University of Windsor - Latornell Conservation Symposium · University of Windsor 2. Bruce...

Post on 06-Jun-2020

3 views 0 download

Transcript of University of Windsor - Latornell Conservation Symposium · University of Windsor 2. Bruce...

Tomato plant roots/ carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) method for the removal

and recovery of phosphate from agricultural wastewater

University of Windsor

Chemistry and Biochemistry

David Ure1, Angela Awada1, Nicole Frowley1, Neils Munk2, Amanda Stanger2 and Bulent

Mutus1

1. University of Windsor 2. Bruce Peninsula Biosphere Association

The goal of this project: Reduce nutrient loadings from agricultural streams before it drains into rivers and lakes. Accumulation in aquatic ecosystems leads to eutrophication.

Eutrophication Eutrophication occurs when ecosystems accumulate too many nutrients

Aids the formation of harmful algal blooms algal toxins> dead algae> bacteria> depletion of oxygen> kill of aquatic animals

Causes many, our focus = P Phosphate is important in many aspects of biology Therefore, it is used in fertilizers

Like crops, algae depends on phosphate for growth and development Therefore, the accumulation of phosphate promotes algal growth

Phosphate Binders Chitosan matrix with chelated iron

From shell fish exoskeleton

Phosphate Binders Chitosan matrix with chelated iron

Drastic price increase Leeching of iron to environment Unstable: digested by microorganisms

Phosphate Binders Ideal binding matrix should; 1. Bind large quantities of phosphate 2. Inexpensive 3. Safe for the environment

Tomato plant roots

Binding Capacity

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70P-

Rec

over

ed (g

/kg)

Phosphate Binders Ideal binding matrix should; 1. Bind large quantities of phosphate 2. Inexpensive 3. Safe for the environment

Tomato plant roots

Probably

Plant Roots – Phosphate Binding Capacity: ~ 55 g/kg

Plant Roots – Phosphate Binding Capacity: ~ 55 g/kg

P

Tightness of Binding

KD App

Iron-Chito: 138.3mM

Roots: 23.1mM

Methods of P Recovery

Direct reapplication of P-saturated roots as

fertilizer

Recovery and Regeneration of Binding Capacity

P replaced with counter anion – maybe liquid fertilizer P - P - Typically, acid/base or

conjugate salt

Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC)

P

CMC

CMC displaces P

P can be collected and the root material reused

CMC enhances calcium-phosphate precipitation

Less calcium to harvest P

Lower cost

Precipitation of P as Calcium-Phosphate

No CMC

With CMC Increasing calcium

(0-10mM)

Lion’s Head On Site Testing

Lion’s Head On Site Testing

Water source on site contaminated with manure.

Cham

ber 1

Cham

ber 2

Cham

ber 3

Direction of flow -Radial filtration

Biofilter-Idea: Neils Munk; Design: Mutus; Build: UW Tech Support Centre

Flow rate: ~4L/min

ISCO samplers

inflow

outflow inflow outflow

Lion’s Head On Site Testing

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350D

ay 1

Day

2D

ay 3

Day

4D

ay 5

Day

6D

ay 7

Day

8D

ay 9

Day

10

Day

11

Day

12

Day

13

Day

14

Day

15

Day

16

Day

17

Day

18

Day

19

Day

20

Day

21

Day

22

Day

23

Day

24

[P] (

µg/L

)

Iron-Sawdust Phosphate Levels – Before and After Filtration

Before After

Lion’s Head On Site Testing

0500

10001500200025003000350040004500

Day

1D

ay 2

Day

3D

ay 4

Day

5D

ay 6

Day

7D

ay 8

Day

9D

ay 1

0D

ay 1

1D

ay 1

2D

ay 1

3D

ay 1

4D

ay 1

5D

ay 1

6D

ay 1

7D

ay 1

8D

ay 1

9D

ay 2

0D

ay 2

1D

ay 2

2D

ay 2

3D

ay 2

4

Nitr

ates

(µg/

L)

Iron-Sawdust Nitrate Levels – Before and After Filtration

Before After

Summary

Phosphate Removal (%)

Nitrate Removal (%)

Iron-Sawdust 26.2% 58.5%

0100200300400500600700800

Day

1D

ay 2

Day

3D

ay 4

Day

5D

ay 6

Day

7D

ay 8

Day

9D

ay 1

0D

ay 1

1D

ay 1

2D

ay 1

3D

ay 1

4D

ay 1

5D

ay 1

6D

ay 1

7D

ay 1

8D

ay 1

9D

ay 2

0D

ay 2

1D

ay 2

2D

ay 2

3

Phos

phat

e (µ

g/L)

Roots Phosphate Levels – Before and After Filtration

Before After

Lion’s Head On Site Testing

Lion’s Head On Site Testing

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500D

ay 1

Day

2D

ay 3

Day

4D

ay 5

Day

6D

ay 7

Day

8D

ay 9

Day

10

Day

11

Day

12

Day

13

Day

14

Day

15

Day

16

Day

17

Day

18

Day

19

Day

20

Day

21

Day

22

Day

23

Day

24

Nitr

ate

(µg/

L)

Root Nitrate Levels – Before and After Filtration

Before After

Summary

Phosphate Removal (%)

Nitrate Removal (%)

Iron-Sawdust 26.2% 58.5%

Plant Roots 70.8% 58.2%

What in plant roots binds phosphate?

In collaboration with Dr. Robert Schurko, Austin Peach and Michelle Quan

Used solid state nuclear magnetic

resonance

Probe the chemical environment of P

atom

ssNMR of Plant Roots Throughout Binding-Elution Cycle

Demonstrates strong uptake and removal of phosphate throughout the binding-removal cycle

ssNMR of Plant Roots Throughout Binding-Elution Cycle

Not definitive on what binds P Co-run Na and H atom NMR

Iron-chito – iron interacts with P

P (-) Fe (+)

The NMR signal of metal – P interactions is distinct and not occurring in roots

NMR data suggests the formation of H-bond(s)

H-bonds suggest binding to a protein All organisms, including tomatoes have phosphate transporter proteins that internalize phosphate

Outside

P

P P

P

P P

Inside

P

P P

P

P

P P

Outside Inside

P

P P

P

P

P P

Outside Inside

P

P P

P

P

P P

Outside Inside

P

P

P

P

P P

Outside Inside

P

P

P

P

P

P P

Outside Inside

Our roots are dead

No energy available

P

But, the P binding protein works without

energy

P

Phosphate binds

Phosphate binds

Induce release with counter anions (CMC

or Cl)

P

Phosphate binds

Induce release with counter anions (CMC

or Cl)

Repeat

P - P -

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Untreated Urea

PBC

Disrupt proteins with urea or heat treatment

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Untreated 2hr HeatPB

C

6 M Urea 150 °C

Current and Future Objectives

Phosphate transporter protein expression is regulated by phosphate in soil Study the effect on phosphate treatment on later use of roots for remediation Working with Holy Names High School – STEM Academy (Ms Mary-Ellen Kavanaugh)

Current and Future Objectives

P and No P roots

Flow rates

0102030405060708090

P-R

ecov

ered

(g/k

g)

Different Ages and Types of Plant Roots

Current and Future Objectives

Study different plant roots ie. cucumber Study the degradation in binding capacity overtime

Acknowledgements: WECO2 Parks: Matthew Posthumus, Sergey Postnikov Bruce Peninsula Biosphere Association (BPBA): Katherine McLeod, Amanda Stanger, Elizabeth Thorn and Neils Munk Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA): William Tate, Samantha Dundas, Mackenzie Porter, Katie Stammler and Kevin Money Funding: OMAFRA, BPBA, NSERC-ENGAGE, MITACS, UTRCA, ECCC, University of Windsor Alumni Association (Anonymous Donor)

Thank you very much for listening Questions? Bulent Mutus: mutusb@uwindsor.ca David Ure: ured@uwindsor.ca