1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a...

35
1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business

Transcript of 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a...

Page 1: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

1

EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006

The effectiveness of teams in the management of a

family-owned versus a non-family owned small business

Page 2: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

2

STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION

• Introduction• Purpose of assignment writing• Working in groups• Assignment instructions• Literature overview• Empirical research• Writing the report• Plagiarism declaration• Lecturer’s evaluation• Before handing in

Page 3: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

3

INTRODUCTION

The practice of writing assignments:

• Accepted teaching method for most university courses • Compulsory for all Business Management modules• Develops effective report writing skills• Develops scientific research skills• Expands knowledge of subject area• Group work prepares students for the business world

Page 4: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

4

PURPOSE AND VALUE OF ASSIGNMENT WRITING

• To compile a written research report in accordance with scientific assignment rules and guidelines, e.g., Harvard method

• Students get to tackle a ‘real life’ problem in the business world• Application of theoretical concepts learnt in EB101 to a practical

situation• Develops independent thought and critical thinking• Prepares students for more advanced report writing projects• Develops students’ ability to gather and condense relevant information

See Du Toit & Geel (2006:1)

Page 5: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

5

WORKING IN GROUPS

Benefits:• Prepares students for their working careers• Opportunity to collaborate on projects with a desired end result• Develops teamwork skills – can include in CV

Challenges:• Equal participation of all members• Planning with deadline date in mind• Setting tasks and establishing clear goals from the outset• Keeping lines of communication open• One person does all the work• Free riders

Page 6: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

6

WORKING IN GROUPS

Tips and tricks:• Appoint a group leader and allocate specific tasks• Identify time frame and set up a chart commencing with deadline

date• Schedule meeting dates, times, venues well in advance and send

out reminders• Ensure everyone knows what to do• Know your way round the library• Expel non-performers• Focus on end result at all times• Check final document as a group• Output is a finished product group should be proud of

Page 7: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

7

FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION OF GROUP NAMES

(A4 sheet only. Tiny scraps of scrap paper not accepted!!!!)

After 10 March 2006 groups may not be changed

SURNAME FIRST NAMES

STUDENT NUMBER

CONTACT NUMBER

GROUP STRUCTURE

GROUPMon/Wed Tues/Fri Tues/Thurs

Group leader

Member

Member

Member

Page 8: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

8

TIMEFRAME EXAMPLE

Week 125 Feb

Week 23 Mar

Week 310 Mar

Week 417 Mar

Week 524 Mar

Week 631 Mar

Week 77 April

Assign roles & tasksSet objectivesMeeting datesCommence lit search

Literature search

Identify suitable businesses

Set up appointments

Study HCSA

Visit Writing Centre

Literature search

Assignment writing

Literature search

Assignment writing

Assignment writing

Finalisation of draft report

Final proof reading

Make adjustments

All attachments included

Submit

Fri 7th

10:30-11:30

Page 9: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

9

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

Topic• The effectiveness of teams (partners) in the

management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business

Aim• To investigate how effective teams (partners) operate in

managing their own business and to establish whether teams (partners) operate more effectively if the members are related to each other versus those that are not related.

Page 10: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

10

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

1. It is compulsory to consult the book “How to complete a scientific assignment and report” (HCSA) by Du Toit and Geel (2006 edition), in the completion of this assignment.

2. Your assignment must be set out according to the Harvard method, as discussed by the authors of HCSA. It will be marked according to the evaluation schedule discussed in class.

3. A special assignment lecture will be given on how to complete this assignment and attendance is compulsory.

4. Set up a title page. (Please provide two copies; one is required for proof of submission purposes).

5. Set up a table of contents.6. Set up an introduction. 7. Provide a literature overview (see contents below).

Page 11: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

11

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

8. Relate theory to practice: • Conduct two interviews. One with a team member that manages

a small family business and one with a team member that managers a small non-family business. A family business is one where two or more family members are working in the business and the family owns more than a 50% share in the business. The two businesses should have been in operation for at least 1 year. For the purpose of this assignment a small business is one that does not employ more than 50 persons.

• A management team exists when two or more persons own and manage the business together. In a family business, team members may be any of the following persons who are related by blood or marriage, who manage a business together: husband and wife, siblings, cousins, in-laws etc.

Page 12: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

12

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

• No chain stores will be accepted e.g. Clicks, Pick ‘n Pay etc. The Summerstrand Village and Seagate Shopping Centres are strictly out of bounds.

• Only one group is allowed per business. Groups must make sure that no other group has already interviewed the businesses they approach. Should this be the case another business must be selected.

• Use the questionnaires provided to obtain the necessary information.

9. Close off your assignment with a conclusion and recommendations.

Page 13: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

13

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

10. Consult at least six different sources (sources include books, journals, newspapers, Internet databases, etc.) Consult the management and organisational behavior textbooks. Additional information can be obtained from the South Campus library, i.e. short loan section and Mrs Prinsloo (1st floor). Use the reference technique described in HCSA.

11. Your assignment must not be more than six A4 pages (excluding title page, table of contents, list of sources and annexures), it must be technically correct, typed in 1.5 line spacing, Times New Roman or Arial font, 12 pt and with margins no bigger than 2.5 cm all round. It must be stapled in the top left had corner (no plastic sleeves or folders).

12. The assignment must be completed in a group of 4 persons.

Page 14: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

14

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

13. The due date is Friday 7 April 2006. Handing in instructions:• South campus: Between 10:30 and 11:30 am, in the foyer

outside venue 35OG05. Assignments will not be accepted on the 5th floor or in class.

• Vista campus: Between 10:30 and 11:30 am, in office number D204. Assignments will not be accepted in the class.

14. A penalty reduction of 10% (of the mark obtained) per day will be imposed for late submission.

15. Attachments as annexures to assignment: • Completed questionnaires• Plagiarism/group participation declaration• Evaluation sheet – names and student numbers

(Stapled last)

Page 15: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

15

Proposed table of contents(Headings must be set out according to HCSA, e.g., bold vs not bold):

1 Introduction2 Literature overview of teams in business.2.1 Defining teams: Distinguish between a group, a team and a partnership. Are these

different concepts or one and the same thing? Define each concept and elaborate on the differences and similarities between them. Also refer to the different types of teams.

2.2 Advantages and disadvantages of working in teams in today’s business environment.2.3 Key characteristics (conditions) of effective teams. Identify and discuss what it takes

to function effectively as a team? (You need at least 2 references for each characteristic/condition identified)

3 Empirical research3.1 Background of the family and non-family small businesses interviewed (introduce the

firms3.2 Report on findings (report findings of questionnaires specifically)4 Summary and recommendations

List of sourcesAnnexure A: Completed questionnairesAnnexure B: Plagiarism/group participation declaration

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS HANDOUT

Page 16: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

16

LITERATURE OVERVIEW

Effectiveness of management teams in business:

• Defining teams• Benefits and shortcomings of working in teams• Key characteristics of effective teams

Library search:

Page 17: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

17

LITERATURE OVERVIEW

Where to start?Prescribed textbook:• Bosch et al. (2006):

Chapter on General and Strategic Management

Literature sourcesLibrary:• Open shelves: books on management, organisational behaviour• Short loan• Mrs Prinsloo – 1st Floor, South Campus Library

will assist with Journal articles

Electronic full text journals (permission required)

Internet search: • Only reliable sources may be used

Page 18: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

18

LITERATURE OVERVIEW

Suggested keywords for literature search:

• Effective management teams• Effective managing partners• Management teams small business• Management teams family business• Family business management teams• Small business management teams• Shared leadership teams

Page 19: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

19

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Background of the small business interviewed

Section A – questionnaire

Introduce firms to reader

Summary profile of firm – questionnaire items 1.1-11.4

Report on findings

Section B – questionnaire

Report on findings (actual responses to factors influencing teamwork)

Analysis of questionnaire items 1-11

Compare average mean scores for family and non-family businesses

Factors influencing effective teamwork can also be ranked for the

family and non-family businesses

Page 20: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

20

1 GOALSPlease indicate (X) to what extent you agree with the following statements.(1) disagree strongly, (2) disagree, (3) neutral, (4) agree (5) strongly agree

My managing team member/s and I … Disagree.......…Agree

1.1 Have an articulated and clear set of business goals 1 2 3 4 5

1.2 Understand our business goals 1 2 3 4 5

1.3 Are committed to our business goals 1 2 3 4 5

1.4 Find our business goals challenging 1 2 3 4 5

1.5 Find our business goals motivating 1 2 3 4 5

1.6 Agree on what business goals and objectives are important 1 2 3 4 5

1.7 Take ownership of our business goals 1 2 3 4 5

B FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFECTIVE TEAMWORK

Average score: 28/7 = 4

Score for goals is 4. Respondent agrees that goals is a factor which influences effective teamwork

Non-family business

Page 21: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

21

1 GOALSPlease indicate (X) to what extent you agree with the following statements.(1) disagree strongly, (2) disagree, (3) neutral, (4) agree (5) strongly agree

My managing team member/s and I … Disagree.......…Agree

1.1 Have an articulated and clear set of business goals 1 2 3 4 5

1.2 Understand our business goals 1 2 3 4 5

1.3 Are committed to our business goals 1 2 3 4 5

1.4 Find our business goals challenging 1 2 3 4 5

1.5 Find our business goals motivating 1 2 3 4 5

1.6 Agree on what business goals and objectives are important 1 2 3 4 5

1.7 Take ownership of our business goals 1 2 3 4 5

B FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFECTIVE TEAMWORK

Average mean score: 22/7 = 3.14

Score for goals is 3.14. Respondent is neutral that goals is a factor which influences effective teamwork

Family business

Page 22: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

22

EXAMPLE: RANKING TOP 5 FACTORS INFLUENCING TEAMWORK

Rank Family business Non-family business

1 Freedom (5) Trust (4.5)

2 Operational efficiency (4.5) Goals (4.8)

3 Competency (4) Leadership (4)

4 Goals (3.14) Operational efficiency (4)

5 Trust (3) Work design (3.8)

Table 3.1 indicates a difference in emphasis between the factors that influence the effectiveness of teams in family owned small businesses versus those that influence non-family owned small businesses.

Comparison – similarities, differences, insight, recommendations for future research???

Table 3.1: Factors influencing effective teamwork in a family vs a non-family business

Page 23: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

23

WRITING THE REPORT

NB NB NB: Consult du Toit and Geel (2006)

Instructions in this guide are clearly set out

Report: 5 main parts

• Introduction• Literature review: what has already been written• Empirical research: report back of interviews• Conclusions and recommendations• List of sources

Layout

• Appearance and technical requirements

Page 24: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

24

WRITING THE REPORT

INTRODUCTION

• Statement of the problem

Develop a problem statement using topic as a guide

Provides direction for rest of the study

• Emphasis on the importance of or reason for the research

Why is the study necessary

What insights might be gained, any future use

• The objectives of the assignment

Refer to assignment topic

Page 25: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

25

WRITING THE REPORT

• The method of research used

Literature search

Empirical research • Difficulties encountered during the research and how the

difficulties were overcome

Condensing a vast amount of information

Group dynamics• An indication of the contents following the introduction

Alert reader to sections that follow

Du Toit and Geel (2006:13)

Page 26: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

26

WRITING THE REPORT

MAIN TEXT – BODY OF REPORT

Du Toit and Geel (2006) must be consulted

• Never refer to “I” or “we” – use “the researchers” only if necessary• Headings must be correctly numbered• Page numbers are shown (except on first page)• When taking information from any source, no matter how short the

extract, reference or source MUST be acknowledged and indicated (otherwise plagiarism)

• All references used in body must be acknowledged in the list of sources

Page 27: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

27

WRITING THE REPORT

MAIN TEXT – BODY OF REPORTWhat is plagiarism in assignment writing?

• Plagiarism occurs when the work, writing, ideas, etc, of another author is copied and passed off as one’s own

• Plagiarism can be deliberate or unintentional• Every source used must be properly acknowledged in accordance

with scientific principles of assignment writing

• Plagiarism is a growing concern in tertiary education today

• Plagiarism is a serious offence which could result in disciplinary action being taken against the offender(s)

Page 28: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

28

WRITING THE REPORT

MAIN TEXT – BODY OF REPORT REFERENCING EXAMPLES (Harvard method)

NB NB NB: Refer to Du Toit and Geel

According to Hunt (2004:38), when leadership responsibility is shared, individual team members are committed to a tangible vision which is pursued by the entire team.

Leadership responsibility, when shared, has individual team members who are committed to a solid vision which is then pursued by the entire team (Hunt 2004:38).

Page 29: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

29

WRITING THE REPORT

Plagiarism example:

Shared responsibility leadership results when a team of individuals is committed to a tangible vision and they all share responsibility for the pursuit of that tangible vision. In other words, it isn't just the "leader" in authority who is responsible for making change happen, it is the entire team.

Piece is copied directly from source (author) to text (body of report)

No credit is given to the author

Page 30: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

30

WRITING THE REPORT

MAIN TEXT – BODY OF REPORT REFERENCING EXAMPLES (Harvard method)NB NB NB: Refer to Du Toit and Geel

Kotler, Grönroos and Carter (2003:172) offer the following advantages and disadvantages that apply to working in teams in the current business environment:

Although it is normal to find management teams operating in family owned businesses, several challenges are unique to the family business when it comes to working in teams (Kotler et al. 2003:191).

Page 31: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

31

SHOWING DIAGRAMS

Table 2.1: Heading

Source: Adapted from Olsen (2001:78)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

East

West

North

Figure 2.1: Heading

Source: Adapted from Olsen (2001:36)

Page 32: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

32

Gray, B.A. 200134598Krüger, J. 202045781Rootman, C. 200347156Van Eeden, S. 200269794

Note: Title page x 2 copies Group names in alphabetical order Name of lecturer/lecturers

AIDS AND THE SMALL BUSINESSTHE PERSPECTIVE OF PRO-DIVE

DATE: 7 April 2006

LECTURER: Ms J Krüger

Page 33: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

33

DECLARATION in respect of PLAGIARISM EB101 GROUP ASSIGNMENT - 2005Declaration must be completed and signed by each group member and handed in with theassignment on the due date. The assignment will not be marked without it.

1 I know that plagiarism is wrong and that it means to use another person’s work, e.g. ideas, words, models, diagrams and pretend that it is my own original work.

2 Irrespective of the conventions used for quoting and referencing in any specific project that I submit, I undertake to give credit to each significant contribution to, and quotation that I have taken from the work(s) of other people. I shall do this by quoting and referencing. All sources derived from the Internet shall be properly acknowledged.

3 I confirm that all written projects which I submit at this University shall be my own work.4 I shall not allow anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her

own work.5 This declaration shall apply to all work whether I submit as an individual or as a

member of a group.6 I understand that disciplinary action may follow should I be in breach of the above

declaration.7 I declare that I participated equally in the preparation of this assignment to the

satisfaction of my group leader and fellow group members.

Signed at Port Elizabeth on the ………………………………………………………2006.

Page 34: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

34

DECLARATION in respect of PLAGIARISM

GROUP LEADER:I declare that I am satisfied that each member listed above made an equal contribution to the assignment and should receive the percentage mark as indicated above.

…………………………...Signature of Group Leader

Groups are required to resolve their own problems, in particular problems concerning member participation. Lecturers will not intervene in group disputes under any circumstances.

Surname & Initials

Student Number

Telephone Number

Group Structure%

Distribution of Ass. Mark

Signature

Group Leader

Member

Member

Member

Page 35: 1 EB101 ASSIGNMENT 2006 The effectiveness of teams in the management of a family-owned versus a non-family owned small business.

35

BEFORE HANDING IN ASSIGNMENT

Due date: Friday 7 April

Time: 10:30-11:30 only Document checklist:•Report has been proof read•Double title page attached•Additional annexures•Questionnaires•Plagiarism declaration (completed & signed)•Evaluation sheet (names & student numbers written on)