1. Social-Network Analysis Using Topic Models 2. Web Event Topic Analysis by Topic Feature...

1. Social-Network Analysis Using Topic Models2. Web Event Topic Analysis by Topic Feature Clustering and Extended LDA Model RMBI4310/COMP4332 Big Data Mining: Presentation CHAN Chung Yin 07547265

Topic modeling

• statistical methods that analyze the words of the original texts to – discover the themes that run through them– how those themes are connected to each other– how they change over time

Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

• The simplest, the most common and basic• Idea:

– Represents documents as mixtures of topics– Defines collections of words and find a set of topics that are likely

to have generated the collection – I like to eat broccoli and bananas.– I ate a banana and spinach smoothie for breakfast.– Chinchillas and kittens are cute.– My sister adopted a kitten yesterday.– Look at this cute hamster munching on a piece of broccoli.

• Sentences 1 and 2: 100% Topic A• Sentences 3 and 4: 100% Topic B• Sentence 5: 60% Topic A, 40% Topic B Topic A (food): 30% broccoli, 15% bananas, 10% breakfast, 10%

munching, … Topic B(cute animals): 20% chinchillas, 20% kittens, 20% cute, 15%

hamster, …

Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

• Learning:– Go through each document (d), and randomly assign

each word (w) in the document to one of the K topics (t).

– Go through each word in a document• Calculate, for each topic t,

– p(topic t | document d) = the proportion of words in document d that are currently assigned to topic

– p(word w | topic t) = the proportion of assignments to topic t over all documents that come from this word w

– Reassign w a new topic p(topic t | document d) * p(word w | topic t)

• Assume that all topic assignments except for the current word in question are correct

– Repeat above step until steady state

Applying LDA to Social Network Analysis

• “follow relationship” among users often looks unorganized and chaotic

• follow relationships are created haphazardly by each individual user and not controlled by a central entity.

• Provide more structure to this follow relationship – by “grouping” the users based on their topic interests– by “labeling” each follow relationship with the identified topic

group

Background

Purpose


• Represent E in matrix form by putting F in the rows and G in the columns

• Symbol Meaning u A Twitter userU A set of all uf A followerF A set of all fg A followed userG A set of all gz A topic (interest)Z A set of all ze(f, g) A follow edge from f to ge'(f, g) A follow edge from g to fe(f) A set of all outgoing edges from fe'(g) A set of all incoming edges to gE A set of all e(f, g) f F, g G∀ ∈ ∀ ∈


• SimilarLDA Edge Generative ModelTopic Interest (z)

Document Follower (f)

Word Followed user (g)


• DifferentLDA Edge Generative Modelmultinomial distribution multivariate hypergeometric distribution

documents are in the rows and words are in the columns

rows and the columns are from the same entity

integer binary

Smaller magnitude Larger magnitude (|f|X|g|)

Power-law distribution Do not show power-law distribution

Handling Popular Users

• Alternative 1: Setting Asymmetric Priors– Over-fitting: Dirichlet priors and constrain 𝞪 𝞫

P(z|f) and P(g|z), respectively– In the standard LDA, each element of and 𝞪 𝞫

is assumed to have the same value– 𝞫 : Distribution of followed user per-interest– we set each prior value proportional to the 𝞫

number of incoming edges of each followed user.


• Alternative 2: Hierarchical LDA– Generate a topic hierarchy and more frequent

topics are located at higher levels– bottom level topics are expected to be more

specific– Infinite topic number– Topics are not

independent


• Alternative 3: Two-Step Labeling– Topic establishment step• We run LDA after removing popular users from the

dataset similar to how we remove stop words before applying LDA to a document corpus.

– Labeling step• we apply LDA only to popular users in the dataset


• Alternative 4: Threshold Noise Filtering– the smallest number of times a popular user is

assigned to a topic group could outnumber the largest number of times a non-popular user is assigned to that topic group.

– Set a cut-off value to determine whether to label a user with each topic

– filter out less relevant topics by keeping only the top-K topics for each user

Experiments

• Twitter• between October 2009 and January 2010 • Sampled 10 million edges

Dataset

Value

|E| 10,000,000

|U| 2,430,237

|F| 14,015

|G| 2,427,373

max(|e(f)|) 142,669 (f: zappos)

max(|e’(g)|) 7,410 (g: barackobama)

Statistics

Experiments

• 100 topic groups• Boundary value V=100

• Experimental cases

Normal user group |e’(g)|<= V

Popular user group |e’(g)| > V

Case Experiment Descriptionbase LDA over the whole group datasetnon-popular LDA over the normal user group datasetbeta LDA with asymmetric priorshlda-2lv HLDA with 2 levelshlda-3lv HLDA with 3 levels2step Two-step labelingfilter-base Threshold noise filtering after base (C=0.05)filter-2step Threshold noise filtering after 2step (C=0.05)

Experiments

• Measurement 1: Perplexity– how well the trained model deals with an

unobserved test data– A perplexity means that you are as surprised on

average as you would have been if you had had to guess between k equiprobable choices at each step.

– Smaller perplexity, better the model is

Experiments

• Measurement 1: Perplexity– HLDA shows significantly worse Perplexity than

others.

Experiments

• Measurement 2: Quality– Determine by how users perceive the quality of

the identified topic groups from each approach– Conduct a survey with a total of 14 participants

Experiments

• Measurement 3: Qualitative Comparison– The top ten users in a topic group– By going over the users' bios, we see that many

of the users in the group have the same interest

Experiments

• Measurement 3: Qualitative Comparison– Base: Topic group cycle from base showing the

popular user issue

Experiments

• Measurement 3: Qualitative Comparison– Base• Barack Obama appears in 15 groups out of 100 topic

groups produced by base. • Among the 15 groups, only one of them is related to

his specialty, politics• the standard LDA suffers from the noise from

popular users if applied directly to our social graph dataset

Experiments

• Measurement 3: Qualitative Comparison– non-popular: Topic group mobile gadget blog

from non-popular

Experiments

• Measurement 3: Qualitative Comparison– 2step : Topic group corresponding to mobile

gadget blog • many users in this group are very popular, tech

media

Experiments

• Measurement 3: Qualitative Comparison– Filter-2step : Topic group corresponding to

mobile gadget blog • many users in this group are very popular, tech

media• cnnbrk and

breakingnews are removed

Conclusion

• Two-step labeling with threshold noise filtering, are very effective in handling this popular user issue

• showing 1.64 times improvement in the quality of the produced topic groups, compared to the standard LDA model.

Web Event Topic Analysis

• Analyze a common topic of many different web events

• Cluster events which belong to a topic • Choose suitable topic terms for clusters


• Dimension LDA (DLDA) – Represent an event as a multi-dimensions

vector– {agent, activity, object, time, location, cause,

purpose, manner} • K-means Clustering

Dimension LDA (DLDA)

• Perform LDA analysis• Add a parameters vector on the weighting

of each dimension• Select some dimensions as topic feature

dimensions

Topic Feature Clustering

• Cluster the content of topic feature dimensions to analyze the common topic for events

Topic Feature Words Selection

• Use DLDA model to select topic feature words

• Find the words within same cluster group• By maximize the probability of topic given

dimension and word

Topic Terms Generating

• Merge 2 words together• Replace existing keyword from dictionary• => candidate topic terms• Finally, Compute probability distribution

of topic candidate terms

Results

• Using Topic Feature Clustering with Extended LDA Model is better than using clustering or LDA model alone

1. Social-Network Analysis Using Topic Models 2. Web Event Topic Analysis by Topic Feature...

Documents

Transcript of 1. Social-Network Analysis Using Topic Models 2. Web Event Topic Analysis by Topic Feature...