1 Dendroecological Techniques for Reconstructing the History of Wildfires in the Southern...
-
Upload
molly-ball -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Dendroecological Techniques for Reconstructing the History of Wildfires in the Southern...
1
Dendroecological Techniques for Reconstructing the History of Wildfires in the
Southern Appalachian Mountains
Dendroecological Techniques for Reconstructing the History of Wildfires in the
Southern Appalachian Mountains
Henri D. Grissino-Mayer 1
Charles W. Lafon 2
Georgina G. DeWeese 1
Lisa B. LaForest 1
Serena R. Aldrich 2
Henri D. Grissino-Mayer 1
Charles W. Lafon 2
Georgina G. DeWeese 1
Lisa B. LaForest 1
Serena R. Aldrich 2
11 22
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000....
Fire
Regi
meLow Fuel LoadingsFew Ladder FuelsSurface FiresLow IntensityStand Main tenance
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000....
Fire
Regi
me
High Fuel LoadingsIncreased Ladder FuelsCrown FiresHigh IntensityStand Rep lacement"Doghair" Thickets
Low Fuel LoadingsFew Ladder FuelsSurface Fire RegimeLow Severity FiresStand Maintenance Fires
High Fuel LoadingsIncreased Ladder FuelsIncreased Stem DensityCrown Fire RegimeHigh Severity FiresStand Replacement Fires
© USDA Forest Service
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000…
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000…
The “Western Model” where fire exclusion = increased fuels and
increased fire danger
But, in the eastern U.S., 20th century fire exclusion could decrease potential for future wildfires.
Fire History:
Four subsites per larger site
Between 15-40 samples at each subsite
Complete inventory regardless of the number of scars on the sample
Concentration on logs, snags, remnants
Over 600 trees sampled for fire history
Fire History:
Four subsites per larger site
Between 15-40 samples at each subsite
Complete inventory regardless of the number of scars on the sample
Concentration on logs, snags, remnants
Over 600 trees sampled for fire history
Stand History:
Three 50 x 20 m “macroplots” per site
Inventoried all tree species, measured dbh
Cored, crossdated/aged all trees ≥ 5 cm dbh
Inventoried all saplings < 5 cm dbh,> 50 cm ht
Inventoried seedlings in 10 x 20 msubplot
Collected sections from 20 mountainlaurel stems
Measured depth to mineral soil at20 random locations
Stand History:
Three 50 x 20 m “macroplots” per site
Inventoried all tree species, measured dbh
Cored, crossdated/aged all trees ≥ 5 cm dbh
Inventoried all saplings < 5 cm dbh,> 50 cm ht
Inventoried seedlings in 10 x 20 msubplot
Collected sections from 20 mountainlaurel stems
Measured depth to mineral soil at20 random locations
Pines Oaks
Mountain Otherlaurel hardwoods
20 m
50 m
A section from a fire-scarred Table Mountain pine snag.
How many fire scars can you see here?
Initial in-field visual inspection most often underestimates true amount of fire history info per sample.
Note that TMP is a very slow-growing tree species (xeric sites, lithic/poor soils, time in understory).
Note issues we face when attempting to date the tree rings on each sample.
TMP can be very young and very small in size when first scarred. At Mill Mountain, median age at first scarring = 16 years, median diameter at first scarring = 6.7 cm.
TMP sampled at Kelly Mountain in 2005 near
Blue Ridge Parkway, displaying an incredible sequence of fire scars.
Initial in-field inspection estimated 6 or 7 possible
fire scars.
Final tally: 11 scars
Interpreting Fire History Charts
Years on x-axis
Period of Reliability: 1896 to 1944
Each line = 1 tree Sample IDs
Composite axis
Solid lines = recorder years
Each tic = fire scar
Dash lines = non-recorder years
Begin/end symbology
Interpreting Fire Regimes
Central Tendency –Weibull Median Probability Interval (MEI)
Variability – are intervals even?UEI, LEI = range
Seasonality – season is very importantEarly Season = DELate Season = MLA
Severity – are cohorts visible?
All scarred and10% scarred classes
Brush Mountain Fire History
Period of Reliability: 1758–1934
All-scarred class:
MEI: 3 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 8 yrs
10%-scarred class:
MEI: 8 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 19 yrs
90% DE fires, 10% MLA fires
Brush Mountain Fire History
Period of Reliability: 1758–1934
All-scarred class:
MEI: 3 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 8 yrs
10%-scarred class:
MEI: 8 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 19 yrs
90% DE fires, 10% MLA fires
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000
Establishment Year
DB
H (cm
)
PineOakOther Hardwoods
North Mountain Fire HistoryPeriod of Reliability: 1779–1934All-scarred class:MEI: 3 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 6 yrs10%-scarred class:MEI: 7 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 15 yrs84% DE fires, 16% MLA fires
North Mountain Fire HistoryPeriod of Reliability: 1779–1934All-scarred class:MEI: 3 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 6 yrs10%-scarred class:MEI: 7 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 15 yrs84% DE fires, 16% MLA fires
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000
Establishment Year
DB
H (cm
)
PineOakOther Hardwoods
Griffith Knob Fire HistoryPeriod of Reliability: 1810–1934All-scarred class: MEI: 2 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 4 yrs10%-scarred class:MEI: 4 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 12 yrs72% DE fires, 28% MLA fires
Griffith Knob Fire HistoryPeriod of Reliability: 1810–1934All-scarred class: MEI: 2 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 4 yrs10%-scarred class:MEI: 4 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 12 yrs72% DE fires, 28% MLA fires
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000
Establishment Year
DB
H (cm
)
PineOakOther Hardwoods
Little Walker Fire HistoryPeriod of Reliability: 1789–1934All-scarred class: MEI: 3 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 5 yrs10%-scarred class:MEI: 4 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 8 yrs79% DE fires, 21% MLA fires
Little Walker Fire HistoryPeriod of Reliability: 1789–1934All-scarred class: MEI: 3 yrs; LEI: 1 yr; UEI: 5 yrs10%-scarred class:MEI: 4 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 8 yrs79% DE fires, 21% MLA fires
Mill Mountain Fire History
Period of Reliability: 1740–1934
All-scarred class:
MEI: 5 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 9 yrs
10% scarred class:
MEI: 7 yrs; LEI: 3 yrs; UEI: 15 yrs
90% DE fires, 10% MLA fires
Mill Mountain Fire History
Period of Reliability: 1740–1934
All-scarred class:
MEI: 5 yrs; LEI: 2 yrs; UEI: 9 yrs
10% scarred class:
MEI: 7 yrs; LEI: 3 yrs; UEI: 15 yrs
90% DE fires, 10% MLA fires
SpeciesBasalArea
(stems/ha)Frequency Density Dominance
Relative Frequency
(%)
Relative Density
(%)
Relative Dominance
(%)
Importance Value(%)
Acerrubrum
99.70 2.33 23.33 83.08 2.55 2.67 0.81 1.51
Castanea dentata
< 0.001 0.17 1.70 < 0.001 0.74 0.19 0.001 0.23
Nyssa sylvatica
252.01 16.33 163.33 210.00 17.22 17.78 7.75 14.25
Pinus pungens
1599.50 37.33 373.33 1332.92 38.63 37.71 55.75 44.03
Pinusrigida
< 0.001 0.08 0.83 < 0.001 0.09 0.09 0.002 0.047
Pinusstrobus
277.80 2.58 25.83 231.50 3.53 3.54 2.21 2.32
Pinus virginiana
0.003 0.83 8.33 0.003 0.86 0.88 0.04 0.45
Robinia pseudoacacia
< 0.001 0.08 0.83 < 0.001 0.36 0.09 < 0.001 0.11
Quercusalba
< 0.001 0.58 5.83 < 0.001 0.65 0.65 0.02 0.33
Quercus coccinea
118.40 7.92 79.17 98.67 8.10 7.54 2.21 5.95
Quercus montana
653.38 24.58 245.83 544.49 24.59 26.02 29.57 26.73
Quercus rubra
144.30 2.50 25.00 120.25 2.98 2.07 1.63 2.22
Quercus velutina
0.003 0.50 5.00 0.003 0.70 0.54 0.02 0.31
Saplings
Species
BrushMountain
GriffithKnob
Little Walker Mountain
NorthMountain Total Percent
Acer rubrum 12 8 13 46 79 7.14
Carya glabra 0 2 0 0 2 0.18
Castanea dentata 1 2 5 1 9 0.81
Fagus grandifolia 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Nyssa sylvatica 95 5 35 338 473 42.77
Pinus pungens 5 131 92 9 237 21.43
Pinus rigida 0 2 0 0 2 0.18
Pinus strobus 1 18 43 0 62 5.61
Pinus virginiana 0 16 0 0 16 1.45
Quercus alba 1 7 1 10 19 1.72
Quercus coccinea 0 99 1 0 100 9.04
Quercus montana 4 4 0 39 47 4.25
Quercus rubra 3 11 6 1 21 1.90
Quercus velutina 0 0 15 1 16 1.45
Robinia pseudoacacia 0 4 15 0 19 1.72
Tsuga canadensis 0 3 1 0 4 0.36
SpeciesBrush
MountainGriffith Knob
Little Walker Mountain
NorthMountain Total Percent
Acer rubrum 44 26 50 73 193 23.74
Carya glabra 0 22 0 0 22 2.71
Castanea dentata 0 1 7 2 10 1.23
Fagus grandifolia 0 1 0 0 1 0.12
Nyssa sylvatica 7 0 4 36 47 5.78
Pinus pungens 0 8 5 0 13 1.60
Pinus rigida 0 3 0 0 3 0.40
Pinus strobus 0 1 1 0 2 0.25
Pinus virginiana 0 5 0 0 5 0.62
Quercus alba 0 17 0 1 18 2.21
Quercus coccinea 8 39 0 51 98 12.05
Quercus montana 150 35 36 10 231 28.41
Quercus rubra 7 94 8 8 117 14.39
Quercus velutina 5 45 0 0 50 6.15
Robinia pseudoacacia 0 0 3 0 3 0.37
Tsuga canadensis 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Seedlings
Brush Mt. Mountain Laurel
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984
Establishment Date
North Mt. Mountain Laurel
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1945-1949 1950-1954 1955-1959 1960-1964 1965-1969 1970-1974 1975-1979 1980-1984
Establishment Date
Mountain Laurel: Brush Mountain
Mountain Laurel: North Mountain
Previous studies found that a duff layer of 1.5 to 3 inches is sufficient for successful Table Mountain pine regeneration.
Surprisingly, we found average duff (+litter) depths to be about 3 to 3.5 inches at all sites, with maximum values between 6 and 7.5 inches.
What about hardwoods?
We found many fire-scarred hardwoods, but these proved very difficult to analyze.
Advanced decay
Erratic ring patterns
Difficult to crossdate
ConclusionsConclusions
Past fire regimes:
Fires were very frequent, once every 2 to 3 yrsRange: shortest interval = 1 yr, longest = 8 yrs
Potentially widespread fires, once every 4 to 8 yrsRange: shortest interval = 1 yr, longest = 18 yrs
In general, these fires were low severity fires.
Cohorts evident in age structure and fire history analyses, indicating moderate severity fires.
Dominated by dormant season and early growing season fires.
Stand composition:
Current overstory dominated by chestnut oak, Table Mountain pine, and black gum
Sapling composition dominated by black gum and Table Mountain pine
Seedling composition dominated by oaks and red maple, with very few Table Mountain pines
Future stands likely will be dominated by black gum, oaks, and red maple, with very few Table Mountain pines
ConclusionsConclusions
Moving to the south:Great SmokyMountains National Park
Builds upon the work of Mark Harmon, Tom Waldrop, andPat Brose
Gold Mine Trail, Cooper Road Trail, and Rabbit Creek Trail, all on west side of park
Dominated by shortleaf andVirginia pines, many with fire scars.
Moving to the south:Great SmokyMountains National Park
Builds upon the work of Mark Harmon, Tom Waldrop, andPat Brose
Gold Mine Trail, Cooper Road Trail, and Rabbit Creek Trail, all on west side of park
Dominated by shortleaf andVirginia pines, many with fire scars.
A truly surprising find: actually locating in the field two of Harmon’s original samples taken in 1981.
With a hand saw, no less.
A truly surprising find: actually locating in the field two of Harmon’s original samples taken in 1981.
With a hand saw, no less.
fire, fire, fire, firefire, fire, fire, fire
And the lack thereof =
the 20th century “curl”
And the lack thereof =
the 20th century “curl”
1804
19001900
Preliminary fire history for Gold Mine Trail
Very patchy fire regime
Only one major widespreadfire in 1929
This 1929 event was also thelast major fire event as seenin the fire chart.
Older samples will pushthe fire inventory backto the late 1700s.
University of TennesseeHenri Grissino-MayerGeorgina DeWeeseLisa LaForest David MannAlison MillerEvan LarsonDaniel LewisSaskia van de GevelChris UnderwoodBeth AtchleyMichelle PfefferNathaniel MorganAnna ComptonAshley HeatonPreston RobertsPamela DalalJessica BrodgenWayne ClatterbuckTim Green
University of TennesseeHenri Grissino-MayerGeorgina DeWeeseLisa LaForest David MannAlison MillerEvan LarsonDaniel LewisSaskia van de GevelChris UnderwoodBeth AtchleyMichelle PfefferNathaniel MorganAnna ComptonAshley HeatonPreston RobertsPamela DalalJessica BrodgenWayne ClatterbuckTim Green
Texas A&M UniversityCharles LafonSerena AldrichAdam KrustchinskyPaul RindfleischAlexis GreenJennifer HossJohn AldrichKirk StueveLauren SpencerJeremiah WagstaffJames Dalton
The Nature ConservancyJudy DunscombWanda SanJuleJennifer Allen
Virginia Department ofGame & Inland FisheriesNelson Lafon
Texas A&M UniversityCharles LafonSerena AldrichAdam KrustchinskyPaul RindfleischAlexis GreenJennifer HossJohn AldrichKirk StueveLauren SpencerJeremiah WagstaffJames Dalton
The Nature ConservancyJudy DunscombWanda SanJuleJennifer Allen
Virginia Department ofGame & Inland FisheriesNelson Lafon
USDA Forest ServiceSteven CroyElaine Kennedy SutherlandBeth BuchananJesse OvercashCarol Hardy CroyGeorge AnnisDanny WrightButch ShawHerbie HuffmanKenneth HickmanJason HattersleyZack PenningtonMitch Kerr
West Virginia UniversityStockton Maxwell
USDA Forest ServiceSteven CroyElaine Kennedy SutherlandBeth BuchananJesse OvercashCarol Hardy CroyGeorge AnnisDanny WrightButch ShawHerbie HuffmanKenneth HickmanJason HattersleyZack PenningtonMitch Kerr
West Virginia UniversityStockton Maxwell
PersonnelPersonnel