© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved Prototype Productions,...
-
Upload
trevin-gallup -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of © Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved Prototype Productions,...
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Prototype Productions, Inc.
JHU/APL Patents & Pizza
Prototyping for Commercialization
September 6, 2007
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Commercialization
•Commercialization for APL means selecting and working with a commercial partner, often through licensing.
•A successful prototyping effort will improve the value of the license and speed time to market.
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Risk Reduction
•Licensing implies reduction in risk for the licensee and allows them to allocate their in-house resources to other projects or technologies.
•In order to commercialize and bring technology out of the lab, it must be made readily accessible to the licensee.
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Best License Value
•Best license value:– Most risk reduction– Most direct fit for
commercial partner
•License value can be negotiated based on maturity of technology and risks that have been addressed prior to licensing.
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Experimentation
•Risk reduction requires experimentation in the most challenging areas of the design.
•Effective prototyping is critical to effective experimentation.
•Successful experimental results strengthen the license.
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Cost of Prototyping
•Prototyping can be costly:– low volume– no ability to amortize NRE – High setup costs with
traditional methods
•Prioritize prototyping efforts:– Does it further the core
technology?– Does it improve value of
license?– Functional or Cosmetic?– Valuable experimentation?
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
So, In Summary…
•Prototype experimentally on the riskiest aspects of design first, to make best use of funds.
•Keep the commercial partner in mind when deciding what needs to be prototyped.
• Carefully consider the manufacturing methods used in their existing products
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Mechanical Prototyping Methods in Detail
•Traditional metalworking methods are well developed and understood.
•Rapid prototyping has recently become mature and widely accepted. The methods are well understood.
•Both methods have their place and are often used in combination.
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Sheet Metal Machining
Traditional Metalworking Methods
Pros•Accuracy•Widespread Use•Well Understood•Durable
Cons•Cost Related to Complexity•Lead Time in Weeks/Months•Resource Constraints•Limited Part Geometries
&
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Recommendation
•Alternative: Design for manufacture from plastic where possible, and utilize one of three primary Rapid Prototyping methods shown on the following pages.
•Plastic is widely used for manufacture of fully commercialized (cost- reduced) product, and demonstrates sophistication, evolution of a design, and shows that cost was considered during initial development.
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
•Liquid Resin•Photocured with Laser
RP with Stereolithography (SLA)
Pros•Lead time days, not weeks•Most widely used•Highly developed•Lowest cost
Cons•Limited material properties•Brittle, non-functional parts•Poor chemical compatibility•Requires support structures
&
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
•Continuous melting, extruded plastic filament
RP with Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)
Pros•Lead time days, not weeks•ABS, PC, PPS Materials•Office-friendly equipment•Lowest equipment cost
Cons•Rough surface finish•Speed related to complexity•Poor chemical compatibility•Requires support structures
&
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
•Powdered material, fused together with a laser…This is what we use…
RP with Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)
Pros•Lead time days, not weeks•Rugged, functional parts•Very good accuracy •Nylon, Titanium, Stainless Steel
Cons•Needs paint for best finish•Most expensive equipment•Needs coating for watertight•Industrial equipment install
&
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
• In the last 10 years, PPI has completed 66 products in various industries including:
• 13 Commercial and Medical – Immersion’s robotic surgical simulation training systems, including I.V. Catheterization, Pacemaker Implantation, and Endoscopy. PPI and Immersion Medical were the first commercially viable manufacturer of surgical simulators.
• 11 Industrial and Consumer - Airak’s fiber-optic sensing systems for utility and shipboard applications, Privaris’ handheld biometric identification device, PowerGrid Fitness’ virtual reality exercise equipment, Wireless Ventures’ Set-top-box, and Keynetik’s ruggedized PDA.
• 12 Biotech - Edge Biosystems’ automated preparation systems for PCR, JHU/APL’s intelligent sample processing systems for biological agent detection, Frito-Lay’s visual inspection systems for FDA food processing environments, and Bausch & Lomb’s contact lens manufacturing center.
• 30 Aerospace and Defense - SureScan solid-state CT-based baggage inspection system, ruggedized machine vision system for United Defense mobile Howitzer artillery platform, US Army ARL autonomous package delivery system, Special Forces remote monitoring and sensing platform.
Who is PPI?
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
A Diverse Product Development Company
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Prototype Productions Ventures, LLC Prototype Productions Ventures, LLC (PPIV)(PPIV)
Investment and CommercializationInvestment and Commercialization
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
PPIV views PPI as IP/startup filtration enginePPIV views PPI as IP/startup filtration engine
PPIV commercializes filtered projectsPPIV commercializes filtered projects
PPIV primary screening criteria:PPIV primary screening criteria:Potential for VC-like return on investmentPotential for VC-like return on investment
PPIV owns a PPIV owns a minimumminimum of 50% upon investment of 50% upon investment
Device-base companies, web-based software Device-base companies, web-based software butbut PPIV will be opportunistic (e.g. food tech)PPIV will be opportunistic (e.g. food tech)
PPI + PPIVPPI + PPIV
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
PPI/PPIV ModelPPI/PPIV Model
I. Internal (PPI )IPI. Internal (PPI )IP
• SBIRsSBIRs
• Spot OpportunitiesSpot Opportunities
II. Third-Party IPII. Third-Party IP•Universities, Gov’t labs Universities, Gov’t labs
•Joint Ventures (Food Tech)Joint Ventures (Food Tech)
•M&A (NPI)M&A (NPI) PPIVPPIV
PPIPPI• DesignDesign
• PrototypingPrototyping
• ManufacturingManufacturing
CONCEPT TO CONCEPT TO COMMERCIALIZATIONCOMMERCIALIZATION
• Seed FinancingSeed Financing• Business PlansBusiness Plans• ValuationValuation• Business DevelopmentBusiness Development• Capital raisingCapital raising• M&AM&A
•Liquidity Liquidity eventsevents
•Licensing Licensing RevenueRevenue
•DividendsDividends
© Copyright 2007, Prototype Productions, Incorporated. All rights reserved
Contact Information
Ben FeldmanVice President, Product Development703.858.0011 [email protected]
Prototype Productions, Inc.21641 Beaumeade CircleSuite 301Ashburn, VA 20147703.858.0011www.protoprod.com