Post on 27-Jul-2020
Highway Safety Improvement Program
Off-System
FY 2017/2018 HSIP (Cycle 3)Call for Applications
WebinarThis presentation has been modified to update the relevant contact information. An updated version of this presentation will be presented October 10, 2018 and subsequently posted on this site. Thank you!
Welcome
Mario Dipola, P.E., MBA, FCCMDistrict Safety Engineer
Agenda
2015/2016 – Off-System HSIP (Cycle 1) 2016/2017 – Off-System HSIP (Cycle 2) 2017/2018 – Off-System HSIP (Cycle 3) Example HSIP Projects Local Agency Safety Team (LAST) Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Example SRTS Projects Re-Cap
2015/2016 & 2016/2017Off-System HSIP
Under MAP-21
MAP-21 into effect on October 1, 2012 Goal: To achieve a significant reduction in
traffic fatalities and serious injuries Data driven strategic approach Lump sum total vs. individual authorizations Road user defined Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSP) 5% reports no longer required
Projects Summary
8 Shortlisted
6Advanced for funding
2016/2017Cycle 2
11 Applications
10 Shortlisted
8Advanced for funding
2015/2016Cycle 1
22 Applications
Factors Non data-driven Non crash reduction
projects Constructability Coordination Transferred
Signing & PavementMarking
Apply friction courseoverlay
Mid-Block Crossingwith RRFB
Add Sidewalk Realign Left Turn Lanes Audible markings
Lessons Learned
Requests must be accurate, detailed, data drivenand complete.
Better identification of issues related to roadwaysafety concerns.
All projects need to be constructible, feasible andcost effective.
Coordination with the Local Agency Safety Team(LAST) is needed for each application.
2017/2018 Off-System HSIP (Cycle 3)
Under FAST Act
Maintains focus on safety
Data-driven
Continues the HSIP to reduce fatalities and seriousinjuries using funds for:– Safety projects consistent with State SHSP– Safety projects to correct/improve a hazardous road
location/feature or address a highway safety problem
Limits HSIP eligibility to only those listed in statute
Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSPs)
Vision, Mission and Goals Transportation Safety Needs Safety Strategies Performance Measures Development, Implementation and Update
Florida SHSP Emphasis Areas Lane Departures Intersections Work Zones Pedestrians & Bicyclists Aging Road Users Teen Drivers Motorcyclists Distracted Driving Impaired Driving Speeding & Aggressive Driving Occupants Protection Commercial Motor Vehicles Traffic Records & Inf. Systems
4 E's Road Safety ENGINEERING EDUCATION ENFORCEMENT EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Process
• Attend informational webinarWorkshop
• Identification of Potential Project LocationsPre-Application
• Conduct Safety Study of Advanced Locations from Pre-ApplicationSafety Study
• Application and Signed/Sealed StudyApplication and Study Submittal
• Feasibility/Constructability Review - ShortlistingSubmittal Review
• Identification and requesting for funding of candidateprojects
District Review and Selection
• Approval and funding of projectsCentral Office Review
Requirements and Restrictions
Data-driven and evidence based forecastedsafety improvements
Projects intended not to address: Beautification Drainage Bridge needs
Capacity enhancement Economic development Maintenance (Annual) Railroad quiet zone
HSIP Basic Process
Project Identification
Preliminary Analysis
HSIP Funding Request
Project EvaluationProgrammingDelivery
Pre-Application
Key elements:1. Maintaining Agency
Contact Person2. Project location #13. Project location #24. Project location #35. Where to Submit
1
2
3
4
5
Application
Key elements:1. Project location/Priority2. Maintaining Agency
Contact Person3. LAP Willingness4. Maintaining Agency
Concurrence
1
2
3
4
Application
Key elements:5. Location Details6. Problem Description7. Scope of Work8. Infrastructure Impacts9. Cost Estimate and B/C
5
6
7
8
9
Safety Study
Study must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer.
Recommended Format
Executive Summary Location Map Qualitative Summary Crash Analysis Planned Improvements Concept Plan Cost Estimate, Benefit Cost
Analysis and Net Present Value Appendices
Crash Analysis
Five years of crash data (2011 – 2015)– List of possible causes and countermeasures (site
specific)
Use Signal Four Analytics https://s4.geoplan.ufl.edu
– If you do not have an account, you can register online.– If you use an alternate data source, you will need to
provide the data with the study.
Financial Analysis
Include a detailed preliminary cost estimate– Include PE, CEI, contingencies, and R/W if available– Inflation may be considered in the estimate if selected
Conduct Benefit-Cost (B/C) Analysis– B/C > 2.0– Use B/C tool provided at www.nfltrafficsafety.com– Use Crash Modification Factors from FHWA CMF
Clearinghouse www.cmfclearinghouse.org
Example HSIP Eligible Projects
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/
Intersection Crashes
S t re et l ights
Pav e m e nt m ark ings
Ov e rs i ze d S igns/B e aco ns
Intersection Crashes
One s igna l he ad pe r lane
B ackp late s
New alignment
Turn re st r i c t io ns
Turn m ark ings
Intersection Crashes
A cce ss m anage m e nt
C lo se dr iv eways Turn lane s
S p l i t te r i s lands
Lane Departure Crashes
Ce nte r l ine /Edge l ine Rum ble S t r ipsPav e d S h o u lde rs
S afety Edge
Lane Departure Crashes
G uardra i l
Enhance d De l ine at io n fo r Ho r i zo nta l Cur v e s
Vulnerable Road Users
Hy b r id B e aco naka HAW K Pe de st r ian I s land Pe de st r ian Co untdown S igna l
I m prov e d Pe de st r ian Fe ature s
Local Agency Safety Team
Responsibilities and Duties
Pre-Application Review
Application Assistance
Recommendations for fundingconsiderations
Coordinate with non-fundedproject applicants for one (1)year for consideration in thenext year cycle.
Matthew Weaver, P.E.(813) 415-8826mweaver@elementeg.com
The LAST does not replace anagency’s existing engineering staffor consultant on contract.
Application Completion
Qualitative assessment/field review Constructability/feasibility review Update improvement concept Update improvement cost estimate using FDOT
construction costs. Develop project scope Update economic analysis (benefit/cost and net
present value)– B/C > 2.0 and NPV > 0– Use Crash Modification Factors from FHWA CMF
Clearinghouse www.cmfclearinghouse.org
2016/2017 Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Projects Summary
9 Applications
6 Shortlisted
3Advanced for
funding
Factors Applications Surveys & Tallies NCSRTS’s Database Requested Items Constructability Right of Way Public Involvement SRTS Committee
Lessons Learned
SRTS Applications must be accurate, detailed, fullycompleted, and presented on time.
Surveys and Tallies must be fully completed andentered into the NCSRTS’s database.
The requested items need to be approved,constructible, feasible and cost effective.
Need to present proof of Right of Way andsupporting crash data.
2017/2018 Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Objective
Facilitate the planning, development, andimplementation of projects that will improvesafety and reduce traffic, fuel consumption,and improve air quality in the vicinity ofschools (K-12).
Application
SRTS Eligible applicants have now been extendedKindergarten through 12th grade (Private andCharter Schools are included).
SRTS 3.5 hour Workshop is MANDATORY. Onlyattendees will be allowed to submit applications.
The Student-In-Class Travel Tally and Parent Surveydata summaries need to be attached.
Application Process
Maintaining Agency submits
Application
District Reviews and Scores Application
Feasibility and Cost Review(Top Scored
Applications)
Request for funding from Central Office
Central Office Review and
Approval
District Notifications and Project
Programming
Application: Section 1
Key elements:1. School Information2. Applicant Information3. Maintaining Agency
Information4. Metropolitan/
Transportation PlanningOrganization (M/TPO)Support
1
2
3
4
School, Applicant & Maintaining Agency Information
5
Eligibility and Feasibility Criteria Confirmations
Application: Section 2
Key elements:5. Data Forms
Application: Section 3 and 4
Key Elements:6. Past Activities7. Future Activities8. FTBSEP (http://safety.hhp.ufl.edu/)
9. Public Support
6 7
8
Background Information and Problem Identification
9
Application: Section 5
Key elements:10.Demographics11.In-Class Travel Tally12.Route Data13.Location (within 2
miles of the school)14.Pedestrian/Bike
Features
10
11
12
13
14
Specific Infrastructure Improvement(s) Requested
18
19
Key elements:15.Traffic Control16.Traffic Data17.Cost Estimate18.Cost Narrative19.Checklist
Application: Section 6 and 7Cost Estimate and Submission Checklist
15
16
17
Example SRTSEligible Projects
Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities
New Sidewalks
S idewa lk W ide n ing
S idewalk G ap C lo sure
B us S to p Ro ute I m prov e m ents
B icyc le L ane s
Share Use Paths
S tarke E le m e ntar yB radfo rd Co unty
S o urce : © G o o g le Maps
Traffic Control Devices
New/UpgradedCrosswalks
Traffic Signs and S igna ls
F lash ing B e aco ns
Pe de st r ian Co untdown S igna ls
Pe de st r ian A ct iv ate d S igna l Upgrade s
Lando n Midd le S cho o lJ u l ia L a ndo n Co l le ge Pre parato r yDuv a l Co unty
Andrew A. Robinson Elementary
Re-Cap
Schedules
SRTS Call for Projects: November 2017 – March 2017
March 31, 2018 – Project Submittal Deadline
April – May 2018 – Project Reviews
June 2018 – Recommendations for project selection and funding
2017/2018 Off-System HSIP (Cycle 3) Call for Projects: November – December 2017
Project Identification: November 2017 Preliminary Project List Review: November 2017 Project Safety Study: December 2017
December 31, 2017 –Project Submittal Deadline
January – May 2018 – Project Reviews
June 2018 – Recommendations for project selection and funding
November 16 3:00 – 4:30 p.m.
Webinar
Questions?
Mario Dipola, P.E., MBA, FCCM FDOT Project Manager District Safety Engineer(904) 360-5633mario.dipola@dot.state.fl.us
Matt Weaver, P.E., CPM ELEMENT Engineering GroupTampa(813) 386-2101 mweaver@elementeg.com
HSIP Program & SRTS Program Contact