Post on 23-Dec-2015
Updates on MVAT Laws Updates on MVAT Laws with special emphasis on with special emphasis on
builders & developersbuilders & developers
Presentation by Presentation by CA Rajat Talati, Mumbai CA Rajat Talati, Mumbai
on 14.10.2012 on 14.10.2012 rajat@talatico.comrajat@talatico.com
organised by organised by J. B. Nagar CPE Study Circle of WIRCJ. B. Nagar CPE Study Circle of WIRC
Agenda
• Recent amendments to Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005
• Recent amendments to Profession Tax Act - Maharashtra State
• Taxation of builders & developers
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 2
Amendments
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 3
Purchase Tax
• Sec 6A & 6B - Purchase tax @ 5% on cotton and oil seeds purchased from URD– URD includes persons -farmers.– PT u/s 6B on purchases of oil seeds effective from
1.5.12– PT u/s 6A on URD purchase of cotton not made
effective• Registration compulsory when purchase
turnover exceeds 5 lacs.– Prescribed limits would also include TO liable to PT
– Sec 4(5A)– Till such time exemption from PT –Sec 3(2)
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 4
Purchase Tax (cont...)
• The purchase tax is payable in the following circumstances:– Oil seeds so purchased are dispatched by way of stock
transfer to places outside the states within India or – Oil seeds so purchased are used in manufacture of
– taxable goods and the goods so manufactured are transferred outside the state within India as stock transfer or
– tax free goods
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 5
Purchase Tax (cont...)
• The rate of purchase tax is equal to the vat applicable to sale of oil seed i.e. 5% (current rate)
• Purchase tax payable in the month when the contingencies occur
• Purchase tax paid would also qualify for set off, subject to rule 53 & 54
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 6
Purchase Tax (cont...)
• Is it that purchases from RD & URD put at par?- it would be appropriate to make purchases from
registered dealer on payment of vat wherever there is some reduction in the ITC/ set off
• Is it liable to stk of URD seeds on 30.4.12?
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 7
Tax Collection at Source
• Sec 31A – TCS - by – Persons who auctions right to excavates and– Or who is in temporary possession over goods
that may be notified• Rate to be notified
• Form 421 to be issued by auctioneer/ person
• TCS allowed to be adjusted against tax liability of buyer
• Notification yet to be issued
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 8
Textile processors• Sec 8(3C) –exemption from VAT on value of
material transferred in execution of WC effective 15.8.2007 to textile processors– Amendment in ADE wef 8.4.11
– Amendment to MVAT act effective 1.5.2012 provides –reference to ADE as it stood before Finance Act 2011
– Thus w.e.f. 1.5.12 – textile processors –exempted
– Therefore taxable bet 8.4.11 to 30.4.12
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 9
Penalty provisions
• Non- Registration in time –Sec 29(2A)
– Penalty equal to amt of tax payable– Builders developers??
• Saved in view of Admn relief scheme [14T/2012]
• Late fees of Rs. 5000/- on late filing of returns w.e.f. 1.8.2012.– Penalty u/s 29(8) deleted– Late retns filed upto 31.7.12 penalty
applicable
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 10
Others
• Appeal stay - on 3rd adjournment / fails to attend – stay to be vacated subject to payment of 15% of
disputed amt or Rs. 15 cr whichever is less– Order of additional part payment is non-appealable
order• Period for maintenance of sales invoice
increased from 3 to 8 yrs (retrospective) and other books of a/cs remains 8 yrs.
• Dealers not subjected to VAT audit are now supposed to file Annexure J1 & J2 by 29th June 2012 for the year 2011-12.
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 11
Others (cont..)
• First return of a dealer is defined to be quarterly.• Natural Gas –defined as fuel –u/r 53(1) retention-3%• Stock Transfer retention- retention u/r 53(3) -4%• Tax if paid by the claimant dealer & to give credit for
the total value of collection certificate received is included in Rule 55 (1), (1b), (3).
• Submission of Audit report proponed to 30th November.
• Dealers of PSI can avail ITC on purchases other than raw materials.
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 12
Taxation of Furnishing fabrics [FF]
• Sch entry – C- 101(a) – Fabric & Sugar –as defined under Sec14 of the CST Act
• Sch Entry C- 101(b)- varieties of textiles- notified
• Both attract VAT @ 5% wef 1.5.2011
• T.O. of sales of FF not included in retailer’s composition. So no composition qua that T.O. of sales
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 13
Taxation of Furnishing fabrics (cont..)
• Sale of notified FF -exempt – accept at last point– Unless sale made for consumption
• How to determine – sale for consumption?• Trade cir- 16T/25.9.12
– Sales to tin holders – treated as not for consumption – exercise due diligence
– If sold to RD with knowledge- mention –sold for consumption on Tax Invoice
– If sold to URD –onus on seller to prove not for consumption
• Inter –state sale of notified FF -taxable
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 14
Dealers in FF
• Obtain Registration under MVAT & CST Acts– If TO of sales exceeded Rs 5 L + purchase /
sales of taxable goods > 10K before 31.8.12 –ref sec 3(4)
• Apply within 30 days of 5.9.2012• Otherwise apply within 30days of exceeding limits
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 15
Hawala Purchases
• Disallowance of ITCDisallowance of ITC– Circular transactionsCircular transactions– Accommodation billsAccommodation bills– Affidavit by Hawala operatorsAffidavit by Hawala operators– BeneficiaryBeneficiary
• Any way out? Any way out? – Counter affidavitCounter affidavit– No goods – no taxNo goods – no tax– Fight out legally – do not file revised return but file appealFight out legally – do not file revised return but file appeal
• BHC – WP – 48(5) casesBHC – WP – 48(5) cases– Mahalaxmi CottonMahalaxmi Cotton– Assmt + other promises by StateAssmt + other promises by State
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 16
Amendments to Profession Tax Act,1975
• E-payment mandatory for all profession tax registered dealer.
• Mandatory to make E-payment of professional tax before filling of the return.
• The period of limitation for remaining un-enrolled under Profession Tax Act is restricted to 8 years .
• Late filing of returns is to attract late fees of Rs.1000/- for returns [w.e.f. 1.8.2012].
• Revised return can be filed before notice of assessment or expiry of 6 months from the end of the year; whichever is earlier.
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 17
Taxation of builders & developers
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 18
Overview – Brief history
• Levy of tax – how for legal ?– Tax on immovable property
• MOFA Act• SC – K Raheja Development Corporation• Karnataka v/s Maharashtra
– Difference in agreements
• Insertion of definition of w/c under MVAT Act
• Trade Circular no.12T of 2007 CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 19
Overview – Brief history (cont..)
• Challenge by MCHI
• Interim stay by BHC – 7.12.2007
• Final judgment upholding levy – 10.4.2012
• Intervening period– Builders not forced for registration– MCHI members to file quarterly information
statement
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 20
VAT Liability – builders & developers - Administrative relief
• Trade Circular no.14T/2012 dt.6.8.12
• Administrative relief will be allowed to the builder / developer for a period exceeding 5 yrs i.e. their registration certificate would be made effective from 20.6.2006 [wherever reqd]– Application for registration is to be made
before 16.8.12 [ now extended to 15.10.12]
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 21
VAT Liability – builders & developers - Administrative relief
– Application for Administrative relief is to be made before 31.8.12 [now 31.10.12] along with
• Proof of filling returns for all past periods [quarterly]
• Pay Tax & interest + late fee (Rs. 5000/- for each qtr) – attach challan
• Pay composition amount of Rs. 5000/- for the entire period of delay
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 22
VAT Liability – builders & developers - Administrative relief
• In such a case penalty u/s 29(2A) would not be levied - the penalty is otherwise leviable for not getting registered in time- penalty leviable at equal to amt of tax payable
• Get the accounts audited u/s 61 by a Chartered accountant get upload the audit report in Form 704 for all the past periods by 30.11.2012– If audit reports are so filed, penalty u/s 61(2) – for
late filling of audit report- would not be attracted VAT Liability
– builders & developers- Administrative relief
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 23
Liability – builders & developers - Administrative relief
– If applications for registration and the admn relief is not made before the dates given, then the compounding amount would be calculated as under
• Rs. 5000 + 0.5% of the gross sales tax [i.e. before deduction of ITC] for each month of the delay. Thus for a delay of say, 5 yrs, it would be Rs. 5000/- + (0.5% *60) = Rs. 5000/- + 30% of the gross tax payable.
• Penalty u/s 29(2A) at 100% of the tax payable would be levied.
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 24
Post BHC decision
• Most of builders & developers not registered under MVAT Act – Applications made
• SLP in SC & interim decision dt. 29.8.12– Extended the date of payment of tax to
31.10.12– Interest / penalty not to be paid now.– Those who are yet not registered, may get
their registration by 15.10.12
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 25
Departmental approach
• FAQ’s along with circular no. 14T / 2012
• FAQ’s on website [first uploaded on 27.8.12]
• Circular no.17T/2012 – informing about SLP before SC
• Circular no.18T/2012 – various options / methods for discharge of tax liability by builders.
– Cost plus GP method not acceptable
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 26
Builders’ plight
• Questions the very levy of tax on sale of flats / shops etc
Without prejudice• Different methods of calculation not suitable to
developers• Cost plus GP method results in least tax liability.• To file return with annexures?
– Is rule amended?– Can admin relief denied?
• what if there is short / excess payment as per return?– Would admin relief denied?– What about refund?
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 27
Buyers’ point of view
• Is this levy payable by him as per agreement?• What is the basis of calculation• Is ITC deductable from gross liability of the dealer? If
yes, should he pass on that to buyer?• Is interest / penalty also payable?• What about indemnity / BG / FD or escrow amount paid?
– When is that encashable / payable– What if liability found payable is less / more than the BG / FD / escrow
deposit?
• Should I really pay?
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 28
Auditors’ dilema
• Orders for Admn relief still not passed– Should the dealer be treated as RD– Returns filed as per one of the methods / cost + GP method
• Any observations?– All methods have issues in implementations
– Audit report form• For 06-07 & 07-08 – old form?
– Manual filing ? Where?– Certain particulars not required in new formats
• For 08-09 onwards in latest format– With all annexures?
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 29
IssuesCost + GP method• Conceptually acceptable
– Circular 17T/2012 dt.26.9.12 denies this as a legitimate method
– Clarification to contractors - Some assessment completed based on this method
• % of GP• How to compute
– Sq. ft. sold after OC– Sq. ft. – agreement registered after 1.4.10– Before 20.6.06– Under construction– Progressive ‘under construction’ calculation
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 30
Issues• Land cost deduction [ for Rule 58(1) & it’s proviso]
– How to calculate?– Cost v/s ready recknor– Should it be the same for all flats / should it change
every year?– TDR/ premium paid to MCGB?
• Rule 58(1) –deductions for exps on – Marketing, interest, depreciation & other cost– Solicitor fees, general Admn cost etc
• Sub-contractor’s payment– If RD – form 407 / 408 not received?– If tax not separately charged & if 407 / 408 not received– URD – sub-contractor
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 31
Any Queries ????
CA Rajat B. Talati, Mumbai 32