© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods...

21
© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional)

Transcript of © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods...

Page 1: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists

Sensory Science 101Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods

Sensory Science 101Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods

Speaker NameSpeaker Title

Date (optional)

Speaker NameSpeaker Title

Date (optional)

Page 2: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 2

What is Sensory Evaluation?

“A scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyze and

interpret those responses to products that are perceived by

the senses of sight, smell, touch, taste and hearing.”

Stone, H and Sidel, JL. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices. 2nd ed. Academic Press: San Diego.

Page 3: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 3

How is Sensory Evaluation Used?

• In a food company, sensory scientists work closely with

product developer’s to understand: What consumers like and why If consumers can tell a difference when they change a product (e.g.

substitute an ingredient)

• In academia, sensory scientists: Try to understand how our senses work and how our senses respond

to stimuli (both from food and chemicals) Improve testing methodology

Page 4: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 4

Why Is Sensory Evaluation Used?

• It reduces uncertainty and risks in decision making

• It ensures a cost-efficient delivery of new products with high

consumer acceptability

• Human observers are good measuring instruments People can sometimes detect odorants at levels lower than what can

be detected by an instrument Instruments can not measure liking (although they can be used to

determine what characteristics of a food correlate with liking - e.g.

with many beverages – up to a point - as sweetness increases so

does liking)

Page 5: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 5

Principles of Good Practice• Facilities should be well designed

White or off-white color Lighting should be controlled There should be good ventilation

• Samples should be prepared properly Temperature should be controlled and the same for all samples Volume served should be equal for all samples Samples should be served at equivalent shelf-life or time since cooking/preparation

• Experimental Design Considerations Samples should be labeled with random 3-digit codes to avoid bias Samples should be served in random or counterbalanced order

• Counterbalanced order means that if 2 samples are served, half of the subjects receive one sample first and the other half receive the other sample first

• Counterbalancing takes into account order effects

Page 6: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 6

Sensory Evaluation Methods

• Goal is to match the right

test with the right question

Question Method

Are products

different?

Discrimination Tests

If products

are different,

how are they

different?

Descriptive Analysis

What is the

acceptability

of a product?

Is one

product

preferred

over another?

Affective/Hedonic Tests

Page 7: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 7

Discrimination Tests• Basic Question: Are two products different from one another?

• Basic Setup 25-50 panelists Screened for acuity (keenness or sharpness of perception, i.e. can they smell

and taste well?) Given triangle, duo-trio or paired comparison tests Analysis is done using tables which compare results to chance – this analysis

ensures that the difference was real and not because people chose the correct sample by luck/chance

• Advantage Quick and simple

• Limitations Limited results – only yes they are different or no they are not

Page 8: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 8

Discrimination Tests• Question: Are two products different from one another?

• Triangle Test: Choose the sample that is most different

• Duo-trio Test: Choose the sample that matches the reference

• Paired Comparison Test: Which sample is sweeter?

342 608 194

A A B

976821

A B

437

Reference (B)

759035

B A

Page 9: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 9

Descriptive Tests

• Basic Question: How do products differ in all sensory attributes?

• Basic Setup 8-12 panelists Screened for acuity Trained Asked to rate intensity for all sensory attributes Analysis is done using a t-test to determine if means are statistically different

• Advantages Detailed quantitative information

• Limitations Time consuming

Page 10: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 10

Descriptive Tests

• Most food companies have a panel that is trained on each of

their products

• To train a panel takes several weeks to months

• There are several different methods of training Quantitative Descriptive Analysis Sensory Spectrum Flavor Profile

Page 11: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 11

Descriptive Tests• What does trained mean?

• It means that the panelists are trained

to evaluate products similar to how

any instrument would give a reading

• In essence, the panelists are

calibrated so that they have an

understanding of each attribute and

the range of intensity

• For example, a trained panel would

be a given a sample of grape juice

and would be able to rate the level of

turbidity, color, viscosity, etc..

Sample Ballot305

Page 12: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 12

Descriptive Tests

• Mean attribute ratings are

calculated, statistics is used to

determine if the means are

significantly different

• The data can be plotted onto

graphs – such as the spider plot –

to easily compare samples

• In this example three brands of

grape juice were compared: Which is sweeter? Which has more cooked flavor?

Page 13: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 13

Consumer Acceptance Tests

• Basic Question: Are the products liked?

• Basic Setup 75-150 consumers per test Screened for product use (Do they buy the product? And how often?) Asked degree of liking (how much do they like it) and/or preference

questions

• Advantages Provides essential information – Do they like it or not?

• Disadvantages May be difficult to get a representative sample of consumers

Page 14: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 14

DISLIKE EXTREMELY1

DISLIKE VERY MUCH2

DISLIKE MODERATELY3

DISLIKE SLIGHTLY4

NEITHTER LIKE NOR DISLIKE5

LIKE SLIGHTLY6

LIKE MODERATELY7

LIKE VERY MUCH8

LIKE EXTREMELY9

Quartermaster Corp. 9-point hedonic (liking) scale(Most common)

Consumer Acceptance Tests• Acceptance Tests

Used to measure how much people like a product There are several types of scales that can be used

The Smiley Scale(Used with kids)

Sample Ballot

Taste each product in the order listed. Circle how much you like the product.

Page 15: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 15

Consumer Acceptance Tests

• Preference Tests The “Pepsi Challenge” type of test that is widely used in marketing

research Used to determine which product is preferred, although people have

the option to choose “no preference”

Taste each product in the order that they are listed. Circle the number of the product that you prefer, all things considered.

470 193 no preference

Sample Ballot

Page 16: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 16

Careers in Sensory Evaluation• Job Titles:

Sensory Scientist Sensory Analyst Sensory Technician

• Employers: Food processors Cosmetic and fragrance

manufacturers Ingredient

manufacturers/suppliers Academia (Higher Education) Consumer and marketing

research firms Self-employed/Consultant

• Job Responsibilities: Experimental design Sample Preparation Perform, analyze, and report

experimental results Troubleshooting

Sensory Scientist at Work!

Page 17: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 17

Want to learn more?

•Visit: http://www.ift.org http://school.discovery.com/foodscience/

•Find a Food Scientist: A database of IFT members who are willing to

provide more information about the field of food

science to you http://members.ift.org/IFT/Education/TeacherResources/findafoodscientist.htm

Page 18: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 18

Questions?

Page 19: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 19

Activity

• Triangle Sensory Test with Oreo Cookies

Page 20: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists© 2007 Institute of Food Technologists 20

References

Lawless, HT and Heymann, H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of

Food: Principles and Practices. New York: Chapman &

Hall.

Page 21: © 2007 Institute of Food Technologists Sensory Science 101 Part II: Sensory Evaluation Methods Speaker Name Speaker Title Date (optional) Speaker Name.

Headquarters525 W. Van Buren StreetSuite 1000Chicago, IL 60607312.782.8424ift.org

Washington, D.C. Office1025 Connecticut Avenue, NWSuite 503Washington, D.C. 20036202.466.5980