD(X), LCS

– Employing “Network

‐centric

warfare”

– All three ships now cancelled/truncated

• Navy has an opportunity to implement new

surface warfare concept

– Final specifications for Flight III DDG‐51

– Concept and design of follow‐on SSC and

modifications to LCS

– Phased modernization of remaining CGs

– New weapons and sensors

• This study proposes a plan focused on:

– Large and small surface combatants

– Results possible by mid‐2020s



China the “pacing challenge” but not the only, or most likely, A2/AD threat

the surface forces will face



Iran

shows

less

capable

militaries

can

combine

geography

and

“fire

and

forget” weapons in effective A2/AD network



0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

M i l l i o n s o f F Y 2 0 1 5 $

Historical Budget

Authorities

Army Navy Air Force Defense Wide

KOREA DRAWDOWNKOREA DRAWDOWN VIETNAM DRAWDOWNVIETNAM DRAWDOWN

COLD WAR DRAWDOWNCOLD WAR DRAWDOWN

OIF/OEF DRAWDOWNOIF/OEF DRAWDOWN

Army

Navy

Air Force

DoD‐wide

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

P e r c e n t o f B u d g e t b y C a t e g o r y

Historical Budget

Authorities

as

Percent

of

Total

DoN Budget

Authority

DoN Share of Healthcare

MILPERS

Operations and Maintenance

R&D and Procurement

Other Spending

Budgets unlikely

to

rise;

pressure

continues

on

R&D

and

procurement



Cold War

“Outer

Air

Battle”

– Enabled carriers to approach within striking distance of Russia

– Surface fleet’s contribution was “Up, Out and Down”

– Ships

&

aircraft

able

to

engage

Soviet

bombers

outside

anti‐

ship

missile

range



V a r i a t i o n i n

Y - v

a l u e s i s f o r i l l u s t r a t i o n

o n l y ,

n o t i n t e n d e d t o

r e f l e c t

r e l a t i v e

a l t i t u d e

50 nm 100 nm 150 nm 200 nm 250 nm 300 nmRange:

Enemy

Combatant

BrahMos

SS-N-19

Kosar

Nasr

KarusTondar

C-701

C-801

C-704

Surface-Launched Missile Threat to U.S. Surface Combatants

50 nm 100 nm 150 nm 200 nm 250 nm 300 nmRange:

Naval Strike Missile range from IHS Jane’s Navy International. All other ranges from IHS Jane’s Defence: Weapons database.

* RGM-84L, a Harpoon Block II variant, is the only variant in service with the U.S. Navy.

** Extended-range Harpoon Block I variant previously in U.S. and foreign service.

U.S. Surface

CombatantEnemy

Combatant



BAMS

Secure Data Link

DDG

TAGOSFuture Anti-Submarine

Weapon

Future Anti-Ship Missile

SM-6

• Surface combatants

will

conduct

bulk

of

sea

control

– Subs, carriers, amphibious ships conducting power projection in future scenarios

• Defeat enemy weapon launchers, not just enemy weapons



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

S u c c e s s

f u l E n g a g

e m e n

t s

Defending Missile Single Shot Pk

S‐L‐S SS‐L‐S

Mission Missile Number

Long‐range

Defensive AAW

SM‐6 16

Mid‐range

Defensive AAW

SM‐2 32

ESSM 32 (8 cells)

BMD SM‐3 6

Strike Tomahawk 24

SUW Harpoon 8 non‐VLS

ASW VLA 10



5 nm

Ship Self-Defense

30 nm

Defensive AAW

DDG

LCS

LCS

JHSV

• Shift to

a single,

dense

defensive

AAW

layer

– Smaller interceptors; just as capable and more numerous as longer range

– Acknowledges challenges against OTH targets

– Enables integration of lasers, railgun and electronic warfare

• Long‐range interceptors used for offensive AAW

ASBM

ASCM Salvo

EMRG

Laser

RAM

CIWS

ESSM



• More capacity needed

from each VLS cell

• Emphasize:

– relevant capability

– multi‐mission

applicability

– smaller size; > 1 per cell

• Planned solutions are

large, single‐

mission weapons

• No ASW weapon able to

outrange sub‐launched

anti‐ship missiles

Mission Missile (replacement) Number

Offensive AAW SM‐6 32

Defensive AAW ESSM Blk II 96 (24 cells)

BMD SM‐3 6

Strike Tomahawk (NGLAW) 24

SUW Harpoon (LRASM) 8 non‐VLS

ASW VLA (None) 10

Getting the

most

out

of

the

ship’s

main

battery

– the

VLS

magazine



Mission Current Missile Number Future Missile Number

Offensive AAW SM‐6 16 SM‐6 42

Defensive AAW SM‐2 32 ESSM Blk II 96 (24 cells)

ESSM 32 (8 cells)

BMD SM‐3 6 SM‐3 4

Strike Tomahawk 24 LRASM 18

SUW Harpoon 8 non‐VLS LRASM / SM 18/42

ASW VLA 10 New ASW Missile 8

Multi‐mission

LRASM Long

‐range

ASROC SM

‐6 for

offense ESSM

for

defense



0

5

10

15

20

25

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33 FY34 FY35 FY36 FY37 FY38 FY39 FY40 FY41 FY42 FY43

S h i p

C o u n t

Fiscal Year

Operating CG 52‐62

Phased Mod CGs

Operating CG 63‐73

CG‐47 Replacement

Fiscal Year

N u m

b e r o

f C G s

Cruiser phased modernization needed for offensive sea control, air defense

commander capacity



Cruiser phased modernization needed for offensive sea control, air defense

commander

Iwakuni Naval

Ai r StationSasebo

Naval Base Yokosuka Naval Base

Misawa Air Base

Tokyo

THAAD BatteriesTHAAD Batteries

PAC-3 BatteriesPAC-3 Batteries

Shore‐based BMD systems should replace BMD ships in defense of fixed

locations overseas



Passive Lis tening

Secure Data Link

Mutually-Supporting Air Defenses

Passive Towed Array

150 to 300 nm range engagement

Variable Depth Sonar

Enabling small surface combatants able to contribute to offensive sea

control with

CGs

and

DDGs

or

on

their

own

Future Anti‐Submarine Weapon

Future Anti‐Ship Missile



0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

F Y 1 4

F Y 1 5

F Y 1 6

F Y 1 7

F Y 1 8

F Y 1 9

F Y 2 0

F Y 2 1

F Y 2 2

F Y 2 3

F Y 2 4

F Y 2 5

F Y 2 6

F Y 2 7

F Y 2 8

F Y 2 9

F Y 3 0

F Y 3 1

F Y 3 2

F Y 3 3

F Y 3 4

F Y 3 5

F Y 3 6

F Y 3 7

F Y 3 8

F Y 3 9

F Y 4 0

F Y 4 1

F Y 4 2

F Y 4 3

F Y 4 4

Follow on

SSC

LCS

MCM

PC

FFG

DDG‐1000

Future Large Surface

Combatant

DDG‐51 Flight III

DDG‐51 Flight IIA

DDG‐51 Flight II

DDG‐51 Flight I

CG

N u m

b e r o

f S u r f a c e

C o m

b a t a

n t s

Growing SSC shortfall requires new approaches to escort, training and

security missions

so

CGs

and

DDGs

can

focus

on

offense

SSC reqmt

Large Surface Combatant reqmt

CSG escorts

BMD stations



LCS Procurement

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11

1 1 0 0 2 2 2


4 4 4 3 3 3 3

Follow‐on SSC Procurement


2 3 3 3 3 3 3

• Modify LCS

to

be

the

follow

‐on

SSC

– Only one variant

• Equip for defensive AAW, ASW and

SUW missions

– VLS (24

cell)

– 3D radar (not SPY)

– ASW mission package

– Same gun

• Upgrade selected

LCS

with

VLS



• Evolve to

dedicated

LCS

crews

– Forward base 16 LCS

• Upgrade selected LCS with VLS

• Consider buying more JHSV

4

LCS

4 LCS

8 LCS

8 LCS

8 LCS

117

Days

117

Days

117

Days

117

Days

117

Days

117

Days

117

Days

117

Days

LCS 1 Deployed Homeport

LCS 3 Homeport Deployed

Crew

101

LCS 1 Off

Hull

LCS 3 LCS 1 Off

Hull

LCS 3 LCS 1 Off

Hull

Crew

102

Off

Hull

LCS 3 LCS 1 Off

Hull

LCS 3 LCS 1 Off

Hull

LCS 3

Crew

103

LCS 3 LCS 1 Off

Hull

LCS 3 LCS 1 Off

Hull

LCS 3 LCS 1

Deployed Homeport

LCS forward 60‐120 days 30 days

LCS CONUS 120‐210 days 180 days

Shift LCS

to

dedicated

crews;

base

some

in

today’s

overseas

SSC

ports



• Separate mission packages

from LCS program – Whole MCM mission package

– Whole SUW mission package

– Parts of

ASW

mission

package

• Add new mission packages

– Electronic warfare

– Humanitarian assistance

– Maritime security

• Consider expanding non‐

combatant fleet

– Less expensive option for some

operations in low‐threat environments

111714 Press Briefing Slides

Documents

Transcript of 111714 Press Briefing Slides