1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.
-
Upload
jemima-howard -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.
![Page 1: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
ERM - Post 9/11
Presented by: Susan Witcraft
Guy Carpenter
July 8, 2002
![Page 2: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Overview
• ERM: Is it really used?
• For what is ERM valuable?
• Example
![Page 3: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
ERM: Is it Really Used?
• ERM is a process– Has been done in varying forms as long
as companies have had to face risk
– Has become more sophisticated in recent years as tools have evolved
– Tools include DFA, RAROC, others
![Page 4: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
ERM: Is it Really Used?
“Underestimating tail correlation coefficients in the DFA models will underestimate overall risk and the capital required to support the individual risks. . . . It is critical to understand the potential shortfalls in each analysis when using these tools to manage risk. The author believes failure to do this is one of the major reasons for rampant underpricing during the 1990s as management underestimated tail correlations (with the help of their consultants and mathematicians) and thus underestimated capital requirements in the quest for diversification.”
Bill Riker, Chapter 25, Correlation in Risk Management, page 529, bold and italics added.
![Page 5: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
ERM: Is it Really Used?
• Several major insurers using RAROC
• Lots of insurers have considered DFA
• Many insurers have played with it
• Only a few have implemented it– Even fewer have relied heavily on the
full tool for decision making– Many have used “mini-DFA” to provide
insight on decisions
![Page 6: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
For What is ERM Valuable?
• Asset allocation
• Reinsurance programs
• Capital adequacy
• Capital allocation
• Line of business mix
• Understanding income statement and balance sheet risks
![Page 7: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
• Enhancing corporate communication
• Expanding actuaries’ horizons
– Overall company management
– Investments
– Improved analysis tools
For What is ERM Valuable?
![Page 8: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Enhancing Corporate Communication
• Successful ERM implementation requires participation of all corporate departments.
• Topics of discussion are wide-ranging.
• Participants have varying levels of knowledge of these topics.
![Page 9: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Expanding Actuaries’ Horizons: Overall Company Management
• Actuary – Oversees or implements model.– Understands issues important to all
constituents.– Interprets results. – Participates in decision-making process.
![Page 10: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Expanding Actuaries’ Horizons: Finance and Investments
• Enterprise risk management models include all corporate financial activities.
• Actuaries – Traditionally most familiar with underwriting
issues.– Must become at least conversant with economic
modeling, investment issues and finance to implement model and interpret results.
![Page 11: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Expanding Actuaries’ Horizons: Analysis Tools
• ERM has required actuaries to refine and expand analysis techniques.
• Examples include modeling of:– Small, large and cat claims.– Development of booked reserves.– Payment pattern variability.– Links between losses and economic conditions.– Pricing process.
![Page 12: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Improved Analysis Tools: Case Study
• Analysis tools can be used for other applications.• Examples:
– Reserve development and payment pattern variability for evaluating adverse development covers.
– Separation of losses into small, large and cat for evaluating excess of loss or cat covers or for evaluating adequacy of rates for lines with facultative covers.
![Page 13: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Case Study:Loss Portfolio Transfer
• Questions faced by company:
– What is the economic cost of each loss portfolio transfer/adverse development cover proposal?
– Does each proposal meet the auditors requirements for transfer of risk?
![Page 14: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Background
• $200 million of loss and LAE reserves as of 12/31/01.
• Considering capital contribution or merger.
• Significant uncertainty surrounding reserve estimates.
• Want balance sheet protection.
![Page 15: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Three Proposals
1. $75 million excess $175 million for $30 million.2. $50 million excess $200 million for $15 million.3. $250 million excess $0 for $190 million.
All 3 include experience account with 7% interest credit guaranteed by ceding company and a reinsurers’ margin of $10 million {$15 million for (3)}.
![Page 16: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Analysis Approach
• Simulate possible future payments by calendar year.
• Reflect differences in emergence patterns under varying historical reinsurance programs.
• Apply reinsurance terms to each scenario.• Auditor defines risk transfer test.• Calculate economic cost and risk transfer test.
![Page 17: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Overall Approach
Calendar Year Payments By Accident Year
Calendar Year Payments By Accident Year
Ending Reserve By Accident Year
Ending Reserve By Accident Year
BeginningReserve By
Accident Year
![Page 18: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Payments
xInflation Claim Expected
Inflation Claim Actual
PaymentsActual
x ReserveBeginning
Component)RandomRatio(Payment
![Page 19: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Ending Reserve
ComponentRandom ReserveinChange
ReserveEnding
Reserve Beginning x
x
InflationCost Claim Future Expected Prior
Inflation Cost Claim Future Expected Current
![Page 20: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Total Payments
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
115
125
135
145
155
165
175
185
195
205
215
225
235
245
255
265
275
285
295
305
315
325
335
345
355
365
Amount (in millions)
Pro
babi
lity
![Page 21: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Present Value of Payments
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
Amount (in millions)
Pro
babi
ltiy
![Page 22: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Evaluation of Proposals
ProposalFirst Year
Cost*Economic
Cost
Probability of Meeting Threshold
$75 x $175 $0 $1.5 million 34%
$50 x $200 $0 $3 million 30%
$250 x $0 $-10 million $4 million 39%
* Assumes no development.
![Page 23: 1 ERM - Post 9/11 Presented by: Susan Witcraft Guy Carpenter July 8, 2002.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070411/56649f425503460f94c61562/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
ERM - Post 9/11
Presented by: Susan Witcraft
Guy Carpenter
July 8, 2002