001 SG - Formation Damage

download 001 SG - Formation Damage

of 29

Transcript of 001 SG - Formation Damage

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    1/29

    Universidad Nacional de MedellínOctober 24-25, 2002

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    2/29

    Formation Damage

    Types, Mechanisms & Prevention

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    3/29

    OUTLINE

    • Definition of Formation Damage

    • Types

    • Classification• Influence of Geology-Rock Properties

    • Operation Related Damages

    – Drilling

    – Completion

    – Stimulation

    – Production

    – Workovers

    • Summary

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    4/29

    FORMATION DAMAGE

    “a reduction of permeability around awellbore, which is the consequence of drilling, completion, injection, stimulation,

    or production of that well”*

    * BP Well Productivity Awareness

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    5/29

    Productivity Potential. Skin Factor

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    6/29

    Skin Damage Factor

    • It is identified at the beginning of well testing

    • It is identified when pressure drops are recordedin addition to those corresponding to idea radial

    flow

    • Positive skin means high pressure drops near

    wellbore, then productivity will be less in

    comparison to another well with skin=0

    • Negative skin means productivity is higher in

    comparison with another well with skin =0

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    7/29

    Skin Damage Factor

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    8/29

    Flow Efficiency

    • Skin is an useful mathematical concept, but it does notprovide a correct idea of damage effect on productionrate

    • Fluid Efficiency is amore useful concept:

    FE= Actual Production Rate( with skin) qr

     IdeaI Production Rate ( without skin ) qi

    FE = ln ( re/rw ) =  7

    ln ( re/rw) + s 7 + s

    Both production rates ( current skin and skin cero ) requireto be

    measured under identical pressure drop conditions.

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    9/29

    Skin Damage Factor

    • Damaged Well

    ? Ps>0, S>0, FE

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    10/29

    Productivity Index

    • Measurement of production rate per each psi of 

    pressure drop.

    TYPES OF FORMATION

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    11/29

    TYPES OF FORMATIONDAMAGE

    • Physical Reduction in Pore / Pore Throat

    Size

    • Relative Permeability Reduction to

    Hydrocarbons

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    12/29

    PHYSICAL REDUCTION IN PORESPACE

    • Drilling Mud Solids and Filtrate Invasion

    • Cement Filtrate Invasion

    • Completion/Workover Solids and FluidsInvasion

    • Perforation Damage Zone

    • Plugging of Formation with Native Solids

    • Asphaltene or Paraffin Precipitation

    • Scale Precipitation in theFormation/Perforations

    • Formation of Emulsion in the Formation

    • Growth or Injection of Bacteria• Compaction of Reservoir with Production

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    13/29

     REDUCTION

    • Water Coning

    • Condensate Banking• Fluid Saturation Change and Fluid

    Blocking• Wettability Change

    • Emulsion Formation

    • Relative Permeability Change

    FORMATION DAMAGE CLASSIFICATION

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    14/29

    FORMATION DAMAGE CLASSIFICATIONBY PROCESS

    Process

    Type

    Phy sical Pore Siz e

    Reduction

    Relative

    Permeability

    Reduction

    F lu i d -Rock 

    I n t e r a c t i o n 

    •  Fin es m igration

    •  Clay sw e l l ing

    •  Sol id s invasion

    •  Adsorption.precipitation

    large m olecules

    (polymeric)

    •  Wettabi l i ty chang e d ue

    to adso rption of su rface

    active com pou nd or

    rem ov al of n ative

    c o m p o u n d s

    F l u i d - F l u i d  

    I n t e r a c t i o n 

    •  Form ation s o f s cales ,Em uls ion and s lud ges

    •  Flu id satu ration chang eand f lu id b locking

    Pressure/Temp Change 

    •  S cale form ation•  Wax/A sp haltene Form ation

    •  G as breakout•  Conden sate banking

    •  Water conin g

    M echani cal 

    Processes 

    •  Stress ind uced p erm

    change•  Perfo ration p lu gg in g

    -

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    15/29

      -TYPE

    • Porosity, Permeability and Pore Structure

    • Rock Type

    – Sandstone

    – Carbonate

    • Cementation, Cleanliness, Heterogeneity• Clay Content

    – Kaolinite (plate booklets prone to migrate)

    – Illite (fibers prone to catch moving fines)

    – Chloride (random platelets, often Fe rich)

    – Smectite (prone to swell & block pore throats)

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    16/29

     ROCK

    • CT Scanning/Core Photo

    • Geological Description• Thin Section, SEM Description, XRD

    • Ø Vs. K, Other Data From Conventional Core

    Analysis• Pore (Hg Injection) and/or Particle Size

    Distribution

    • Capillary Pressure

    • Relative Permeability

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    17/29

    Pore Level Characterization

    FORMATION DAMAGE

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    18/29

    FORMATION DAMAGEDURING DRILLING

    • Solids Usually Invades More Permeable Sections of 

    Reservoir , Can Reduce Permeability Dramatically.

    • Mud Filtrate Invasion Can Cause Damage by– Swelling and dispersion of clays

    – Scale precipitation

    – Fluid saturation changes/blocking

    – Chemical adsorption/retention and emulsion

    • Natural Fractures Increase Well Productivity as longas they are not Blocked by Mud Invasion.

    • Laboratory Tests Can be Utilized to Minimize

    Formation Damage During Drilling

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    19/29

    COMPLETIONS

    • Completion Types

    – Well design (vertical, high-angle or horizontal)

    – Completion design (Barefoot, uncementedliner, cased & perforated)

    • Casing and Cement

    • Completion Fluids

    – Types

    – Cleanliness, compatibility– Displacement

    • Perforating (tunnel length, clean-up)

    • Sand Control (Gravel packs, Frac-Pack,chemicals)

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    20/29

    STIMULATIONS• Reasons for Stimulation

    – Very low native permeability

    – To by-pass Near-wellbore damage• Acidization

    • Hydraulic Fracturing

    • Formation Damage During Acidization

    – Corrosion and Iron Reprecipitation

    – Fluid incompatibilities– Fines mobilization

    – Liquid Blocking

    – Cement Bond Destruction

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    21/29

    STIMULATIONS (cont.)

    • Prevention of Damage During Acidization

    – Perform acid compatibility tests with all fluids

    to be used to eliminate potential problems

    – Carry out core tests at the reservoir conditions

    with actual rock and fluids to assess benefit

    – On-site quality control on chemicals supplied

    – Clean all pipework to be used

    – Control wellhead pressure to prevent fractures– Throughout acid job, monitor and record all

    parameters carefully to compare with the

    expectations

    STIMULATIONS ( t )

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    22/29

    STIMULATIONS (cont.)

    • Prevention of Damage During Fracturing

    – Perform compatibility tests with all fluids to be

    used to eliminate potential problems– Carry out realistic tests with treating fluids to

    determine breaking of crosslinked fluid

    – On-site quality control on proppant andchemicals supplied and take frequent samples

    – Clean all pipework to be used

    – Throughout acid job, monitor and record all

    parameters carefully to compare with the

    expectations

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    23/29

     DAMAGE

    • Precipitation

    – Scale Precipitation (carbonate and sulfates)

    – Asphaltenes– Waxes-very limited

    • Fines Migration

    • Phase Related Perm Reduction

    – Condensate banking

    – Water coning– Gas breakout

    • Stress Induced Perm Changes

    • Injection Well damage

    FORMATION EVALUATION

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    24/29

    FORMATION EVALUATION

    BASED ON FORMATION DAMAGE

    IDENTIFICATION

    ROCK  FLUIDS RESERVOIR  

    MineralogicalInformation

     (Drilling Cuttings)

    X-Ray Diffraction

    SEM

    Petrographic Analysis

    Rock Properties

    ( core samples)

    Young’s ModulusPoisson’s Ratio

    Sonic Logs

    Permeability

    Porosity

    Formation Fluids

    Characterization( fluid samples)

    Oil Water  

    Paraffins,

    Asphaltens

    Bo

    API

    Viscosity

    Physical &

    Chemical

     Analysis

    Resistivity

    PBU / DST Electrical Logs

    Drainage

    Radius

    K.h

    S

    P*

    Resistivity

    Sonic

    σmin

    Density

    Lithology

    σmin

    CBL,CAST-V

    MRIL

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    25/29

    WORKOVERS

    • An Operation Upon an Existing Well

    • Types

    – Scale treatment– Wax and asphaltene cleanout

    – Recompletions (repair of existing design,

    sidetracking, reperforation, etc),

    – Stimulations (acid and fracturing).

    – Water shut-off 

    – A combination of the above

    • Follow Best Practices, Especially the ones

    Worked Before

    k

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    26/29

    Skin Damage Factor

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    27/29

    SUMMARY

    • Know your Reservoir

    • Be Aware of the Problems

    • Apply/Develop Solutions to Prevent Damage

    • Think in Terms of the Life of the Well, Not Very

    Immediate Future• Communicate/Work with Others-Teamwork

    • Employ Best Practices

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    28/29

    Data Adquisition TREATMENT SELECTIONTREATMENT SELECTION

  • 8/18/2019 001 SG - Formation Damage

    29/29

    Data Adquisition

    K= Logs, Well testing, Laboratory

    Φ = Logs. Laboratory

    σmax,

    σmin = Logs, SRT, MinifracSw, So, Sw

    Mineralogy

    Litology = Logs , Drilling cuts, cores

    Reservoir pressure

    Flowing Pressure

    Skin

    Productivity

    S>0 (+)

     NO

    YES

    Reservoir Geology

    Formation Fluids

    Damage identification Depth Damage

    Low K 

    Fines, Clay and

    Carbonate content

     NO

    YES

    YES

     NO

    Acidizing

    Frac

    TREATMENT SELECTION TREATMENT SELECTION