1 - Original Complaint

19
 riLEO I N T H E UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FO R TH E EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 2 5 fl 9 P I . 0^ CLEr::r al: v^ CURTIS A. EVANS and WHIPGOLF, LLC Plaintiffs, V PLUSONE SPORTS LLC a Mas sac hus etts limite d liabil ity company, an d ALEXVAN ALEN Defendants C.A.NO. I IfCS Ci>S?\ JURY TRUL DEMANDED COMPL INT Plaintiffs, Curtis A. Evans ( Evans ) and WhipGoIf, LLC ( WhipGoIf), for their complaint against Defendants, PlusOne Sports, LLC ( PlusOne ) and Alex Van A en ( Van Alen ), for breach of contract, declaratoryjudgment , damages, and injunctive reli ef, incl uding attorneys' fees and costs, allege asfollows: Jurisdiction a n d Venue 1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because the parties are citizens o f differentstatesand the amountin controversy exceeds 75,000. 2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because contractual negotiations occurred in this district and by the contractual agreement o f the par tie s. 3. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The par ies also contractuallyagreedtovenueinthis District. Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 16

description

Evans et al v. PlusOne Sports, LLC et al

Transcript of 1 - Original Complaint

  • riLEO

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 2015 flAY 29 P I).-0^

    CLEr::ral:,'v^

    CURTIS A. EVANS and WHIPGOLF, LLC,

    Plaintiffs,

    V.

    PLUSONE SPORTS, LLC,a Massachusetts limited liability company,and ALEX VAN ALEN,

    Defendants.

    C.A.NO. I IfCS/Ci>S?\JURY TRUL DEMANDED

    COMPLAINT

    Plaintiffs, Curtis A. Evans ("Evans") and WhipGoIf, LLC ("WhipGoIf), for their

    complaint against Defendants, PlusOne Sports, LLC ("PlusOne") and Alex Van Alen ("Van

    Alen"), for breach of contract, declaratory judgment, damages, and injunctive relief, including

    attorneys' fees and costs, allege as follows:

    Jurisdiction and Venue

    1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332, because

    the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

    2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because contractual

    negotiations occurred in this district and by the contractual agreement of the parties.

    3. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). The parties also

    contractually agreed to venue in this District.

    Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 16

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 2 of 19 PageID# 17

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 3 of 19 PageID# 18

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 4 of 19 PageID# 19

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 5 of 19 PageID# 20

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 6 of 19 PageID# 21

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 7 of 19 PageID# 22

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 8 of 19 PageID# 23

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 9 of 19 PageID# 24

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 10 of 19 PageID# 25

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 11 of 19 PageID# 26

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 12 of 19 PageID# 27

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 13 of 19 PageID# 28

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 14 of 19 PageID# 29

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 15 of 19 PageID# 30

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 16 of 19 PageID# 31

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 17 of 19 PageID# 32

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 18 of 19 PageID# 33

  • Case 1:15-cv-00683-CMH-TCB Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 19 of 19 PageID# 34