1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next...

17
1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki EuroFGI IA.7.6 Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI Santander, Spain 28-29 June 2007

Transcript of 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next...

Page 1: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience

Kalevi Kilkki

EuroFGI IA.7.6 Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI

Santander, Spain 28-29 June 2007

Page 2: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

2 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Content

What is Quality of Experience?

How could we analyze it?

Page 3: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

3 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Historical perspective: Papers in IEEE databaseQoS vs. QoE

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

1989 1994 1999 2004

ATM

Ethernet

Wireless

Internet

Quality of Service or QoS

Quality of Experience

or QoE

2002 1102 1

2003 1328 3

2004 1540 3

2005 1720 3

2006 1681 10

Terms in abstract

Relative share of QoS papers with the keyword1 = average share of QoS papers over all networking papers

Too many QoS papers is bad for any networking technologybecause the scope of QoS is too narrow

Page 4: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

4 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Very brief literature study about Quality of Experience

Quotations from QoE papers

Liu Li-yuan, et al, 2006• “The function of quality of experience (QoE) evaluation includes two

aspects: to monitor the experience of user on-line, then to control and justify the service based on the QoE to ensure that the quality of service can highly meet the requirements of the user.”

Lopez, et al, 2006 • “Quality of experience (QoE) has been defined as an extension of the

traditional quality of service (QoS) in the sense that QoE provides information regarding the delivered services from an end-user point of view.”

Some more references in extra slides

Page 5: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

5 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

What does QoE mean?

Definition = meaning (not purpose)

• It is questionable to define QoE as an extension of something (QoS), or through a specific goal (optimization of service).

Wikipedia

• In business terminology QoE is also known as "Quality of User Experience," and is a subjective measure of a customer's experiences with a vendor.

• QoE as regards telecommunications networks is a purely subjective measure from the user’s perspective of the overall value of the service provided.

Obviously some confusion about the genuine meaning of QoE

• Let us take a somewhat broader view

Page 6: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

6 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

The big picture: Ecosystem modeling

Communications ecosystem

is immensely complex

To manage the complexity, it

can be divided into three areas

• Human behavior

• Business analysis

• Technical performance

Ultimate goal is to give credible estimates about

• benefits obtainedby persons,

• user and customer behavior, and

• business opportunity (€)

ApplicationApplication

ServiceproviderServiceprovider

UserUser

NetworkoperatorNetworkoperator NetworkNetwork

CustomerCustomer

DeviceDevice

DevicevendorDevicevendorContent

ownerContentowner

GroupmemberGroup

member PersonPerson

€€

Page 7: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

7 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Modeling human behavior

Person with different roles• Person when thinking

about fundamental needsand overall satisfaction

• User when using applications orservices

• Customer when selecting and buying products and services

• Group member when interacting with others

• Quality of Experienceis related to all roles

UserUser

CustomerCustomer

PersonPerson ApplicationApplicationGroup

memberGroup

member

NetworkNetwork

QoS

QoEMOS

Mean Opinion Score

Vendor / ProviderVendor / Provider

Marketing

Page 8: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

8 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Dictionary approach

Dictionary

• Experience: the totality of a person's perceptions, feelings, and memories

• Quality: the basic character or nature of somethingQoE: the basic nature of a person's perceptions, feelings, and

memories– far-reaching definition, hard to apply in a concrete analysis

• Still, we may keep QoE as the most generic concept, and then define additional terms for each role

• From modeling viewpoint that is the most reasonable approach PersonPerson

QoE

Page 9: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

9 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

What are the sub-concepts?

Quality of User Experience (QUE)Quality of Customer Experience (QCE)Quality of Group Experience (QGE)?Quality of xxx Experience (Q?E)

Google hitsQuality of Experience 383 000Quality of User Experience 13 400Quality of Customer Experience 32 300Quality of Group Experience 9

Quality of Service 28 300 000Mean Opinion Score 104 000

UserUser

CustomerCustomer

PersonPersonGroupmemberGroup

member

QoS

QoEMOS

ApplicationApplication

NetworkNetwork

QUE

QCE

QGE ?

Page 10: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

10 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99

Session

€/session

An approach to model QUE

ApplicationApplication

Userbehavior

Userexperienc

e

Motivation

Perceived

value

UserUser

Pricing

ServiceproviderServiceprovider

PersonPerson

36€/month

current cost per session(time * effort + money)

50

QUEmeasure

Page 11: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

11 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99

Session

€/session

End-user model – improving quality

ApplicationApplication

Userbehavior

Userexperienc

e

Motivation

Perceived

value

UserUser

Pricing

ServiceproviderServiceprovider

PersonPerson

+19 € +10 sessions

+30%

The value of service is deemed 30% higherbecause of improved display properties

Page 12: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

12 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99

Session

€/session

End-user model – improving usability

ApplicationApplication

Userbehavior

Userexperienc

e

Motivation

Perceived

value

UserUser

Pricing

ServiceproviderServiceprovider

PersonPerson

+12 € +16 sessions-0.2 €/session

Service is easier to use (30 s/session) cost of session is decreased by 0.2 €

Page 13: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

13 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99

Session

€/session

End-user model – improving network

ApplicationApplication

Userbehavior

Userexperienc

e

Motivation

Perceived

value

UserUser

Pricing

ServiceproviderServiceprovider

PersonPerson

+4 € +6 sessions

success rate +12%

Service availability is improved from 80% to 90%

NetworkNetwork

Page 14: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

14 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Summary

Quality of Experience

• Key concept when we try to understand what the Next Generation Internet is able to provide to end-users (to us!)

• Covers all relevant aspectsthat define how satisfieda person is with a service

• Shall be divided into sub-concepts (because analysismust be modular in any case)

• The ultimate objective is to assesshow users and customers behave with new service e.g. provided by Next Generation Internet

– A lot work is needed to accomplish this task

UserUser

CustomerCustomer

PersonPersonGroupmemberGroup

member

QoS

QoEMOS

ApplicationApplication

NetworkNetwork

QUE

QCE

QGE ?

Page 15: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

15 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Comments orquestions?

Page 16: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

16 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Abstract

Quality of Service (QoS) was the Term ten years ago. Particularly QoS was the answer to the question why should telecom operators and providers rely on ATM rather than on best effort Internet. Obviously, a network with QoS was able to provide better service than a network without QoS. However, this QoS viewpoint was pretty technical, while end-users are not usually at all bothered about technical performance. What they really care about is the experience they are able to obtain, and Internet provided, even without any QoS mechanisms, a lot of new experiences, like web-browsing, e-mail and search engines. Thus if and when we want to make realistic analysis what network technologies and services will succeed, we must consider very seriously what are the real issues that define the real behavior of end-users. Quality of Experience (QoE, sometimes QoX) is a key term in this task. QoE is a subjective measure from the user's perspective of the overall value of the service provided. QoS is just one, often minor ingredient of Quality of Experience analysis. Other essential issues include the expectations of the end-users, the content of the service, the importance of service for the end-user, the characteristics of the device, and the price of the service. The challenging task of QoE research is to create a framework that is able combine these diverse aspects under a common umbrella in a way that we are able to somehow predict the behavior of end users when new services are offered to them. The talk will discuss about how this task can be carried out.

Kalevi KilkkiPrincipal ScientistNokia Siemens Networkskalevi.kilkki(at)nsn.comSelected publications available at http://kilkki.net/3

Page 17: 1© Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007 Next Generation Internet and Quality of Experience Kalevi Kilkki.

17 © Nokia Siemens Networks Workshop on Socio-Economic Issues of NGI / Kilkki / 28.6.2007

Quality of Experience in some papers (IEEE)

Heddaya, A.S., An economically scalable Internet, Computer, Vol. 35, Issue 9, Sept. 2002, p. 93 – 95• For example, downloading a two-hour movie to a home entertainment system or PC for later viewing can yield high QoE for the

movie-viewing experience, even if the available bandwidth is of low quality in terms of packet loss, packet delay, and bandwidth variation.

Pereira, F., A Triple User Characterization Model for Video Adaptation and Quality of Experience Evaluation, 7th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Oct. 2005.• The notion of 'quality of service' has to evolve to something more encompassing like 'quality of experience' where user

satisfaction considers not only the sensorial and perceptual dimensions but also the important emotional dimension.Liu Li-yuan; Zhou Wen-an; Song Jun-de, The Research of Quality of Experience Evaluation Method in Pervasive Computing Environment. 1st International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, 3-5 Aug. 2006, p.178 - 182 • The function of quality of experience (QoE) evaluation includes two aspects: to monitor the experience of user on-line, then to

control and justify the service based on the QoE to ensure that the quality of service can highly meet the requirements of the user.

Zapater, M.N. et al., A Proposed Approach for Quality of Experience Assurance of IPTV, 1st Int. Conf. on the Digital Society, Jan. 2007. • There is a need to ensure quality on an end-to-end basis and at a higher abstraction layer by combining QoS and QoE in one

integrated framework.Lopez, D.; Gonzalez, F.; Bellido, L.; Alonso, A., Adaptive multimedia streaming over IP based on customer oriented metrics, International Symposium on Computer Networks, 16-18 June 2006, p. 185 - 191 • Quality of experience (QoE) has been defined as an extension of the traditional quality of service (QoS) in the sense that QoE

provides information regarding the delivered services from an end-user point of view.Siller, M.; Woods, J.C., QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission, Int. Conf. on Visual Information Engineering, 7-9 July 2003 p. 238 - 241• This contribution presents a Quality of Experience (QoE) framework. It evaluates QoE using QoS metrics, network feedback,

and dynamic user requirements. and proposes a definition for QoE. In (3) QoE is considered as all the perception elements of the network and performance relative to expectations of the users/ subscribers.

Patrick, A.S. et al, A QoE sensitive architecture for advanced collaborative environments, First International Conference on Quality of Service in Heterogeneous Wired/Wireless Networks, 2004, p. 319 - 322 • Quality of Experience can be defined as the characteristics of the sensations, perceptions, and opinions of people as they

interact with their environments.