Post on 14-Apr-2018
What Appraisers, Accountants, and Attorneys Need to Know About
Business Valuation-Related Issues in Estate Planning
November 2, 2011
www.aicpa.org/fvs
Forensic and Valuation Services Section www.aicpa.org/fvs
DISCLAIMERThe views expressed by the presenters do not necessarily represent the views, positions, or opinions of the AICPA or the presenter’s respective organization.
These materials, and the oral presentation accompanying them, are for educational purposes only and do not constitute accounting or legal advice or create an accountant-client or attorney-client relationship.
Forensic and Valuation Services Section 3
PanelistsF.A. "Chip" Brown, CFA, CPA, ABV, CFFWillamette Management Associatescbrown@willamette.com404-475-2306
Curtis R. Kimball, CFA, ASAWillamette Management Associatescrkimball@willamette.com404-475-2307
www.aicpa.org/fvs
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Focus of Today’s Presentation
Best practices for estate tax valuationsAppraiser’s potential roles in estate planningValuation issues in the drafting of corporation and partnership documentsRecent valuation discount settlements
www.aicpa.org/fvs 4
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
8 Best Practices for Estate Tax Valuations1. Adhere to Recognized Professional Standards2. Meet or Exceed any Reporting or Disclosure
Requirements3. Obtain Relevant Professional Qualifications,
Experience, and Education4. Perform Adequate Due Diligence5. Understand Subsequent Events6. Have a General Awareness of Relevant IRS Publications7. Apply Generally Accepted Valuation Methods 8. Perform Adequate Analyses to Support any Discounts
6
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #1Adhere to Recognized Professional Standards
USPAP• IRS commentaries have indicated that a USPAP-compliant
report will generally be regarded as a qualified appraisal.• Kohler case – Tax Court critical of IRS expert report that “was
not prepared in accordance with all USPAP standards” • Not that high of a hurdle to overcome
SSVS No. 1• AICPA members required to follow this standard when they
perform engagement to estimate value that culminate in the expression of a conclusion of value or a calculated value
Other Valuation Professional Organization Standards
7
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #2Meet or Exceed any Reporting or Disclosure Requirements
The name of the game in gift and estate planning is “adequate disclosure.” • The IRS’s rules set forth in Treasury Regulations Section
301.6501(c)-1(f)(3), published December 3, 1999, apply to all gifts made after August 5, 1997.
The valuation report must contain certain items in order to meet adequate disclosure (see subsequent slide)
8
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
• The date of the appraisal.• The date of the transfer.• The purpose of the appraisal.• A description of the property.• A description of the appraisal process
employed, including the valuation method(s) utilized.
• A description of the assumptions utilized.
• A description of any hypothetical conditions considered.
• The information considered in determining the value; including all financial information in sufficient detail to allow the reader to replicate the appraisal analysis and valuation.
• The appraisal procedures followed, and the reasoning that supports the analysis, opinions and conclusions.
• The valuation method utilized, the rationale for the valuation method, and the procedure used in determining the fair market value of the asset transferred
• The specific basis for the valuation, such as specific comparable sales or transactions, sales of similar interests, asset-based approaches, merger-acquisition transactions, etc.
• Descriptions of any restrictions or other limiting conditions present.
Adequate disclosure items related to the valuation report
9
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #3Obtain Relevant Professional Qualifications, Experience, and Education
At least one business valuation specific credential (ABV, ASA, AVA, CVA, CBA)• Definition of qualified appraiser under IRC Section 170 recently
modified to include “earned an appraisal designation from recognized professional appraiser organization.”
• Kohler case – Tax Court commented favorably that the Estate’s experts were “certified appraisers”
Regularly perform business valuationsExperience in gift/estate tax related mattersContinuing education and training related to gift/estate tax matters
10
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #4Perform Adequate Due Diligence
Site visits (at least periodically) by the valuation analyst to the subject company location(s)Interview management • Kohler case – Court critical of IRS expert for limited due
diligence related to site visit and interviewing management. “we are convinced from his report and trial testimony that [the IRS expert] did not understand Kohler’s business. He spent only 2-1/2 hours meeting with management”
Typical for the respective court to show a keen interest in the level of due diligence that was performed• Kohler case – “[Estate’s experts] spent sufficient time with the
company and management to understand the Kohler business”
11
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #5Understand Subsequent Events
USPAP• Provides guidance regarding subsequent events for retrospective appraisals
(appraisals in which the effective date of the appraisal is prior to the report date).• Based on USPAP, it is reasonable for an analyst to consider data subsequent to
the valuation date but only to confirm historical trends and market expectations as of the valuation date.
SSVS 1• Provides guidance regarding subsequent events. • Based on SSVS 1, an analyst is not required to disclose subsequent events.
However, an analyst may disclose subsequent events in a separate report section for informational purposes.
12
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Subsequent events (continued)
While in theory any subsequent events should not impact valuation, the IRS often will try to use subsequent events as corroborating evidence for its position. Therefore, it may be helpful to be prepared to reconcile the valuation to subsequent events
13
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Subsequent events (continued)
A majority of the federal tax cases dealing with subsequent events have concluded that it is inappropriate to use hindsight as direct evidence of value as of the valuation date.However, the Tax Court (and other federal courts) has also opined that certain subsequent events that occur within a reasonable time after the valuation date may be appropriate to consider:• Reasonably foreseeable• Prove reasonableness of expectations • Subsequent sale of subject interest• Subsequent sale of comparable ownership interest
14
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Subsequent events (continued)
Gimbel case• Subsequent event of the redemption of all estate shares by the
Company. Court found that it was reasonably foreseeable as of the date of death that the company would repurchase a portion (20%) of shares, but not all the shares. Tax Court did not adopt the exact subsequent transaction price or number of shares as a basis for its decision. However, Tax Court was clearly influenced by the subsequent event.
Ringgold Telephone Company case• Tax Court criticized taxpayer expert for failing to consider the
subsequent sale.
15
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #6Have a General Awareness of Applicable IRS Publications
Federal Tax Law• Internal Revenue Code • Code of Federal Regulation
Internal Revenue Service Publications• Treasury Regulations • Treasury Decisions • Revenue Rulings • Revenue Procedures
Advance Rulings and Determinations• Technical Advice Memorandums• Technical Memorandums
16
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #7Apply Generally Accepted Valuation Methods
Sounds simple, but the devil is in the detailsMeet Daubert standardsSSVS 1 provides a good outline for generally acceptable valuation methodsAICPA Practice Aid – Business Valuations for Estate and Gift Tax Purposes (not yet published, but currently being worked on)
17
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Best Practice #8 Perform Adequate Analyses to Support any Discounts
Consideration of empirical models/theoretical models/regression models as part of the discount for lack of marketability discountGo beyond the studies and rules of thumbDo not use court cases as support for discountsFind applicable closed-end fundsReview and understand provisions of any partnership/operating agreements that may impact control and/or marketability
18
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Coordination Between Estate Attorney and Appraiser
Appraisers should not render a legal opinionRely on attorney in regards to the likely understanding of rights and privileges associated with subject interestA hypothetical willing buyer/seller would likely consult with attorney on similar issuesAny document in the appraiser’s file is subject to being discovered during the audit process or in subsequent valuation litigation. This includes written correspondence, emails, notes and drafts of appraisals.Appraiser should be independent
20
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Potential Stages of the Estate Planning Process
Initial planning stageGifting stageGift tax audit stageGift tax litigation stageEstate tax stageEstate tax audit stageEstate tax litigation stage
21
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Planning StageAppraiser potential roles
Identify problem valuation situations or problem assetsIdentify the effects of various gift and estate planning alternatives on valuationProvide input on company/partnership documents that may impact valueDetermine preferred rate/yieldProvide input on capital structure (voting, non-voting, preferred, super common)
22
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Gifting StageAppraiser potential roles
Perform periodic valuationsDecide the appropriate type of report format to achieve “adequate disclosure” yet maintain a budget that makes sense with regard to the complexity and level of tax exposure of the clientBe aware of any tax deadlines
23
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Estate Tax StageAppraiser potential roles
Perform valuation as of the date of deathProvide input on whether alternative valuation date should be consideredIf requested/needed, perform valuation as of alternative valuation dateSometimes more than one valuation firm is engaged to perform the valuation
24
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Gift/Estate Tax Audit StageAppraiser potential roles
Review any IRS letters Educate the attorneys on the valuation issues that may be raised by the IRSRespond in writing on valuation questions raised by IRSParticipate in call/meetings with IRSAdvise client on potential impact on value Prepare for litigation in the event an agreement cannot be achieved on audit or on appeal
25
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Estate/Gift Tax Litigation StageAppraiser potential role
Provide input on whether to prepare a formal rebuttal report to any other expert reports submitted in opposition to the original valuation positionClarify the impact of any subsequent events or newly discovered facts on the subject interest’s valuationAn new appraiser may be brought in during the litigation phase
26
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Valuation Issues in the Drafting of Company and Partnership Documents
27
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Considerations in partnership/operating agreements
Attorneys drafting LLC and LP agreement documents have to deal with a certain balance between terms that provide flexibility of operation with restrictions on control and marketabilityState law can have a substantial influence over how interests are viewed for appraisal. Federal transfer tax laws and regulations are also important.As part of estimating the fair market value of an entity interest, the appraiser should consider the valuation impact of the terms of the agreement. This creates a unique interface between the attorney and appraiser during the planning stage of the creation of an entity.
28
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Terms impacting lack of control
Management of operationsVoting rightsControl over the timing and amount of distributionsControl over the type of distributionsControl over additional capital contributionsRemoval of general partner or managerControl over tax matters and tax elections
29
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Terms impacting lack of marketability
Duration of entity until dissolutionRestrictions on transfersRights of first refusalRestrictions on pledging or other forms of anticipating valueMandatory or option buy-sell requirementsAdmission of additional or substitute partners/membersTreatment of assignees
30
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Terms impacting other adjustments
Built-in gains and the Section 754 election adjustment• Built-in gains that result when a buyer of a partnership interest
cannot adjust his share of the basis of the assets in apartnership to their present value has a detrimental impact onthe marketability of the entity’s interests.
• Ownership interests that cannot compel the management of theentity to enter into this election tend to have larger marketabilitydiscount adjustments to reflect the fewer number of buyerswilling to take the risk that an election will be made in the futureat the appropriate time.
• Some entity agreements make the party requesting the 754election bear the costs of compliance. This contingent costburden also results in an incremental additional discount.
31
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Terms impacting other adjustments (continued)
Loss of a key manager – rules for successor management• Some agreements have complicated successor appointment
terms which could slow down the ability of the entity to respondto business opportunities or risks during a time when the entityhas lost a key manager. This factor can result in an increaseddiscount adjustment.
32
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Terms impacting other adjustments (continued)
Greater restrictions in the terms of an entity agreement may result in loss of present interest status • Estate of Hackl
- The judge viewed what he concluded were overly-broad provisionsin the operating agreement of the LLC that had the effect ofeliminating any meaningful economic benefits to the immediateuse, possession, or enjoyment of the subject LLC intereststransferred under the annual exclusion gift under Section 2503(b).
• Some commentators have suggested providing a limited (in time) rightof redemption or put right for minority interests whereby the interestcould be redeemed by the entity at fair market value, applying all theappropriate discount adjustments, in order to substantiate that theinterest has a present economic benefit.
33
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements
The following data was compiled by Curtis Kimball and members of Willamette from our own case files and from materials presented by othersSettlement data is interesting because it shows what the IRS and taxpayers have agreed to as fair market value in cases that are similar in nature to valuation engagements in which one may be currently involvedThese are out of court settlements
35
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Absent a comprehensive list of private transactions in non–publicly registered entities, these data may be helpful in providing the appraiser with some insight into the issues that create conflicts between the IRS and taxpayersThese cases, however, should not be treated as something akin to guideline transactions, but rather should be viewed in the same manner as court case decisionsPlease remember that these settlements do not necessarily represent arm’s-length transactions, given the prospect of further litigation if a settlement is not reached Because of the differing facts and circumstances of each case, no statistical average or similar metric would be appropriate
36
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 1By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2011
Type: Estate (2009)
Interest: Limited partnership (non-controlling)
State Law: Florida
Assets: Publicly traded common stocks (80%); cash (20%)
Other factors: None
Discount settlement: 37.1%
37
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 2By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2011
Type: Estate (2008)
Interest: Common stock (controlling interest in a C corp)
State Law: Delaware
Assets: Municipal bond portfolio
Other factors: Built-in gains tax exposure; executor sold off all the bonds during settlement negotiations.
Discount settlement: 7% discount for lack of marketability and all built-in gains.
38
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 3By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2011
Type: Estate (2007)
Interest: Limited liability company (non-controlling)
State Law: Delaware
Assets: Diversified bond portfolio
Other factors: Graegin note exposure
Discount settlement: 25% (Graegin note interest allowed)
39
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 4By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2011
Type: Estate (2007)
Interest: 50% common stock interest
State Law: Florida
Assets: Professional medical services
Other factors: Mandatory distribution agreement; interest sold by executor after settlement; Willamette brought in to rebut the IRS’ Appellate valuation position
Discount settlement: 20% discount for lack of marketability
40
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 5By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2011
Type: Estate (2009)
Interest: Three LP and LLC interests (all 49% non-controlling interests)
State Law: Florida
Assets: Publicly traded diversified stock and bond portfolio
Other factors: Each LLC was the general partner of one of the LPs
Discount settlement: 35.5% to 36.3%
41
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 6By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2010
Type: Estate (2007)
Interest: Limited Partnership
State Law: Oregon
Assets: Commercial Real Estate
Other factors: Some exposure on valuation of underlying real estate
Discount settlement: 39%
42
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 7By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2010
Type: Estate (2008)
Interest: Limited Liability Company (non-controlling)
State Law: North Carolina
Assets: Timberlands, croplands, farm house (57%); public securities - mostly stock and bond funds (43%)
Other factors: Real estate consisted of undivided interests
Discount settlement: 31.7%, plus 40% discount for undivided interests (total discount approximately 50.6%)
43
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
Recent discount settlements (cont’d)
Settlement # 8By: Willamette Management Associates
Date: 2010
Type: Estate (2007)
Interest: Limited Partnership
State Law: Florida
Assets: Stocks (50%); Bonds (50%)
Other factors: Section 2036 exposure; powers of appointment
Discount settlement: 23% for one LP block; 30.8% for other LP block (taxed under two different sections of the IRC; see Mellinger case)
44
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
AICPA Business Valuation Web Seminar Series: Core Competencies from the Nation’s Leading Experts
www.aicpa.org/fvs 46
Upcoming Web Seminars:• Valuation for Employee Stock Ownership Plans November 17, 2011• Valuations for Financial Statement Reporting Purposes December 6, 2011• Principles of Valuation for Marital Dissolution Purposes December 15, 2011• Valuations for Dissenting Stockholder & Minority
Oppression Actions January 5, 2012• Pass-through Entity Valuation 2012: Research & Methods January 19, 2012• Forensic Analysis Expert Witness Testimony: Defending
Your Expert Report and Expert Testimony February 2, 2012
For more information visit: www.aicpa.org/BVSeries
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
See You at the Event!
Visit www.aicpa.org/FVS_CPE_Events to register for the following face-to face educational opportunities:
AICPA National Business Valuation Conference• New in 2011 – PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS TRACK!• November 6-8, 2011 in Las Vegas, NVAICPA National Healthcare Industry Conference• New in 2011 – VALUATIONS SPECIALIZATION TRACK!• November 17-18, 2011 in Baltimore, MD
www.aicpa.org/fvs 47
Forensic and Valuation Services Section
For additional information, please visit:
Forensic and Valuation Services (FVS) Sectionwww.aicpa.org/fvs
Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV) Credential Overview
www.aicpa.org/abvCertified in Financial Forensics (CFF) Credential Overview
www.aicpa.org/cff
48www.aicpa.org/fvs