11

From PHARE to ATCFrom PHARE to ATC

A. VinkA. Vink

Domain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROLDomain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROL

22

Picking up the results of PHARE in EUROCONTROLPicking up the results of PHARE in EUROCONTROL

The PHARE programme has researched and The PHARE programme has researched and demonstrated the operational and technical demonstrated the operational and technical feasibility of using ATC Data Processing tools feasibility of using ATC Data Processing tools

The EATCHIP III programme has developed The EATCHIP III programme has developed common European requirements and generic common European requirements and generic specifications for ATC Data Processing toolsspecifications for ATC Data Processing tools

Convergence of programmes is apparent :Convergence of programmes is apparent : inside EUROCONTROL : PHARE and EATCHIP IIIinside EUROCONTROL : PHARE and EATCHIP III with other programmes : EU-CINCAT and FAA-FFP1with other programmes : EU-CINCAT and FAA-FFP1

33

R & D convergenceR & D convergence

PHARE PHARE toolstools

EATCHIP III EATCHIP III (EATMP)tools(EATMP)tools

EU EU CINCAT toolsCINCAT tools

FAA FFP1FAA FFP1toolstools

• trajectory predictor

• conflict probe

• flight path monitor

• co-operative tool

• problem solver

• arrival manager

• departure manager

• tact.load smoother

• negotiation manag.

trajectory predicto

MTCD

MONA

HMI devices

• CORA

AMAN

• DMAN

• Multi Sector Plan.

CPDLC

• trajectory predictor

• conflict probe

• flight path monitor

• co-operative tools :

• filtering device

• activity predictor

• extrapolation tool

• surveillance aid

• flight profile

• URET

• in URET

• DSR

• CTAS/TMA pFAST

• SMA

• CDM

• CPDLC Builds

feasibility demonstrated agreed ORD/specs similar tools convergence

44

R& D ImplementationR& D Implementation

The ATC/DP domains have a stake in applied ATC research The ATC/DP domains have a stake in applied ATC research The ATC/DP domains’ raison d’être is The ATC/DP domains’ raison d’être is implementationimplementation Implementation responsibility with ATC Service Providers Implementation responsibility with ATC Service Providers The road between research and operations is long and the The road between research and operations is long and the

gaps are widegaps are wide ““R&D must choose between ownership and implementation, R&D must choose between ownership and implementation,

it rarely goes together”it rarely goes together” Tools similar to PHARE have been implementedTools similar to PHARE have been implemented Use windows of opportunity for implementationsUse windows of opportunity for implementations

55

R& D OperationsR& D Operations

PHARE toolsPHARE tools EATCHIP III EATCHIP III (EATMP)tools(EATMP)tools

• trajectory predictor

• conflict probe

• flight path monitor

• co-operative tool

• problem solver

• arrival manager

• departure manager

• tact.load smoother

• negotiation manag.

trajectory predicto

MTCD

MONA

HMI devices

• CORA

AMAN

• DMAN

• Multi Sector Plan.

CPDLC

Implementation examples Implementation examples (Europe)(Europe)

• various local FDPS

• ACOD (Amsterdam), ERATO plans (F)

• Amsterdam, Brussels, SACTA (Esp), ERATO

• ERATO plans in France, ODID based implem.

• HIPS Oceanic, VERA Maastricht UAC

• Amsterdam, Paris, Frankfurt, Copenhagen

• Amsterdam, LATCC, Brussels CANAC

• PETAL trials at Maastricht UAC

66

ATC/DP Domains strategyATC/DP Domains strategy

The ATC tool development work is continued in the The ATC tool development work is continued in the EATMP programmes assigned to the ATC / Data EATMP programmes assigned to the ATC / Data Processing DomainsProcessing Domains Automated Support to ATC programmeAutomated Support to ATC programme Air/Ground Co-operative ATS programmeAir/Ground Co-operative ATS programme

The ATM 2000+ strategy is driving the EATMP The ATM 2000+ strategy is driving the EATMP ATC/Data Processing domainsATC/Data Processing domains

The ATC/DP domains have defined “Concept The ATC/DP domains have defined “Concept Elements”, to build ATM 2000+Elements”, to build ATM 2000+

77

Performance driven ATC/DP developmentPerformance driven ATC/DP development

ATC/DP domains keyword : ATC/DP domains keyword : “performance driven”“performance driven” Safety, Capacity, Cost and Environment objectives of Safety, Capacity, Cost and Environment objectives of

ATC/DP Concept Elements must be quantifiedATC/DP Concept Elements must be quantified ““if you haven’t measured, you can’t change” if you haven’t measured, you can’t change” PHARE has proven operational and technical feasibility, but PHARE has proven operational and technical feasibility, but

quantificationquantification is to be completed is to be completed The ATC domain has launched a new collaborative R & D The ATC domain has launched a new collaborative R & D

project (INTEGRA), to achieve :project (INTEGRA), to achieve : measurement techniques measurement techniques measured resultsmeasured results

88

ConclusionConclusion

FeasibilityFeasibility

ImplementationImplementation

DevelopmentDevelopment

PHARE has demonstrated operational and technical feasibility of ATC tools Quantification of benefits required

EATCHIP III has developed common European Requirements and Specifications EATMP ATC/DP programmes will continue to develop ATM 2000+ “Concept Elements”

Performance driven approach Commitment through Convergence and Implementation Plan Strategy Work Plan Budget

O w

n e r s h I pO

w n e r s h I p

99

From PHARE to ATCFrom PHARE to ATC

A. VinkA. Vink

Domain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROLDomain Leader ATC, EUROCONTROL

nextnext