businesspapers.parracity.nsw.gov.au · Web view1.1 Demographic Profile and Trends. To determine...

Open Space Plan

Parramatta City Council November 2003

Parramatta Open Space Plan 2003

Volume 2 - Supporting Materials

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1. Demographic and Locality Analysis

1.1 Demographic Profile and TrendsTo determine the degree to which current and future provision of public open space is serving the people of Parramatta, it is essential to understand the status of the LGA’s population and its demographic profile.

The Parramatta LGA has shown substantial residential growth in the last fifteen to twenty years. The population of the LGA as seen in the 1991 Census was 132,810, climbing 4.8% to 139,158 for the 1996 Census and climbing a further 3.8% to 144,490 in the 2001 Census. In the coming years, a number of major developments in the Parramatta LGA and adjoining areas may influence growth and corresponding public open space needs.

Parramatta CBD is Sydney’s second CBD, a major business hub of Sydney with 61,000 people working in the Parramatta Primary Centre in 1996. This working population is expected to increase by 50% to 90,000 by 2021 with the majority of the increase being in the CBD.

Developments outside the Parramatta LGA that may influence open space and other leisure needs include the continued development of Olympic Park and the proposed urban development on the Homebush Bay Peninsula, for which Parramatta will be the major CBD.

The following is a brief summary of the key findings of the Parramatta City Council Demographic Profile 2000, undertaken by Scott Carver Urban Planning. Summary statements are also taken from Council’s Social Plan 2001. Figures are based on the 1996 Census data. Analysis of the 2001 Census data has been included where stated.

Page 1

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1.1.1 Population and Growth Trends

The overall LGA population growth rate was 6.4% between 1986 and 1996, mainly as a result of growth in the 25-54 age group which experienced an 18.5% increase

Compared to other parts of Sydney and western Sydney, Parramatta LGA has relatively low proportions of children (0-11 years old), young people (12-25 years old although not applying to young people of working age ie 20-25 years old) and older people (55+ years old)

The population growth rate has been accelerating but has slowed a little in the 5 years of 1996 to 2001. However, the population is currently predicted to grow by 34% between 1996 and 2020

20-29 year olds make up the largest proportion of the population (17.2%)

The 70+ groups experienced strong growth between 1986 and 1996

The 60-69 age group experienced a negative growth rate (-13.9%) as also did the 10-19 age group (-14.3%, with –11.1% being between 1991-1996) in the period 1986-1996.

1.1.2 Household Types

Families with children comprise the largest household type (over 54%) increasing by 21.4% between 1986-1996, suggesting an increasing significance of families with children.

Couples without children decreased markedly between 1986 and 1996 (-41%) and increased slightly between 1991 and 1996 (2%)

There has been almost a doubling in the number of one-parent families since 1986

There was a moderate decline in separate dwellings between 1986 and 1996 and a significant increase in multi unit housing

The mix of dwelling types is tending towards more multi unit and semi detached housing as compared with separate housing:

detached housing 66% in 1996, 62% in 2001 multi unit housing 23.2% in 1996, 27% in 2001 semi detached housing 8.2% in 1996, 10.8% in 2001.

Page 2

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1.1.3 Birthplace and Language Spoken

Parramatta LGA has significant cultural diversity with 34.6% of Parramatta’s population born overseas (1996) and increasing to 43.9% in 2001.

31.3% speak a language other than English (LOTE) at home, the major languages being Arabic (9.2%), Cantonese (4.1%) and Mandarin (1.6%). Korean, Turkish and Hindi are being spoken by increasing numbers of Parramatta’s residents.

1.1.4 Profiles by Locality

Table 1 below shows the demographic variation between localities (1996 Census data). Key demographic features drawn from analysis of this table include:

Populations vary significantly between localities with larger populations found in localities 1, 2 and 3 and smaller populations found in localities 4 and 9

The highest numbers of children are found in locality 2 with couples with children dominating the population in this locality

Localities 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 have larger population of 20-29 years olds whilst localities 7, 8, and 9 are under represented

For ages over 50, locality 4 has the lowest number of residents aged 50-79

Localities 3 and 4 are areas with high proportions of multi-unit housing

Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) populations are highest in Localities 3, 4, 5 and 6

Page 3

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Locality 1 – Winston Hills / Old Toongabbie/Northmead 3rd largest population 17, 345 20 - 29 large age group (16.8%) 40 - 59 age group v. high (29%) 50% households with children Mostly detached dwellings (87%) (no flats over 2 storeys) Birthplace: 80% Oceania or Europe

Locality 2 – Toongabbie/Wentworthville/Westmead 2nd largest population. 20,409 (15.7%) Highest number of children in Council 0-9 age range 20 – 29 age range high Couples with children dominate (83%) 83% detached housing Birthplace: 78% Oceania or Europe

Locality 3 – North Parramatta/Parramatta Largest population in the CLGA 21,773 (15.6%) 20 - 39 age dominates (43%) - much greater than LGA Average Couples with children 24% Residential flats dominate (59%) Birthplace: 65% Oceania/Europe, 9% NE Asia

Locality 4 – Harris Park/Rosehill Smallest population 7,571 (5.4%) 20 - 49 age range high 50 - 79 age range lower High residential flats density - 1,2 and 3 storey Birthplace: 45% Oceania/Europe, 13% Southern Asia, 9% Middle East,

9% NE Asia

Locality 5 – Clyde/Granville/Merrylands 3rd smallest population 14,795 20 -29 age range large + 30 - 39 0 - 19 also high 72% detached housing Birthplace: 65% Oceania/Europe, 14% Middle East

Locality 6 – South Granville/Guildford 4th largest population 16,121 Large age range 0 -9 + 10 - 19 = 31% of population 40% couples with children Detached housing dominant (57%) Birthplace: 64% Asia, Oceania or Middle East

Locality 7 – Rydalmere/Ermington Population 15,381 20 - 29 age range under-represented Even distribution couples/non-couples 79% detached housing Birthplace: 81% Oceania/Europe and 6% NE Asia

Page 4

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Locality 8 – Telopea/Carlingford/Dundas Population 15,258 20-29 age under-represented Higher percentage 60 – 69 age range 64% detached housing Flats 23.8% Birthplace: Oceania/Europe 79%, 6% NE Asia

Locality 9 – Epping/Eastwood 2nd smallest population 9,705 40 - 49 large age group (16%) Low 20 – 29 age range Even distribution household 58.4% detached housing Modern flats up to 3 storeys Birthplace: 76% Oceania/Europe, 13% NE Asia

Table 1 Locality Comparison of Demographic Characteristics(Source: Scott Carver Urban Planning 2000)

1.1.5 Population Projections

The conclusions below have been drawn from the population projection analysis for the Parramatta LGA (Scott Carver Urban Planning 2000). It should be noted that the projections are based on anticipated development when the Parramatta LEP 2001 was in draft form in late 2000. Slight changes were made to development densities in the finalisation of the LEP in 2001 such that some caution should be attached to the figures.

About 26,580 additional occupied dwellings will be built in the Parramatta LGA between 1996 and 2020. This equates to between 1,107 and 2,316 average net additional occupied dwellings for each year between 1996 and 2020.

Page 5

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


The Parramatta LGA will accommodate 48,050 additional residents between 1996 and 2020. This equates to between 2,011 and 4,456 average net additional residents for each year between 1996 and 2020. The increase in population will have an impact on open space demands and needs that need to be taken into account in future strategies. The proportion of the population in the 55 and over age group is expected to grow significantly compared to other age groups with a 45% growth rate predicted between 2000 and 2019.

As seen in Table 2, population increases are expected to be greatest in locality 8, especially north of Kissing Point Rd in Dundas Valley. Major proposed development sites in this locality include the theological college in Pennant Hills Rd, Oatlands and the Carlingford Village apartment site. Localities 7 and 9, also located towards the east of the LGA, are expected to experience strong growth. Major residential development sites include the Ermington naval stores and the Eastwood brickworks sites.

Locality 1 in the north west of the LGA is expected to show strong population growth, mostly limited to areas in Northmead and Old Toongabbie. Locality 2 is predicted to experience average population growth, concentrated in the Wentworthville area.

Localities 5 and 6, to the south of the LGA, are expected to incur average population increases. Within these localities, areas towards the south of locality 5 and the north and west of locality 6 are expected to experience the most intense residential development. Population increases are expected to be lowest in the central parts of the LGA in localities 3 and 4.

PopulationLocalities 1996 (2001) 2020 %

Increase1 Winston Hills, Old

Toongabbie, Northmead 17,369 25,543 +47%2 Toongabbie,

Wentworthville, Westmead 20,592 26,589 +29%3 North Parramatta,

Parramatta 21,894 26,046 +19%4 Harris Park, Rosehill 7,627 7,627 0%5 Clyde, Granville, Merrylands 14,853 19,085 +28%6 South Granville, Guildford 16,218 20,789 +28%7 Rydalmere, Ermington 15,500 22,957 +48%8 Telopea, Carlingford,

Dundas 15,293 24,482 +60%9 Eastwood, Epping 9,812 14,093 +47%

Page 6

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Total 138,940 144,490 187,211 + 34%Table 2 Population Growth Projections by Locality (Source: Scott Carver Urban Planning 2000 and 2001 Census)1.2 The Open Space SystemThis section describes the nature of open space in the Parramatta LGA and discusses the key issues that will affect future planning development and management. The status of open space amount and distribution is examined in relation to existing and forecasted population to determine current and likely equity of access across the LGA. Key facts and figures are:

The City has a total of approximately 827 Ha of public open space representing 13.8% of the City’s total land area (see Sections 2.1 and 2.2).

The comparison of public open space in Parramatta with that of other Councils of similar physical size in Western Sydney is generally favourable: Parramatta LGA has 5.7 Ha of public open space per 1000

persons, dated 2001 Fairfield LGA has 2.8 Ha of public open space per 1000

persons, dated 1998 Bankstown LGA has 4.5 Ha of public open space per 1000

persons, dated 2000.However, it should be noted that these LGAs do not possess a CBD or primary centre that attracts as many workers or is predicted to grow as strongly as with Parramatta. Workers are significant users of public open space and this consideration needs to be remembered when comparing open space amounts between LGAs and localities.

There are a total of 324 parks in the LGA that can be designated a hierachy of which:

6 are ranked as Regional Parks (representing 251 Ha or 30% of the total open space area)

36 are ranked as District Parks (representing 212 Ha or 26% of the total open space area)

The vast majority, 282 parks, are ranked as Local Parks (representing 365 Ha or 44% of the total open space area). Of these 282 Local Parks, 53 are very small parcels of open space, totalling 8.5 Ha in all.

The size and shape of parks has a strong bearing on a range of management and recreation opportunities for parks.

Page 7

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


The topography of the LGA has allowed for extensive and linked linear parks along waterway corridors such as Ponds and Subiaco Creeks in the Dundas/Rydalmere area Toongabbie and Quarry Branch Creeks in the western LGA and Duck River in the LGA's south. As such, 81 parks form part of an open space corridor.

Page 8

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Many of the parks in the LGA are very small with 30% being less than 0.2 Ha in size. The minimum standard recommended by the planning section of the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources, is preferably 0.5 Ha for a local park.

107 parks contain natural area features (e.g. waterways, foreshore, bushland)

47 parks have cultural heritage features contained within the park area (e.g. European or Aboriginal heritage items).

1.2.1 Open Space Distribution

The distribution of public open space within the LGA is a key access and equity issue for the community. The ability of the LGA’s residents to gain access to public open space within an easy walk from home may have a significant bearing on their sense of well-being and community belonging. For many, the presence of public open space within easy reach of home is an essential value in their daily lives. For others in the community, particularly young people and those originating from highly urbanised environments, the public domain of most value may be those areas not zoned as public open space, for example malls and shopping areas.

Parks may be assigned a hierarchy that reflects the level of facilities, service standards and size of the catchment that attracts users of the park (See Sections 2.2 and 2.3). Local Parks are generally small open space areas that are positioned and designed to attract residents living within a 0.5 km radius. District Parks are generally larger and attract visitors from surrounding suburbs and offer a more diverse range of activities. Regional Parks are large or unique areas that attract users from a metropolitan-wide catchment. Designation of a park as Local, District or Regional will determine planning and development factors such as:

Levels of development and infrastructure expected by the community

Service level standards, particularly relating to maintenance Carrying capacity, that is, the ability to accommodate

intensity of visitors Flexibility to meet changing demands Leasing, licensing and casual hiring requirements Funding priorities

Page 9

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Figure 1 shows the amount of public open space per locality with the average amount of public open space per locality being 90 Ha. Figure 2 shows the number of parks per locality and for each locality, breaks down parks into hierarchies.

Figure 1 Locality Comparison of Public Open Space Amounts

Figure 2 Locality Comparison of Park Hierarchies

Page 10

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Figures 1 and 2 both show disparities between localities in open space provision with the following features and characteristics:

Locality 1 contains a large number of very small parks concentrated mostly in the Winston Hills area. Much public open space is contained within corridors following creek lines.

Locality 2, in the Wentworthville/Pendle Hill area has a number of very small local parks but apart for the Toongabbie Creek corridor parks and Binalong Park, none are greater than 0.5ha with facilities of a district park standard

Locality 3 contains a significant amount of regional and district open space as Parramatta Park, Lake Parramatta Reserve and the North Parramatta Regional Sport Complex fall within this area. Overall this locality contains significantly more open space than the other localities

Locality 4 contains significantly less public open space than other localities (nine hectares). The majority of this Locality is an industrial area including Camellia and parts of Rosehill and Rydalmere. Harris Park north of the M4 motorway is not adequately provided with local parks

The amount of open space in Locality 5 is below average. Guildford/Merrylands/Granville, especially west of Woodville Road, is not adequately provided with local parks

Locality 6 contains a high proportion of district parks compared to other localities (except Locality 3) and includes significant open space along the Duck River corridor

Locality 7 contains an above average amount of open space compared to other localities including open space corridors along the Parramatta River and Ponds Subiaco Creek

Locality 8 contains a similar amount of open space as Locality 7. However Locality 8 is better provided with district parks compared with Locality 7. Open space corridors along Vineyard Creek and Ponds Subiaco Creek and their tributaries are significant in this locality

Locality 9 has the third lowest amount of open space across all localities. This Locality contains only 1 district park and lacks a local park in the area around Midson Road/Chelmsford Road in Epping/Eastwood. A number of parks are linked along Terrys Creek and its tributary.

Page 11

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1.2.2 Relationship of Open Space to Population

Analysing the relationship of open space to current and future populations is critical in planning for adequate open space provision. Figure 3 compares the area of public open space with the current population and predicted future population for each locality. The average amount of public open space across the whole LGA is 5.7 Ha/1000 persons (2001). With forecast population growth, in 2020 it is predicted to be 4.4 Ha/1000 persons. The general standard for public open space provision is 2.83 Ha/1000 persons (Department of Planning 1992).

The ratios of public open space to population vary greatly from locality to locality and more specifically that:

Compared to the entire LGA, Locality 1 provides an average amount of public open space per person both now and in the future. The amount of open space per person provided in both 1996 and 2020 is considered to be above average with respect to the general standard for open space provision.

Locality 2 is under-provided with district parks in that it is the second most heavily populated locality, with the largest proportion of the LGA’s children whose recreational needs are particularly dependent on space in their ensuing teenage years. The amount of open space per person is below average for the LGA both in 1996 and 2020 and with respect to the general standard for 2020.

Locality 3 is well above the LGA average and general standard for open space provision both in 1996 and 2020. However, there are significant numbers of workers visiting the CBD and primary centre such that the general standard for open space provision may not be as relevant to this locality.

Locality 4 has the lowest ratio of public open space per person across the LGA with the situation similar in 1996 and as predicted for 2020. The provision of open space is below the general standard for open space provision both in 1996 and 2020.

Locality 5 contains the second lowest ratio of public open space per person across the LGA with the situation similar in 1996 and as predicted for 2020. The provision of open space is below the general standard for open space provision both in 1996 and 2020.

Locality 6 is above the LGA average and the general standard for open space provision in both 1996 and 2020.

Page 12

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Locality 7 is above the LGA average and the general standard for open space provision in both 1996 and with the strong population growth predicted up until 2020.

Locality 8 is above the LGA average and the general standard for open space provision in both 1996 and with the strong population growth predicted up until 2020.

In 1996, Locality 9 contained the fourth lowest ratio of public open space per person across the LGA. In 2020, it is predicted that Locality 9 will still contain the fourth lowest amount of open space per person compared with the other localities, however, provision will fall just below the general standard for open space provision.

Figure 3 Ratio of Open Space to Current and Future Populations

Page 13

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1.3 RecreationWhilst the Open Space Plan is primarily focused on Open Space, the physical asset needs to be examined together with an understanding of the recreational use of open space. This dual focus is important as local government has a responsibility to provide facilities and services that contribute to the health and wellbeing of their communities. Open space areas provide and contain many of these recreational facilities, especially those that promote physical activity. The role of open space is especially important as studies show that approximately half of Australian adults and children do not adequately participate in physical activity.

Recreation is considered to be a leisure activity undertaken principally for pleasure. Public outdoor areas provide opportunities for a variety of recreational and physical pursuits whether it be walking and cycling for pleasure; relaxing with a book; picnicking; meeting friends; or enjoying space and solitude whilst bushwalking or studying nature. Public open space also provides significant opportunities for organised sports and physical activities of a more intense nature such as skateboarding, swimming, jogging, tennis and football to name a few. As such, recreation may include structured/organised (“active”) or unstructured/informal (“passive”) activities.

However, this section does not discuss and respond to user needs for recreation facilities as user needs research was not undertaken for the development of the Open Space Plan. A comprehensive analysis of recreational facility user needs analysis will be undertaken in an update of the Parramatta City Council Community Services Plan (Recreation Volumes) 1994. Without such analysis, it is not possible to determine the status of recreational facilities with respect to level of provision for different user groups; user satisfaction; or priorities for improvement. As such, the spatial distribution of recreational facilities and their relationship to demographics and population trends only is observed and discussed in this Open Space Plan.

1.3.1 Spatial Distribution of Recreation Facilities

The major outdoor recreation facilities that the public can use in the Parramatta LGA are listed in Table 3. Recreation facilities located on non-Council land are also included in the case of golf courses, bowling clubs and Parramatta Park facilities as they contribute to recreational opportunities in the LGA. Other recreation facilities found in Parramatta’s public open space that have not been itemised below include basketball courts, recreational walking tracks in open space and bushland, and performance amphitheatres. Ancillary items supporting recreational use of parks have not been included in this analysis but include items such as lighting, toilets, shelters, seating, bins, BBQs and signage. It should be noted that these basic facilities

Page 14

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


are very important to the community and contribute greatly to the community’s enjoyment of open space.

Page 15

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Recreation Facility

Number of Facilities in the LGA

Number of Recreation Facilities in

the LGA managed by

Council

Aquatic Centres3 (including 1 Council land - Woodville Golf Course at Guildford and 2 managed by other organisations at Oatlands and Parramatta)

2

Golf Courses3 (including 1 Council land - Woodville Golf Course at Guildford and 2 managed by other organisations at Oatlands and Parramatta)

1

Bowling Clubs8 (Including 2 Council land - Rydalmere and Carlingford and 6 bowling clubs on private land are located in the LGA)

2

Tennis Facilities 12 (44 courts at 11 facilities on Council land and 1 managed by Parramatta RSL) 11

Children’s Playgrounds 125 125

Sportsfields35 (5 Council sportsfields are fully leased by sporting organisations). 1 Sportsfield is located in Parramatta Park.

34

Skateboard Facilities 1 (James Ruse Reserve, Harris Park) 1

Dog Off-leash Parks

3 (Cowells Lane Reserve, Ermington, McCoy Park, Toongabbie, Wolseley St Reserve, Guildford)

3

BMX Tracks0 (although riders use the skateboarding facility at Harris Park and have created numerous unofficial tracks in bushland)

0

Table 3 Recreation Facilities LGA-Wide

A locality by locality tally of recreation facilities is seen in Table 4 with the following observations being drawn:

Aquatic Centres – Aquatic Centres are located in Localities 3 and 5, Parramatta and Granville respectively. Of the remaining localities, most residents are able to attend a public aquatic centre within approximately 7 km of their place of residence.

Page 16

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Golf Courses – Golf Courses appear to be located at a relatively even spread when considering those both within the LGA and those available in adjacent LGAs. The LGA's residents are able to access a Golf Course within approximately 8 km of their residences.

Bowling Clubs – Bowling clubs appear to be relatively evenly spread for LGA residents when considering those both within the LGA and those present in nearby areas of adjacent LGAs. Bowling Clubs are located within approximately 4 km of all residences.

Tennis Facilities – Localities 1-Winston Hills/Old Toongabbie /Northmead and 3-North Parramatta/ Parramatta have the highest number of tennis courts. All other localities except for Locality 7, Rydalmere/Ermington, contain less than half the number of courts as found in both Localities 1 and 3. Localities 4 - Harris Park/Rosehill and 5 - Clyde/Granville/Merrylands contain no public tennis facilities.

Children’s Playgrounds – The highest number of children’s playgrounds is found in Localities 1 - Winston Hills/Old Toongabbie/Northmead, 2 – Toongabbie / Wentworthville / Westmead, 6 - South Granville/Guildford, 7 - Rydalmere/ Ermington, and 8 - Telopea/Carlingford/ Dundas (see Figure 2.3.3 below). Locality 1 - Winston Hills/Old Toongabbie/ Northmead contains significantly more playgrounds than the other localities. There particularly seems to be a shortage of local playground facilities in the Rosehill area of Locality 4.

Sportsfields – Localities 3 - North Parramatta/Parramatta and 6 - South Granville/Guildford have a significantly higher number of sportsfields compared to other localities with Locality 6 having at least twice as many sportsfields as all other localities except Locality 3. All Localities contain sportsfields with Localities 4 - Harris Park/Rosehill and 9 - Epping/Eastwood having only one sportsfield.

Skateboard Facilities – With only 1 skateboarding facility in the LGA (Locality 4 - Harris Park) and few in nearby areas of other LGAs, there appears be a need for more facilities. Parramatta's existing skate park is heavily used by skateboard riders and is also used by BMX bike riders, although it is not designed for bike use. The nearest permanent skateboard facilities are found at Rooty Hill (Blacktown Council), Marsfield (Ryde Council), Carlingford and Baulkham Hills (Baulkham Hills Council). A new facility is proposed at Wetherill Park (Fairfield Council). The Harris Park facility, being located near the Parramatta CBD, is generally well served by public transport and is therefore accessible for young people who use the facility.

Page 17

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Dog Off-leash Parks – The dog off-leash parks are located towards the extremities of the LGA. They are not of high quality due to drainage issues and the lack of fencing and other facilities, which may be contributing to low levels of usage.

BMX Tracks – Council does not have an official BMX bike dirt facility, however some provision for rides has been made at Gallery Gardens, Toongabbie (Locality 2) in a location that is not supported by a number of residents. There appears to be a demand for such a facility as numerous unofficial tracks have been created in bushland across the LGA. he nearest official BMX dirt track facilities are located at North Rocks, Castle Hill Baulkham Hills and Carlingford (Baulkham Hills Council) and Bass Hill (Bankstown Council).

1.3.2 Population and Recreation Facilities

In general, competition is currently high for recreation facilities in the LGA with competition expected to increase with the forecast population growth in the LGA. This is the case especially for sportsfields and courts. A number of conclusions can be drawn when relating facility provision to demographic patterns in the LGA. However, it should be noted that benchmarks have not been identified for recreation facility provision within this Open Space Plan. Together with the requirement for a user survey, it is difficult to determine if recreational opportunities in open space areas are adequate across community sectors and interest groups.

Conclusions by Locality Locality 1 – The total number of playgrounds and the

provision of playgrounds in relation to the number of children and persons is significantly higher compared with other localities. Tennis court facilities appear to be well provided for compared with most other localities. The closest aquatic centre and golf courses are found outside the LGA in the “Hills” area and it is expected that other facilities in the “Hills” area are used by Locality 1 residents. As such, it is important that facilities in adjacent LGAs are considered when determining user patterns in Locality 1 under the proposed Recreation Plan.

Locality 2 contains a high number of families with children, the recreational needs of children and their parents in the 20-45 age group need to be addressed. As these children grow, demand for appropriate recreation facilities for young people may increase. The insufficient amount of open space in Locality 2, including the low numbers of district parks containing facilities for sports, is

Page 18

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


an issue now and is expected to be in the future. There appears to a pressing need for a BMX dirt park in Locality 2 as a number of inappropriate sites within parks have been informally used by children and young people for this purpose causing damage to significant bushland and creek banks.

Locality 3 is characterised by a significant amount of multi-unit dwellings and office workplaces. With open space being well provided for in Locality 3, the challenge will be to enhance existing open space to meet the needs of a growing residential and working population who may have different needs. Most recreational facilities appear to be adequately catered for in or adjacent to this locality, especially tennis courts. However, the number of children’s playgrounds is below average, which may be an issue given that many residents will not have yards in which to place their own play equipment. Additionally, leash free dog parks are at a considerable distance from Locality 3. Given that open space is not in short supply in this area, if a need is proven for such a facility, space should not be an issue. The CALD community is well represented in Locality 3 such that recreational facilities should be considerate of their needs. With government and business desiring to enhance Parramatta’s image through higher quality public space in and around the CBD, recreational facilities should similarly be of a high standard.

Locality 4 appears to have an overall deficiency of recreational facilities compared to the other localities. However, Harris Park has the lowest population (less than half of all localities) and facilities are available at nearby Parramatta and Granville. Nevertheless, there appears to be a shortage of local playground facilities in the Rosehill area, particularly when considering the high amount of multi-unit housing. This shortage is linked with the low number of parks in this area. Additionally, leash free dog parks are at a considerable distance from Locality 4. The CALD community is well represented in Locality 4 such that recreational facilities should be considerate of their needs. With government and businesses aiming to enhance Parramatta’s image through higher quality public space in the primary centre, recreational facilities should similarly be of a high standard.

Locality 5 has a very low number of children’s playgrounds in an area that has limited open space and significant populations of children and young people.

Page 19

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Locality 5 does not contain any tennis facilities but contains an aquatic centre that is soon to be updated. With a growing population and higher density residential development predicted, public open space will be placed under further pressure such that recreational facilities will need to closely reflect the local community’s needs, be able to withstand high rates of usage, and be flexible enough to meet the needs of a significant and diverse CALD population.

Locality 6 is well provided for with sportsfields and playgrounds. Recreational facilities need to meet the needs of a significant CALD population.

Locality 7 is expected to experience significant population growth in the next 20 years. However, many areas within this locality are zoned for low density housing such that some recreational activities can be undertaken on private properties in many areas. However, larger recreational facilities are expected to be placed under higher demand as the residential population grows.

Locality 8’s recreational facilities will need to be planned for, designed and managed in consideration of the high proportion of older people aged over 60 and the significant population growth predicted.

Locality 9 is expected to experience strong population growth. With a modest amount of existing public open space and a fairly significant amount of multi-unit housing, recreational facilities are expected to experience increased usage and will need to be managed in consideration of this increased pressure.

FACILITIES LOCALITY OF CLOSEST FACILITYIf not present in locality

Locality 1 – Winston Hills / Old Toongabbie/Northmead1 Bowling Club on private land (Northmead)3 Tennis Facilities (10 courts)24 Children’s Playgrounds3 Sportsfields

Closest aquatic centre is at Parramatta, Castle Hill (BHSC)

Closest golf course is at Parramatta, North Rocks (BHSC)

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park, Baulkham Hills (BHSC)

Closest dog off-leash park is at McCoy Park, Toongabbie

Closest BMX track is at Baulkham Hills (BHSC).

Locality 2 – Toongabbie, Wentworthville, Westmead1 Bowling Club on private land (Toongabbie)

Closest aquatic centre is at Parramatta, Wentworthville (HCC) or Blacktown (BCC)

Page 20

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


2 Tennis Facilities (4 courts)19 Children’s’ Playgrounds2 Sportsfields1 Dog Off-leash Park

Closest golf course is at Parramatta, Toongabbie (Fox Hills BCC)

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park or Baulkham Hills (BHSC)

Closets BMX track is at Baulkham Hills (BHSC)

Locality 3 – North Parramatta, Parramatta1 Aquatic Centre1 Golf Course in Parramatta (managed by Parramatta Park Trust)1 Bowling Club in Parramatta (managed by Parramatta RSL)1 Tennis Facility (17 courts)14 Children’s’ Playgrounds6 Sportsfields

Closest skateboard facility is Harris Park Closest dog off-leash park - equidistant to

all 3 PCC dog parks Closest BMX track is Carlingford or North

Rocks (BHSC)


Locality 4 – Harris Park, Rosehill1 Bowling Club on private land (Camellia)1 Children’s Playground1 Sportsfield1 Skateboard Facility

Closest aquatic centre is at Parramatta, Granville

Closest golf course is at Parramatta or Oatlands

Closest tennis facility is at North Parramatta Closest dog off-leash park is at Guildford Closest BMX track is at Carlingford (BHSC)

Locality 5 – Clyde, Granville, Merrylands1 Aquatic Centre9 Children’s’ Playgrounds3 Sportsfields

Closest golf course is at Guildford, Parramatta Park, Auburn (AC)

Closest bowling club is at Guildford, Parramatta (RSL), Auburn (AC),

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park Closest tennis facility is at Granville,

Parramatta (RSL), Merrylands (HCC) Closest dog off-leash park is at Guildford Closest BMX track is at Carlingford (BHSC)

or Bass Hill (BaCC)

Locality 6 – South Granville, Guildford1 Golf Course1 Bowling Club 1 Tennis Facility (3 courts)17 Children’s’ Playgrounds10 Sportsfields1 Dog Off-leash Park

Closest aquatic centre is at Granville, Fairfield (FCC), Birrong (BaCC)

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park Closest BMX track is at Bass Hill (Ba CC)

Locality 7 – Rydalmere, Ermington1 Bowling Club and 1 Bowling Club on private

Closest aquatic centre is at Parramatta, Homebush Bay (AC)

Page 21

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


land (Dundas)2 Tennis Facilities (6 courts)18 Children’s’ Playgrounds3 Sportsfields1 Dog Off-leash Park

Closest golf course is at Oatlands, West Ryde (RCC)

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park Closest BMX track is at Carlingford (BHSC)

Locality 8 – Telopea, Carlingford, Dundas1 Golf Course on private land (Oatlands)1 Bowling Club1 Tennis Facility (1 court)16 Children’s’ Playgrounds5 Sportsfields

Closest aquatic centre is at Parramatta, Epping (HSC)

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park Closest dog off-leash park is in Ermington Closest BMX track is at Carlingford (BHSC)

Page 22

Open Space Plan

Volume 2



Locality 9 – Eastwood, Epping1 Tennis Facility (3 courts)7 Children’s’ Playgrounds1 Sportsfield

Closest aquatic centre is at Epping (HSC), West Ryde (RCC)

Closest golf course is at West Ryde (RCC) and Beecroft (HSC)

Closest bowling club is at Carlingford, Epping x2 (HSC), Eastwood x2 (RCC)

Closest skateboard facility is at Harris Park Closest dog off-leash park is in Ermington Closest BMX track is at Carlingford (BHSC)

Table 4 Recreation Facilities by Locality

Of the facilities listed in Table 4, it is expected that only children's playgrounds should be provided at the local level such that all residents can access them within 0.5 km of their homes. Figure 4 shows the relationship between playground provision per locality and the current child and projected population for 2020. In descending order, Localities 3, 9, 5 and 4 are below average in the number of children's playgrounds per child and per person for the 1996 and 2020 years. With only one (1) playground per 1000 children in Locality 4, a number significantly lower than other localities, further playground equipment is required.

Figure 4 Relationship of current and projected population to children's playground facilities by locality

Page 23

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1.4 AccessCritical to the widest opportunities to enjoy public open space is ease of access. Such access may be as diverse as the opportunity for a teenager being able to get to a favourite CBD hang-out or skateboard facility by public transport, to a person with disabilities being able to enjoy a BBQ with their family at the local park and getting there independently.

This section is particularly focused on access to open space other than by private vehicle, in line with Sydney wide transport planning direction and in consideration of alternative means of transport as Parramatta LGA’s population grows.

Two factors that perhaps most strongly affect access to open space at a local level are distance to travel and distribution of open space.

1.4.1 Public Transport

The Parramatta LGA is characterised by variable access to different public transport modes. However, consultation suggests that few people currently use public transport to visit parks within the LGA.

This suggests that even where public transport is good the more critical access issue for regular leisure and recreation is distribution of local parks and the absence of physical or perceptual barriers to access to open space However, with improvements to public transport in the next few years and parking limitations in the CBD, more people are expected to travel to parks by public transport.

TrainsParramatta is fortunate in having a number of train lines available for the use

of the LGA’s residents. All localities contain train stations except Locality 1 such that residents in this area do not have the option of accessing the LGA’s parks solely by train.

Parks that have district or regional significance and/or are part of an open space corridor are listed in Table 5 if they are located within 250 metres of a train station. It is considered that distances of 250m or less are comfortable walking distances for the majority of the community such that car usage is generally not required.

The proposed and now deferred Parramatta Rail Link (Parramatta to Chatswood), will greatly improve the service levels on the Carlingford Line such that rail access to open space will be enhanced in Localities, 4, 7 and 8.

Page 24

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Regents Park Station in the Auburn LGA may become an access point for a recreational corridor along the Sydney Water Pipeline easement. This easement connects with District and Regional Parks in Locality 6 including Campbell Hill Pioneer Reserve, Norford Park and the Duck River Corridor and Woodville Golf Course.

Station District and Regional Parks located within 250 metres of station

Locality 1 – Winston Hills / Old Toongabbie/NorthmeadNo train stations are found in this locality nil

Locality 2 – Toongabbie, Wentworthville, WestmeadToongabbie Station McCoy Park and Toongabbie Creek open space

corridorLocality 3 – North Parramatta, ParramattaParramatta Station and Westmead Stations

Church St Mall and Parramatta Park

Locality 5 – Clyde, Granville, MerrylandsMerrylands StationGranville Station

Granville ParkGranville Memorial Park

Locality 6 – South Granville, GuildfordGuildford Station Guildford ParkLocality 7 – Rydalmere, ErmingtonTelopea Station Vineyard Creek ReserveLocality 8 – Telopea, Carlingford, DundasCarlingford, Dundas and Rydalmere Stations

Parks following Ponds and Subiaco Creek including joining "The Ponds Walk"

Locality 9 – Eastwood, EppingEpping Station Boronia Park

Table 5 District and Regional Parks located near rail stations

Buses - On RoadThe areas closest to the Parramatta CBD (Locality 3) are generally very well

serviced by both privately and publicly run bus services allowing access to a variety of parks in and near the CBD. The majority of District and Regional Parks in other areas of the LGA can be readily accessed by various bus routes. However, service frequencies will vary between routes, limiting access at various times. Table 6 shows the District Parks, Regional Parks and parks that form part of open space corridors that are located close to bus stops.

Page 25

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


In addition to standard passenger bus services, the Parramatta Explorer bus operates on weekends and stops at key open space areas including Parramatta Park, Prince Alfred Park, Parramatta River between Lennox Bridge and Purchase St and parks along the "Harris Park Heritage Walk" route.

Locality 1 – Winston Hills / Old Toongabbie/NorthmeadArthur Phillip Park, Caber Park , parks along Toongabbie Creek, parks along Quarry Branch CreekLocality 2 – Toongabbie, Wentworthville, WestmeadBinalong Park, parks along Toongabbie CreekLocality 3 – North Parramatta, ParramattaBelmore Park, Doyle Ground, PH Jeffrey Reserve, Barton Park, Lake Parramatta Reserve, Old Saleyards Reserve, Dan Mahoney Park, Ollie Webb Reserve, Queens Park Wharf Reserve and other parks along the "Harris Park Heritage Walk" and Parramatta River ForeshoreLocality 4 – Harris Park, RosehillJames Ruse Reserve, Robin Thomas Reserve, James Ruse Reserve and other parks along "Harris Park Heritage Walk"Locality 5 – Clyde, Granville, MerrylandsFS Garside Park, Granville Memorial Park, Granville Park, parks along Duck River and the "Duck River Walking Track"Locality 6 – South Granville, GuildfordCampbell Hill Pioneer Reserve, Duck River Bushland Reserve including Melita Stadium, Everley Park, Woodville Golf Course, Colquhoun Park and other parks along Little Duck CreekLocality 7 – Rydalmere, ErmingtonBartlett Park, Rydalmere Park, George Kendall Reserve, Eric Primrose Reserve, Upjohn Park, Cowells Lane Reserve and connecting parks, parks along Ponds Subiaco Creek and tributaries including "The Ponds Walk"Locality 8 – Telopea, Carlingford, DundasDundas Park/Curtis Oval, parks along Ponds Subiaco Creek and tributaries including "The Ponds Walk", parks along Vineyard Creek and its tributariesLocality 9 – Eastwood, EppingBoronia Park and parks along Terrys Creek and tributaries

Table 6 Regional and District Parks and Corridor Parks accessible by on-road buses

Page 26

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Buses - Dedicated Lanes or Off RoadThe Western Sydney Rapid Bus Transitway Network, a 95km network of bus only roadways, to be completed by 2006 will improve access to the LGA's District and Regional Parks for residents both within and outside the LGA as follows:The Liverpool to Parramatta Transitway has improved access by bus to

Parramatta Park and other important open space near the Parramatta CBD (Locality 3) for residents from adjoining LGAs to the south west such as Fairfield and Holroyd Council residents.

The Parramatta to Rouse Hill (Mungerie Park) Transitway will provide access to the Toongabbie Creek open space corridor and Parramatta Park for residents in the north west of the LGA (Localities 1 and 2), and for residents living outside the north west of the LGA through the location of stations along Old Windsor Rd.

The Parramatta to Strathfield Transitway will provide access to open space along the Parramatta River foreshore at Parramatta (Locality 3) for residents living outside the south east of the LGA and provide a link to the Sydney Olympic Park.

FerryRydalmere and Ermington are at some distance from the rail network. An

alternative travel mode is the Rivercat ferry service on the Parramatta River. This service connects residential areas in Locality7 and important open space along the Parramatta River with the Parramatta CBD (Locality 3) via the wharf located at Eric Primrose Reserve, Rydalmere and a wharf at Wharf Rd, Ermington.

1.4.2 Barriers to Access

Parramatta LGA is criss-crossed by an extensive road, river and rail network, much of which is of sufficient magnitude to act as both physical and perceptual barriers to residents gaining access to open space. Such barriers will often define peoples’ senses of the boundaries of their neighbourhoods. The significant east west barriers at the ‘neck’ of the LGA, such as the M4, railway and Parramatta Road probably contribute as much to a perception of detachment from the CBD for the residents of the south of the LGA as does physical distance.

Page 27

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


The open space needs of Harris Park and Rosehill, Locality 4, and north Granville in Locality 5 require particular attention due to the barriers of major transport routes. These areas are at present mostly served by one large park with a sports orientation, namely Garside Park. However, the RTA-funded cycleway in the A'Becketts Creek/M4 area are especially important in overcoming these barriers. The improved recreation opportunities afforded by the pending redevelopment of the Granville Memorial Park and Aquatic Centre in Locality 5 will also assist those from Locality 4 for whom the rail and road network is a real barrier to access northwards.

Woodville Road is also a major barrier and boundary to accessing open space, disadvantaging residents in the Guildford area west of Woodville Road in Locality 5. The residents of this area have access to only one park of any significant size, being Guildford Park (sports based). Their opportunity to seek open space in the adjoining Holroyd LGA is inhibited by the presence of the rail line at Merrylands.

Barriers to park access may be improved by the building of pedestrian overbridges across major roads and the upgrading or installation of pedestrian crossing facilities and traffic calming infrastructure. The Parramatta Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) 2003 identifies and recommends appropriate pedestrian facilities and routes which will assist park users by enhancing road safety and accessibility and will help break down these barriers to access.Other barriers to accessing open space areas are private lands. An example is the Parramatta Valley Cycleway where the principal challenge of the completing the mostly off-road route is the installation of the route on land currently in non-Council ownership. To date, apart from the Department of Defence land at Ermington (ex Naval Stores) in Locality 7, there has been no installation of the PVC on lands in non-Council ownership in the Parramatta LGA. Additionally a number of private properties are located in the route’s path such that easement rights or acquisition needs to take place to “join up” completed sections and complete linkages. It is considered that issues concerned with lands or properties along the route that are in non-Council ownership, have posed the most significant constraint to the completion of this cycleway to date.

Page 28

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


1.4.3 Access for People with Disabilities

At the individual park level, park layout, design and maintenance practices may determine the accessibility and enjoyment of the park by people with disabilities. Legislation has been developed (Australian Standard No. 1928) to ensure equity of access in both the public and private domain. Additionally, Council has developed and implemented the Parramatta Disability Action Plan 1999-2002, which states that approximately 19% of Parramatta's population have a disability and that 49% of people over 65 have a disability. With 12% of the LGA’s population aged 65 plus (2001 Census data) and a general trend towards the aging of the population, access to, and opportunities in open space need to be provided for this significant demographic group. Of relevance to open space, an outcome of implementing this Plan is that "people with disabilities will have access to all of Council's facilities and infrastructure". There are specific actions relating to open space included in this plan.

Many legislative requirements can be met by design and construction methods that are of benefit to all users, including persons with disabilities, parents with prams, cyclists and walkers.

It should be noted that the steep topography of the LGA is such that equal access to all areas for the physically disabled may not always be practicable. A reasonable balance must be achieved here that recognises the physical limitations of this geography. Careful design can however provide real opportunities for some path access even in relatively steep locations.

Page 29

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


2. Management Tools

2.1 Open Space InventoryThis section provides a list of the public open space areas in the Parramatta LGA. It includes all lands managed by Council as public open space and also Parramatta Park, which is the managed by Parramatta Park Trust.

The inventory includes all areas listed in Council’s parks and reserves asset database and provides a “snapshot” of the current information held by Council for each park.

Actions in Volume 1 specify that this inventory be continuously improved and regularly updated and linked to other management tools such as the GIS and Council’s park’s asset database.

The park hierarchies have been assigned based on the current management and facility provision for each park. However, this does not preclude any alterations of park hierarchies in future.

The “characteristics” listed for each park do not necessarily reflect “categories” listed under an adopted plan of management. Many parks will contain more than one “category” however categorisation must take place in the process of developing a plan of management in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. As such “characteristics” have been listed and may be used as a guide in the development of future plans of management.

Page 30

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Open Space InventoryKey to Plan of Management (POM) and/or Landscape Masterplan (LMP):A = General Parks & Land for General Community Use POM 96/1A1 = General Parks & Land for General Community Use POM 96/1 + LMPC = Sportsgrounds POM 96/3 + LMPC1 = Sportsground POM 96/3 + General Parks & Land for General Community Use POM 96/1C2 = Sportsgrounds POM 96/3C4 = Galaringi Reserve, Cox Park, Dandarbong Reserve, Eric Mobbs Memorial Park POM 2002C5 = Sportsgrounds – POM 96/3 + Ponds Subiaco Watercourse & Bushland Res. - POM96/5 + LMPD = North Parramatta Regional Sports Complex POM 95/3E = Foreshore Parks - POM 96/2F = Lake Parramatta Reserve POM 96/6G = Not Community Land – managed by Parramatta Park TrustH = Garside Park Granville POM 94/1I = Norford Park South Granville POM 95/1J = Ponds Subiaco Watercourse & Bushland Res. POM 96/5K = General Parks & Land for General Community Use – POM 96/1 + Ponds Subiaco Watercourse & Bushland Res. – POM 96/5 + LMPL = Edna Hunt Sanctuary Epping POM 96/7M = Bruce Cole Reserve POM 2003 N = Timbergetters Reserve POM 2003 O = Everly Prk & Melita Stadium POM 2003

Key to categories:SG = Sportsground,P = Park,CS = Area of Cultural Significance,GCU = General Community Use,Nb GCU x = Parks that may be better categorised as Natural Area or Area of Cultural Significance.Na = Natural Area

Key to Park Hierarchy:D = District,R = Regional,L = Local,C = part of a corridor.

Natural Areas may be divided into 5 sub-categories as follows:Bushland (B), Wetland (We), Escarpment (E), Watercourse (Wa) with Wa* meaning waterway is channelised, and Foreshore (F).

Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03

x=not itemised in any POM so isGCU by default

Other characteristics present

(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 1273 227300 Armagh Park/Alice Watkins

Park Hart Drv Wentworthville AP 1.632 A P Wa L C

060 206001 Arthur Phillip Park Edward St Northmead AP 3.328 C SG X X X D

208 220800 Arthur Wright Park Ayles Rd Winston Hills CC 0.197 A P X L

235 223500 Barnett Park Barnett Rd Winston Hills CC 1.513 A P X L

210 221000 Bruce Cole Reserve Gibbon Rd Winston Hills CC 1.46 M NaB L

Page 31

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03



(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 1 (continued)204 220400 Buckley Park Stock Pl Winston Hills CC 1.648 A GCU B, We L

508 250800 Bundilla Forest Reilleys Rd Winston Hills CC 1.732 A GCU x B, Wa L C

068 206800 Burlington Memorial Park Balfour St Northmead AP 0.704 A P Wa L C

192 219201 Caber Park Clackmannan Rd Winston Hills CC 3.2444 A P X D

215 221500 Caithness Cres Reserve Caithness Cr Winston Hills CC 0.09 A GCU L

205 220500 Caroline Chisholm Park Olympus St Winston Hills CC 0.997 C SG X D

217 221700 Casuarina Park Rebecca Pde Winston Hills CC 0.125 A GCU L

065 206500 Charles Herbert Reserve Whitehaven Rd Northmead CC 0.7738 A P B L

194 219400 Doig St Playground Doig St Wentworthville AP 0.132 A GCU X L

206 220600 Dundee Park Caledonian Ave Winston Hills CC 0.159 A GCU L

284 228400 Goldsmith Ave Reserve Goldsmith Ave Winston Hills CC 0.451 A P L

182 218200 Hammers Rd Reserve Hammers Rd Old Toongabbie CC 3.38 A GCU x B, Wa X L

272 227200 Harvey Murray Park Lurgan St Wentworthville AP 0.22 A P X L

219 221900 Hilary Playground Ursula St Winston Hills CC 0.079 A GCU L

240 224000 Hillcrest Ave Reserve Thackeray St Winston Hills CC 0.26 A P L

418 241800 Hospital Farm Reserve Beamish Rd Northmead AP 1.224 A GCU x Wa, B L C

415 241500 Impeesa Reserve Baden Powell Pl Winston Hills CC 3.134 A GCU x B, Wa X L C

234 223400 John Berger Reserve Orchard Ave Winston Hills CC 0.308 A P L

075 207501 John Curtin Reserve Huxley Dr Winston Hills CC 9.8568 C1 SG /GCU x B, Wa X X D C

243 224300 Keith Willis Reserve Caroline Chisholm Dr Winston Hills CC 0.097 A P L

274 227400 Klippert Park Portadown Rd Wentworthville AP 0.3305 A P X L

431 243100 Land Adjacent To Toongabbie Ck Redbank Rd Northmead AP 3.5 A GCU x Wa, B X L C

459 245900 Land Between Michelle And Ferndale Michelle Drv Wentworthville AP 0.029 A GCU x L

419 241900 Land In Belotti Ave Belotti Ave Winston Hills CC 0.0006 A GCU L

497 249700 Land In Orchard St Orchard St Winston Hills CC 0.00095 A P X L

226 222600 Langdon Rd Reserve Caroline Chisholm Dr Winston Hills CC 0.066 A GCU L

196 219600 Lomond Reserve Lomond Cr Winston Hills CC 0.304 A P L

209 220900 Maid Marion Reserve Longbow Cl Old Toongabbie AP 0.0344 A GCU L

214 221401 Max Ruddock Reserve Romulus St Winston Hills CC 3.389 C2 SG D

230 223000 Model Farms Gardens Caroline Chisholm Dr Winston Hills CC 0.065 A GCU L

279 227900 Model Farms ReserveYarrabee Rd/Churchill Dr/Goodin Rd

Winston Hills CC 7.94 A GCU x B, Wa X L C

064 206400 Model Farms Siding Reserve Folini Ave Northmead CC 0.256 A P X X L

067 206700 Moxham Park Whitehaven Rd Winston Hills CC 1.735 A GCU x B, Wa X L C

Pl an

of

Ma x=not itemised in

any POM so isGCU by default


(x = present)

Page 32

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


nage

men

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t No

vem

ber

2003

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 1 (continued)187 218700 Oakes Reserve Oakes Rd Old Toongabbie CC 3.696 A GCU x Wa X L

222 222200 Old Post Office Reserve Jerome Ave/ Belotti Ave/Willis Winston Hills CC 1.312 A P L

218 221800 One Tree Hill Reserve Rebecca Pde Winston Hills CC 2.2715 A GCU B L

260 226000 Otto Losco Reserve Allambie Ave Northmead CC 0.624 A GCU x B, Wa X L C

229 222900 Palestine Park Goliath Ave Winston Hills CC 7.548 A GCU x Wa, B X X L C

520 252000 Pemulwuy Park Stock Pl Winston Hills CC 0.212 A P L

213 221300 Prior St Reserve Old Windsor Rd Winston Hills CC 0.008 A GCU L

494 249400 Public Reserve Area Old Windsor Rd Old Toongabbie CC 0.248 A GCU x L

198 219800 Reilleys Rd Reserve Reilleys Rd Winston Hills CC 0.244 A P X L

275 227501 Richill Park Lurgan Rd Wentworthville AP 0.556 A P L

193 219300 Robin Hood Park Sherwood St Old Toongabbie AP 2.384 A GCU x Wa, B X L C

441 244100 Tartoola Reserve Park St Northmead AP 3.004 A GCU x B, Wa L C

199 219901 Third Settlement Reserve Edison Pde Old Toongabbie / Winston Hills CC 12.95 A GCU x Wa, B X X X L C

212 221202 Timbergetters Reserve Ixion St Winston Hills CC 1.685 N NaB X L

224 222400 Toongabbie Creek Reserve Briens Rd Northmead AP 3.393 A GCU x Wa, B L C

491 249100 Unnamed Res Melbourne Rd Winston Hills CC 0.065 A P L

528 252800 Unnamed Res Madonna St Winston Hills CC 0.012 A GCU L

503 250300 Unnamed Res Prior St Prior St Winston Hills CC 0.038 A GCU L

414 241400 Unnamed Res Attlee Pl And Peel Pl Peel St Winston Hills CC 0.093 A P X L

223 222300 Unnamed Res Caroline Chisholm Drive

Caroline Chisholm Dr Winston Hills CC 0.114 A GCU L

498 249800 Unnamed Res Cnr Baldwin Ave & Palme Baldwin Ave Winston Hills CC 0.164 A GCU L

481 248100 Unnamed Res Cnr Kliens Rd & Briens Briens Rd Northmead AP 0.039 A GCU L

461 246100 Unnamed Res Containing Hanging Tree Goliath Ave Winston Hills CC 0.055 A GCU X

? L

411 241100 Unnamed Res E/Side Allambie Ave Allambie Ave Northmead CC 0.104 A P X L

486 248601 Unnamed Res Lloyd George Ave & Palm Palmerston Ave Winston Hills CC 0.1 A GCU L

487 248700 Unnamed Res Mcmillan Ave Mcmillan Ave Winston Hills CC 0.175 A P L

510 251000 Unnamed Res Russell Ave Model Farms Rd Winston Hills CC 0.089 A P L

512 251200 Unnamed Res Shelley St & Caroline C Shelley St Winston Hills CC 0.039 A GCU L

535 253501 Unnamed Res Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Winston Hills CC 0.084 A P X L

211 221100 Ursula St Playground Old Windsor Rd Winston Hills CC 0.31 A GCU L

063 206300 Willsford Homes Playground Kliens Rd Northmead AP 0.348 A P L

197 219701 Winston Hills Lions Park Churchill Dr Winston Hills CC 1.381 A P Wa X L

216 221600 Woodberry Park Cromarty Cr Winston Hills CC 0.091 A GCU L

Pl an

of




(x = present)

Page 33

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


nage

men

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t No

vem

ber

2003

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 2184 218400 Ambrose Hallen Park Derbyshire Street Toongabbie CC 0.46 A P L

189 218900 Arrunga Gardens Chetwyn Place Wentworthville AP 2.988 A GCU x B, Wa L C

200 220000 Beck Rd Playground Beck Rd Old Toongabbie CC 0.159 A GCU L

180 218001 Binalong Park Binalong Rd Old Toongabbie CC 5.584 A SG X D

201 220101 Birk Park Geoffrey St Wentworthville CC 0.417 A P L

225 222500 Bulli Rd Reserve Bulli Rd Old Toongabbie CC 0.0145 A GCU x L

202 220200 Coopers Creek Reserve Bourne St Wentworthville AP 0.008 A GCU Wa L

183 218300 Darcy Rd Reserve Darcy Rd Wentworthville AP 2.652 A GCU x Wa* X L

227 222700 Doris Sargeant Park Chalmers Cres Old Toongabbie CC 0.144 A P L

203 220300 Emma Playground Emma Crescent Wentworthville CC 0.092 A P L

181 218100 Frank Hayes Playground Darcy Road Wentworthville AP 0.119 A P X L

233 223300 Gallery Gardens Fitzwilliam Rd Old Toongabbie CC 1.372 A P Wa, B X L

436 243600 Gibbons Reserve Burrabogee Rd Pendle Hill CC 0.889 A GCU x Wa L

220 222000 Greenleaf Park May St Wentworthville AP 0.032 A GCU L

247 224700 Greenmeadows Creek Reserve

Greenmeadows Cres Toongabbie CC 0.632 A GCU x Wa L

191 219100 Johnston Bridge Reserve Old Windsor Rd Toongabbie CC 4.7045 A GCU x Wa, B L C

185 218500 Joseph Knox Park Burrabogee Rd Pendle Hill AP 0.104 A P L

177 217701 Mccoy PARK MIMOSA AVE / EDNA AVE TOONGABBIE CC 15.2179 C SG Wa,

We D

228 222800 Milson Park Briens Rd Wentworthville AP 1.6277 A GCU x Wa, B X L C

221 222100 Mount St Reserve Fuliton St Wentworthville AP 0.57 A GCU x Wa L

062 206200 Parabianga Reserve Mayfield St Wentworthville AP 3.068 A GCU x Wa, B L C

239 223900 Parsons Park Dorothy St Wentworthville AP 0.264 A P X L

241 224100 Peachtree Ave Reserve Peachtree Ave Wentworthville CC 0.057 A P L

269 226900 Rausch St Reserve Rausch St Toongabbie CC 0.172 A P L

178 217800 Reynolds Park Chanel St Toongabbie CC 1.508 A1 GCU x Wa, B X X L C

232 223200 Ron Hill Park Cooyong Cr Toongabbie CC 0.768 A GCU x Wa X L

207 220700 Sheeham St Playground Sheehan Pl Pendle Hill AP 0.26 A GCU L

195 219500 She-Oak Reserve Premier St Toongabbie CC 0.36 A GCU x Wa L

526 252600 Sue Savage Park Chanel St Toongabbie CC 16.672 A1 GCU x Wa L C

190 219000 Thane St Playground Thane St Pendle Hill AP 0.288 A P L

186 218600 Thorne Ave Playground Thorne Ave Pendle Hill AP 0.072 A P X L

254 225400 Unnamed Res ,Adj Westmead Hospital Darcy Rd Westmead AP 0.208 A GCU Wa L

179 217900 Willmot Reserve Willmot Ave Toongabbie CC 0.36 A P X L C

Page 34

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03



(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 3080 All Saints Cemetry Brickfield St Nth Parramatta AP A GCU x X L

238 223800 Barton Park James Ruse Dr Nth Parramatta EM 0 D SG X D

034 203401 Belmore Park And Richie Benaud Oval Pennant Hills Rd Nth Parramatta AP 5.042 C SG X D

051 205100 Bill Thompson Reserve Victoria Rd & Henry St Parramatta EM 0.209 A P L

017 201700 Collett Park Victoria Rd Parramatta East EM 0.757 A P X L

040 204001 Dan Mahoney Reserve Isabella St Parramatta EM 3.351 D SG D

038 203800 David Frater Reserve Church St/Wilde Ave Parramatta AP 0.625 E NaF Wa* X L

505 250500 Dixon Park Stewart St & Queens Ave Parramatta AP 0.255 E GCU F L

036 203601 Doyle Ground Macathur St Nth Parramatta EM 7.72 D SG D

460 246000 Foveaux Park Gould Pl Parramatta EM 0.3225 A P X L

018 201801 Jubilee Park Parkes St Parramatta AP 1.1564 A P X L

016 201601 Lake Parramatta Reserve Bourke St Nth Parramatta AP 73.746 F NaB Ba, Wa X X R

543 254300 Maria Lock Park Castle St Nth Parramatta AP 0.265 A P X L

019 201900 Noller Park Lansdowne St Parramatta AP 0.348 A P Wa* L

268 226800 Old Saleyards Reserve Belmore St Nth Parramatta EM 3.41 D GCU D

037 203701 Ollie Webb Reserve Glebe St Parramatta AP 5.679 C SG X D

033 203300 P.H Jeffery Reserve James Ruse Dr Nth Parramatta EM 4.52 A SG R

014 201402 Parramatta ParkPitt St, Macquarie St, O'connell St,

Parramatta AP 97.784 G R

015 201500 Prince Alfred Park Victoria Rd Parramatta AP 1.704 A P X D

021 202101 Queens Wharf Park George St Parramatta EM 1.25 E NaF X L C

464 246400 Rosslyn Blay Park Grose St Nth Parramatta AP 0.1537 A P L

058 205801 Rotary Park Sorrell St Parramatta AP 0.085 E NaF Wa* X L

057 205700 Sherwin Park B/W Gladstone St & Isabella St Nth Parramatta EM 1.0043 D P X D

020 202000 St Johns Park Church St Parramatta AP 0.122 A GCU X X L

281 228100 Symonds Ave Reserve Symonds Ave Parramatta EM 0.067 A P L

502 250200 Thomas Williams Reserve Pennant Hills Rd Nth Parramatta AP 0.41 A GCU L

439 243900 Unnamed Res Wilde Ave Parramatta AP 0.3 E NaF F, Wa* L

542 254200 Unnamed Res Sorrell St Parramatta AP 0.128 E NaF Wa* X L

522 252200 Unnamed Res Irving St Parramatta EM 0.124 A P L

514 251400 Unnamed Res Arthur St Arthur St Parramatta EM 0.069 A GCU x L

501 250100 Unnamed Res Broughton St Broughton St Parramatta EM 1.124 E NaF F, We L

449 244900 Unnamed Res Elizabeth St Elizabeth St Parramatta AP 0.335 E NaF F, Wa* X L

Page 35

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03



(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 3 (continued)471 247100 Unnamed Res Hunt St Hunt St Nth Parramatta AP 0.029 A GCU Wa L

507 250700 Unnamed Res Macarthur St & Rangihou

Macathur St & Rangihou Cr. Parramatta EM 1.255 E NaF F, B X L

490 249000 Unnamed Res Mason St Mason St Parramatta EM 0.033 A GCU L

248 224800 Unnamed Res Moxham St Moxham St Nth Parramatta AP 0.36 A P X X L

493 249300 Unnamed Res W/Side Of North Rocks R

North Rocks Rd (& Parramatta River)

Nth Parramatta AP 0.045 A GCU x Wa* L

069 206900 W.R Musto Playground Gore St Parramatta EM A P x L

259 225900 Walter Lawry Methodist Memor Park Betts St Nth Parramatta EM 0.556 A P X L

Locality 4406 240600 Elizabeth Farm Reserve Alice St Rosehill EM 1.7676 A1 P X L C

409 240900 Experiment Farm Reserve Ruse St & Alice Street Harris Park EM 0.3193 A1 P X D

039 203900 James Ruse Reserve Hassall St Harris Park EM 3.052 A1 P X X D C

475 247500 John Irving Park Jordan St Rosehill EM 0.161 A P X L

277 227700 Parkes St Rest Park Parkes St Parramatta EM 0.239 A P X L

035 203502 Robin Thomas Reserve Harris St Parramatta EM 2.333 A1 P X X D C

242 224200 Rosella Park Harris St Harris Park EM 0.715 A1 P L

407 240700 Swann Reserve Gregory Pl Harris Park EM 0.127 A1 P X X L C

532 253200 Unnamed Res Gt Western Hwy Wigram Street Harris Park EM 0.229 A GCU x L

509 250900 Unnamed Res Ritchie St Ritchie St Rosehill EM 0.0279 A GCU x L

408 240800 Unnamed Res Ruse St Ruse St Parramatta EM 0.3047 A1 GCU X L C

Locality 5290 229000 Bennalong Park Bennalong Street Granville W 0.22 A P L

252 225201 Coronation Park Excelsior St Granville W 0.12 A P L

022 202200 F.S Garside Park Alfred St Granville EM 2.851 H SG Wa* X ? X D

023 202300 Granville Memorial Park Memorial Drive Granville EM 2.572 A P X D

024 202401 Granville Park Woodville Rd Merrylands W 12.379 C SG X X? D

474 247400 Illoura Reserve John St Granville W 0.562 A1 P L C

401 240101 Land Adjacent To Chanel Alfred St Granville EM 0.221 A GCU x L

400 240000 Land In A'beckett St A'beckett St Granville EM 0.128 A GCU x L

052 205200 Roy Godfrey Reserve Clyde Street Granville W 0.366 A P L

061 206100 Sam Taylor Reserve Patten Ave Granville W A GCU x L

Page 36

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03



(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 5 (continued)029 202900 Scout Memorial Park Glen St Granville W 1.038 A P L

422 242200 Unnamed Res Bertha Street Bertha Street Merrylands W 0.1158 A GCU x L

423 242301 Unnamed Res Bertha Street Bertha Street Merrylands W 0.208 A P X L

450 245000 Unnamed Res Elizabeth St Elizabeth St Granville W 0.1977 A GCU Wa* L

251 225100 Unnamed Res Fifth St Fifth Str Granville W 0.76 A P L

523 252300 Unnamed Res Thomas St Thomas St Granville W 0.0375 A GCU x L

402 240200 Unnammed Reserve Adam St Granville W 0 A GCU Wa* L C

538 253800 Unnamed Res James Ruse Drv James Ruse Dr Granville EM 0.06 A GCU x L

Locality 6027 202700 Bright Park Guildford Rd Sth Granville W 0.9828 C1 SG X L C

600 260020 Byrnes St Tennis Courts Byrnes St Sth Granville W 0.4427 C2 SG D C

283 228301 Campbell Hill Pioneer Reserve

Campbell Hill Road Guildford W 18.5463 A1 P Wa, B R C

026 202600 Colquhoun Park Blaxcell St Granville W 3.252 C2 SG X D C

264 226401 Duck River Bushland Reserve Everley Road & Wellington Rd Granville W 19.387 C1 SG/GCU x B, Wa X L C

059 205901 Everley Park Boundary Road Sth Granville W 9.726 O SG Wa, B D C

453 245300 Excelsior St Playground Excelsior St Granville W 0.2544 A P L

077 207701 Fredrick Newby Reserve Lough Ave Guildford W 0.096 A P L C

025 202501 Guildford Park Bursill Street Guildford W 3.762 C2 SG X D

246 224600 Harry Gapes Reserve Lavina St Granville W 2.8023 C2 SG Wa L C

545 254500 Horlyck Reserve Boronia St And Duck River Sth Granville W C1 SG/GCU x Wa, B X X L C

511 251100 Maurice O'connell Reserve Salisbury Road Guildford W 0.192 A P L C

245 224501 Norford Park Hector Street Sth.Granville W 7.665 I SG Wa X X D C

032 203201 Ray Marshall Reserve. Erie Street Granville W 6.765 C SG Wa, B D

249 224900 Robertson/Eve Street Reserve Robertson Street Granville W 2.154 A P Wa* X L

465 246500 Unnamed Red Guildford Rd Guildford Road Sth Granville W 0.808 A P Wa X L C

537 253700 Unnamed Res Barbers Road Barbers Road Sth Granville W 14.591 A P B, Wa L C

291 229100 Unnamed Res Behind Commwealth Bank Guildford Road Guildford W 0.084 A P X L

428 242800 Unnamed Res Brazier St Rawson St Guildford W 0.04 A GCU Wa* L

442 244200 Unnamed Res Chiswick Road Clyde Street Sth Granville W 0.192 A P L

421 242100 Unnamed Res Clyde St Clyde St Granville W 0.248 A GCU Wa, We, B L C

448 244800 Unnamed Res Elayne Place Rawson Road Sth Granville W 0.032 A GCU x L

478 247800 Unnamed Res Kirk Ave Kirk Ave Sth Granville W 0.254 A P L

496 249600 Unnamed Res Olsen St Olsen Street Sth Granville W 0.11 A GCU L

Page 37

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03



(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 6 (continued)506 250600 Unnamed Res Randolph

Street Randolph Street Sth Granville W 0.7955 A GCU Wa* L

534 253400 Unnamed Res South Willoughby

Willoughby (South) Sth Granville W 0.0575 A GCU L

424 242400 Urimbirra Park Blaxcell St Sth Granville W 0.596 A GCU X L

454 245400 Victor Brazier Park Excelsior St Guildford W 0.7995 A GCU Wa L

028 202800 William Lamb Park Dellwood St Granville W 0.532 A P L

031 203100 Woodville Golf Course Barbers Rd Guildford W 39.688 C2 SG B R C

Locality 7519 251900 Albert Brown Park Florida Ave Ermington LM 0.125 A GCU L C

480 248000 Anderson Park Pine St Rydalmere EM 0.068 A P X L

470 247000 Archer Park Waratah St Ermington LM 5.765 E NaF F, Wa, B X L C

012 201200 Bartlett Park Victoria Rd Ermington LM 2.934 A GCU B L

456 245600 Bretby Park Primrose Ave Rydalmere EM 0.275 A P L

525 252500 Bruce Miller Reserve Trumper St Ermington LM 0.5965 A P L

433 243300 Council Owned Land Brodie St Brodie St Rydalmere EM 0.594 E GCU B, Wa* L

043 204301 Cowells Lane Reserve Cowells Lane Ermington LM 12.342 A P Wa X L C

011 201100 Crowgey St Reserve Crowgey St Rydalmere EM 0.995 J P B, Wa X L C

049 204901 Eccles Park Spurway St Ermington EM 1.9687 K P/NaWa X L

070 207001 Eric Primrose Reserve Silverwater Rd Rydalmere/Ermin EM 38.906 E NaF Wa, B X X D

504 250400 Fallon Park Primrose Ave Rydalmere EM 0.42 A GCU L

046 204602 George Kendall Riverside Park Spofforth St Ermington LM 16.2 E NaF FB X X R C

435 243500 Hannibal Macarthur Park Burbang Cres Rydalmere EM 0.177 A P L

263 226300 Hilder Rd Reserve Spurway St Ermington EM 3.57 A GCU Wa X L

293 229300 Hughes Ave Reserve Hughes Ave Ermington LM 0.235 A P L C

530 253000 John Carver Reserve Victoria Rd Rydalmere EM 0.243 A P L

488 248801 Johnston Park Monroe St Ermington LM 0.231 A P L C

466 246600 Keith Mckinnon Park Hinkler St Rydalmere EM 0.204 A P X L

288 228800 Lockyer Reserve Flinders St Ermington LM 0.93 A P L C

500 250000 Reid Park Pike St Rydalmere EM 1.641 E NaF F L

013 201301 Rydalmere Park Park St Rydalmere EM 4.93 C SG X X D

434 243400 Schaeffer Park Brodie St Rydalmere EM 0.18 E NaF Wa, B L C

071 207101 Thomas Wemyss Park Bartlett St Ermington LM 3.405 A1 P L

516 251600 Tynan Park Stamford Ave Ermington LM 0.109 A P L

079 207900 Unnamed Res 35 Patterson Street

35 Patterson Street Ermington LM A GCU x L

Pl an

of




(x = present)

Page 38

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


nage

men

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t No

vem

ber

2003

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 7 (continued)410 241000 Unnamed Res Arrunga St Arrunga St Dundas EM 0.048 A P X L

427 242700 Unnamed Res Bray St Silverwater Rd Dundas LM 0.182 A GCU L

455 245500 Unnamed Res Cnr Fallon & South St South St Rydalmere EM 0.044 A GCU x L

444 244401 Unnamed Res Cowells Ln Cowells St Ermington LM 0.425 C1 SG L C

445 244500 Unnamed Res Cowells Ln N/Side Of Fi Cowells St Ermington LM 0.633 A P X L C

447 244701 Unnamed Res Dean Cr Dean Cr Ermington LM 0.21 A GCU L

278 227800 Unnamed Res Ella Street Ella Street Rydalmere EM 1.108 E NaF F L

451 245100 Unnamed Res Elonera St Elonera St Rydalmere EM 0.008 A GCU L

457 245700 Unnamed Res Florida Ave Cleveland St Ermington LM 0.295 A GCU x L C

292 229200 Unnamed Res In Rippon Ave Dundas Rippon Ave Dundas EM 0.0626 A P X L

473 247300 Unnamed Res Jenkins St Jenkins St Dundas LM 0.101 A P L

458 245800 Unnamed Res Monterey Pde Monterey Pde Ermington LM 0.4265 A GCU L C

446 244600 Unnamed Res Se Cnr Cowells Ln Cowells St Ermington LM 0.1785 A GCU L C

517 251701 Unnamed Res St.Andrews Pl St Andrews Pl Dundas EM 0.025 A P X L

518 251800 Unnamed Res Station St Station St Dundas EM 0.029 A GCU L

531 253101 Unnamed Res Victoria Rd & Spurway S Spurway St Ermington EM 0.049 A GCU L

413 241300 Unnamed Res W/Side Of Atkins Rd Atkins Rd Ermington LM 0.121 A GCU L

515 251500 Unnamed Res W/Side Spurway St Silverwater Rd Rydalmere EM 0.475 A GCU L

267 226701 Williams Reserve Dora Cr Dundas EM 1.777 A P L

053 205300 Winjoy Reserve Calder Rd Dundas EM 0.417 A P L

Locality 8048 204800 Acacia Park Evans Rd Telopea LM 1.542 A P X L

437 243700 Allan Cunningham Reserve Supply St Mobbs Hill LM 2.266 J NaWa B L C

405 240500 Barayly Park Alexander St Dundas LM 1.29 J NaWa B L C

467 246701 Calangara Park Homelands Ave Carlingford EM 0.322 A NaB B, Wa L C

010 201000 Carlingford Memorial Park Pennant Hills Road Carlingford LM 0.7986 A P X X L C

476 247600 Charles Fraser Park Kenilworth Rd Dundas LM 0.697 J NaWa L C

055 205501 Cox Park Evans Rd Carlingford LM 8.362 C4 SG B D C

270 227000 Dandarbong Reserve Dandarbong Ave Dundas LM 1.2435 C4 GCU L C

003 200301 Dundas Park/Curtis Oval Fullford St/Quarry Rd Dundas LM 6.466 C5 SG Wa, B X D C

256 225600 Edwin Ross Reserve Barellan Ave Carlingford LM 0.207 A P X L

499 249900 Elizabeth Macarthur Park Telopea St Telopea EM 2.61 A GCU x B, Wa X L C

Page 39

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Plan

of M

anag

emen

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t Nov

embe

r 20

03



(x = present)

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 8 (continued)469 246900 Fitzgerald Forest Honiton Ave

West Carlingford LM 1.493 J NaB Wa X L C

008 200800 Fred Robertson Park Kissing Point Rd Dundas EM 7.435 A GCU x B, Wa X X L C

005 200501 Galaringi And Eric Mobbs Memorial Gr Evans Rd Carlingford LM 11.132 C4 GCU , B L C

426 242600 Herbert Rumsey Reserve Brand St Dundas LM 0.57 J NaB Wa L

045 204501 Homelands Reserve Homelands Ave Telopea EM 2.149 C1 SG X D C

056 205600 K13 Submarine Memorial Park Pennant Hills Rd Carlingford EM 0.261 A P X L

438 243800 Kilpack Park Dobson Cr Dundas LM 2.608 J NaWa B L C

477 247700 Lachlan Macquarie Park Stewart St Dundas LM 0.9182 A P X L

544 254400 New Settlers ParkBettington Rd (Cnr Kissing Point Rd)

Oatlands EM A P X L

257 225700 Perry St Perry St Dundas LM 0.4725 J P X L C

430 243000 Rapanea Community Forest Brand St Dundas LM 3.615 J NaB Wa X X L C

452 245200 Reserve Area Evans Rd Evans Rd Dundas LM 0.042 A GCU L

483 248301 Rock Farm Reserve Leamington Rd Dundas EM 0.352 A P Wa L C

417 241700 Searle Park Telopea St Telopea EM 0.181 A P X L

237 223700 Sir Thomas MITCHELL RES (Inc Ray Price Field) ALEXANDER ST DUNDAS LM 3.868 C1 SG B X X D C

244 224400 Sturt Park Sturt St Telopea/Dundas EM 2.39 A5 P/Wa X X L C

521 252100 Talinga Park Talinga St & Rickard St Carlingford LM 0.334 A P L

485 248500 Tobin Park Leo St Telopea EM 0.3746 A P X L

403 240300 Unnamed Res Adderton Rd Off Adderton Rd Dundas EM 1.806 A GCU x B, Wa X? L C

404 240400 Unnamed Res Adina St And Grace St

Between Adina St And Grace St Telopea EM 0.149 A P X L

440 244001 Unnamed Res Carson St Carson St Dundas LM 0.096 A GCU x L C

416 241600 Unnamed Res Cnr Bain Pl & Forster P Bain St Dundas LM 0.106 J GCU L C

539 253900 Unnamed Res E/Side King St King St Dundas LM 0.112 A GCU L

541 254100 Unnamed Res E/Side Railway Btn Tipt Marshall St Telopea LM 2.899 A GCU L C

482 248201 Unnamed Res Kywong St Kywong St Telopea EM 0.16 A P X L

484 248400 Unnamed Res Leamington Rd - E/Side Leamington Rd Dundas EM 0.631 A P Wa, B L C

489 248900 Unnamed Res W/Side Marsden Rd, Opp Marsden St Ermington LM 0.301 J GCU E L

425 242500 Unnamed Res Wylde St Wylde St Telopea EM 0.099 A GCU L

536 253600 Unnamed Res Yates Rd & King St King St Dundas LM 1.043 J NaWa L C

551 255100 Unnamed Reserve Keeler St Keeler St Carlingford LM A GCU x L

050 205001 Upjohn Park Ronald Ave Dundas EM 17.35 C5 NaWa/SG B X X X D C

540 254000 Vineyard Creek Reserve Robert St/Greens Av/Tulong/Bells Telopea EM 10.572 A NaB Wa X L C

253 225300 Walter Brown Park Wesley St Telopea EM 0.349 A P L C

Pl an

of




(x = present)

Page 40

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


nage

men

t and

/or

Land

scap

e M

aste

rpla

n Ap

plica

ble

as a

t No

vem

ber

2003

Park

hie

rarc

hyCo

rrido

rPark

No.

Asse

t ID

Name Street Surburb

War

d

Area

(Ha)

Curre

nt P

rimar

y Ca

tego

ry u

nder

ad

opte

d pl

an o

f M

anag

emen

t

Natu

ral a

rea

Spor

ts g

roun

dPa

rkCu

ltura

l Sig

nific

ance

Gen

eral

Com

mun

ity

Locality 9546 254600 Bluegum Reserve Harley Cres Eastwood LM A GCU x B L

007 200701 Boronia Park Kent St Epping LM 5.06 A1 P B, Wa* X X D

042 204200 David Hamilton Reserve Holway St Eastwood LM 4.561 A P Wa, B L

255 225502 David Scott Reserve Wyralla Ave Epping LM 0.539 A P D

443 244300 Don Stewart Park Cottee Drv Carlingford LM 0.783 A P X L

002 200200 Duncan Park Boronia Ave Epping LM 0.71 C SG Wa L

078 207801 Edna Hunt Sanctuary Cocos Ave Eastwood LM 6 L NaB Wa X L

066 206600 Eileen Mahoney Park Lewis St Epping LM 0.1017 A P X L

009 200901 Fred Spurway Park Mobbs Lane Dundas LM 3.5 A P Wa X X L

044 204400 George Harley Park Epping Ave Epping LM 0.855 A P B X L

271 227100 James Hoskin Reserve Raimonde Rd Eastwood LM 9.128 A P Wa L

266 226601 Kim Rutherford Reserve Wyralla Av Epping LM 0.173 A P L

004 200400 Loftus Square Willougby St Epping LM 0.61 A1 P L

276 227600 Mobbs Lane Reserve B/W Mobbs Ln & Lomax St Mobbs Hill LM 4.05 A GCU x B, Wa X L

282 228200 Simpson Reserve Kay St Carlingford LM 0.268 A P X L

265 226500 Skenes Ave Reserve Spencer St Eastwood LM 1.612 A GCU x Wa, B L

513 251301 Unnamed Res E & W Cnrs Of Cobac Av Cobac Av Eastwood LM 0.016 A GCU x L

529 252900 Unnamed Res E/Side Valley Rd Valley Rd Eastwood LM 0.077 A GCU x Wa L

468 246800 Unnamed Res Grimes Lane ..N/Acs.. Off Meredith St Carlingford LM 0.21 A GCU x L

492 249200 Unnamed Res S/Side Of Mobbs Ln Mobbs Ln Epping LM 0.0566 A GCU L

Locality 5/6074 207400 Duck River Reserve Brussels Street Granville W 10.8476 A GCU x Wa, B X L C

Locality 7/8047 204700 Ponds Creek

Reserve/Subiaco Creek RKirby St/Moffats Dr/Brand St Dundas/Telopea LM 34.5996 J NaWa B X D C

Page 41

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


2.2 Park Hierarchy GuidelinesParks may be assigned a hierarchy that reflects the level of facilities, service standards and size of the catchment that attracts users of the park.

The hierarchy a park or reserve is assigned will provide a guide to the: Levels of development and infrastructure expected by the

community; Service level standards, particularly relating to maintenance; Carrying capacity, that is, the ability to accommodate

intensity of visitors; Flexibility to meet changing demands; Leasing, licensing and casual hiring requirements; Funding priorities.

The Facilities Checklist for Parks (See Section 2.3) provides a guide to the appropriate facilities for each park hierarchy level.

It should be noted that the park hierarchies in this Open Space Plan and in the Open Space Inventory do not refer directly to the standard of sports facilities and whether district sports or regional sports competitions take place.

The Open Space Inventory (See Section 2.1) shows the park hierarchy for all the Parramatta LGA’s parks and reserves. Additionally, the Inventory indicates whether or not a park or reserve forms part of a corridor. It should be noted that a significant number of Local Parks are extremely small and, in future, may be assigned a hierarchy to indicate this limitation. The hierarchies were assigned using the following criteria:

Local Parks Generally small open space areas (greater than 0.5 ha in size

is preferable) that are positioned and designed to attract residents living within a 0.5 km radius

Should be accessible within a maximum of a 10-minute walk from residences

Generally contain basic facilities suitable for the local community

Provide facilities for short term visits

Page 42

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Generally do not provide facilities for larger groups Access for most users is by walking or cycling Are more numerous than District and Regional Parks

District Parks Generally larger than Local Parks Attract visitors from surrounding suburbs Offer a more diverse range of activities than do Local Parks Provide for longer term visits than for Local Parks (eg toilets,

BBQs) May have a specialised use Cater for larger groups Are generally not as numerous as Local Parks, but more

numerous than Regional Parks Many have sports facilities and/or large playgrounds Access for most users is by car or public transport

Regional Parks Large or unique areas Attract users from a metropolitan-wide (or wider) catchment May have a mix of uses or a specialised use High quality facilities and maintenance standards May have high heritage, environmental, amenity of other

significance Access for most users is by car or public transport Examples include botanic gardens, golf courses and state and

national competition sportsground parks.

With regard to parks that, with further development, will form part of a well-used, extensive corridor, it may be appropriate to consider them District Parks in the future and provide the “corridor” with District Park facilities.

Page 43

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


2.3 Facilities Checklist for ParksThe following Checklist provides a guide to the types of facilities that are appropriate for the three park hierarchy types – Regional, District and Local. This checklist can be used in the review of facilities at individual parks when undertaking Masterplans or Plans of Management or when considering requests from the public for extra facilities. Alternatively it can be used across wider areas or even the whole LGA for a strategic review of facility provision.

General Facilities Checklist For Parks

Regional Parks – Target Standard Facilities Formal carparking facilities that are paved and marked Picnic tables A range of sporting and/or recreational facilities (eg ovals,

courts, clubrooms, bowling greens, skate facilities, BMX tracks, basketball/netball, bike circuit)

Playground Shelters (gazebo pergola) Seating Drinking fountains Rubbish Bins Barbeques Public toilets (disabled, needle collection) Lighting Pathways Large areas of shade Good access to public transport links and major roads The ability to cater to large amounts of people

Page 44

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


District Parks – Target Standard Facilities Informal carparking Single use sporting and/or minor recreational facilities (eg

oval, tennis court, clubroom, bowling green, skate facility, BMX track, basketball/netball, bike circuit)

Shelters (gazebo/pergola) Seating Picnic tables Drinking Fountains Rubbish bins

District Open Space – Potential Additional Facilities

Playgrounds Barbeques Public toilets (disabled, needle collection) Lighting Pathways Areas of Shade Suitable areas catering to local communities Recycling bins

Page 45

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Local Parks – Target Standard Facilities Some shade A suitable area to cater to local communities

Local Parks – Potential Additional Facilities A specific recreational facility (eg skate facility, BMX track,

basketball/netball, bike circuit) Playground Picnic table Drinking fountains Drinking fountains Rubbish bins Barbeques Pathways

In upgrading parks using this checklist, priority should be given to: Areas of Intense Urban Consolidation; Areas of Significant Change in Demographic Profile; District and Regional Parks that are readily accessible by public transport; District and Regional Parks that form part of a corridor.

Page 46

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


2.4 Open Space Development and Management Principles

The tables in this section provide principles for the development and management of a number of open space categories at the three (3) hierarchies of regional, district and local parks. These principles can be applied:

In planning for open space acquisition and upgrading as a model of best practice with respect to size, topography, location;

In the development of open space plans of management and masterplans in the consideration of facilities, recreation, heritage, environment and values and character;

As a guide to park management and maintenance.

Page 47

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Development and Management Principles for:

Natural Area Bushland – REGIONALDevelopment Level 1 – Regional

Existing Example: Bushland parts of Lake Parramatta ReserveAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: As found, preferably on or close to arterial/trunk road and public transport routes. Major paths should be accessible to persons with disabilities if topography permits.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: Min 100 ha.

Topography suitable to permit car park in one location

Preferable location for site above all surrounding land that is not bushland. Ideally, part of regional bushland corridor.

NUMBERS AND DISTRIBUTION: As located and can be acquired. Preferably within 45 minutes drive by private vehicle and 60 minutes bus ride from most of Sydney City.

Recreation DevelopmentFACILITIES: Opportunity to provide for:

• Visitor Centre/toilets• Picnic area/shelters/BBQs• Major shelters for large groups• Gathering space for large groups• Major walking route including steps of natural materials at steeper locations• Viewing point (where applicable)• Cycle route if adjoining urban area or as part of City linked route or environmental corridor• Boardwalks (where applicable)

CARPARKING: Max. 150 car spaces on site. Subdivide to reduce visual impact if required. Porous surface where possible.

Heritage & EnvironmentBUSHLAND: Min. 90% tree cover and full vegetation profile. All species locally indigenous and generally conforming with natural alliances.

DRAINAGE: Where possible all adjoining land uses drain away from site. If applicable, install low flow pipes or deflection on boundaries directly to creek.

INTERPRETATION: Visitor Centre information and brochures and/or signage on walking route or guided or self-guided walks. Also interpret impacts of urban stormwater and weeds.

HERITAGE: Protect and interpret. Preserve Aboriginal sites (NPWS), but seek local Aboriginal groups permission to interpret.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Optimum protection of all natural features. Align walkway routes to enhance full range of senses. Conserve peaks and ridges in particular.

VIEWS: Use existing topography to explain/retain middle and long distance views.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By Trust/Council as applies and with Park Committee or Bushcare Groups liaison.

LICENCES/LEASES: In accordance with landholder’s policies. Visitor Centre up to 21 year lease.

MAINTENANCE: By Landholder with volunteer organisation assistance. (eg local Volunteer Bushcare Group).

SPONSORSHIP: In accordance with Landholder’s policy. Signage must be discrete.

Natural Area Bushland – DISTRICTDevelopment Level 2 – District

Page 48

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


John Curtin ReserveAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: As found, preferably on or close to arterial/trunk road and public transport routes. Preferably, extensive disabled persons access if topography permits.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: Min 10 ha, preferably 20ha plus.

Topography suitable to permit car park in one location

Preferable location for site above all surrounding land that is not bushland.

NUMBERS AND DISTRIBUTION: As located and can be acquired. Preferably within 30 minutes drive by private vehicle and 45 minutes bus ride from most of City

Recreation DevelopmentFACILITIES: Opportunity to provide for:• Visitor Centre or interpretive shelter/toilets• Picnic area/shelters• Major walking route including steps of natural materials at steeper locations• Viewing point (where applicable)• Cycle route if adjoining urban area or as part of City linked route or environmental corridor• Boardwalks (where applicable)

CARPARKING: Max. 30 car spaces on site, porous surface where possible.

Heritage & EnvironmentBUSHLAND: Min. 90% tree cover. All species locally indigenous and generally conforming with natural alliances.


INTERPRETATION: Visitor Centre or interpretation shelter information and brochures and/or signage on walking route or self guided walks. Also interpret impacts of urban run-off and weeds. Interpret European heritage.


VIEWS: Use existing topography to explain/retain middle and long distance views.


Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By Council with Park Committee/Bushcare Group assistance.

LICENCES/LEASES: Lease for Visitor Centre: 5 years. Licenses: mobile kiosk in car park: annually.

MAINTENANCE: Bush rehabilitation by Council with assistance from Volunteer Bushcare Groups.

SPONSORSHIP: Seek corporate sponsorship for walkways/cycleways, interpretation and major events. Signage to be temporary and/or discrete.

Page 49

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Natural Area Bushland – LOCALDevelopment Level 3 – Local

Existing Example: Edna Hunt SanctuaryAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: As found, preferably on or near local road and public transport routes.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: Min 5ha and a consolidated shape, not linear if possible. Should lie above surrounding land uses where possible.

NUMBERS & DISTRIBUTION: As opportunity and local environment permits.


• Visitor information/ interpretation signage• Picnic tables (shaded)• Walking route with porous surface where possible (cemented earth)• small open/kickabout area if not threatened/endangered species present and the park is only local park in urban area

CARPARKING: No on site car spaces. Porous surface draining to boundary or street where possible.

Heritage & EnvironmentBUSHLAND: Min 85% tree cover. In urban areas where this is only local park this percentage may reduce. All locally indigenous species.


INTERPRETATION: Key features signed. Run occasional local birdwatch/spotlighting days or evenings.



VIEWS: Exploit all mid to long distance views.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By Council, with Bushcare Group/Park Committee assistance in bush rehabilitation.

LICENCES/LEASES: No leases or licenses.

MAINTENANCE: Council bushland restoration with Volunteer Bushcare Groups/Park Committee assistance.

SPONSORSHIP: Seek local business sponsorship for paths, plant materials.

Page 50

Open Space Plan

Volume 2



River Foreshore Parks – REGIONALDevelopment Level 1 – Regional

Existing Example: George Kendall Riverside Park Access & Open Space

ACCESS: As found, preferably on or close to major arterial or trunk road and regular bus route and stop.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: Min 10 ha.

Topography suitable for waterside access/walk and boat launching.

NUMBERS AND DISTRIBUTION: Max. 45 minute drive in private vehicle, 60 minute by bus/rail from most Sydney metropolitan area.


• Turning/washdown area (adequate depth of water for launch/recovery)• Boat building/repair yard• Restaurant, cafes, food kiosks• Large jetty and smaller jetties• Slipway• Picnic areas • Large kickabout area• Adventure playground

• Major playground (unfenced if well away from water) and child’s cycle circuit• Major shelters for events, large groups• Toilets• BBQs, shelters, taps• Foreshore shaded walk as part of continuous link, plus cycleway• Boat/canoe hire facilities

CARPARKING: Max. 150 car spaces on sites outside the CBD, split if necessary to reduce visual impact. Restrictions on local street parking.

Heritage & EnvironmentPLANTING/BUSHLAND: Min 30% tree cover.

All planting predominantly locally indigenous except feature trees as native. Shrub and native grass species on inland boundaries.

DRAINAGE: ‘Soft’ engineering constructions with natural filter if outside CBD. Channelled if space does not permit above. Include a small wetland area where space permits.

INTERPRETATION: Provide signage interpreting natural systems along a specific walking route. Consider commissioning public art.

HERITAGE: Protect and interpret existing features. To be part of Heritage Trail if heritage values are significant.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Urban water frontage with lit walkway/boardwalk, promenade, jetty and food outlet/boat hire, etc. Balance of open areas and bushland. Retain/plant groups of trees on foreshore.

VIEWS: Retain and frame all long distance views. Ensure waterfront planting does not obscure views.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By administering body (eg. Council, Trust, etc.).

LICENCES/LEASES: In accordance with Plan of Management.Cafes, restaurants, boat businesses: 21 years.Kiosk, etc: 5 years.License for mobile boat/bicycle hire/kiosks: annual.major shelters: booking

MAINTENANCE By administering authority/Council. Assistance from voluntary groups. Emphasis on bushland/wetland maintenance in non CBD areas.

SPONSORSHIP: In accordance with Plan of Management. Seek corporate sponsorship for walkways, jetties, bushland rehabilitation, artwork, etc.

Page 51

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


River Foreshore Parks – DISTRICTDevelopment Level 2 – District

Existing Example: Eric Primrose ParkAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: As found, preferably on or close to major arterial or trunk road and regular bus route and stop.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: 5-10 ha. Topography suitable for waterside access/walk and boat launching.

NUMBERS AND DISTRIBUTION: Max. 20 minute drive in private vehicle, 30 minute by bus/rail from most of City.

Recreation DevelopmentFACILITIES: Opportunity to provide for:• Turning/washdown area (adequate depth of water for launch/recovery)• Food kiosk• Small jetty• Picnic area• Kickabout area• Major playground (unfenced if well away from water) and child’s cycle circuit• One major shelter for events, large groups• Toilets• BBQs, shelters, taps• Foreshore shaded walk as part of continuous link, plus cycleway.

CARPARKING: Max. 60 car spaces on site, split if necessary to reduce visual impact. Restrictions on local street parking.

Heritage & EnvironmentPLANTING/BUSHLAND: Min 30% tree cover.

All planting predominantly locally indigenous except feature trees as native. Shrub and native grass species on inland boundaries.

DRAINAGE: ‘Soft’ engineering constructions with natural filter. Channelled if space does not permit above. Include a small wetland area where possible.

INTERPRETATION: Provide signage interpreting natural systems along a specific walking route.

HERITAGE: Protect and interpret existing features.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Urban water frontage with lit boardwalk, promenade, jetty and food outlet/boat hire, etc. Balance of open areas and bushland. Retain/plant groups of trees on foreshore. No new building facilities below 1:20 flood level.

VIEWS: Retain and frame all long distance views. Ensure waterfront planting does not obscure views.

SCREENING: Minimise impact on surrounding residents through screening facilities.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By Council except leased facilities. Local community assistance/involvement with Park Committees and Volunteer Bushcare Groups.

LICENCES/LEASES: Cafes, restaurants, boat businesses: 21 years.Kiosk, etc: 5 years.License for mobile boat/bicycle hire/kiosks: annual.Shelters: booking

MAINTENANCE: Council mowing or by contract. Various mowing heights (kickabout shorter than picnic etc). Emphasis on bushland/wetland maintenance with involvement of Park Committees/Volunteer Bushcare Groups.

SPONSORSHIP: Seek corporate sponsorship for walkways, bushland rehabilitation, etc. No major non-local franchises for food outlets.

Page 52

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


River Foreshore Parks – LOCALDevelopment Level 3 – Local

Existing Example: Reid ParkAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: As found, preferably on or near trunk road and bus route. Accessible by bicycle.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: 1-5ha with other conditions as above.

NUMBERS & DISTRIBUTION: Accessible within 10 minute drive, 20 minute bus ride from any where in the locality

Recreation DevelopmentFACILITIES: Opportunity to provide for:• One boat ramp or canoe access point• Mobile food kiosk location (weekends)• Picnic area/kickabout• Shelters, taps• Play equipment (unfenced if safe)• Foreshore walk as part of continuous walk

CARPARKING: Max. 6 on site car spaces if not available on street.

Heritage & EnvironmentBUSHLAND: Min 40% tree cover in non CBD context.

All planting locally indigenous except at except where other cultural values dominate. All native planting.

DRAINAGE: All ‘soft’ engineering with natural filter to River, if in non urban situation.

INTERPRETATION: Sign to describe key features of site.

HERITAGE: As for above.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Constructed foreshore at key locations only (eg. adjoining jetty). Natural foreshore throughout remainder.

VIEWS: As for above.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By Council. except leases/licenses.

LICENCES/LEASES: Leases: kiosks: 5 years. Licenses: mobile kiosk, windsurf board hire: annual.

MAINTENANCE: Mowing by Council. Bushland Restoration by Council with Volunteer Bushcare Group support.

SPONSORSHIP: As for Level 2.

Page 53

Open Space Plan

Volume 2



Sportsgrounds – REGIONALDevelopment Level 1 – Regional

Existing Example: Woodville Golf CourseAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: On or close to major arterial/distributor road. Close to railway station or regular bus route. Easy bicycle access.

Full access throughout to persons with disabilities.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: No less than 10ha.

Topography: principally 1 in 10 gradient or less. Site development should not entail major cut and fill exercise.

DISTRIBUTION: Typically 45 minute drive in private car, 60 minutes by public transport (non rush hour). Ideally, close to major adjoining passive recreation area.

Recreation DevelopmentFACILITIES: Opportunity to provide for as minimum:• athletics track around major field with field sports facilities• grandstand/ spectator areas• indoor sports facility, leisure/swimming centre• health and fitness area• restaurant, cafe, food outlets• synthetic playing field surface, floodlit• 4 outlying fields, all floodlit, minimum area to permit full range of field sports including baseball diamond and cricket pitch

• 2 fields unlit• 12+ consolidated multi-purpose all weather courts, all floodlit• secondary amenities buildings• picnic area/BBQs• fenced playground• off-road cycle circuit, ideally linked to off-site cycleway• ideally linked to regional walking/trail

CARPARKING: 150-200 car spaces on site, subject to size/location of site. Restricted car parking in adjoining streets.

Heritage & EnvironmentPLANTING: Site selection should entail minimum clearing of native vegetation.Boundary area and corners of site substantially planted with locally indigenous tree/shrub species.Exotic species acceptable for entrance and feature areas.Native shade trees dividing fields and shading carparking.Passive recreation areas predominantly native to minimum 40% cover.

DRAINAGE: On site detention and natural filter for irrigation water/recycle.All drainage into basin/creek and away from adjoining bushland if possible.

HERITAGE: Preserve Aboriginal sites, retain/ refurbish heritage buildings, retain listed trees. Do not develop on sites where landscape has heritage significance that may be damaged or obscured.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Well planted boundaries to screen neighbours, particularly for night lighting.

VIEWS: Retain existing middle distant views where possible.

Planning, Management & FundingMAINTENANCE: Major mowing regime by Council. Initial line marking by Council. Irrigation on major oval and 4 outlying fields.

Additional mowing, subsequent line marking and other work by lessee.

SPONSORSHIP: Acceptable and visible on grandstand, major facilities.

Page 54

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Sportsgrounds – DISTRICTDevelopment Level 2 – District

Existing Example: Binalong ParkAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: On or close to major arterial/distributor road. Close to railway station or regular bus route. Easy bicycle access.Access positive.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: No less than 510ha.Topography: principally 1 in 10 gradient or less. Site development should not entail major cut and fill exercise.

DISTRIBUTION: Adequate coverage across City to ensure 15-20 minute drive in private car, 30 minutes by public transport (non rush hour). Ideally, close to neighbourhood centre or major adjoining passive recreation area and sited generally within urban area.

Recreation DevelopmentFACILITIES: Opportunity to provide for as minimum:• Athletics track around major field with grandstand / clubhouse / food outlet• 4 outlying fields, all floodlit, minimum area to permit full range of field sports including baseball diamond and cricket pitch• 2 fields unlit• 10 consolidated multi-purpose all weather courts, all floodlit• fenced playground• off-road cycle circuit, ideally linked to off-site cycleway• ideally linked to regional walking/trail

CARPARKING: Up to 50 car spaces on site (reinforced grass for overflow parking), dependant on proximity to public transport. Restricted car parking in adjoining streets.

Heritage & EnvironmentPLANTING: Site selection should entail minimum clearing of native vegetation.Boundary area and corners of site substantially planted with locally indigenous tree/shrub species.Exotic species acceptable for entrance and feature areas.Native shade trees dividing fields and shading carparking.Passive recreation areas predominantly native to minimum 40% cover.

DRAINAGE: On site detention and natural filter for irrigation water/recycle.All drainage into basin/creek and away from adjoining bushland if possible.

HERITAGE: Preserve Aboriginal sites, retain/ refurbish heritage buildings, retain listed trees. Do not develop on sites where landscape has heritage significance that may be damaged or obscured.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Well planted boundaries to screen neighbours, particularly for night lighting. Ensure good visibility into and out of park from street.

VIEWS: Retain existing middle distant views where possible.

SCREENING: Minimise impact on surrounding residents (especially night lighting) through screening of facilities.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: By Council.Maintenance of major field/oval and leased courts by lessee.

LICENCES/LEASES: Max. lease on any facility 21 years by open tender. Typical leases: major oval, grandstand, multi-purpose courts (but Council/ community rights to some allocations).Multi-use of facilities encouraged.

MAINTENANCE: Major mowing regime by Council. Initial line marking by Council. Irrigation on major oval and 4 outlying fields. Additional mowing, subsequent line marking and other work by lessee.

SPONSORSHIP: Acceptable and visible on major facilities.

Page 55

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Sportsgrounds – LOCALDevelopment Level 3 – Local

Existing Example: Duncan ParkAccess & Open Space

ACCESS: On local through route and visible from road where possible.

No more than 15 minutes walk from bus stop/railway station.

Access positive.

AREA & TOPOGRAPHY: Min 2ha.

Topography: as for Level 2.

NUMBERS & DISTRIBUTION: Adequate coverage throughout City for max 5 minute drive or 10 minute cycle ride, 15 minute walk.


• 2 fields with cricket wicket between

• 4 multi-purpose courts (preferred)

• toilet/changing module

• play equipment

• link to local cycleway

CARPARKING: Preferably no on site parking. Max 10 N° permanent spaces on site, room for on-street parking without detriment to local residents.

Heritage & EnvironmentPLANTING: As above, but emphasis on locally indigenous species.

DRAINAGE: Stormwater discharge to street.

HERITAGE: As for Level 2.

Values & CharacterSCENIC QUALITY: Provide shade for spectators by tree planting.

VIEWS: Emphasise location by distinctive street-front planting.

Planning, Management & FundingMANAGEMENT: Principally by Council with Parks Committee/Sports Club input.

LICENCES/LEASES: None.

MAINTENANCE: mowing by Council.

Tree planting programs by local park committees, schools and Bushcare Groups.

SPONSORSHIP: None that involves significant signage.

Page 56

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Appendix ACommunity ResearchEnvironmetricsEnvironmetrics Pty Limited. ACN 003 546 192.Suite 402/144-148 Pacific Highway North Sydney 2060.Locked Bag 2116 North Sydney 2059.Tel (02) 9954 0455 Fax (02) 9954 9046.Email [email protected]

Qualitative Community Research forParramatta’s Open Space

Prepared forParramatta City CouncilbyEnvironmetrics

May 2003

Page 57

mailto:[email protected]

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Executive Summary

This report presents a predominantly qualitative community study of Parramatta Council’s parks and open space system.This section summarises some of the key findings from the research.

Open Space Values and Perceptions Parramatta LGA’s open space is most highly valued as

somewhere to enjoy passive recreation with other people. Over two thirds of respondents valued the LGA’s open space

as providing a place to relax. Close to half of the community values local open space as

somewhere to appreciate the beauty of nature and to spend time with other people.

Approximately a third of all respondents value Parramatta’s open space as a place to get some physical exercise, or a place to enjoy the landscape, or somewhere where everyone can engage in recreation.

Less than a fifth of the sample value Parramatta’s open space for its significant natural qualities, a place for spiritual renewal, for scientific education or study or for community gatherings. Although we only spoke to a small number of NESB respondents, parks played a crucial role in providing a venue for community gatherings for the Lebanese and Korean communities in particular.

Awareness of open space On the whole, there were low levels of awareness of the

names of parks within the Parramatta LGA. A number of respondents were not aware of the range of

outdoor facilities available within the LGA, other than those within their local suburb.

There was very low awareness of whether various parks were part of the Parramatta LGA or neighbouring council areas.

Page 58

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Respondents were not aware of the classification given to park types; they tended to perceive them according to the activities they provided, such as playground or sportsfield.

Leisure participation Passive recreation, that is, leisure activity that tends to be

relaxed and/or social (unlike organised sport), plays a major role in the lives of most respondents. More than two thirds either picnicked, barbecued, sat in the park or went walking for leisure in the last month.

About a fifth of all respondents participated in fishing or bird watching within the same period.

Approximately half of all respondents used the playgrounds or went

bushwalking within the past month; and a third engaged in organised sports, cycled, played frisbee or went jogging outdoors.

Less than 10% engaged in more active or specialised sports or activities including boating, BMX bike riding, roller blading or skateboarding.

A small percentage of the respondents had an active interest in the environment, as about 8% participated in bush rehabilitation or tree planting within the past month.

Family seems to feature in the lives of many respondents, as close to two thirds attended a family gathering within the past month. This may be reflective of the ethnic diversity of the LGA, which was represented in the makeup of the focus group and in-depth interview respondents.

Other non-outdoor leisure activities that respondents participated in included attending a live show (30%), and visiting a museum or gallery (21%). A small percentage of the sample seem to be active local community members, as 7% attended a local meeting.

Distribution and amount of open space There was widespread feeling that there was uneven

distribution of funds and parks across the LGA. The southern region was considered to lack the quality of open space available in the northern suburbs of the LGA.

Perceptions regarding amounts of open space seemed to relate to the quality of the space. It seems that residents

Page 59

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


perceive open space to be lacking whereas they do not account for parks and reserves that they do not use for a range of reasons. This suggests that the quality of existing open space requires more urgent attention than the number of parks throughout the LGA.

Page 60

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Open space standards and quality The maintenance of parks was thought to be in need of

improvement. Respondents talked of run down and outdated play equipment and locked or vandalised toilet blocks. There were one or two parks that were an exception to this and were thought to be good benchmarks on which other parks should be modelled.

A number of sports fields were reported to have uneven playing surfaces, bad drainage and a lack of spectator facilities. Others were considered to be good examples of the standards of maintenance they expected.

The Parramatta River was acknowledged as having become a more attractive place for passive recreation over recent years. However, to some respondents it has not yet improved enough; there was a perception that it was unclean due to the colour of its water.

A number of respondents felt inhibited to use the parks at the end of their street, as they felt that the standard of facilities was not adequate for comfort or enjoyment.

A number of parks throughout the LGA that were perceived to be unsafe, due to their isolated location, lack of lighting, or location of unfenced playgrounds close to roads.

Some parks were considered to be successful in providing a range of activities for a variety of users. However, a number of parks were thought to be limited in terms of this variety, which tended to dissuade large groups from using them for social gatherings.

Ideals for the future Passive recreation facilities in a beautiful environment was a

common theme to emerge as an ideal future open space system.

The main themes to emerge for the ideal future were:Water-side activities;

Animals;

Barbecue and community;

Nature;

Family and children;

Sport;

Page 61

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Relaxation;

Socialising.

Council’s open space vision statement There was virtually no awareness of this vision statement

prior to the focus groups. Overall, the statement was seen to be representative of

Council’s positive steps towards improving the city over recent years.

Some felt that the vision statement presented unrealistic expectations and some conflicting values.

Summary of ImplicationsOpen space values and perceptions

Parramatta’s open space should provide residents with opportunities to sit and relax under trees in a beautiful environment.

There are opportunities to develop a number of natural plant communities in which residents can appreciate the beauty of nature. The existing striking combinations of mature native and ornamental planting characteristic of many of Parramatta’s parks could be enhanced and expanded into additional local parks.

Incorporating cafe facilities into parks is likely to be well received by a range of residents of all ages. Care should be taken to ensure that cafe facilities do not compromise the natural setting.

There is an urgent need to address the social needs of teenagers. Open space should include activities for this age group, namely skateboarding and BMX riding facilities, particularly in and around the Parramatta CBD.

Open space corridors and linkages should continue to be developed to cater for walkers, joggers and cyclists.

There are opportunities for aesthetic improvements to be made to local parks. This will improve the community’s perceptions of their local environment.

Parramatta’s rich heritage offers a range of opportunities for interpretation and education through its parks and open space network. The Open Space Plan may explore ways in which parks can further develop the community’s interest in the

Page 62

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


subject, while filling in vast knowledge gaps. There is an opportunity to raise the community’s awareness about Parramatta’s heritage walks.

Open space planning should respond to the values of the multicultural community by improving and developing parks with facilities suitable for large social gatherings.

Awareness of open space

There is an opportunity for Council to better educate the community on the range of parks and open spaces in their local government area, as well as the variety of leisure activities available within these parks.

People generally do not feel any loyalty for their own local government area and the recreational opportunities provided. Awareness and usage are influenced by factors other than which council manages the facility, including word of mouth, standard and interest of facilities, where friends and family live, and convenience.

Leisure participation

For the Open Space Plan to respond to community needs, it will need to plan for passive recreation pursuits as well as a range of active recreational activities, including cycling, jogging, organised sports, rollerblading, BMX bike riding, skateboarding and even fishing and boating.

Council should acknowledge that the community will not patronise local open space just because it is run by their local Council. It must satisfy their recreational needs, otherwise they will travel to other local government areas.

Distribution of open space

There is a strong perception that there is uneven distribution of funding and open space facilities across the LGA. The southern suburbs of the LGA were perceived to be most lacking in open space recreational opportunities.

The improvement and maintenance standards of parks across the LGA is likely to change the community’s perception of the distribution and amount of parks.

The community has little or no awareness of the categories used to identify open space, including local parks, district parks and so on. Instead, they describe them in terms of their size (local park being small and close by, sportsgrounds, bushland and playgrounds).

Page 63

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Maintenance levels

Maintenance levels of parks directly affect the community’s decision whether to use it. Improving maintenance levels in open space across the LGA is likely to increase visitation.

Maintaining and developing spectator and non-sporting facilities (such as canteens and toilets) at sportsgrounds across the LGA should be a priority if Council wishes to increase patronage of these venues and improve public perceptions.

Improved maintenance of cycleways and walkways throughout the LGA will improve perceptions and safety.

Council may wish to address the perceived inequity of maintenance levels across the local government area.

Appearance

There is an opportunity for Council to educate the public about water quality in the Parramatta River, including details about recent improvements and what is an acceptable colour that depicts good river health.

The appearance of individual parks within the LGA may be addressed by assessing maintenance levels, standards of facilities and lighting, all of which influence how people use the parks, which, in turn, affects people’s perceptions of appearance.

Useability

There is an urgent need to provide facilities in local parks, particularly seats, tables, shelters, barbecues and toilets. These should cater for both small and large groups.

Families with young children are more likely to use local parks if they are screened from the street by planting or fencing around play areas.

Increased presence of security personnel and increased lighting in secluded areas such as open space corridors is likely to encourage greater use of a number of open space areas, including Parramatta CBD at night.

The useability of a number of sportsfields throughout the LGA would be increased if Council were to improve their playing surfaces and provide better spectator facilities.

Page 64

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Safety and security

There are real concerns about perceived lack of safety and security throughout Parramatta’s open space areas, particularly the CBD plaza and desolate parks.

Better lighting and a stronger security presence is likely to assist in reducing perceptions of lack of safety.

Real and perceived safety for toddlers and their parents are likely to be improved by the screening of existing playgrounds from roads, or else relocating the playgrounds within the parks.

Access

There is an expectation for free parking to be provided at parks, particularly those that are used for an all-day event.

Variety

An opportunity exists for Council to dramatically transform the community’s perceptions and use of Parramatta’s parks by introducing a greater range of high standard facilities within the parks.

Campbell Hill Pioneer Reserve, South Granville and Caber Park, Winston Hills, may be used as benchmarks in terms of the elements that the community expects in parks, as they contain a variety of passive and active activities for a range of different users.

Page 65

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Ideals for the future

There is an opportunity to continue to develop and promote the Parramatta River and its foreshores as a recreational venue.

The future of Parramatta’s open space system will be best received if it is focused on providing a range of activities for the whole family, including barbecues, children’s play, birds or animals and even festivals or events in the parks.

Tranquillity is particularly important for older residents within the LGA. The Open Space Plan should incorporate places to relax in beautiful surroundings. Flower displays and water elements would greatly enhance these settings.

Sport is likely to always be important to the local community. Upgraded facilities for players and spectators alike would be well received.

If the Parramatta LGA is to continue to provide passive recreational opportunities for the local community, it should remain accessible to locals for walking and jogging.

Council’s vision statement

There is an opportunity for Council to increase awareness of its vision statement within the community.

The vision statement may be used in other Council communication materials, such as against progress reports on what improvements are being made in the local government area.

As awareness of the vision statement increases, it will be important for the community to be informed as to exactly how Council is implementing the vision.

Page 66

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Appendix BCommunity Forums

Parramatta City Council Open Space Plan

Public Forums Report

June 2003

AuthorLorraine CairnesPlanner and Facilitator, Parramatta Open Space ForumsFathom Consulting, Sydney

Page 67

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Executive Summary

During April 2003, six community forums comprising five Public Forums and one Forum for Park Committee members were held to provide discuss the new Open Space Plan for the whole Local Government Area. Council appointed Lorraine Cairnes, Executive Director of Fathom Consulting as the independent planner and facilitator for these Forums; part of this role was to write a report following the Forums to summarise the advice from the community.

Three Themes formed the focus of discussion: Values of Open Space; Use and Users of Open Space, and Management of Open Space.

The issues raised demonstrated that the community values the open space for many reasons, and feels a strong responsibility to the Parramatta community of the future. The changing nature of the region means that there will be many more people living and working in Parramatta in the future, who will be less likely to live in freestanding dwellings. Private open space will be significantly reduced; the public open space will become “the new backyard”.

The community told us that open space fills many needs, ranging from exercise places, bush and habitat conservation, formal and informal recreation, and quiet places for creative activities and meditation. Most striking was the extent to which the community wishes to see planning that will enhance these places for simple socialising by small and large groups of friends and family. The smaller future backyards will not be large enough for these gatherings. The design of open space will need to accommodate many separate groups.

Another feature of advice was the high value placed on open space within walking distance of home. This means that even the smallest pocket parks are valued, as long as they are accessible. The community accepts and appreciates that small parks will have limited facilities; nevertheless they are places to enjoy, and for young people to gather.

At all Forums, safety and security were raised in many contexts. To fully utilise the Open Space, people must feel that they are safe

Page 68

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


places. These are issues that demand careful open space design and management that will ensure the greatest security possible.

The provision of off-leash areas for dog exercise was raised at several workshops, and many people at one workshop had come particularly to discuss this issue. This is another expression of “the new backyard”: people need somewhere to exercise their companion animals, and many now live in places where this is not possible. There was another perspective on this, of course, as off-leash dogs are frightening to some people, and are not appropriate in areas of native fauna habitat. It does not seem that the present off-leash areas are meeting demand, and a number of constructive ideas for using areas efficiently to allow this use were put forward.

Open Space areas that are linked by recreational pathways to provide for longer distance walking and cycling, and biodiversity connections, were favoured.

The community is still keen on partnerships with Council to care for Open Space, but the changing work patterns and general demands of modern living mean that sustained contributions from week to week are becoming difficult for many. However, there is great enthusiasm to be involved in special events such as planting days, provided Council remains responsible for maintenance.

Community Gardens have captured imagination as a future use (there are already two such gardens in the LGA) and despite understanding of the complexity of management, many people are keen to pursue and support this idea.

Participants indicated that they are keen to remain involved with the development of the draft Open Space Plan, and through the attendance and advice of Council personnel at the Forums, they have been exposed to many of the dilemmas and problems faced by Council in planning and managing Open Space. It can be assumed that the people who attended the Forums are now a well-informed group who will fairly and constructively continue to work with Council on the Plan.

Themes of discussionThree themes to guide discussion were identified in the Forum Program:

1 Values of the Open Space System

2 Uses and Users of the Open Space System

3 Management of the Open Space System

Page 69

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Participants were invited to nominate additional themes for discussion if they felt that the issues of importance to them were not included in the three themes. Only one additional theme was identified at a Forum (Ermington): Provision of areas for dog exercise. This theme has been reported as an issue under Theme 2: Uses and Users of the Open Space system.

Page 70

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Theme 1: Values of the Open Space SystemThe community values Open Space for many reasons. These values need to be provided by the Open Space System as a whole, and the community recognises that not every Open Space place can provide all of the values. However, some values (e.g., security and safety; personal wellbeing) are needed to be maintained in all open space.

The Forums found no difficulty in reviewing the general values of the Open Space System (as opposed to the values of individual parks and reserves), which indicates that the Open Space Plan will be recognised by the community as an important guide to Council in setting the directions, strategies and principles for the system as a whole.

The values identified can be grouped as:

Recreational values Social and socialising values Creativity and education values Design and aesthetic values Personal wellbeing values Natural heritage values Values of linked Open Space places Places with multiple values Property values Values for the future Security and safety valuesRecreational values

A broad spectrum of values for recreation was raised and this discussion was developed further in the “Use” theme.

Social values

The discussion on social values of Open Space revealed that people value Open Space as places to socialise – and see it as a way for the younger age groups to learn about socialising in recreational group settings.

Page 71

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Creativity and educational values

The values discussion ranged from settings for unstructured to highly structured creative and educational activities.

Design and aesthetic values

Although not frequently mentioned when values were discussed, there was more frequent reference to these values in discussion of the “Use” theme.Personal wellbeing values

These were closely related to the recreational values, but discussion often moved into more personal interpretations of the values of open space. Clearly, many people rely on Open Space places as an important factor in leading a balanced and satisfying life. This group of values can be difficult to incorporate into a formal plan, but should be pursued to ensure that the future Open Space meets the community’s needs.

Natural heritage values

Where these values occur they are highly regarded by the community, and the community appears to be making substantial efforts to restore natural heritage values to Open Space places. This is not always in the context of an agreed Plan of Management, and there is frustration when planted or regenerated native plants are mown or otherwise destroyed by Council workers maintaining reserves. Clearly, this is an area for further exploration and discussion (see also “Management Partnerships” below) to establish clearer shared values and constructive partnerships between Council and the community.

Value of linked Open Space places

Linked areas of Open Space were valued by the community. The values of links include landscape, biodiversity, and recreational use. See also below under “Uses and Users”.

Places with multiple values

It was recognised that very small parks would have a smaller range of values and uses than larger areas, and that consequently there would need to be limits to the number of uses that could be accommodated together in such parks.

Page 72

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Property values

The enhancement of property values adjacent to Open Space areas was only mentioned once in the Forum series, suggesting that this might not be a strong value for the community as a whole. Many people like to live within walking distance of a park (even a very small park), for ease of access.

Values for the future

Discussion about this value was multi-faceted. There was a strong view that the community would need, all the Open Space it currently has, and more and therefore Council should keep. There was concern about selling off less valuable Open Space to provide funds for purchase of additional lands where there is a greater need for Open Space. There was cynicism that the accounting system would direct the funds from such sales to purchase of new open space. Nevertheless, the principle was generally seen as logical and there was useful discussion on this point between community and Council personnel.The value of the small neighbourhood “pocket parks” was reinforced (see below – “The New Backyard”).

Security and safety values

This issue was raised at every Forum and in a variety of contexts. Clearly, it is an issue of great concern, and the Open Space Plan (or an allied plan) will need to address it specifically. People did not generally imply that Open Space places are all unsafe now, but they are very concerned that their security will be protected while they are using open space, and that they will feel safe.

Theme 2: Use and users of the Open Space System

This theme was reviewed with frequent reference to the forecast changes and trends in population and housing, and the work patterns of the future (See Section 3: Background Information).

The Forum discussion has been grouped into the following topics:

General use strategies Shared uses Landscaping and design for use Use by different cultural groups Social uses and socialising

Page 73

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Future uses and users Sports uses Educational uses Community gardens Paths, tracks and links for users Safety for users Use of Open Space managed by others Provision of areas for dog exerciseGeneral use strategies

The advice for the Open Space Plan was that it should factor in all of the Open Space in Parramatta LGA, including that owned by Council and by other government agencies. The need to safeguard and protect Open Space for use by the whole community (and not to allow it to be leased or sold to commercial enterprises) was raised. The contribution by park committees and their future role was mentioned.

Shared uses

Sharing of Open Space by different uses was seen as a productive area to be addressed by the future plan. Suggestions included use of school’s Open Space facilities by other use groups, review of underutilised facilities by groups that may have leases from Council, and time-segmented sharing for uses that may not be compatible together (e.g. off-lead dogs in small parks). Safety for all users was an issue. The requirement for categorisation (Local Government Act) of each parcel of Open Space land needs explanation in the draft Plan, as this statutory requirement is generally not understood.

It was suggested that the Plan should include principles that recognise competing values and use: that, as more people use the open space, there will need to be greater tolerance of other uses and users. However, Forums mentioned a number of times that small parks have limits in providing for many different uses and would be less valuable if too many uses are expected of them.

Landscaping and design for use

The community considered that achieving excellence in landscape design through the Plan will be a good investment. Parks are at risk of being bland and boring; and they will need clever design to be able to accommodate more users. An (expensive) alternative is to acquire more Open Space area.

Use by different cultural groups

Page 74

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Parramatta’s population at present and as forecast will be culturally diverse. This richness is already being expressed in the new ways in which people use open space, for gatherings, sports and games. This should be recognised in the new plan.

Social uses and socialising

Open Space was seen as having a significant role in developing emotional, social and life skills. Basic facilities are still desired in parks and reserves, but there is now emphasis on facilities that will support and enhance the way in which people can get together and enjoy social interactions. These include such facilities as shelter in parks for extended families; clean toilets; barbeque areas dispersed through parks (not grouped in one central place); earth mounds for teenagers’ biking; and seating placed to encourage communication, with some seats facing each other, not all in a row.

Future use and users

The Forums readily recognised the real challenge of providing for the future population, where there will be higher density living, and more people needing access to open space. The issues of educating and making new generations aware of (and comfortable in) Open Space and its uses was discussed a number of times. The need to create challenging recreation, and the idea of deliberately creating new traditions such as events related to cultural heritage was suggested. There was concern that there will not be enough Open Space for the future community.

The Forums considered that the users of the future (the majority will be living in units, parents working, children need to play) would need more exercise places, and that their high-pressure lifestyles would mean that they also needed Open Space to relax. The cost of managing Open Space for the users was discussed, with no clear view on whether users should pay for their upkeep. The full range of the future users should be engaged in the process of planning, and there was support for the focus group study process.

Sports uses

Use of Open Space by organised sporting bodies generated considerable discussion. The large area of playing fields needed to support organised sport was recognised, as was the value of sport. Associated issues were access and parking, under-utilisation when sport was not being played, increased use by schools, and the possibility of clubs or commercial organisations providing for more of this use, rather than further developing the community open space, and achieving a balance needed between sporting ovals and general

Page 75

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


recreational uses. The issue of Parramatta Stadium has not been forgotten, and was raised several times. A principle to deal with this issue might be incorporated into the future plan.

Educational usesEducation was seen as an important use of open space, which will need appropriate programs to support it.

Community Gardens

The Community Garden concept has captured the imagination and support of the community, with recognition of the future demise of large private gardens. There is great interest in find ways for the community – all ages – to continue to be involved in planting, tending, enjoying and harvesting gardens.

Community gardens are seen to have social, educational and recreational benefits and to be a way to compensate for some of the less appealing aspects of denser residential development.

There is recognition that community gardens entail considerable organisation and maintenance, and that there would be risks of problems in the future, but nevertheless, the keenness is a signal that this could be the time to explore and expand this use of Open Space. The three community gardens already in the area were frequently cited as successful examples on which to build.

Tracks, access and links for users

Creating publicly accessible links to join Open Space areas will significantly enhance their values to users. The system of extended walking and cycling tracks is important and appears to be very widely used. The frustrating problem of “tracks to nowhere” was raised; tracks themselves need logical starting and finishing points, or should be part of a circuit. Creating and maintaining linkages by utilising lands owned by other agencies was mentioned as an issue that could be included in the Open Space Plan.

The dangers posed by cycles are of concern to many. A policy is needed on shared use of paths by pedestrians and cycles; some considered that now is the time to limit the areas where bicycles are allowed, as they are having adverse impacts on some places and values. More Open Space areas need wheelchair and pram access.

Safety for users

The safety of Open Space users was raised a number of times, and for many is a central issue to the full and free use of open space.

Page 76

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Use of Open Space managed by others

The Open Space Plan should examine the Open Space used by Parramatta LGA residents but controlled by other agencies. The actual owner / manager is not always known (or relevant) to the users.

Page 77

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Provision of areas for dog exercise

This issue was raised as a major issue for discussion at the Ermington Forum, and there were additional comments on this topic at three other Forums.

Some dog owners are passionate in their promotion of expansion of off-lead areas, but most recognise that this use can also create conflicts with other users (particularly the old and the very young, and those who fear or dislike dogs), who then avoid these areas.

Some areas are inappropriate for dogs, such as playing fields and areas with fauna habitat values.

The hygiene issue is significant, and although most owners might be responsible and remove dog droppings, it appears that many are irresponsible.

The Forums made very constructive suggestions for education, a code of conduct, time-sharing, better definition of the attributes for off-lead areas, good signage to indicate dog areas, and imaginative solutions such as a commercial café that welcomes dogs.

The issue needs to be managed positively, recognising that there will be an increase in the number of people who wish to own dogs but cannot provide private open space for their exercise.

The Forums have provided some guidance and, it appears that Council will need to take the lead in this issue and perhaps review the way in which it is being managed by other Councils in the Sydney region.

Page 78

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Theme 3: Management of Open SpaceThe Forum discussion has been grouped into the following topics:

Management partnerships Council’s management role and performance Maintenance Managing for security Waste Management Park Facilities Bushcare and biodiversity management Access and parking Training of staff Future management issues Management issues outside scope of the Open Space PlanManagement partnerships

The concept of extending and improving management partnerships between the community and the Council was discussed positively. It would be useful to explore a modified model, perhaps in conjunction with the review of the role of the Park Committees. The Forums generally felt that people do not have time for regular commitment to voluntary roles, but will enthusiastically support special one-off events, as long as Council can follow up with maintenance.

Some management issues raised were related to individual parks and reserves; the Council personnel at the Forums were able to offer assistance with most of these. However, some were examples of wider management issues that the community would like to have addressed in a future plan.

Involvement of schools, to give pride and ownership of open space, and some problems with conflicting activities by volunteer groups’ plantings, and the maintenance program (mowing) by Council would be worth exploring, either in the context of the Open Space Plan, or otherwise.

Page 79

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Council’s management role and performance

There appeared to be general satisfaction with current management of Open Space by Council, and understanding of the challenges of managing a diverse system of parks and reserves.

The community seems keen that Council’s management should closely relate to the plans for parks and reserves, and that management should reinforce biodiversity values, even where these were not the prime value for reserves.

There was discussion about whether Council was unnecessarily “manicuring” areas, when the community would be just as happy with less tidy landscapes.

Maintenance

Recognising that areas should not be neglected, it appears that the community might tolerate reduction in some aspects of maintenance programs if there were consultation in advance. The community advised that “easy care” strategies will minimise failure, and good planning is critical to reducing maintenance. However, maintenance programs should aim to discourage anti-social behaviour by ensuring that areas look cared-for.

Managing for security

Safety was again raised in this theme’s discussion, as it had been in the other themes.

Waste management

Generic approaches suggested for waste management included cleanup days, increased “ownership” of open space, higher-profile compliance programs; and more regular waste removal.

Park facilities

Shelters and toilets were mentioned, in addition to the facilities already identified for users. Clean toilets appear to be the single most desired element in parks and Forums felt that people would be willing to pay for use if that meant that they were clean. However, there are other implications such as people feeling excluded from using the parks for gatherings if some people were not easily able to afford to pay.

Page 80

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Bushcare and biodiversity management

Bushcare and biodiversity management were frequently identified as requiring management review. The issue of mowing of recent native plantings was raised. Recommendations included:

Use of fire as an ecological process to assist regeneration; Involvement of children in native plantings; Need for Council support for Bushcare Groups and

maintenance of bushcare work once the primary work had been done; and

Publicising biodiversity management.Access and parking

Suggestions for inclusion in the Plan included protocols for access, provision of adequate vehicle parking for Open Space uses, and restriction of bicycle access to appropriate areas.

Training for future management

The training of Council staff in new approaches to management of Open Space with complex values and planning objectives was recommended; training for Open Space management could be a component of the future plan.

Future management issues

Some particular management issues for the future were nominated: they included water conservation (plant natives now), and the need to explore alternative funding mechanisms for acquiring new open space.

Management issues outside scope of the Open Space Plan

A number of practical management issues that were not within the scope the Open Space Plan were referred to Council officers for attention.

Significant issues – additional reviewThree issues were so frequently raised during all of the Forums that they are reported here in a little more detail.

Page 81

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


The New Backyard

Discussion of the future Open Space consequences of higher density living and a higher regional population was a recurring theme at the Forums.

The changes that are forecast, planned – and already happening – were recognised, and the transition from the “old” lifestyle of recreation in large private backyards to dependence on public Open Space is very significant in the community’s eyes.

The community is looking to Open Space to provide many of the same benefits that were once supplied by the old backyard. Even where single dwellings continue to exist, the yards will be smaller because house blocks are smaller, and houses are now larger, leaving less outdoor space for recreation.

These benefits include simple recreational activities: walking, running about, throwing balls, games, socialising, playing with pets, reading, writing, drawing, and meditating.

Backyards are no longer large enough for large gatherings of friends or family. These outings are now held in Open Space parks and reserves, where the need is seen to provide the same essentials that a private house would have done: shelter from sun and rain, barbeques, clean toilets, and space for games.

Some of the popular reserves are already used to capacity at busy times, and clever design will be needed to provide separation of groups and denser usage at these times.

The community recognises that it is difficult and expensive to add substantial new Open Space area, and is willing to contemplate greater density of use.

The small “pocket parks” are staunchly defended. The community sees these as providing different values to the larger regional parks. The pocket parks, even the smallest, are becoming neighbourhood assets that are highly valued. They are gathering places, and many can be reached on foot for those without private transport. Mothers with prams and toddlers were frequently cited. They also served as socialising areas for older children and young teenagers. There were warnings about trying to fit too many uses into very small parks, as this would lead to conflicts.

Page 82

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Safety and security

The issues of safety and security were raised at every Forum, in a variety of contexts. People strongly expressed the need to feel safe in Open Space areas. There are already some areas that the community might avoid, and it was seen as a problem that must be addressed for the future.

Some of the solutions put forward were greater policing by Council, allowing dog-owners access to more areas, night lighting, landscape design, and surveillance by neighbours.

The source of the threats were not particularly explicit, but examples cited included people doing drug deals, people partying and drinking and destroying park assets, dogs off leads, and risk of personal attack at night.

This issue is of such importance to the community that careful consideration needs to be given about the way in which it should be included in the future plan.

Do we have enough open space?

Forums were asked to consider whether Parramatta LGA has sufficient Open Space. The response was that more Open Space is likely to be needed with the future increase in population, and that Open Space might be provided by preventing land owned by other State and Commonwealth agencies from being sold off, or by selling off low-value Open Space and buying more useful areas. It would be important to evaluate carefully the values of Open Space parcels and to consult the community before a decision is made to sell it.

Page 83

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Appendix COther Community InputPublic workshops held in the early development of the Open Space Plan and community consultations for the Parramatta City Council Social Plan 2001/2-2004/5 and surveys (in 2000) of multi-unit housing and CBD workers revealed some core values concerning the LGA’s public open space. Principal amongst these are:

The importance of the LGA’s cultural and natural heritage being reflected in parks and open space.

The significance of the Parramatta and Duck Rivers and the LGA’s natural creeks

The significant value of the extensive bushland in the LGA. The diversity of park settings and recreational opportunities

available. The importance of a sense of space (in compensation for

increasing residential densities).

In addition, concerns regularly raised in these forums included:

Lack of opportunities for young people. Need for wider promotion of the parks network to the

community. Sense of lack of personal safety in some parks. Many from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds

(CALD) did not appreciate the opportunities and values of the LGA’s parks (including a belief that more parks-based events might help redress this and build a sense of community)

Sense that some residents in localities do not feel part of Parramatta (Epping, Toongabbie).

Parramatta Park has been a ‘political football’ for too long. The recent renaming of parks does not reflect the names by

which they are known by many people. Public space and facilities need to be of a higher quality rather

than emphasising expanding the amount of facilities.

Page 84

Open Space Plan

Volume 2


Council's most recent, independent community survey (IRIS December 2001) found the following of relevance to open space areas:

Along with shopping centres and Parramatta's convenient location to central Sydney, colonial heritage, open spaces and the river were highlighted as key attributes making the LGA a distinctive place.

The majority of people interviewed provided a high agreement rating the statements "Parramatta's parks/open spaces provide good environment for leisure and recreation" and "You, your family and your friends feel safe moving about your neighbourhood during the day, including visiting parks and public places".

Tree planting programs received a high satisfaction score. Water quality in creeks, rivers and lakes received a low

satisfaction score and was identified as a high priority for attention.

"Amount and variety of bushland", "number and types of tree planted" and "management of flood prone areas" received the top three rankings of 11 environmental indicators for the LGA.

"Amount of litter and rubbish around Parramatta" was one of the lowest three rankings of 11 environmental indicators for the LGA.

The majority of respondents believed that Council does a good job in managing facilities including parks, playing fields and open spaces.

The biggest issues facing the Parramatta LGA are crime, environmental management, planing/development, road conditions and safety, traffic and parking and public transport.

Research undertaken for the Parramatta Community Safety and Crime Prevention Plan 2002, found that the community felt unsafe in open space when there was inadequate lighting and where they were isolated. The community suggested that improved lighting, increasing numbers of people in open space, particularly in the CBD and improving pedestrian access could make the LGA a safer place.

The Benchmark Park User Satisfaction Survey January 2002 found that compared with 9 other Councils from across the Sydney metropolitan area, Parramatta's major parks were ranked in the number one (1) position for maintenance performance. Grass length and quality, shelters, tables and seats, playground undersurfacing, fences and barriers, signs, repair of damage and land drainage were rated particularly high for Parramatta compared with other Sydney LGAs.

Page 85

Open Space Plan

Volume 2

Parramatta City Council November 2003Page 86

Open Space Plan

Volume 2Table of Contents

Volume 2 Supporting Materials

1. Demographic and Locality Analysis 1

1.1 Demographic Profile and Trends 11.2 The Open Space System 71.3 Recreation 131.4 Access 21

2. Management Tools 27

2.1 Open Space Inventory 272.2 Park Hierarchy Guidelines 392.3 Facilities Checklist for Parks 412.4 Open Space Development and Management Principles 44

AppendicesA Community Research 54

B Community Forums 63

C Other Community Input 78

/tt/file_convert/5d1bc12588c993fc268bc398/document.doc

businesspapers.parracity.nsw.gov.au · Web view1.1 Demographic Profile and Trends. To determine...

Documents

Transcript of businesspapers.parracity.nsw.gov.au · Web view1.1 Demographic Profile and Trends. To determine...