1 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat By Steven Gianvecchio, Mengjun...

41
1 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat By Steven Gianvecchio, Mengjun Xie, Zhenyu Wu, and Haining Wang College of William and Mary

Transcript of 1 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat By Steven Gianvecchio, Mengjun...

11

Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

By Steven Gianvecchio, Mengjun Xie, Zhenyu Wu, and Haining Wang

College of William and Mary

2USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Outline

Background Measurement Classification System Experimental Evaluation Conclusion

3USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Outline

Background Measurement Classification System Experimental Evaluation Conclusion

4USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Bots

Bots - programs that automate human tasks web bots automate browsing the web chat bots automate online chat can be harmful and/or helpful

5USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Chat Bots vs. BotNets

BotNets – networks of compromised machines some use chat systems (IRC) for C&C, others

use P2P, HTTP, etc. abuse various systems

Chat Bots – automated chat programs some are helpful, e.g., chat loggers can abuse chat systems and their users

6USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

The Chat Bot Problem

The Problem – chat bots abuse chat services (e.g., AOL, Yahoo!, MSNMSN) send spam spread malicious software mount phishing attacks

Our focus is on the Yahoo! chat system

7USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

A Typical Chat

Alice12 entered the room.Alice12 entered the room.

Alice12: Hi room.

Alice12 entered the room.

Alice12: Hi room.Bob34: hi alice

Alice12 entered the room.

Alice12: Hi room.Bob34: hi alice

Susie88: any guys want to let a cute girl move in with them! hehe

Alice12 entered the room.

Alice12: Hi room.Bob34: hi alice

Susie88: any guys want to let a cute girl move in with them! hehe

Alice12: What’s up?

Alice12 entered the room.

Alice12: Hi room.Bob34: hi alice

Susie88: any guys want to let a cute girl move in with them! hehe

Alice12: What’s up?Bob34: not much

Alice12 entered the room.

Alice12: Hi room.Bob34: hi alice

Susie88: any guys want to let a cute girl move in with them! hehe

Alice12: What’s up?Bob34: not much

Susie88: can you guys see me on my web-cam?? (its in my profile)

8USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Yahoo! Chat

Yahoo! chat is a large commercial chat service over 3,000 chat rooms

AUTH,

CHAT,

IM, …

9USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Yahoo! Chat

Yahoo! chat system client connects to a server servers relay messages to/from clients

10USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Outline

Background Measurement Classification System Experimental Evaluation Conclusion

11USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Measurement

August-November 2007 – we collect data August 2007 – Yahoo! adds CAPTCHA

must pass to join a chat room protocol update, prevents some 3rd party

clients from accessing chat

October 2007 – bots are back some bots return before 3rd party clients

12USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Measurement

September and October 2007 very few chat bots

August and November 2007 many chat bots 1,440 hours of chat logs 147 chat logs 21 chat rooms

13USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Measurement

To create our dataset, we read and label the chat users as human, bot, or ambiguous

In total, we recognized 14 different types of chat bots different triggering mechanisms different text generation techniques

14USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Triggering Mechanisms

Timer-Based periodic timers, e.g., 40 seconds random timers, e.g., 45-125 seconds

Response-Based responds to other usersSam77: Bob12, you’re just full of questions, aren’t you?

Sam77: Bob12, lots of evidence for evolution can be found here http://

15USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Text Generation

Character PaddingFiona88: anyone boredjn wanna chat?uklcss

Synonym PhrasesMarjorie99: Hi Babes! Marjorie Here! Inspect My Site

Marjorie99: Mmmm Folks! Im Marjorie! View My Webpage

Odd Line or Word Spacing Message Replay

16USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Types of Chat Bots

Periodic Bots – sends messages based on periodic timers

Random Bots – sends messages based on random timers

Responder Bots – responds to messages of other users

Replay Bots – replays messages of other users

17USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Humans inter-message delay – evidence of heavy tail message size – well fit by Exponential

(λ=0.034)

18USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Periodic Bots inter-message delay – several clusters with

high probabilities message size – messages built from

templates approximate a normal distribution

19USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Random Bots inter-message delay – Equilikely distribution

at 40, 64, and 88; Uniform distribution 45-125 message size – messages selected from a

small database

20USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Responder Bots inter-message delay – human-like timing message size – multiple templates of different

lengths

21USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Replay Bots inter-message delay – cluster with high

probabilities (replay bots are periodic) message size – human-like size, well fit by

Exponential (λ=0.028)

22USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Outline

Background Measurement Classification System Experimental Evaluation Conclusion

23USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Classification System

Entropy Classifier detects abnormal behavior based on message sizes and inter-message

delays accurate but slow

Machine Learning Classifier detects “learned” patterns based on message content fast but must be trained

24USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat 24

Observation – chat bots are less complex than humans, and thus, lower in entropy exploits the low entropy of chat bots

Corrected Conditional Entropy Test (CCE) estimates higher-order entropy

Entropy Test (EN) estimates first-order entropy

Entropy Classifier

25USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Machine Learning Classifier

Observation - chat spam like email spam is a text classification problem exploits message content of chat bots

CRM114 a powerful text classification system several built-in classifiers: HMM,

KNN/Hyperspace, OSB, SVM, Winnow, etc. we use OSB

26USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Hybrid Classification System entropy classifier builds and maintains the bot

corpus machine learning classifier uses the bot and

human corpora

BOT CORPUS

CLASSIFY AS CHAT BOT

HUMAN CORPUS

CLASSIFY AS HUMAN

INPUT

ENTROPY CLASSIFIER

MACHINE LEARNING

CLASSIFIER

27USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Outline

Background Measurement Classification System Experimental Evaluation Conclusion

28USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Experimental Evaluation

Types of Chat Bots Periodic Bots Random Bots Responder Bots Replay Bots

Classifiers entropy classifier – 100 messages machine learning classifier – 25 messages

29USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Experimental Evaluation

Classification Tests Ent – entropy classifier SupML – fully-supervised ML classifier,

trained on AUG BOTS SupMLre – fully-supervised ML classifier,

retrained on NOV BOTS EntML – entropy-trained ML

30USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

EN(imd) 121/121 68/68 1/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 7/1713

CCE(imd) 121/121 49/68 4/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 11/1713

EN(ms) 92/121 7/68 8/30 46/51 34/109 0/40 7/1713

CCE(ms) 77/121 8/68 30/30 51/51 6/109 0/40 11/1713

OVERALL 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

Entropy Classifier EN – entropy CCE – corrected conditional entropy (imd) – inter-message delay (ms) – message size

31USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

EN(imd) 121/121 68/68 1/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 7/1713

CCE(imd) 121/121 49/68 4/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 11/1713

EN(ms) 92/121 7/68 8/30 46/51 34/109 0/40 7/1713

CCE(ms) 77/121 8/68 30/30 51/51 6/109 0/40 11/1713

OVERALL 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

EN(imd) and CCE(imd) problems against responder bots detect most other chat bots

32USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

EN(imd) 121/121 68/68 1/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 7/1713

CCE(imd) 121/121 49/68 4/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 11/1713

EN(ms) 92/121 7/68 8/30 46/51 34/109 0/40 7/1713

CCE(ms) 77/121 8/68 30/30 51/51 6/109 0/40 11/1713

OVERALL 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

EN(ms) and CCE(ms) problems against random and replay bots detect most other chat bots

33USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

EN(imd) 121/121 68/68 1/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 7/1713

CCE(imd) 121/121 49/68 4/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 11/1713

EN(ms) 92/121 7/68 8/30 46/51 34/109 0/40 7/1713

CCE(ms) 77/121 8/68 30/30 51/51 6/109 0/40 11/1713

OVERALL 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

OVERALL detects all chat bots false positive rate is ~0.01 100 messages

34USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

Ent 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

SupML 121/121 68/68 30/30 14/51 104/109 1/40 0/1713

SupMLre 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 0/1713

EntML 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 1/1713

Entropy and Machine Learning Classifiers Ent – entropy classifier (from last slide) SupML – fully-supervised machine learning SupMLre – SupML retrained EntML – entropy-trained machine learning

35USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

Test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

Ent 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

SupML 121/121 68/68 30/30 14/51 104/109 1/40 0/1713

SupMLre 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 0/1713

EntML 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 1/1713

Ent OVERALL results from previous slide

36USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

Ent 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

SupML 121/121 68/68 30/30 14/51 104/109 1/40 0/1713

SupMLre 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 0/1713

EntML 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 1/1713

SupML has problems against November bots needs to be retrained for new bots

SupMLre detects all bots

37USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

AUG BOTS NOV BOTS

periodic random respond periodic random replay human

test TP TP TP TP TP TP FP

Ent 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 17/1713

SupML 121/121 68/68 30/30 14/51 104/109 1/40 0/1713

SupMLre 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 0/1713

EntML 121/121 68/68 30/30 51/51 109/109 40/40 1/1713

EntML false positive rate is ~0.0005

(Ent is ~0.01) 25 messages

38USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Outline

Background Measurement Classification System Experimental Evaluation Conclusion

39USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Conclusion

Measurements overall, chat bots are less complex than

humans some chat bots more human-like

Classification System exploits benefits of both classifiers quickly classifies known chat bots accurately classifies unknown chat bots

40USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Conclusion (cont.)

Future Work investigate more advanced chat bots explore applications of entropy on other forms

of bots (e.g., web bots) explore other applications of entropy (e.g.,

detecting covert timing channels)

41USENIX Security 2008 Measurement and Classification of Humans and Bots in Internet Chat

Questions?

Thank You!