Post on 06-Mar-2018
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures
In Accordance with NERC’s MOD-032-1 Reliability Standard “Data for Power System Modeling and Analysis”
Prepared by: Vito De Luca, Eng. Effective date: July 1, 2015 Revision: 1
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Table of Contents
1. Objective ............................................................................................................................. 5
2. Power System Modeling .................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Power flow and Dynamics Case Building ........................................................................................6 2.2 Functional Entities within the Québec Interconnection ....................................................................6 2.3 Power System Modeling Workflow and Processes ..........................................................................8
2.3.1 Power System Modeling Workflow ......................................................................................8 2.3.2 Description of Power System Modeling Activities .............................................................10 2.3.3 Case Building Timeline.......................................................................................................11
3. Modeling of Generating Facilities ....................................................................................12 3.1 Modeling Data Requirements .........................................................................................................12
3.1.1 Steady-State Data Requirements for Generator Modeling ..................................................13 3.1.2 Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Generator Modeling .........................14
3.2 Reporting Procedures .....................................................................................................................17 3.2.1 Data Format .........................................................................................................................17 3.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................18
4. Transmission System Equipment ....................................................................................19 4.1 Modeling Data Requirements .........................................................................................................19
4.1.1 Transmission System Equipment Steady-State Data Requirements ...................................20 4.1.2 Transmission System Equipment Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements ..........23
4.2 Reporting Requirements .................................................................................................................25 4.2.1 Data Format .........................................................................................................................25 4.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................26
5. Modeling of Aggregate Demand ......................................................................................27 5.1 Modeling Data Requirements .........................................................................................................27
5.1.1 Steady-State Data Requirements for Demand Modeling ....................................................27 5.1.2 Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Demand Modeling ...........................29
5.2 Reporting Procedures .....................................................................................................................29 5.2.1 Data Format .........................................................................................................................29 5.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................29
6. Complementary Power System Information ...................................................................30 6.1 Resource Planning Data..................................................................................................................30
6.1.1 Resource Planning Data Requirements ...............................................................................30 6.1.2 Data Format .........................................................................................................................30 6.1.3 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ..........................................................................30
6.2 Interchange Schedule ......................................................................................................................30 6.2.1 Interchange Data Requirements ..........................................................................................31
6.2.2 Data Format ........................................................................................................................ 31 6.2.3 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule ......................................................................... 31
7. Data Submission Procedure and Schedule .................................................................... 32 7.1 Data Submission Procedure ........................................................................................................... 32 7.2 Data Submission Schedule ............................................................................................................. 33 7.3 Compliance Violations................................................................................................................... 34
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 35
APPENDIX 1 – Load Data Reporting Templates ....................................................................... 36
APPENDIX 2 – List of Approved Dynamics Models .................................................................. 37 A2.1 Standard Library Models .................................................................................................................. 37 A2.2 Approved User-Defined Models ....................................................................................................... 41
APPENDIX 3 – Examples of Siemens-PTI PSS/E Model Library Data sheets ......................... 43
APPENDIX 4 – Generator Modeling Data Reporting Template ................................................ 44
APPENDIX 5 – HQT Bus Numbering and Classification ........................................................... 45 A5.1 Bus Number Ranges ......................................................................................................................... 45 A5.2 NPCC Area Codes ............................................................................................................................ 46 A5.3 Québec Interconnection Zoning Codes ............................................................................................ 46
APPENDIX 6 – Interchange Data Template ............................................................................... 49
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 5
1. Objective
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (HQT), in its role as Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner, is charged with the task of maintaining transmission system models (steady-state, dynamics, and short-circuit) and developing power flow and dynamics cases necessary to support planning studies and reliability analysis of Québec’s interconnected transmission system. The accuracy of system models is heavily dependent on the reliability of modeling data collected from the various functional entities that interface with the transmission system.
The purpose of this document is to establish steady-state, dynamics, and short-circuit modeling data requirements and reporting procedures, in accordance with NERC’s MOD-032 reliability standard, “Data for Power System Modeling and Analysis”. The document shall serve as a reference guide to all functional entities that provide data necessary for system modeling, providing the basic requirements regarding the type of data required as well as applicable data submission procedures. It will also describe how entities shall reference and use existing HQT technical documents and procedures to meet modeling data requirements.
The most updated version of the present document shall be made available to all concerned functional entities by means of an online posting on HQT’s website, via the following link:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/en/modeling.html.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 6
2. Power System Modeling
Power flow and dynamics cases are developed by the Planning Coordinator (PC) in order to realistically simulate the steady-state and dynamic performance of the Québec interconnected transmission system. All electrical elements that comprise the transmission system, such as generating units, power lines, transformers, reactive power compensation equipment, and system loads, are modeled based on measured electrical parameters (modeling data) provided by various functional entities within or connected to the transmission system.
2.1 Power flow and Dynamics Case Building
Power flow and dynamics cases are developed using the Siemens Power Technologies Inc. (PTI) Power System Simulator for Engineers (PSS/E) simulation software. A power flow case is a collection of steady-state models of generation, transmission system equipment and topology, short-circuit data, load, dispatch, and interchanges that constitute a snapshot of the selected set of operating conditions. A dynamics case is a collection of dynamic models used in conjunction with a power flow case to perform stability analysis of system performance.
The PC develops a series of power flow and dynamics cases (also referred to as base cases) on an annual basis, reflecting various system conditions and planning scenarios. These cases are used by the PC and Transmission Planners (TPs) for system studies and reliability analysis. They are also used by the NPCC through its SS-37 Working Group on Base Case Development. Consequently, the accuracy of studies and reliability of base cases are heavily dependent on the quality of modeling data collected from functional entities.
The PC’s annual case building exercise is a structured and detailed process, which is explicitly outlined in HQT’s base case building manual document entitled “Mise à jour des réseaux planifiés” as well as in NPCC’s C-29 Document entitled “Procedures for System Modeling: Data Requirements & Facility Ratings”, available at https://www.npcc.org/Standards/Procedures/c-29.pdf.
2.2 Functional Entities within the Québec Interconnection
The functional entities, as per MOD-032-1 (part A, section 4.1 “Applicability”), that play key roles in obtaining, submitting, validating, and maintaining modeling data within the Québec Interconnection are defined in the following table.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 7
Table 1 – Functional Entities within the Québec Interconnection
Functional Entities Names of Organization(s) Role in Power System Modeling
Generator Owners (GO) • Canadian Hydro Developers Inc. • Cartier Wind Energy Inc. • Domtar Inc. • Énergie éolienne Le Plateau s.e.c.
(Invenergy Wind LLC) • Énergie La Lièvre s.e.c. (Brookfield
Renewable Power) • Hydro-Québec Production (HQP) • Hydro-Saguenay • Manicouagan Power Limited Partnership
(SCHM) • NextEra Energy Resources (FPL Group) • Northland Power Inc. • Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA) • Rolls-Royce Canada Limited • TransCanada Québec Inc. • All other privately owned hydroelectric,
biomass and fossil fuel generating stations, and windfarms
Provides modeling data for generating units and generation outage information.
Load Serving Entity (LSE)
• Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD) Provides aggregate demand modeling data.
Planning Authority/Coordinator (PC)
• HQT – Direction - Planification Responsible for Interconnection-wide base case building and modeling data maintenance (data storage).
Resource Planner (RP) • Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD) Provides generator dispatching information based on load-side contractual obligations.
Transmission Owners (TO)
• Arcelor Mittal Montréal • Canexus Chemicals Canada Limited
Partnership • Cedars Rapids Transmission Co. (CRT) • Énergie éolienne Le Plateau s.e.c.
(Invenergy Wind LLC) • Énergie La Lièvre s.e.c. (Brookfield
Renewable Power) • HQT – Direction Principale – Exploitation des
installations • Kruger Inc. (Trois-Rivières) • Manicouagan Power Limited Partnership
(SCHM) • PPG Canada Inc. • Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA)
Provides modeling data and outage information of transmission system equipment.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 8
Transmission Planners (TP)
• HQT – Direction - Planification Users of base cases for system studies.
Transmission Service Providers (TSP)
• HQT - Direction – Commercialisation et affaires règlementaires
• Cedars Rapids Transmission Co. (CRT)
Provides transmission service customer contract data (point-to-point transmission service details) as published on OASIS.
2.3 Power System Modeling Workflow and Processes
2.3.1 Power System Modeling Workflow
The PC’s annual exercise of developing reliable base cases is an intricate process requiring active inter-organizational collaboration from all function entities.
The following figure illustrates a general overview of how the functional entities listed above shall interact in regards to the submittal and processing of modeling data within the Québec Interconnection.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 9
Figure 1 – Planning Coordinator Modeling Data Workflow
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 10
2.3.2 Description of Power System Modeling Activities
As illustrated above, power system modeling is comprised of a sequence of modeling data submission, validation and processing activities required to produce interconnection-wide base cases suitable for system studies. Modeling data is collected from various functional entities, validated to ensure functionality and compatibility with simulation tools, and then entered into specific data bases for referencing and base case building.
Essentially, case building is achieved based on the following inputs:
1. Steady-state and Short-circuit Modeling Data from PSS® Model on Demand (MOD) Database
The MOD database consolidates all generation and transmission system steady-state and short-circuit modelling data (including planned future projects) collected from various functional entities in a central data repository. MOD is synched with DSR, the PC’s main equipment data base containing updated modeling data of all existing generating and transmission system facilities, producing a MOD base case scenario in PSS/E format (.sav). Future projects, consisting of generation or transmission system additions, upgrades or modifications, are submitted to the PC by TPs and stored in MOD. They are then applied to the MOD base case scenario, allowing the PC and TPs to customize planning cases for any desired future point in time.
Corrections or modifications to modeling data for existing facilities are validated before data is updated in the DSR database. In the case of future projects, preliminary modeling data submitted by GOs, TOs and TPs are entered directly into MOD, after model validation by the PC. New generating units or transmission system equipment are only added to DSR after project commissioning and after the PC has received all updated modeling data. This updated data is obtained from GOs and TOs at the later stages of the project commissioning phase.
2. Dynamics Models and Modeling Parameters
Validated dynamics models and modeling parameters of existing facilities and future projects collected from GOs, TOs and TPs are stored in the PC’s dynamics library. The PC’s dynamics library consists of all dynamics model files required to run dynamics simulations in PSS/E (*.lib, *.obj, *.dll, etc.), source code files for certain user-defined models, dynamics parameters in the form of DYR files, and any IDEV or PYTHON programs necessary to set up dynamics simulation parameters.
3. Aggregate Demand Data
Once aggregate demand data for each load-serving bus is received from the LSE, the PC validates and processes the data, mapping load data to the appropriate load serving buses in the MOD base case. The validated data is then stored in the PC’s Load Forecast Database which is used to produce load profiles for a given forecast year in the form of PYTHON
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 11
automation files. These files are applied to the MOD base case scenario to produce customized planning cases for any desired future point in time.
4. Resource Data
The RP, in collaboration with GOs, provide the PC with data regarding all available resources needed to fulfill LSE demand requirements. This allows the PC to produce realistic generation dispatch scenarios, adequately balancing load and generation.
5. Interchange Data from TSPs
When preparing a base case scenario, the PC must consider scheduled MW transfer levels at each inter-area interconnection facility. Interchange data used in base case building is based on transmission service customer contract data (point-to-point transmission service details) as published on OASIS, as well as the NPCC Interchange Schedule prepared annually by NPCC’s SS37 work group.
6. Equipment Outage Information
Planned maintenance or commissioning of generating units and transmission system equipment resulting in outages must be considered in base case development. Short-term generator outages are reported to the PC by GOs and transmission system equipment outages are reported by the TOs.
2.3.3 Case Building Timeline
The modeling data produced by the power system modeling activities described above are assembled during case building according to the timeline illustrated in the following figure.
Figure 2 - Case Building Timeline
June 1st
Phase 1 of Load Data Collection
(Winter Peak)
October 1st Phase 2 of Load Data Collection
(All data)
January 15th
Start of Annual Case Building
Exercise
February 1st
Generation Modeling Data
Collection
March 1st
Reporting deadline for new future projects and
modifications to existing modeling data (DSR & MOD)
April 1st
Integration of complementary power
system information (Outage, resource
allocation and Interchange data)
May 1st
Delivery of finalized
Power flow and dynamics
base cases
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 12
3. Modeling of Generating Facilities
3.1 Modeling Data Requirements
All Generator Owners (GOs) connected to the Québec interconnected transmission system must provide valid modeling data of existing and future generating units to the PC on an annual basis.
The PC also requires GOs of existing facilities to recertify generator modeling data on an annual basis, either by resubmitting all required modeling data or by certifying that data has not changed from the previous year’s data submission. In the case of changes to modeling data, GOs must clearly identify all changes and submit all modified modeling data in accordance with the requirements herein.
For new or future planned generating units, generator modeling data shall be submitted 1) during the project’s planning phase, normally 3-5 years prior to commissioning, and 2) immediately after project commissioning.
1- Project Planning Phase Data
The PC and TPs initially collect approximated generator modeling data from new and prospective GOs in order to conduct interconnection or system impact studies prior to commissioning of generating facilities. This preliminary data is submitted to the PC and TPs in conjunction with GOs’ request for system impact studies, as described in section 3 of HQT’s technical requirements document and in HQT’s Procedure document for the connection of new generating units, available (in French) on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/demarche-a-suivre-2012.pdf.
2- Post-commissioning Data
GOs shall update the preliminary data provided to the PC and TPs during the project planning phase by providing actual or measured modeling parameters. GOs must conduct data validation testing in order to validate modeling data as well as demonstrate that their facilities meet the requirements set out in the document “Transmission Provider Technical Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System”, available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_09_en.pdf.
The validation procedures and testing for wind farms are outlined in HQT’s “General Validation Test Program for Wind Power Plants Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System” document, available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/essais-eoliennes2011-en.pdf
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 13
The validation of modeling data is a prerequisite for final TO acceptance of the generating facility project and must be completed within 6 months of initial commercial commissioning.
GOs of generating units with capacities less than 10 MW that are connected at the distribution network level are not required to provide detailed modeling data unless specifically requested by TPs or the PC for system studies purposes.
The following sections present the steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data required to effectively model all generating units within the Québec interconnected transmission system, defining the type of data required and the units this data is to be reported in.
3.1.1 Steady-State Data Requirements for Generator Modeling
i. In general, generator owners shall provide steady-state modeling data of existing and prospective generating units according to the requirements set forth in Appendix A of HQT’s technical requirements document entitled “Transmission Provider Technical Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System”. The most updated version of the document is readily available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_09_en.pdf.
ii. The table below summarizes the main steady-state data requirements, as outlined in MOD-032-01, A1-3.
Table 2 – Steady-State Data Reporting Requirements for Generator Modeling
Generator Unit Component
Steady-State Modeling Data Requirements
Synchronous/Asynchronous Generators
• Generator type (hydroelectric, thermal, wind, etc.) • Real power capabilities (maximum and minimum values in
MW) • Reactive power capabilities (maximum and minimum
values in MVAR) • Machine MVA base • Generator unit regulated bus and set point voltage • Machine grounding impedances • In-service status
Generator Step-Up Transformers*
• Number of transformers • Nominal voltages of windings (kV) • Rated power (MVA) • Power ratings (MVA) with corresponding cooling method • Positive sequence impedances and winding resistance
(Ohms or p.u.)
* This data shall be provided by the owner of generator step-up transformers, which can be the GO or the TO.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 14
• Coupling (winding connection) • Number of tap positions (kV or p.u.) • Tap ratios (voltage or phase angle) • Minimum and maximum tap position limits • Regulated bus (for voltage regulating transformers) • In-service status
Wind Farm Collector Network Equipment
• Transmission line impedance parameters (ohms or p.u.) • Transmission line admittance (siemens or p.u.) • Transmission line ratings (MVA or A) • Capacitor/Inductor number, in-service status, reactive
power ratings and voltage.
iii. For future planned generating units, GOs shall provide the expected commissioning date.
iv. GOs shall also provide generating station service auxiliary load information for existing units, detailing real (MW) and reactive power (MVAR) load values associated with a given generating unit.
v. In regards to “in-service status”, a 10-year forecast of scheduled outages of duration greater than 6 months shall be provided by GOs on a yearly basis. Outage information shall consist of:
• Start and end dates of planned outage
• Generating unit(s) and/or specific equipment within generation facility scheduled to be out of service.
• Impact of outage on generation (i.e. reduction in power plant generation in MW)
3.1.2 Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Generator Modeling
i. In general, GOs shall provide short-circuit and dynamics modeling data of existing and future planned generating units according to the requirements set forth in Appendices A and B of HQT’s technical requirements document entitled “Transmission Provider Technical Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System”. The most updated version of the document is readily available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_09_en.pdf.
ii. In order to accurately simulate dynamic performance of generating units, GOs must provide the PC with validated dynamics models and associated parameters of all power generating equipment and components of the power plant, including:
• Generators, including Wind Turbines, Photovoltaic Systems, Fuel Cells and any other resource that delivers MW to the electric power system.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 15
• Excitation systems
• Turbine and speed governors
• Voltage regulators (if equipped)
• Power system stabilizers (if equipped)
iii. All dynamics models submitted to the PC must be based on standard IEEE models and must be compatible with the current version of Siemens-PTI’s PSS/E (Power System Simulator for Engineers) software, which is used by the PC and TPs for dynamics system studies.
The use of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models is preferred when they can accurately represent the dynamic performance of the device being modeled.
A list of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models as well as all user-defined models approved by the PC for use in dynamic simulations is listed in Appendix 2 of the present document.
iv. User-defined models
a) In the event that a compatible standard IEEE or PSS/E dynamics model is unavailable, user-defined or “black-box” models may be used. A user-defined model is any model that is not a standard Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model but has been accepted by the PC after being successfully tested for compatibility.
b) User-defined models submitted to the PC shall fulfill the following requirements:
• User-defined models must be able to work with a time-step exceeding 4 ms.
• User-defined models must be accompanied by a user manual providing all relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the model, including block diagrams, values and names for all model parameters and a list of all state variables.
• GOs must also provide compliance test results demonstrating that the model accurately represents the dynamic performance of the device being modeled. GOs must ensure that model compliance testing is performed every 10 years.
c) GOs are responsible for validating and maintaining all dynamics models, ensuring that models submitted to the PC are compatible and fully functional in the current version of PSS/E, allowing for error-free initialization. In the event of PSS/E version updates (PC migrates to a newer version of the PSS/E software), GOs shall provide all necessary model updates, ensuring all models are compatible with the new version of PSS/E.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 16
d) In the case of user-defined models representing wind farms, the following requirements shall be observed:
• Validation of wind turbine models shall be conducted using HQT’s “Procedure for PSS/E model validation” document, available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/procedure-validation-modeles-psse-en.pdf
Test base cases are also available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/zip/procedure-validation-eolien-v32.zip.
• The user-defined model must allow wind turbines to be represented as a single generator and must be functional across its entire range of real and reactive power.
• In the case where voltage regulation of a wind power plant is achieved by means of additional compensation equipment in the switchyard, the GO shall also provide the complete PSS/E model for the corresponding reactive power compensation equipment, including all associated technical documentation, modeling data and parameters.
e) In addition to providing all required data for user-defined models as stipulated in 3.1.2.iv above, GOs must also identify the Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model(s) that most closely represents the dynamic performance of the user-defined model, as well as provide the corresponding modeling parameters. GOs may refer to the list of accepted models presented in Appendix 2.
v. When submitting model parameters, GOs shall indicate the source of the data reported (manufacturer technical specifications, measured values, typical or estimated theoretical values, etc.).
vi. In the case of incomplete data or unknown parameters, GOs shall provide the PC with estimated values based on the GO’s assumptions and hypotheses. All estimated values shall be clearly indicated as such.
vii. In regards to under/over-frequency protection of generating units, all GOs shall provide under/over-frequency relay data, specifically generator unit protection relay trip settings and time delay, as described in NERC’s PRC-006-1 standard “Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding”.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 17
3.2 Reporting Procedures
3.2.1 Data Format
i. Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data shall be submitted to the PC in one of the following formats:
• Table format: Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all corresponding model parameters are provided in a table format. GOs with numerous generating units may use the sample modeling data reporting table provided in Appendix 4 of the present document.
• PSS/E Library Data Sheets: GOs using Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library models may also elect to submit modeling parameters using the corresponding Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model data sheets. These data sheets may be provided to the GO upon request. An example of a PSS/E library model data sheet is included in Appendix 3.
• PSS/E RAW, DYR format: PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all corresponding steady-state and dynamics parameters are provided in RAW and DYR files, respectively.
ii. In the case of user-defined models, GOs shall submit:
• All associated model files required to run simulations in PSS/E (*.lib, *.obj, *.dll, etc.). The PC may request the source code for certain user-defined models, which must be submitted in the FLECS language of the current PSS/E revision, in C, or in FORTRAN.
• All corresponding user-defined model steady-state and dynamics parameters, provided in RAW and DYR files, respectively.
• All relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the user-defined model, including compliance test results, block diagrams, values and names for all model parameters and a list of all state variables.
• Any IDEV or PYTHON programs necessary to set up dynamics simulation parameters.
• The Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model that most closely represents the generating unit’s dynamics performance, along with all corresponding model parameters.
iii. GOs shall provide generator outage information in an Excel table format.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 18
3.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i. Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule described in section 7.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 19
4. Transmission System Equipment
4.1 Modeling Data Requirements
All Transmission Owners within the Québec Interconnection shall provide the PC with valid modeling data of all existing and future transmission system equipment, including:
• AC transmission lines
• DC transmission systems
• Voltage and phase shifting transformers
• Breakers
• Shunt reactive compensation equipment (capacitors and reactors)
• Series reactive compensation equipment
• Static Var systems and synchronous condensers
• Special protection systems (SPS)
The PC, in accordance with NERC’s MOD-032 standard, requires all TOs of existing facilities to recertify system modeling data on an annual basis, either by resubmitting all required modeling data or by certifying that data has not changed from the previous year’s data submission. In the case of changes to modeling data, TOs must clearly identify all changes and submit all modified modeling data in accordance with the requirements herein.
For future planned modifications, additions or upgrades of transmission system equipment, TOs must submit preliminary modeling data to the PC and TPs during the planning phase of the project, during which system impact studies are conducted. This data is generally submitted to the PC and TPs approximately 3-5 years prior to project commissioning. At this stage, estimated or typical modeling parameters are acceptable.
TOs shall update the preliminary data provided to the PC during the project planning phase by providing actual or measured modeling parameters based on equipment compliance testing results conducted during the commissioning phase. The validation of modeling data is a prerequisite for final TO acceptance of the transmission system facility project and must be completed within 6 months of initial commercial commissioning.
The following sections present the steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data required to effectively model transmission system equipment within the Québec Interconnection, defining the type of data required and the units this data is to be reported in.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 20
4.1.1 Transmission System Equipment Steady-State Data Requirements
i. Each TO shall provide steady-state modeling data of existing and future transmission equipment according to the requirements set forth in the present document.
ii. The table below summarizes the main steady-state data requirements, as outlined in MOD-032-01, A1- 1, 4-8.
Table 3 – Transmission System Equipment Steady-State Data Reporting Requirements
Transmission System Component
Steady-State Modeling Data Requirements
Buses • Bus numbers and alphanumeric names • Nominal voltage • Type of bus (substation bus bar, load or generator) • Area, zone and owner • Associated substation or line
AC Transmission Lines • To and from buses or substations • Line length (km) • Impedance parameters, R and X (ohms or p.u.) • Susceptance, B (siemens or p.u.) • Thermal ratings at -20⁰C, 0⁰C and 30⁰C (MVA or A) • In-service status
DC Transmission Systems (DC lines and converter stations)
• To and from buses or substations • DC Line length (km) • DC Line impedances and data (Voltage, Rcmp-Ohms,
Vcmode, CCC Itmax, Rdc-Ohms, Delti, Dcvmin, CCC Accel)
• Rectifier and Inverter data (Primary base voltage, Bridges in Series, Trans Ratio, CCC X, AC Tx From Bus, AC Tx To Bus, Max Firing Angle, Commutating R and X, Max & Min Tap Settings, Tap Step)
• In-service status
Transformers (Voltage and Phase Shifting)
• Location of transformer (substation name) • Transformer name (ID number) and assigned position
number • Nominal voltages of primary, secondary and tertiary
windings (kV) • Impedance parameters, R and X (p.u.) • Magnetizing admittance G and susceptance B (p.u.) • Nominal MVA base • Tap ratios (voltage or phase angle) • Minimum and maximum tap position limits • Number of tap positions • Regulated bus (for voltage regulated transformers) • Capacity ratings at -20⁰C, 0⁰C and 30⁰C (MVA)
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 21
• In-service status
Breakers • Location of breaker (substation name) • Breaker name (ID number) and assigned position number • Nominal voltage (kV) • Manufacturing data (manufacturer, year, design standard) • Breaker interrupting symmetrical and asymmetrical
current capacities (kA) • Breaker X/R ratio
Shunt Reactive Compensation Devices (Capacitors and Reactors)
• Location of shunt unit (substation name) • Shunt unit name (ID number) and assigned position
number • Number of capacitors and reactors in unit • Reactive power capacity of each capacitor and reactor
(MVAR) • Rated voltage (kV) • Regulated voltage band limits (kV) • Mode of operation (fixed, discrete, continuous, etc.) • Regulated bus • In-service status
Series Reactive Compensation Devices
• Location of series capacitor (substation name and transmission line compensated)
• Series capacitor unit name • Unit type • Rated voltage (kV) • Unit impedance (p.u. or ohms) • Unit admittance (p.u. or siemens) • Reactive compensation % • Reactive power capacity (MVA) • Overload factor • In-service status
Static Var Systems and Synchronous Condensers
• Location of Static VAR or Synchronous Condenser (substation name)
• Rated voltage (kV) • Machine MVA base • Reactive power limits (MVAR) • Regulated bus • Voltage set point (p.u. or kV) • In-service status
iii. Attribution of bus numbers and associated bus data must be consistent with the PC’s bus
numbering and naming practices presented in the table below:
Table 4 – HQT Bus Numbering and Naming Practices
Bus Data Bus Numbering and Naming Practices
Bus Number • Bus numbers must be unique for all buses in the Québec
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 22
Interconnection. • Bus numbers must be attributed in accordance to the assigned
bus number ranges presented in Appendix 5.
Bus Name • Bus names are descriptive names given to buses in PSS/E • Bus names must be unique for all buses in the Québec
Interconnection and must not exceed 8 alphanumeric characters.
• By convention, bus names must be in the following format: ABC123-1 or ABC123-A In general, the first 3 characters are letters relating to the name of the substation where the bus is located, and the next 3 characters are numbers denoting the nominal voltage level of the bus. A dash and a number or letter may be added at the end of the name in order to help differentiate between multiple buses with the same first 6 characters. For example, according to the naming practice, the PSS/E names of two 315 kV bus bars at the Duvernay substation would be DUV315-1 and DUV315-2.
Bus Location • For each bus in the transmission system, an Area number, Zone number and Owner name/number must be specified.
• Area refers to the NPCC Area where a given bus is located. For example, buses of the HQT transmission system are located in the HQTÉ Area denoted by number 104.
• Zone refers to the specific geographic region within the Québec Interconnection.
• Owner refers to the specific transmission owner responsible for a given bus.
• A complete listing of all available Area and Zone number codes are presented in Appendix 5.
iv. Transmission owners shall also provide substation service auxiliary load information for existing substations, detailing real (MW) and reactive power (MVAR) load values associated with a given substation.
v. For all future additions or upgrades where HQT is TO, steady-state modeling data shall reflect technical data specified in the Design Specifications Document (cahier des charges).
vi. In regards to “in-service status”, transmission system equipment outages for the upcoming year of duration greater than 6 months shall be provided by the TO on a yearly basis. Outage information shall consist of:
• Start and end dates of planned outage
• Transmission equipment scheduled to be out of service
• Voltage level
• Location (substation name, zone, etc.)
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 23
• Description of project or maintenance causing outage
4.1.2 Transmission System Equipment Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements
i. Each TO shall provide short-circuit and dynamics modeling data of existing and future transmission equipment according to the requirements set forth in the present document.
ii. The table below summarizes the main short-circuit and dynamics modeling data requirements, as outlined in MOD-032-01, A1.
Table 5 – Transmission System Equipment Short-circuit and Dynamic Data Reporting Requirements
Transmission System Component
Dynamics and Short-Circuit Modeling Data Requirements
AC Transmission Lines • Zero sequence impedance parameters, R and X (ohms or p.u.)
• Zero sequence susceptance, B (siemens or p.u.)
DC Transmission Systems (DC lines and converter stations)
• DC line dynamics model and associated parameters • DC converter dynamics model and associated
parameters
Transformers (Voltage and Phase Shifting)
• Winding connection • Zero sequence impedance parameters, R and X
(ohms or p.u.) • Zero sequence grounding impedances, RG and XG
(ohms or p.u.)
Shunt Reactive Compensation Devices (Capacitors and Reactors)
• Zero sequence shunt admittances, G and B (p.u.)
Series Reactive Compensation Devices
• Zero sequence impedances, R and X (p.u. or ohms) • Zero sequence admittance, B (p.u. or siemens) • Unit admittance (p.u. or siemens)
Static Var Systems and Synchronous Condensers
• Positive sequence machine impedances, R1 and X1 (p.u.)
• Negative sequence machine impedances, R2 and X2 (p.u.)
• Zero sequence machine impedances, R0 and X0 (p.u.)
• Static Var System equipment dynamics model and associated parameters
• Synchronous Condenser dynamics model and associated parameters
Special protection systems (SPS) • SPS dynamics model and associated parameters
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 24
iii. All dynamics models submitted to the PC must be based on standard IEEE models and must be compatible with the current version of Siemens-PTI’s PSS/E (Power System Simulator for Engineers) software, which is used by the PC and TPs for dynamics system studies.
The use of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models is preferred when they can accurately represent the dynamic performance of the device being modeled.
A list of Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard dynamics models as well as all user-defined models approved by the PC for use in dynamic simulations is listed in Appendix 2 of the present document.
iv. In the event that a compatible standard IEEE or PSS/E dynamics model is unavailable, user-defined or “black-box” models may be used. A user-defined model is any model that is not a standard Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model but has been accepted by the PC after being successfully tested for compatibility.
v. User-defined models submitted to the PC shall fulfill the following requirements:
• User-defined models must be able to work with a time-step exceeding 4 ms.
• User-defined models must be accompanied by a user manual providing all relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the model, including block diagrams, values and names for all model parameters and a list of all state variables.
• TOs must also provide compliance test results demonstrating that the model accurately represents the dynamic performance of the device being modeled. TOs must ensure that model compliance testing is performed every 10 years.
vi. TOs are responsible for validating and maintaining all dynamics models, ensuring that models submitted to the PC are compatible and fully functional in the current version of PSS/E, allowing for error-free initialization. In the event of PSS/E version updates (PC migrates to a newer version of the PSS/E software), TOs shall provide all necessary model updates, ensuring all models are compatible with the new version of PSS/E.
vii. In addition to providing all required data for user-defined models as stipulated in 4.1.2.iv-vi, TOs must also identify the Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model(s) that most closely represents the dynamic performance of the user-defined model, as well as provide the corresponding modeling parameters. TOs may refer to the list of accepted models presented in Appendix 2.
viii. When submitting model parameters, TOs shall indicate the source of the data reported (manufacturer technical specifications, measured values, typical or estimated theoretical values, etc.).
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 25
ix. In the case of incomplete data or unknown parameters, TOs shall provide the PC with estimated values based on the TO’s assumptions and hypotheses. All estimated values shall be clearly indicated as such.
x. For all future additions or upgrades where HQT is TO, short-circuit modeling data shall reflect technical data specified in the Design Specifications Document (cahier des charges).
4.2 Reporting Requirements
4.2.1 Data Format
iv. Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data shall be submitted to the PC in one of the following formats:
• Table format: Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all corresponding model parameters are provided in a table format.
• Manufacturer Testing Reports: Modeling parameters may be submitted in the form of a report, presenting results from the manufacturer’s technical compliance testing.
• PSS/E Library Data Sheets: TOs using Siemens-PTI PSS/E dynamic library models may also elect to submit modeling parameters using the corresponding Siemens-PTI PSS/E library model data sheets. These data sheets may be provided to the TO upon request. An example of a PSS/E library model data sheet is included in Appendix 3.
• PSS/E RAW, DYR format: PSS/E dynamic library models are identified and all corresponding steady-state and dynamics parameters are provided in RAW and DYR files, respectively.
• Siemens PSS®MOD format: This form of data reporting is only applicable to HQT. Future projects or modifications shall be submitted to the PC in the form of MOD *.prj files or entered directly into HQT’s MOD database, available online at:
http://131.195.100.81/MODWeb/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fmodweb%2fDefault.aspx.
v. TOs shall also submit a one-line diagram, illustrating the planned or commissioned transmission system additions and/or modifications.
vi. In the case of user-defined models, TOs shall submit:
• All associated model files required to run simulations in PSS/E (*.lib, *.obj, *.dll, etc.). The PC may request the source code for certain user-defined models, which must be submitted in the FLECS language of the current PSS/E revision, in C, or in FORTRAN.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 26
• All corresponding user-defined model steady-state and dynamics parameters, provided in RAW and DYR files, respectively.
• All relevant technical documentation and characteristics of the user-defined model, including compliance test results, block diagrams, values and names for all model parameters and a list of all state variables.
• Any IDEV or PYTHON programs necessary to set up dynamics simulation parameters.
• The Siemens-PTI PSS/E standard library model that most closely represents the generating unit’s dynamics performance, along with all corresponding model parameters.
vii. The TO shall provide transmission system equipment outage information in the form of a report or a simplified Excel table.
4.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i. Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule described in section 7.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 27
5. Modeling of Aggregate Demand
5.1 Modeling Data Requirements
The main Load Serving Entity (LSE), in this case Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD), is responsible for preparing and submitting demand data to the Planning Coordinator (PC) for the entire Québec Interconnection. This data is based on demand forecasts prepared and/or assembled on an annual basis by all LSEs.
The following sections present the steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit data required to effectively model demand within the interconnected transmission system, defining the type of data required and the units this data is to be reported in.
5.1.1 Steady-State Data Requirements for Demand Modeling
i. Steady-state load data shall be submitted to the PC, listing forecasted aggregated load data at each load-serving bus bar for each year of a given demand forecast.
ii. The LSE shall also provide Interconnection-wide total demand forecasts, summing substation, customer facility and substation auxiliary load data.
iii. Demand forecasts shall be prepared and submitted to the PC in accordance with HQD-HQT agreements (“Ententes sectorielles”) 1, 3 and 6, available at http://transenergie.hydro.qc.ca/ planification_expertise_aff_reglementaires/528.htm, and in compliance with NERC standards MOD-016, MOD-017, MOD-018, MOD-019, MOD-020, MOD-021.
The table below summarizes the steady-state data requirements outlined in the HQD-HQT agreements for loads modeled at satellite substation feeder buses (< 44 kV) and loads representing customer facilities (large industrial plants, pulp and paper mills, aluminum smelters, refineries, mining facilities, etc.), directly connected to the high voltage transmission system (44 kV to 324 kV).
Table 6 – Steady-State Data Reporting Requirements for Demand Modeling
Loads at satellite substation feeder buses < 44 KV
(15 year forecast)
Customer facility loads at buses > 44 kV (10 year forecast)
Bus number Substation name Real power (MW) Reactive power (MVAR) Load apparent power (MVA) Rated power (MVA) and voltage (kV) of
low-voltage side reactive compensation
Bus number Customer facility name Expected real power (MW) Total load apparent power (MVA) Load in-service status Number of shunt capacitors and reactors Rated power (MVA) and voltage (kV) of each
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 28
equipment reactive compensation equipment Reactive compensation equipment in-service
status Quantity of interruptible load
iv. In general, load data submitted to the PC shall reflect the following annually prepared demand forecasts:
• A 15-year aggregate demand forecast for all load-serving satellite substations within the Hydro-Québec Distribution system with secondary bus voltages less than 44 kV.
• A 15-year aggregate demand forecast for all load-serving substations belonging to independent municipal distribution systems with secondary bus voltages less than 44 kV.
• A 10-year estimated demand forecast for industrial customer facilities (large industrial plants, pulp and paper mills, aluminum smelters, refineries, mining facilities, etc.), directly connected to the high voltage transmission system (44 kV to 324 kV).
• A 10-year Interconnection-wide aggregated demand forecast for all three categories listed above.
v. Each demand forecast shall provide load data for the following types of load levels:
• Winter Peak Load
• Summer Peak Load
• Summer Light Load
vi. According to HQD-HQT Agreement #1, Part 2, Article 1, HQD must also provide historical load data based on meter readings at each load-serving satellite substation.
vii. In the case of new customer facilities connected directly to the high voltage transmission system, the submission of more detailed modeling information is required prior to the commissioning of new customer facilities, as stipulated in the PC’s “Technical Requirements for Customer Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System” document. The most updated version of the document is readily available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/ ex_inst_client_en.pdf.
viii. Existing customer facilities must also provide load modeling data according to these same technical requirements upon request from the PC or in the event of any modifications to customer facilities.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 29
5.1.2 Short-Circuit and Dynamics Data Requirements for Demand Modeling
i. Short-circuit and dynamics data is normally required for customer facilities equipped with large motors that can impact the transmission system’s transient and dynamic performance. This information is normally provided by customer facilities prior to commissioning and connection to the transmission system or in the event of modifications to existing customer facilities.
ii. Customer facilities, with the collaboration of HQD, shall provide short-circuit and dynamics data according to the requirements set forth in Appendix 1 of HQT’s “Technical Requirements for Customer Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System” document. The most updated version of the document is readily available on HQT’s website at:
http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/ ex_inst_client_en.pdf.
iii. Customer facilities must also indicate the source of the data submitted (manufacturer technical specifications, measured values, typical or estimated theoretical values, etc.).
iv. In the case of incomplete data or unknown parameters, HQD/Customer facilities are responsible for providing theoretical or estimated values.
5.2 Reporting Procedures
5.2.1 Data Format
i. Steady-state load data submitted to the PC shall be presented in an Excel table format similar to the sample tables provided in Appendix 1, as stipulated in HQD-HQT Agreement #1, Part 2, Articles 2 and 4.
ii. Short-circuit and dynamic load data shall be submitted to the PC using the modeling data template provided in Appendix A of the “Technical Requirements for Customer Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System” document. All fields of the said document must be completed in order to be considered as a valid data submission. Other accepted data submission formats for short-circuit and dynamic load data are the following:
• Excel Table listing model parameters
• PSS/E RAW and DYR files, with all corresponding PSS/E dynamic model files.
5.2.2 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i. Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule described in section 7.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 30
6. Complementary Power System Information
In addition to steady-state and dynamics models, power flow and dynamics cases require quantitative power system information in order to set generation dispatch and inter-area transfer levels. This additional information consists of resource planning data and interchange transfer quantities to neighbouring Areas.
The following sections present the data required to effectively integrate resource planning and interchange data into power flow and dynamics cases, defining the type of data required and the units this data is to be reported in.
6.1 Resource Planning Data
6.1.1 Resource Planning Data Requirements
i. The Resource Planner (RP), in this case Hydro-Québec Distribution (HQD), shall provide the PC with data regarding all long term generation purchasing agreements between GOs and LSEs, determining the generating resources available to fulfill demand requirements.
ii. This data shall be prepared and submitted to the PC in accordance with HQD-HQT agreements (“Ententes sectorielles”) 1, 3 and 6, available at http://transenergie.hydro.qc.ca/ planification_expertise_aff_reglementaires/528.htm
6.1.2 Data Format
i. Resource data shall be reported in an Excel table format, as specified in the above mentioned HQD-HQT agreements.
6.1.3 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i. Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule described in section 7.
6.2 Interchange Schedule
An Interchange schedule is a list of scheduled power transfer quantities exchanged between the Québec Interconnection and its neighbouring Area systems (i.e. New England, New York, Ontario, and New Brunswick). These transactions and transmission reservations reflect firm export/import or point-to-point transmission agreements, as per HQT’s Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT). This information is published on the OATI webOASIS application and provided to the PC by the Transmission Service Provider (TSP).
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 31
6.2.1 Interchange Data Requirements
i. The TSP shall collect and provide the required interchange data regarding all point-to-point transmission agreements, transmission reservations and spot trades between TOs within the Québec Interconnection as well as TOs of neighbouring NPCC Areas. This information must be reflective of the most updated transaction information available on OASIS.
ii. Interchange data shall include:
• Transmission service customer name
• OASIS reference number
• Source and destination substations
• Name of interconnection path
• Transaction quantity (MW)
• Transaction frequency (yearly, monthly, etc.)
• Transmission service type
• Start and end date of transmission service contract
6.2.2 Data Format
i. Interchange data shall be reported in an Excel table format, similar to the sample table in Appendix 6.
6.2.3 Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
i. Data submission is to be performed annually according to the procedures and schedule described in section 7.
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 32
7. Data Submission Procedure and Schedule
7.1 Data Submission Procedure
i. All communication regarding modeling data submission shall be sent to the following email address: te_donneesdemodelisation@hydro.qc.ca.
ii. Data submission is to be performed electronically by email, preferably using a secure file transfer server such as Hydro-Québec’s secure FTP server, available to HQ entities at https://ftps.hydro.qc.ca/ and external clients at https://ftps.hydroquebec.com/.
iii. TOs owned by HQT may also submit modeling data using Hydro-Québec’s file storage software, Hydro-Doc (Enterprise Connect) or enter future project data directly into MOD using the MOD online application, available at: http://131.195.100.81/MODWeb/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fmodweb%2fDefault.aspx
iv. Recertification Process
As stipulated in sections 3.1 and 4.1 of the present document, in addition to reporting additions or modifications to modeling data, GOs and TOs of existing facilities must recertify that existing unchanged modeling data is valid. This recertification of modeling data shall be performed on an annual basis, either by resubmitting all required modeling data or by submitting a written confirmation that data has not changed from the previous year’s data submission. The recertification process is presented as follows:
• Request for recertification: Every year, the PC shall send an email to GOs and TOs requesting the recertification of modeling data for existing generators and transmission system equipment 90 calendar days prior to scheduled data submission deadlines. The PC’s request for recertification will include the modeling information currently maintained by the PC in DSR and MOD.
• Recertification response: Recertification of modeling data or information indicating changes to modeling data shall be provided to the PC prior to the data reporting deadline. GOs and TOs must identify all changes or updates to modeling data (including model compatibility updates for PSS/E version upgrades) and submit the changes in accordance to the requirements specified in sections 3 and 4 of the present document. In the case there are no changes to modeling data, GOs and TOs must submit a written confirmation indicating that there are no changes to report and that current modeling data is valid.
v. Technical Concerns and Questions Regarding Submitted Modeling Data
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 33
a) In the case there are technical concerns with regards to the data submitted, the concerned entity (GO, TO, LSE, RP, etc.) will receive a written notification from the PC or a TP describing the technical basis or reason for the technical concerns.
b) Each notified entity shall respond to the notifying PC or TP as follows:
• Provide either updated data or an explanation with a technical basis for maintaining the current data;
• Provide the response within 90 calendar days of receipt of the notification, unless a longer time period is agreed upon with the PC or TP.
7.2 Data Submission Schedule
All concerned entities responsible for providing modeling data shall submit data annually according to the following schedule:
Table 7 – Modeling Data Submission Schedule
Modeling Data Description of Deliverables Functional Entity Responsible
Submission Date
Aggregate Demand Data
Steady-state winter peak load forecast Load Serving Entity June 1st
Steady-state summer peak and light load forecasts
Load Serving Entity October 1st
Steady-state demand forecast for industrial customer facilities
Load Serving Entity October 1st
Total system load forecast Resource Planner October 1st
Generation Data Recertification of steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit modeling data for existing generating units
Generator Owners February 1st
Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit modeling data for new future planned projects
Generator Owners February 1st
Generator facilities outage schedule Generator Owners April 1st
Transmission System Equipment Data
Recertification of steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit modeling data for existing equipment
Transmission Owners March 1st
Steady-state, dynamics and short-circuit modeling data for new future planned projects
Transmission Owners Transmission Planners
March 1st
Transmission system equipment outage schedule
Reliability Coordinator April 1st
Complementary Power System Information
Resource Planning Data Resource Planner April 1st
Interchange Data Transmission Service Provider
April 1st
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 34
7.3 Compliance Violations
For entities registered with NERC, failure to submit required modeling data by the prescribed submission schedule and in the requested format may be in violation of the requirements established in NERC’s MOD-032 standard.
For more information regarding compliance violations, functional entities may refer to pages 5-11 of the MOD-032-1 standard document, available on NERC’s website at:
http://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Reliability%20Standards/MOD-032-1.pdf
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 35
REFERENCES
[1] Data for Power System Modeling and Analysis, NERC Reliability Standard MOD-032-1, 2015.
[2] Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding, NERC Standard PRC-006-1, 2015.
[3] Demand and Energy Data, NERC Reliability Standard MOD-031-1, 2015.
[4] Procedures for System Modeling: Data Requirements & Facility Ratings, NPCC Document C-29, March 2007.
[5] F. Bélanger, ing, “Mise à jour des réseaux planifiés,” Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie, Montréal, Québec, September 2015.
[6] Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (July 2012), Démarche à suivre pour un raccordement de centrale au réseau d’Hydro-Québec [Online]. Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/ transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/demarche-a-suivre-2012.pdf
[7] Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (February 2009), Transmission Provider Technical Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System [Online]. Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_09_en.pdf
[8] Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (February 2011), General Validation Test Program for Wind Power Plants Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System [Online]. Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/essais-eoliennes2011-en.pdf.
[9] Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (April 2014), Procedure for PSS/E Model Validation [Online]. Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/procedure- validation-modeles-psse-en.pdf.
[10] Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie (December 2008), Technical Requirements for Customer Facilities Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System [Online]. Available : http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/ex_inst_client_en.pdf.
[11] Ententes sectorielles HQ Distribution / HQ TransÉnergie [Online]. Available FTP : transport.hydro.qc.ca Directory : commerce/commerce/ File : FBack_ententes_sect.htm
[12] Siemens Energy Inc. (October 2010), PSSE 32.05 Model Library [Online]. Available FTP : transport.hydro.qc.ca Directory : PTI/PSSE32/DOCS/ModelLibrary File : MODELS.pdf
[13] Siemens Energy Inc. (October 2010), PSSE 32.05 Program Operation Manual [Online]. Available FTP : transport.hydro.qc.ca Directory : PTI/PSSE32/DOCS/POM File : POM.pdf
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 36
APPENDIX 1 – Load Data Reporting Templates
Total Demand Forecast Template (Winter)
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
Besoins réguliers du Distributeur1 37 892- Consommation des centrales HQP dans BRD 74
= Charge locale du Transporteur 37 818Croissance annuelle 375
en % 1.0%
dont Alcan 92
1
PRÉVISION DE LA CHARGE LOCALE DU TRANSPORTEUR - POINTE D'HIVER (MW)
Version du JJ/MM/AAAA
La définition des besoins réguliers du Distributeur (BRD) se limite aux besoins des clients desservis par le réseau de TransÉnergie (exclusion des besoins des réseaux autonomes). Les BRD incluent la consommation des centrales d'HQP associée à l'électricité patrimoniale. Ils sont après effacement de la bi-énergie résidentielle (tarif DT) et avant interruptions chez les clients de la Grande entreprise.
2015-12-16H:\deluca\2015\Autres\MOD-032\APPENDIX 1 - Load Data Reporting Templates.xlsx
Total Demand Tarification, prévision et caractérisationVice-présidence - Clientèle
Aggregate (per bus/substation) Demand Forecast Template (Winter)
Nom_Poste Bus No. Unité Saison Année V01 Charge V01 Charge V02 Charge V03 Charge V04 Charge V05 Charge P01 Charge P02 Charge P03 Charge P04 Charge P05 Charge P06 Charge P07 Charge P08 Charge P09 Charge P10 Charge P11 Charge P12 Charge P13 Charge P14 Charge P15Abitibi MW Hiver 2009Abitibi MVAR Hiver 2009Abitibi MVA Hiver 2009Achigan MW Hiver 2009Achigan MVAR Hiver 2009Achigan MVA Hiver 2009Acton MW Hiver 2009Acton MVAR Hiver 2009Acton MVA Hiver 2009Adamsville MW Hiver 2009Adamsville MVAR Hiver 2009Adamsville MVA Hiver 2009Alain-Grandbois MW Hiver 2009Alain-Grandbois MVAR Hiver 2009Alain-Grandbois MVA Hiver 2009Albanel MW Hiver 2009Albanel MVAR Hiver 2009Albanel MVA Hiver 2009Alma MW Hiver 2009Alma MVAR Hiver 2009Alma MVA Hiver 2009Almaville MW Hiver 2009Almaville MVAR Hiver 2009Almaville MVA Hiver 2009Amos MW Hiver 2009Amos MVAR Hiver 2009Amos MVA Hiver 2009Amqui MW Hiver 2009Amqui MVAR Hiver 2009Amqui MVA Hiver 2009Anne-Hébert MW Hiver 2009Anne-Hébert MVAR Hiver 2009Anne-Hébert MVA Hiver 2009Anse Pleureuse 25 kV MW Hiver 2009Anse Pleureuse 25 kV MVAR Hiver 2009Anse Pleureuse 25 kV MVA Hiver 2009Antoine Lemieux MW Hiver 2009Antoine Lemieux MVAR Hiver 2009Antoine Lemieux MVA Hiver 2009Aqueduc 25 MW Hiver 2009Aqueduc 25 MVAR Hiver 2009Aqueduc 25 MVA Hiver 2009Armagh MW Hiver 2009Armagh MVAR Hiver 2009Armagh MVA Hiver 2009Arthabaska MW Hiver 2009Arthabaska MVAR Hiver 2009Arthabaska MVA Hiver 2009Arthur-Buies MW Hiver 2009Arthur-Buies MVAR Hiver 2009Arthur-Buies MVA Hiver 2009Asbestos MW Hiver 2009Asbestos MVAR Hiver 2009Asbestos MVA Hiver 2009Atwater 12 MW Hiver 2009Atwater 12 MVAR Hiver 2009Atwater 12 MVA Hiver 2009Atwater 25 MW Hiver 2009Atwater 25 MVAR Hiver 2009Atwater 25 MVA Hiver 2009Aubertois MW Hiver 2009Aubertois MVAR Hiver 2009Aubertois MVA Hiver 2009Austin MW Hiver 2009Austin MVAR Hiver 2009Austin MVA Hiver 2009Baie D'urfée 12 MW Hiver 2009Baie D'urfée 12 MVAR Hiver 2009Baie D'urfée 12 MVA Hiver 2009Baie D'urfée 25 MW Hiver 2009Baie D'urfée 25 MVAR Hiver 2009Baie D'urfée 25 MVA Hiver 2009Baie Saint-Paul MW Hiver 2009Baie Saint-Paul MVAR Hiver 2009Baie Saint-Paul MVA Hiver 2009Baie Saint-Paul 315 MW Hiver 2009Baie Saint-Paul 315 MVAR Hiver 2009Baie Saint-Paul 315 MVA Hiver 2009Baie-Trinité MW Hiver 2009Baie-Trinité MVAR Hiver 2009Baie-Trinité MVA Hiver 2009Beauceville Est MW Hiver 2009Beauceville Est MVAR Hiver 2009Beauceville Est MVA Hiver 2009Beaulieu MW Hiver 2009Beaulieu MVAR Hiver 2009Beaulieu MVA Hiver 2009Beaumont 12 MW Hiver 2009Beaumont 12 MVAR Hiver 2009
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 37
APPENDIX 2 – List of Approved Dynamics Models
A2.1 Standard Library Models
Model Name Model Description Developer
Generator Models
CBEST EPRI battery energy storage FACTS model PTI-Siemens
CDSMS1 American Superconductor DSMES device model PTI-Siemens
CGEN1 Third order generator model PTI-Siemens
CIMTR1 Induction generator model with rotor flux transients PTI-Siemens
CIMTR2 Induction motor model with rotor flux transients PTI-Siemens
CIMTR3 Induction generator model with rotor flux transients PTI-Siemens
CIMTR4 Induction motor model with rotor flux transients PTI-Siemens
CSMEST EPRI superconducting electromagnetic energy storage FACTS model PTI-Siemens
CSTATT Static condenser FACTS model PTI-Siemens
CSVGN1 SCR controlled static var source model PTI-Siemens
CSVGN3 SCR controlled static var source model PTI-Siemens
CSVGN4 SCR controlled static var source model PTI-Siemens
CSVGN5 WECC controlled static var source model PTI-Siemens
CSVGN6 WECC controlled static var source model PTI-Siemens
FRECHG Salient pole frequency changer model PTI-Siemens
GENCLS Classical generator model PTI-Siemens
GENDCO Round rotor generator model with dc offset torque component PTI-Siemens
GENROE Round rotor generator model PTI-Siemens
GENROU Round rotor generator model PTI-Siemens
GENSAE Salient pole generator model PTI-Siemens
GENSAL Salient pole generator model PTI-Siemens
GENTRA Transient level generator model PTI-Siemens
Compensator Models
COMP Voltage regulator compensating model PTI-Siemens
COMPCC Cross compound compensating model PTI-Siemens
IEEEVC 1981 IEEE voltage compensating model PTI-Siemens
REMCMP Remote bus voltage signal model PTI-Siemens
Stabilizer Models
BEPSST Transient excitation boosting stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
IEE2ST Dual-input signal power system stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
IEEEST 1981 IEEE power system stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
IVOST IVO stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
OSTB2T Ontario Hydro delta-omega power system stabilizer PTI-Siemens
OSTB5T Ontario Hydro delta-omega power system stabilizer PTI-Siemens
PSS1A IEEE Std. 421.5-2005 PSS1A Single-Input Stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
PSS2A 1992 IEEE type PSS2A dual-input signal stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 38
PSS2B IEEE 421.5 2005 PSS2B IEEE dual-input stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
PSS3B IEEE Std. 421.5 2005 PSS3B IEEE dual-input stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
PSS4B IEEE 421.5(2005) dual-input stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
PTIST1 PTI microprocessor-based stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
PTIST3 PTI microprocessor-based stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
ST2CUT Dual-input signal power system stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
STAB1 Speed sensitive stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
STAB2A ASEA power sensitive stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
STAB3 Power sensitive stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
STAB4 Power sensitive stabilizer model PTI-Siemens
STABNI Power sensitive stabilizer model type NI (NVE) PTI-Siemens
STBSVC WECC supplementary signal for static var system PTI-Siemens
Excitation System Models
AC7B IEEE 421.5 2005 AC7B excitation system PTI-Siemens
AC8B IEEE 421.5 2005 AC8B excitation system PTI-Siemens
BBSEX1 Brown-Boveri static excitation system model PTI-Siemens
BUDCZT Czech proportional/integral excitation system model PTI-Siemens
CELIN ELIN brushless excitation system model PTI-Siemens
DC3A IEEE 421.5 2005 DC3A excitation system PTI-Siemens
DC4B IEEE 421.5 2005 DC4B excitation system PTI-Siemens
EMAC1T AEP Rockport excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC1A 1992 IEEE type AC1A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC2A 1992 IEEE type AC2A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC3A 1992 IEEE type AC3A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC4A 1992 IEEE type AC4A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC5A 1992 IEEE type AC5A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC6A 1992 IEEE type AC6A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESAC8B Basler DECS model PTI-Siemens
ESDC1A 1992 IEEE type DC1A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESDC2A 1992 IEEE type DC2A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESST1A 1992 IEEE type ST1A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESST2A 1992 IEEE type ST2A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESST3A 1992 IEEE type ST3A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
ESST4B IEEE type ST4B potential or compounded source-controlled rectifierexciter PTI-Siemens
ESURRY Modified IEEE Type AC1A excitation model PTI-Siemens
EX2000 EX2000 Excitation System PTI-Siemens
EXAC1 1981 IEEE type AC1 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXAC1A Modified type AC1 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXAC2 1981 IEEE type AC2 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXAC3 1981 IEEE type AC3 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXAC4 1981 IEEE type AC4 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXBAS Basler static voltage regulator feeding dc or ac rotating exciter model PTI-Siemens
EXDC2 1981 IEEE type DC2 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXELI Static PI transformer fed excitation system model PTI-Siemens
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 39
EXNEBB Bus or solid fed SCR bridge excitation system model type NEBB (NVE) PTI-Siemens
EXNI Bus or solid fed SCR bridge excitation system model type NI (NVE) PTI-Siemens
EXPIC1 Proportional/integral excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXST1 1981 IEEE type ST1 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXST2 1981 IEEE type ST2 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXST2A Modified 1981 IEEE type ST2 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
EXST3 1981 IEEE type ST3 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEET1 1968 IEEE type 1 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEET2 1968 IEEE type 2 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEET3 1968 IEEE type 3 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEET4 1968 IEEE type 4 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEET5 Modified 1968 IEEE type 4 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEEX1 1979 IEEE type 1 excitation system model and 1981 IEEE type DC1 model PTI-Siemens
IEEEX2 1979 IEEE type 2 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEEX3 1979 IEEE type 3 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEEX4 1979 IEEE type 4 excitation system, 1981 IEEE type DC3 and 1992 IEEE type DC3A models PTI-Siemens
IEET1A Modified 1968 IEEE type 1 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEET1B Modified 1968 IEEE type 1 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEET5A Modified 1968 IEEE type 4 excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IEEX2A 1979 IEEE type 2A excitation system model PTI-Siemens
IVOEX IVO excitation system model PTI-Siemens
OEX12T Ontario Hydro IEEE Type ST1 excitation system with continuous and bang bang terminal voltage limiter PTI-Siemens
OEX3T Ontario Hydro IEEE Type ST1 excitation system with semicontinuousand acting terminal voltage limiter PTI-Siemens
REXSYS General purpose rotating excitation system model PTI-Siemens
Excitation Limiter Models
MAXEX1 Maximum excitation limiter model PTI-Siemens
MAXEX2 Maximum excitation limiter model PTI-Siemens
MNLEX1 Minimum excitation limiter model PTI-Siemens
MNLEX2 Minimum excitation limiter model PTI-Siemens
MNLEX3 Minimum excitation limiter model PTI-Siemens
UEL1 IEEE 421.5 2005 UEL1 under-excitation limiter PTI-Siemens
UEL2 IEEE 421.5 2005 UEL2 minimum excitation limiter PTI-Siemens
Turbine-Governor Model
BBGOV1 Brown-Boveri turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
CRCMGV Cross compound turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
DEGOV Woodward diesel governor model PTI-Siemens
DEGOV1 Woodward diesel governor model PTI-Siemens
GAST Gas turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
GAST2A Gas turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
GASTWD Gas turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
GGOV1 GE general purpose turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
HYGOV Hydro turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 40
HYGOV2 Hydro turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
HYGOVM Hydro turbine-governor lumped parameter model PTI-Siemens
HYGOVT Hydro turbine-governor traveling wave model PTI-Siemens
IEEEG1 1981 IEEE type 1 turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
IEEEG2 1981 IEEE type 2 turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
IEEEG3 1981 IEEE type 3 turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
IEESGO 1973 IEEE standard turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
IVOGO IVO turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
PIDGOV Hydro turbine and governor model PTI-Siemens
SHAF25 Torsional-elastic shaft model for 25 masses PTI-Siemens
TGOV1 Steam turbine-governor model PTI-Siemens
TGOV2 Steam turbine-governor model with fast valving PTI-Siemens
TGOV3 Modified IEEE type 1 turbine-governor model with fast valving PTI-Siemens
TGOV4 Modified IEEE type 1 speed governing model with PLU and EVA PTI-Siemens
TGOV5 Modified IEEE type 1 turbine-governor model with boiler controls PTI-Siemens
Two-Terminal DC Line Models
CDC1T Two-terminal dc line model PTI-Siemens
CDC4T Two-terminal dc line model PTI-Siemens
CDC6T Two-terminal dc line model PTI-Siemens
CDC6TA Two-terminal dc line model PTI-Siemens
CDC7T dc line model PTI-Siemens
CDCABT ABB dc line model for Kontek line PTI-Siemens
CEELT New Eel River dc line and auxiliaries model. This model internally uses the following models: CHAAUT (auxiliary-signal model), CEEL2T (two-terminal dc
line model), and RUNBK (dc line runback model). PTI-Siemens
CEEL2T New Eel River dc line model PTI-Siemens
Multi-Terminal DC Line Models
MTDC1T Multiterminal (five converter) dc line model PTI-Siemens
MTDC2T Multiterminal (five converter) dc line model PTI-Siemens
MTDC3T Multiterminal (eight converter) dc line model PTI-Siemens
VSC dc Line Model
VSCDCT Two-terminal VSC dc line model PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Generator Models
WT1G1 Direct connected (Type 1) generator PTI-Siemens
WT2G1 Induction generator with controlled external rotor resistor (Type 2) PTI-Siemens
WT3G1 Doubly-fed induction generator (Type 3) PTI-Siemens
WT3G2U Doubly-fed induction generator (Type 3), version 2 PTI-Siemens
WT4G1 Wind generator model with power converter (Type 4) PTI-Siemens
W4G2U Wind generator model with power converter (Type 4), version 2 PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Electrical Model
WT2E1 Rotor resistance control model for Type 2 wind generator PTI-Siemens
WT3E1 Electrical control for Type 3 wind generator PTI-Siemens
WT4E1 Electrical control models for Type 4 wind generator PTI-Siemens
W4E2U Electrical control for Type 4 wind generator, version 2 PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Mechanical Model
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 41
WT12T1 Two mass turbine model for Type 1 and Type 2 wind generators PTI-Siemens
WT3T1 Mechanical system model for Type 3 wind generator PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Pitch Control
WT3P1 Pitch control model for Type 3 wind generator PTI-Siemens
Generic Wind Aerodynamic Model
WT12A1
Pseudo-governor model for Type 1 and Type 2 wind generators PTI-Siemens
Switched Shunt Model
CHSVCT SVC for switched shunt PTI-Siemens
CSSCST SVG for switched shunt PTI-Siemens
SWSHNT Switched shunt model PTI-Siemens
A2.2 Approved User-Defined Models
Model Name Model Description Developer
Stabilizer Models
MBPS4S User-defined PSS model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Excitation System Models
EXHQSC User-defined Excitation System model for synchronous condensers Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Excitation Limiter Models
OELHQ User-defined Excitation Limiter Model (TCE) Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Turbine-Governor Model
HQRVW User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HQRVM User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HQRVN User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HQRVC User-defined Hydro turbine-governor model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Two-Terminal DC Line Models
CHTFWX User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CHTRVX User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CHTFWD User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CHARVS User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
RSPDC3 User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
HIGTDC User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model (High Gate) Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
CMDS User-defined Hydro-Québec DC Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Multi-Terminal DC Line Models
NEDCV3 User-defined Multi-Terminal DC Line Model (HQ-NE)
VSC dc Line Model
VSCDCT Two-terminal VSC dc line model PTI-Siemens
CABB02 HVDC Light® Open model version Ov1.1.10 ABB
CEmpty HVDC Light® Open model version Ov1.1.10 (Dummy call) ABB
Generic Wind Generator Models
EXF2 User-defined Wind Generator Model for Enercon E82 Enercon
EXS3 User-defined Wind Generator Model for Enercon E82 Enercon
E822S3 User-defined Wind Generator Model for Enercon Enercon
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 42
R21201 User-defined Wind Generator Model for Senvion MM92 Senvion
R21301 User-defined Wind Generator Model for Senvion MM82 Senvion
Generic Wind Electrical Model
EFCU02 User-defined Wind Farm Control Unit Model (Enercon) Enercon
RPMU01 Senvion User-defined Power Management Unit Model Senvion
Switched Shunt Model
CHASVC User-defined SVC Model for synchronous condensers Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
IM_AM1 User-defined SVC Model for shunt reactors Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
IM_CMP User-defined SVC Model (Master) Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
IM_EXC User-defined SVC Model (Slave) Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
SVSMO1U1 User written model for continuously controled SVC PTI-Siemens
SVSMO2U1 User written model for discretely controled SVC PTI-Siemens
Other Models
VFTU1 User-defined Phase Shifting Transformer Model Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
PVGU1 User written generator model to represent photo-voltaic (PV) systems PTI-Siemens
PVEU1 User written electrical control model for photo-voltaic (PV) systems PTI-Siemens
PANELU1 User written model to represent the linearized model of PV panel’soutput curve PTI-Siemens
IRRADU1 User written model to represent the linearized model of PV panel’ssolar irradiance profile. PTI-Siemens
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 43
APPENDIX 3 – Examples of Siemens-PTI PSS/E Model Library Data sheets
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International 1-47
PSS®E32.0.5 Generator Model Data SheetsPSS®E Model Library GENSAL
1.21 GENSALSalient Pole Generator Model (Quadratic Saturation on d-Axis)
Note: Xd, Xq, X´d, Xd, Xq, Xl, H, and D are in pu, machine MVA base.
Xq must be equal to Xd.
IBUS, ’GENSAL’, ID, CON(J) to CON(J+11) /
This model is located at system bus
#_____ IBUS,
Machine identifier #_____ ID,
This model uses CONs starting with
#_____ J,
and STATEs starting with #_____ K.
The machine MVA is _________ for each of units = _________ MBASE.
ZSORCE for this machine is _________ + j ________ on the above MBASE.
CONs # Value Description
J T´do (>0) (sec)
J+1 Tdo (>0) (sec)
J+2 Tqo (>0) (sec)
J+3 H, Inertia
J+4 D, Speed damping
J+5 Xd
J+6 Xq
J+7 X´d
J+8 Xd = Xq
J+9 Xl
J+10 S(1.0)
J+11 S(1.2)
STATEs # Description
K E´q
K+1 kd
K+2 q
K+3 speed (pu)
K+4 Angle (radians)
EFD
VOLT at ETERMGENSALTerminal
Bus
Efd
VT
ISORCE
SPEED Speed
Source Current
Terminal Voltage
PMECHPm
ANGLE Angle
Excitation System Model Data Sheets PSS®E 32.0.5IEEEX1 PSS®E Model Library
6-98 Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
6.44 IEEEX1IEEE Type 1 Excitation System
This model is located at system bus #_______ IBUS,
Machine identifier #_______ ID,
This model uses CONs starting with #_______ J,
and STATEs starting with #_______ K,
and VAR #_______ L.
CONs # Value Description
J TR (sec)
J+1 KA
J+2 TA (sec)
J+3 TB (sec)
J+4 TC (sec)
J+5 VRMAX or zero
J+6 VRMIN
J+7 KE or zero
J+8 TE (>0) (sec)
J+9 KF
J+10 TF1 (>0) (sec)
J+11 Switch
J+12 E1
J+13 SE(E1)
J+14 E2
J+15 SE(E2)
STATEs # Description
K Sensed VT
K+1 Lead lag
K+2 Regulator output, VR
K+3 Exciter output, EFD
K+4 Rate feedback integrator
ECOMP
VOEL
VOTHSGEFD
IEEEX1VUEL
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International 6-99
PSS®E 32.0.5 Excitation System Model Data SheetsPSS®E Model Library IEEEX1
IBUS, ’IEEEX1’, ID, CON(J) to CON(J+15) /
VAR # Description
L KE
– + +VERR
11 + sTR
VREF
+
VS
+
–
1 + sTC1 + sTB
KA1 + sTA
RegulatorVRMAX
VRMIN
VR
1sTE
SE + KEsKF
1 + sTF1
–
VFB
DampingVS = VOTHSG + VUEL + VOEL
(pu)EC (pu)
EFD
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International 7-13
PSS®E 32.0.5 Turbine-Governor Model Data SheetsPSS®E Model Library GAST2A
7.6 GAST2AGas Turbine Model
This model is located at system bus #_______ IBUS,
Machine identifier #_______ ID,
This model uses CONs starting with #_______ J,
and STATEs starting with #_______ K,
and VARs starting with #_______ L.
CONs # Value Description
J W, governor gain (1/droop) (on turbine rating)
J+1 X (sec) governor lead time constant
J+2 Y (sec) (> 0) governor lag time constant
J+3Z, governor mode:
1 Droop 0 ISO
J+4 ETD (sec)
J+5 TCD (sec)
J+6 TRATE turbine rating (MW)
J+7 T (sec)
J+8 MAX (pu) limit (on turbine rating)
J+9 MIN (pu) limit (on turbine rating)
J+10 ECR (sec)
J+11 K3
J+12 a (> 0) valve positioner
J+13 b (sec) (> 0) valve positioner
J+14 c valve positioner
J+15 f (sec) (> 0)
J+16 Kf
J+17 K5
J+18 K4
J+19 T3 (sec) (> 0)
J+20 T4 (sec) (> 0)
J+21 t (> 0)
J+22 T5 (sec) (> 0)
J+23 af1
SPEED PMECHGAST2A
Turbine-Governor Model Data Sheets PSS®E 32.0.5GAST2A PSS®E Model Library
7-14 Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
IBUS, ’GAST2A’, ID, CON(J) to CON(J+30) /
J+24 bf1
J+25 af2
J+26 bf2
J+27 cf2
J+28 TR (degree), Rated temperature1
J+29 K6 (pu), Minimum fuel flow
J+30 TC (degree), Temperature control1
1 Units can be F or C depending on constants af1 and bf1.
STATEs # Description
K Speed governor
K+1 Valve positioner
K+2 Fuel system
K+3 Radiation shield
K+4 Thermocouple
K+5 Temperature control
K+6 Gas turbine dynamics
K+7 Combustor
K+8 Combustor
K+9 Turbine/exhaust
K+10 Turbine/exhaust
K+11 Fuel controller delay
K+12 Fuel controller delay
VARs # Description
L Governor reference
L+1 Temperature reference flag
L+2 Low value select output
L+3 Output of temperature control
CONs # Value Description
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International 7-15
PSS®E 32.0.5 Turbine-Governor Model Data SheetsPSS®E Model Library GAST2A
+
1.0
Wf1Reference
+
–
W(Xs+1)
Ys + Z
VAR(L)
Speed
Low
Speed
X K3a
bs + c1
fs + 1
Kf
Fuel
Combustor
T5s + 1
tsTemperature
Control* 1T4s + 1
f1
K6
TCThermocouple
Radiation
Turbine
1TCDS + 1
f2
Turbine
XPMECH Wf2
Gas Turbine
+
+
N
SPEED
f1 = TR - af1(1 - wf1) - bf1(SPEED) f2 = af2 +bf2(wf2) - cf2 (SPEED)
+
–
+
–
MAX
MIN
e-sT
e-sETD
MAX
Fuel
Turbine Exhaust
TRATEMBASE
e-sECR
*Temperature control output is set to output of speed governor when temperature control input changes from positive to negative.
Valve
(pu deviation)
T3s + 1K4 +
K5
Governor Control
ValueSelect
Positioner SystemFuelFlow
WfControl
Dynamics
Shield
Generic Wind Generator Model Data Sheets PSS®E 32.0.5WT3G2U PSS®E Model Library
17-8 Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International
17.5 WT3G2UDoubly-Fed Induction Generator (Type 3)
This model is located at system bus #_______ IBUS,
Machine identifier #_______ ID,
This model uses CONs starting with #_______ J,
and STATEs starting with #_______ K,
and VAR #_______ L,
and ICON #_______ M.
CONs # Value Description
J Tiqcmd, Converter time constant for IQcmd
J+1 Tipcmd, Converter time constant for IPcmd
J+2 KPLL, PLL gain
J+3 KIPLL, PLL integrator gain
J+4 PLLMAX, PLL max. limit
J+5 Prated
J+6 VLVPL1, LVPL voltage 1 Low voltage power logic
J+7 VLVPL2, LVPL voltage 2
J+8 GLVPL, LVPL gain
J+9 VHVRCR, High Voltage Reactive Current (HVRC) logic, pu voltage
J+10 CURHVRCR, HVRC logic, current (pu)
J+11 RIp_LVPL, Rate of active current change
J+12 T_LVPL, Voltage sensor for LVPL, second
STATEs # Description
K Converter lag for Ipcmd
K+1 Converter lag for Iqcmd
K+2 PLL first integrator
K+3 PLL second integrator
K+4 Voltage sensor for LVPL
VAR # Description
L deltaQ, overvoltage correction factor
Siemens Energy, Inc., Power Technologies International 17-9
PSS®E 32.0.5 Generic Wind Generator Model Data SheetsPSS®E Model Library WT3G2U
IBUS, ’USRMDL’, ID, ’WT3G2U’, 1, 1, 1, 13, 5,1, ICON(M), CON(J) TO COM(J+12)
ICON # Description
M Number of lumped wind turbines
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 44
APPENDIX 4 – Generator Modeling Data Reporting Template
Generator Modeling Data Reporting TemplateGenerator Characteristics and Steady-state Data
i Machine Type MES Sb (MVA)* Eb (kV) Sété (MVA) Shiv (MVA) S2h Pnom (MW) En (kV) Snom (MVAR) PF (%) HBus No. Round rotor or salient
pole Initial Commissioning
DateRated apparent
powerRated phase
voltageCoolant Coolant temp.
⁰CRated power @
high temp.Rated power @ design ambient
temp.
Nominal Real Power
Nominal Voltage
Nominal Apparent
Power
Power Factor Inertia Constant (for each
generating unit)
9000 99990 Plant 1 19001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
* Machine reactances (in p.u.) and inertia values must all be based on the base apparent power Sb (MVA) of the machine.
Generator Dynamics Data - Syncrhonous Machines
i Model Type Ra @ 25 C R1 Xl X2 Xdu X'du X''du Xqu X'qu X''qu X'ds X''ds X'qs X''qs Sgl Sgu T'do T''do T'qo T''qoBus No. Installation
No.Power Plant Name Standard Library Model
or User-written Model Armature
resistance per phase
Stator forward resistance
Positive-sequence leakage
reactance
Negative-sequence reactance
Unsaturated direct-axis
synchronous reactance
Unsaturated direct-axis transient
reactance
Unsaturated direct-axis
subtransient reactance
Unsaturated quadrature-axis
synchronous reactance
Unsaturated quadrature-axis
transient reactance
Unsaturated quadrature-axis
subtransient reactance
Saturated direct-axis transient
reactance
Saturated direct-axis subtransient
reactance
Saturated quadrature-axis
transient reactance
Saturated quadrature-axis
subtransient reactance
Saturation factor at 1.2 p.u. of
nominal voltage
Saturation factor at 1 p.u. of
nominal voltage
Direct-axis transient open-
circuit time constant
Direct-axis subtransient
open-circuit time constant
Quadrature-axis transient open-
circuit time constant
Quadrature-axis subtransient
open-circuit time constant
9000 99990 Plant 1 1 GENSAL Standard9001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
Generator Dynamics Data - Asyncrhonous Machines
i Model Type Rs Xs Rr Xr Xm Xlr Xo T'do sBus No. Installation
No.Power Plant Name Standard Library Model
or User-written Model Stator resistance Stator leakage
reactanceRotor
resistanceRotor leakage
reactanceMagnetizing reactance
Locked rotor reactance
Open-circuit reactance
Direct-axis transient open-
circuit time constant
Generator slip factor
9000 99990 Plant 1 19001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
Voltage Regulator Dynamics Data
i Model Type CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 ICON1 ICON2 ICON3 ICON4Bus No. Installation
No.Power Plant Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
9000 99990 Plant 1 19001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
Excitation System Dynamics Data
i Model Type VR Type RR TRH KA TA1 TA2 VRMAX VRMIN KE TE SE.75 max SE max EFD max EFD min AEX BEX KF TF1 TF2Bus No. Installation
No.Power Plant Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
Excitation Type Exciter response ratio
Regulator Input filter
time constant (s)
Regulator gain
Regulator time constant 1 (s)
Regulator time constant 2 (s)
Maximum regulator output
Minimum regulator output
Exciter self-excitation
Exciter time constant (s)
Rotating exciter saturation at 0.75 max field voltage
Rotating exciter saturation at max
field voltage
Maximum field voltage (p.u.)
Minimum field voltage (p.u.)
Derived saturation constant
Derived saturation constant
Regulator stabilizing circuit
gain
Regulator stabilizing circuit time constant (s)
Regulator stabilizing circuit time constant (s)
9000 99990 Plant 1 1 IEEET5 Standard9001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
Turbine & Speed Governor Dynamics Data
i Model Type GOV R PMAX T1 T2 T3 T4 F CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10Bus No. Installation
No.Power Plant Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
Governor Type Turbine steady-state regulation setting (droop)
Maximum turbine output
(MW)
Control time constant (governor
delay)
Hydro reset time constant or pilot
valve time
Servo time constant or
dashpot time constant
Steam valve bowl time constant
Shaft output (p.u.) or
maximum gate velocity (MW/s)
9000 99990 Plant 1 1 HQRVN User-Written9001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
Power System Stabilizer Governor Dynamics Data
Base Values Generator Capacties Nominal Values
Saturated reactances
Other Constants
Other Constants
Steam reheat time, hydro water starting time constant (s) or
minimum gate velocity (MW/s)
T5
Typical Governor Parameters, Constants and Coefficients (may vary depending on type of governor model)
Typical Stabilizer Parameters, Constants and Coefficients (may vary depending on type of stabilizer model)
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Dynamic ModelUnit No.
Installation No.
Damper winding
(connection method)
Unit No.Power Plant Name
Typical Exciter Parameters, Constants and Coefficients (may vary depending on type of exciter model)
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Model CONS Model ICONS
Saturation coefficients Time constantsUnsaturated reactances
Design ambient temperature ⁰C
Temp. rise at rated power ⁰C
i Model Type PSS KQV KQS TQ T'Q1 TQ1 T'Q2 TQ2 T'Q3 TQ3 VS lim CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8Bus No. Installation
No.Power Plant Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
PSS feedback (frequency, speed,
accelerating power)
PSS voltage gain (p.u.)
PSS speed gain (p.u.)
PSS reset time constant
(s)
First lead time constant (s)
First lag time constant (s)
Second lead time constant (s)
Second lag time constant (s)
Third lead time constant (s)
Third lag time constant (s)
PSS output limit setting (p.u.)
9000 99990 Plant 1 1 IEEEST Standard9001 99991 Plant 1 29002 99992 Plant 1 39003 99993 Plant 2 19004 99994 Plant 2 29005 99995 Plant 3 1
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Wind Farm Modeling Data Reporting TemplateWind Generator Characteristics and Steady-state Data
i MES PMAX (MW) EPOI (kV) PRated (MW) QMAX (MVAR) QMIN (MVAR) En (kV) Snom (MVAR) XSource (p.u.) ECollector (kV) RCollector (p.u.) XCollector (p.u.)Bus No. Initial Commissioning
DateInstalled Capacity Voltage level at
point of interconnection
WEC Manufacturer
Model Name Rated power of one WT
Number of WTs
Max Reactive Power Export
Min Reactive Power Import
Nominal Voltage
Nominal Apparent
Power
Source Reactance Voltage level of
collector network
Equivalent Resistance of
collector network
Equivalent Reactance of
collector network
9500 Wind Farm 1 19501 Wind Farm 2 1
Wind Generator Dynamics Data
i Model Type CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 ICON1 ICON2 ICON3 ICON4Bus No. Wind Farm Name Standard Library Model
or User-written Model
9500 Wind Farm 1 19501 Wind Farm 2 1
Wind Electrical Model Data
i Model Type CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 ICON1 ICON2 ICON3 ICON4Bus No. Wind Farm Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
9500 Wind Farm 1 19501 Wind Farm 2 1
Wind Mechanical Model Data
i Model Type CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 ICON1 ICON2 ICON3 ICON4Bus No. Wind Farm Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
9500 Wind Farm 1 19501 Wind Farm 2 1
Wind Pitch Control Model Data
i Model Type CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 ICON1 ICON2 ICON3 ICON4
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Model CONS
U it
Model ICONS
Model CONS Model ICONS
Single Wind Turbine (WT) Data Collector Network Data
Model CONS Model ICONS
Model ICONS
Wind Farm Name Unit No.
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Model CONS
Bus No. Wind Farm Name Standard Library Model or User-written
Model
9500 Wind Farm 1 19501 Wind Farm 2 1
Wind Aerodynamic Model Data
i Model Type CON1 CON2 CON3 CON4 CON5 CON6 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 ICON1 ICON2 ICON3 ICON4Bus No. Wind Farm Name Standard Library
Model or User-written Model
9500 Wind Farm 1 19501 Wind Farm 2 1
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Unit No. Dynamic Model
Model ICONSModel CONS
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 45
APPENDIX 5 – HQT Bus Numbering and Classification
A5.1 Bus Number Ranges
Bus Number Ranges Bus Types Nominal Voltage Regional Area
1-299 Generator Buses All All
300-699 Substation and Line Buses 315 kV All
700-799 Substation and Line Buses 735 kV All
800-999 Reactive Compensator Buses 735 kV All
1000-1099 Miscellaneous Buses All All
1100-1599 Substation and Line Buses 120 kV All
1600-1699 Substation and Line Buses 161 kV All
1700-1999 Miscellaneous Buses All All
2000-2399 Substation and Line Buses 230 kV All
2400-2499 Substation and Line Buses 69 kV All
2500-2799 Load Buses < 120 kV La Grande
2800-3149 Load Buses < 120 kV Mauricie Nord
3150-3499 Load Buses < 120 kV Manicouagan
3500-3829 Load Buses < 120 kV Montmorency Nord
3860-4149 Load Buses < 120 kV Saguenay
4150-4499 Load Buses < 120 kV Laurentides (Outaouais)
4500-5509 Load Buses < 120 kV Richelieu
5510-5699 Load Buses < 120 kV Mauricie Sud
5700-6349 Load Buses < 120 kV Montmorency Sud
6350-6999 Load Buses < 120 kV Matapédia
7000-7599 Load Buses < 120 kV St-Laurent
7600-8899 Load Buses < 120 kV Laurentides (inc. Laval)
8900-8999 Reserved Buses All All
9000-9999 Miscellaneous Load Buses < 120 kV All
10000-12999 Miscellaneous All All
13000-13999 Generator Buses (Wind Farm) < 6 kV Montmorency
14000-14999 Generator Buses (Wind Farm) < 6 kV Richelieu
15000-15999 Generator Buses (Wind Farm) < 6 kV Mauricie
16000-16999 Generator Buses (Wind Farm) < 6 kV Matapédia
17000-19999 Miscellaneous Buses All All
20000-98999 Transformer tertiary winding bus < 69 kV All
99000-99999 Miscellaneous Buses All All
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 46
A5.2 NPCC Area Codes
Area Number Area ID Area Name
101 ISO-NE ISO New England
102 NYISO New York ISO
103 IESO Independant Electric System Operator (Ontario)
104 HQT Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
105 NB New Brunswick Power
106 NS Nova Scotia Power
107 CRT Cedars Rapids Transmission
A5.3 Québec Interconnection Zoning Codes
Zone Number Classification Voltage Level Regional Zone
1 HQT Transmission System 315 kV St-Laurent
2 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Laval
3 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV St-Laurent
4 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Laval
5 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Richelieu
7 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Rive-Nord
8 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Mauricie Nord, Mauricie Sud
9 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Montmorency Nord, Montmorency Sud
10 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Mauricie Nord
11 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Montmorency Nord
12 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Rive-Nord
13 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Mauricie Nord
14 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Montmorency Nord
15 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Mauricie Nord
16 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Laval, Rive-Nord
17 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Richelieu
18 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Mauricie Sud
19 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Montmorency Sud
20 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Richelieu
21 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Richelieu
22 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Mauricie Sud
23 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Montmorency Sud
24 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Richelieu
25 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Mauricie Sud
26 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Mauricie Nord
27 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Matapédia
28 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Matapédia
29 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Matapédia
30 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Matapédia
32 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Manicouagan
33 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Manicouagan
34 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Manicouagan
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 47
36 SCHM Transmission System N/A Manicouagan
37 RTA Transmission System N/A Saguenay
38 RTA Transmission System N/A Saguenay
39 RTA Generating Facilities N/A Saguenay
41 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Saguenay
42 RTA Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Saguenay
43 HQT Transmission System 230 kV Outaouais
44 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Outaouais
45 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Outaouais
46 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Outaouais
47 ÉLL Transmission System N/A Outaouais
48 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Abitibi
49 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Abitibi
50 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Abitibi
51 HQT Transmission System 161 to 49 kV Baie James
53 HQT Transmission System 735 kV Manicouagan
54 HQT Transmission System 735 kV Montmorency Nord, Rive-Nord, Saguenay
55 HQT Transmission System 735 kV Mauricie Sud, Montmorency Sud, Richelieu
56 HQT Transmission System 735 kV Laval
57 HQT Transmission System 735 kV Baie James, Rive-Nord, Sageunay
58 HQT Transmission System 315 kV Baie James
59 HQP Generating Facilities N/A Baie James
60 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Abitibi, Baie James
61 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Laval, Rive-Nord
62 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Matapédia
63 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Mauricie Nord, Mauricie Sud
64 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Manicouagan
65 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Montmorency Nord, Montmorency Sud
66 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Richelieu
67 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A St-Laurent
68 Privately Owned Generating Facilities N/A Saguenau
69 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Manicouagan
70 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Matapédia
71 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Saguenay
72 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Outaouais
73 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Abitibi
74 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Mauricie Sud
75 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Richelieu
76 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Montmorency Nord
77 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Montmorency Sud
78 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A St-Laurent
79 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Rive-Nord
80 High Voltage Client Facilites N/A Mauricie Nord
81 Interconnections N/A Outaouais
82 Interconnections N/A Richelieu
83 RTA Transmission System N/A Mauricie Nord
84 RTA Transmission System N/A Richelieu
85 RTA Transmission System N/A Saguenay
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 48
86 Interconnections N/A Abitibi
87 Interconnections N/A Richelieu
88 Interconnections N/A Matapédia
90 Load Zone < 49 kV Saguenay
91 Load Zone < 49 kV Manicouagan
92 Load Zone < 49 kV St-Laurent
93 Load Zone < 49 kV Richelieu
94 Load Zone < 49 kV Montmorency Nord, Montmorency Sud
95 Load Zone < 49 kV Laval, Outaouais, Rive-Nord
96 Load Zone < 49 kV Mauricie Nord, Mauricie Sud
97 Load Zone < 49 kV Abitibi, Baie James
98 Load Zone < 49 kV Matapédia
99 Reserved for internal usage N/A N/A
Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie
Transmission System Modeling Data Requirements and Reporting Procedures 49
APPENDIX 6 – Interchange Data Template
LISTE DES CLIENTS 20XXPOUR LE SERVICE DE TRANSPORT
POINT-À-POINT
No. Clients Code No Code Nom Mode Date signat. POR/POD Lcrédit /garantie Actifs Dernier achat Déléguédossier OASIS ref PSE original pré- Convention MW LT LT CT Révoquée achats en 2015 Année responsable
Résev. OASIS Tag paiement AA/MM/JJ (sortie) Début Fin AA/MM/JJ12345678910
Convention
Mise à jour: 23 février 2015 1
Référ
ence
OASI
S
clien
t
POR
/ POD
MW so
rtie
REDI
RECT
RECA
LL
À L'É
TUDE
Débu
t
Fin HQT
-CHN
O
HQT-
DYMO
HQT-
LAW
HQT-
ON
HQT-
P33C
HQT-
CORN
HQT-
NB
HQT-
DEN
HQT-
MASS
HQT-
DER
HQT-
HIGH
HQT-
NE
EMI-M
AHO
LAW
-HQT
ON-H
QT
OTTO
-HQT
Q4C-
HQT
NB-H
QT
LAB-
HQT
DEN-
HQT
MASS
-HQT
HIGH
-HQT
NE-H
QT
MAT
I-HQT
MAF
A-HQ
T
MAH
O-MA
TI
65 85 800 1250 345 160 1029 199 1800 50 225 2000 250 470 1250 85 140 785 5150 100 1000 170 2000 250 99 110
LÉGENDE : renouvellement à l'étude
RÉCEPTIONS LIVRAISONS
cacapcité maximale des chemins