001 SG - Formation Damage
Transcript of 001 SG - Formation Damage
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
1/29
Universidad Nacional de MedellínOctober 24-25, 2002
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
2/29
Formation Damage
Types, Mechanisms & Prevention
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
3/29
OUTLINE
• Definition of Formation Damage
• Types
• Classification• Influence of Geology-Rock Properties
• Operation Related Damages
– Drilling
– Completion
– Stimulation
– Production
– Workovers
• Summary
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
4/29
FORMATION DAMAGE
“a reduction of permeability around awellbore, which is the consequence of drilling, completion, injection, stimulation,
or production of that well”*
* BP Well Productivity Awareness
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
5/29
Productivity Potential. Skin Factor
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
6/29
Skin Damage Factor
• It is identified at the beginning of well testing
• It is identified when pressure drops are recordedin addition to those corresponding to idea radial
flow
• Positive skin means high pressure drops near
wellbore, then productivity will be less in
comparison to another well with skin=0
• Negative skin means productivity is higher in
comparison with another well with skin =0
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
7/29
Skin Damage Factor
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
8/29
Flow Efficiency
• Skin is an useful mathematical concept, but it does notprovide a correct idea of damage effect on productionrate
• Fluid Efficiency is amore useful concept:
FE= Actual Production Rate( with skin) qr
IdeaI Production Rate ( without skin ) qi
FE = ln ( re/rw ) = 7
ln ( re/rw) + s 7 + s
Both production rates ( current skin and skin cero ) requireto be
measured under identical pressure drop conditions.
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
9/29
Skin Damage Factor
• Damaged Well
? Ps>0, S>0, FE
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
10/29
Productivity Index
• Measurement of production rate per each psi of
pressure drop.
TYPES OF FORMATION
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
11/29
TYPES OF FORMATIONDAMAGE
• Physical Reduction in Pore / Pore Throat
Size
• Relative Permeability Reduction to
Hydrocarbons
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
12/29
PHYSICAL REDUCTION IN PORESPACE
• Drilling Mud Solids and Filtrate Invasion
• Cement Filtrate Invasion
• Completion/Workover Solids and FluidsInvasion
• Perforation Damage Zone
• Plugging of Formation with Native Solids
• Asphaltene or Paraffin Precipitation
• Scale Precipitation in theFormation/Perforations
• Formation of Emulsion in the Formation
• Growth or Injection of Bacteria• Compaction of Reservoir with Production
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
13/29
REDUCTION
• Water Coning
• Condensate Banking• Fluid Saturation Change and Fluid
Blocking• Wettability Change
• Emulsion Formation
• Relative Permeability Change
FORMATION DAMAGE CLASSIFICATION
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
14/29
FORMATION DAMAGE CLASSIFICATIONBY PROCESS
Process
Type
Phy sical Pore Siz e
Reduction
Relative
Permeability
Reduction
F lu i d -Rock
I n t e r a c t i o n
• Fin es m igration
• Clay sw e l l ing
• Sol id s invasion
• Adsorption.precipitation
large m olecules
(polymeric)
• Wettabi l i ty chang e d ue
to adso rption of su rface
active com pou nd or
rem ov al of n ative
c o m p o u n d s
F l u i d - F l u i d
I n t e r a c t i o n
• Form ation s o f s cales ,Em uls ion and s lud ges
• Flu id satu ration chang eand f lu id b locking
Pressure/Temp Change
• S cale form ation• Wax/A sp haltene Form ation
• G as breakout• Conden sate banking
• Water conin g
M echani cal
Processes
• Stress ind uced p erm
change• Perfo ration p lu gg in g
-
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
15/29
-TYPE
• Porosity, Permeability and Pore Structure
• Rock Type
– Sandstone
– Carbonate
• Cementation, Cleanliness, Heterogeneity• Clay Content
– Kaolinite (plate booklets prone to migrate)
– Illite (fibers prone to catch moving fines)
– Chloride (random platelets, often Fe rich)
– Smectite (prone to swell & block pore throats)
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
16/29
ROCK
• CT Scanning/Core Photo
• Geological Description• Thin Section, SEM Description, XRD
• Ø Vs. K, Other Data From Conventional Core
Analysis• Pore (Hg Injection) and/or Particle Size
Distribution
• Capillary Pressure
• Relative Permeability
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
17/29
Pore Level Characterization
FORMATION DAMAGE
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
18/29
FORMATION DAMAGEDURING DRILLING
• Solids Usually Invades More Permeable Sections of
Reservoir , Can Reduce Permeability Dramatically.
• Mud Filtrate Invasion Can Cause Damage by– Swelling and dispersion of clays
– Scale precipitation
– Fluid saturation changes/blocking
– Chemical adsorption/retention and emulsion
• Natural Fractures Increase Well Productivity as longas they are not Blocked by Mud Invasion.
• Laboratory Tests Can be Utilized to Minimize
Formation Damage During Drilling
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
19/29
COMPLETIONS
• Completion Types
– Well design (vertical, high-angle or horizontal)
– Completion design (Barefoot, uncementedliner, cased & perforated)
• Casing and Cement
• Completion Fluids
– Types
– Cleanliness, compatibility– Displacement
• Perforating (tunnel length, clean-up)
• Sand Control (Gravel packs, Frac-Pack,chemicals)
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
20/29
STIMULATIONS• Reasons for Stimulation
– Very low native permeability
– To by-pass Near-wellbore damage• Acidization
• Hydraulic Fracturing
• Formation Damage During Acidization
– Corrosion and Iron Reprecipitation
– Fluid incompatibilities– Fines mobilization
– Liquid Blocking
– Cement Bond Destruction
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
21/29
STIMULATIONS (cont.)
• Prevention of Damage During Acidization
– Perform acid compatibility tests with all fluids
to be used to eliminate potential problems
– Carry out core tests at the reservoir conditions
with actual rock and fluids to assess benefit
– On-site quality control on chemicals supplied
– Clean all pipework to be used
– Control wellhead pressure to prevent fractures– Throughout acid job, monitor and record all
parameters carefully to compare with the
expectations
STIMULATIONS ( t )
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
22/29
STIMULATIONS (cont.)
• Prevention of Damage During Fracturing
– Perform compatibility tests with all fluids to be
used to eliminate potential problems– Carry out realistic tests with treating fluids to
determine breaking of crosslinked fluid
– On-site quality control on proppant andchemicals supplied and take frequent samples
– Clean all pipework to be used
– Throughout acid job, monitor and record all
parameters carefully to compare with the
expectations
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
23/29
DAMAGE
• Precipitation
– Scale Precipitation (carbonate and sulfates)
– Asphaltenes– Waxes-very limited
• Fines Migration
• Phase Related Perm Reduction
– Condensate banking
– Water coning– Gas breakout
• Stress Induced Perm Changes
• Injection Well damage
FORMATION EVALUATION
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
24/29
FORMATION EVALUATION
BASED ON FORMATION DAMAGE
IDENTIFICATION
ROCK FLUIDS RESERVOIR
MineralogicalInformation
(Drilling Cuttings)
X-Ray Diffraction
SEM
Petrographic Analysis
Rock Properties
( core samples)
Young’s ModulusPoisson’s Ratio
Sonic Logs
Permeability
Porosity
Formation Fluids
Characterization( fluid samples)
Oil Water
Paraffins,
Asphaltens
Bo
API
Viscosity
Physical &
Chemical
Analysis
Resistivity
PBU / DST Electrical Logs
Drainage
Radius
K.h
S
P*
Resistivity
Sonic
σmin
Density
Lithology
σmin
CBL,CAST-V
MRIL
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
25/29
WORKOVERS
• An Operation Upon an Existing Well
• Types
– Scale treatment– Wax and asphaltene cleanout
– Recompletions (repair of existing design,
sidetracking, reperforation, etc),
– Stimulations (acid and fracturing).
– Water shut-off
– A combination of the above
• Follow Best Practices, Especially the ones
Worked Before
k
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
26/29
Skin Damage Factor
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
27/29
SUMMARY
• Know your Reservoir
• Be Aware of the Problems
• Apply/Develop Solutions to Prevent Damage
• Think in Terms of the Life of the Well, Not Very
Immediate Future• Communicate/Work with Others-Teamwork
• Employ Best Practices
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
28/29
Data Adquisition TREATMENT SELECTIONTREATMENT SELECTION
-
8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage
29/29
Data Adquisition
K= Logs, Well testing, Laboratory
Φ = Logs. Laboratory
σmax,
σmin = Logs, SRT, MinifracSw, So, Sw
Mineralogy
Litology = Logs , Drilling cuts, cores
Reservoir pressure
Flowing Pressure
Skin
Productivity
S>0 (+)
NO
YES
Reservoir Geology
Formation Fluids
Damage identification Depth Damage
Low K
Fines, Clay and
Carbonate content
NO
YES
YES
NO
Acidizing
Frac
TREATMENT SELECTION TREATMENT SELECTION