Post on 27-May-2018
The Registered Community Design
(RCD) registration system and links to
the Hague Agreement
2
1. Definition of industrial design
2. Representation of the design
3. Indication of Product
4. Multiple Designs Application
5. Absolute grounds for refusal
6. The Hague Agreement
3
1. Definition of industrial design
4
5
Design: the appearance of the whole or a part of a product
resulting from the features of, in particular, the ...
lines colours shape texture
contours
materials
ornamentation
6
Product:
any industrial or handicraft item, including
inter alia:
– Parts assembled into a complex product
– Packaging
– Get-up
– Graphic symbols
Excluded: “Computer programs”
7
8
Complex Products:
Product composed of multiple components which can be
replaced permitting disassembly and re-assembly of the
product.
Parts intended for assembly into a complex product
9
Foodstuffs
(class 1)
10
Logos
32-00
11
Transformable products
12
Set of articles
Articles having aesthetic and functional complementarity
(common features, being on sale or intended to be used together)
13
Plans, Blueprints
(printed matter)
14
15
Not designs
• Natural products
• Words without any figurative element
• Ideas, methods, processes
• Functions (patents)
• Smells and fragrances
• Music and sounds
…do not constitute the appearance of a product and therefore do not
comply with the definition of a design.
16
Natural products
17
Logos/Graphic symbols
18
2. Representation of a design
19
• The representation can be photos, computer drawings or
drawings by hand, in colour or BW.
Paper application
• The design must be reproduced on opaque white paper
sheet A4 size, either pasted or printed directly on it
• The space used for the reproduction must be no larger
than 26.2cmx17cm with a margin of 2.5cm on the left-hand
side
Electronic application
• Image file format:
– JPEG format, limited to a maximum of 5Mb
– Only 1 image per electronic attachment
20
1. Request for design registration
2. Information identifying the applicant
3. Representation of the design suitable for reproduction:
• Good quality – all details of the design for which
protection is sought should be visible
• Neutral background – the design should be clearly
identifiable in its environment
21
22
23
24
25
26
What is neutral background?
The background in a view is considered neutral as long as the design shown in
this view is clearly distinguishable from its environment without interference of
any other object, accessory or decoration, whose inclusion in the
representation could cast doubt on the protection sought.
In other words, the requirement of a neutral background neither demands a
‘neutral’ colour nor an ‘empty’ background. It is instead decisive that the
design stands out so clearly from the background that it remains identifiable.
The examiner must be able to identify the design
for which protection is sought in each view without
knowing the indication of product or checking the
other views of the design.
27
INDP: Drying Racks
28
29
30
INDP: “Pavilions”
31
INDP: “Vendors´ carts”
32
33
34
35
How to remedy
INDP: “Chair”
36
INDP: Housings for air filters, for engines
37
INDP: “Housings for air filters, for engines”
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Representation of the design Other requirements
All views must show the same product
All views must show the same colour
Only 1 view per electronic attachment (e-filing technical restriction)
Views should not contain explanatory text, wording, numbers or symbols
Detail views of portions of the design should not be shown together with
the design in the same view
Set of articles & complex products must contain in the representation a
global view of the design
Typefaces must contain all the capital and small letters of the alphabet,
Arabic numerals and a text of 5 lines written in that typeface
Disclaimers are acceptable provided they are shown on the views
46
Same product ?
47
48
49
Separation lines
50
Views in colour
Views of the same product showing different colours do
not relate to the same design.
“Design is the appearance of a product resulting from the
features of, among others, its colours …”
51
52
Colour views CANNOT be combined with BW views
53
Views in different grey shades are not acceptable as one
design
54
Positive-Negative
55
Only 1 view per electronic attachment
56
57
Detail views of portions of the design cannot be included in the same view
58
Set of articles
A set of articles is accepted as one design, provided the articles making
up the set are linked by aesthetic and functional complementarity and
are, in normal circumstances, sold altogether as one singe product.
It should be clear that the protection is sought for a design resulting from
the combination of the articles.
At least one view must show the set of articles together.
59
60
Complex products
61
62
Exploded views
63
Disclaimers
64
INDP: “Luggage carriers for cycles”
65
“Colouring, Shading, Blurring”
66
67
Do you consider the following representations acceptable?
INDP Lamps
INDP seat covers
68
INDP kitchen furniture
69
3. Indication of products
70
• The application must contain an indication of
product
• The term must be clear and not too general, so
that its classification is possible
• The indication must correspond to the images.
71
72
73
Suggested changes (examples)
Ornamentation
Where the design represents ornamentation for a given product, and that product as a whole is indicated in
the application, the examiner will suggest to replace that product indication by the indication ‘Product(s) X
(Ornamentation for -)’. The product would thus be classified under Class 32-00 of the Locarno Classification.
Graphic symbols/logos
Where the design represents a graphic symbol or logo but the indication of the products describes what this
logo/graphic symbol represents or to which kind of products it refers to, the examiner will suggest to indicate
the proper product indication, namely logo/graphic symbol.
Products and their parts
Where a design represents the appearance of a product as whole, and a part of that product is indicated in
the application the examiner will suggest either to delete that indication when the whole product is indicated
as well or that the product indication is replaced by the indication of the whole product.
Long lists of products
More than one product can be indicated in an application.
However, in order to ensure that the designs register remains searchable where the product indication
contains more than five products that do not belong to the same subclass of the Locarno Classification, the
examiner will suggest that the applicant limit the number of products to five and select products accordingly.
Where all of the same subclass (and all corresponding to the images) the examiner will ask the applicant to
replace them with some general term(s). Where applicable the heading of the relevant subclass, or part of it,
may be used.
Multiple applications List of indications corresponds to the total of the designs of the multiple but not to each of them.
74
75
76
77
78
INDP: “parts & accessories for cars”
class 12-16
INDP: “parts & accessories for cars”
class 12-16
79
80
07-99
INDP for all the designs: “Household appliances”
99
81
Washing machines
Refrigerators
Dishwashers
Vacuum cleaners
class 15-05
“washing, cleaning and
drying machines”
Ovens (cooking)
07-02
Coffee machines
31-00
Juice extractors
07-04
82
Where the indication of products is ‘Ornamentation’ and the design does not limit itself to representing this ornamentation but also discloses the product to which the ornamentation is applied, or part of it, without its contours being disclaimed, this product will be added to the indication of products and the classification will be amended accordingly.
Cups (ornamentation for-) 32-00
Cups 07-01
83
4. Multiple application and unity of designs
84
More than one design is allowed in an application, provided
the products are in the same Locarno class.
The indication ‘Ornamentation’ or ‘Product (Ornamentation
for)’ in class 32-00 of the Locarno Classification, in respect
of some designs, is neutral and thus ignored for the purpose
of examining whether the indication of products in respect of
the remaining designs meets the ‘unity of class’ requirement.
The same reasoning applies to the following indications of
products in class 32-00 of the Locarno Classification namely,
“Graphic symbols”, “Logos” and “Surface patterns”.
“Get-up” is excluded form the above rule.
85
86
87
88
89
90
5. Absolute grounds for refusal
1) Public policy, public order and morality
91
92
93
5. Absolute grounds for refusal
2) Statutory Prohibitions
94
95
96
97
Case study
99
INDP lace
6. The Hague Agreement
Components of the Hague Agreement
The Hague Agreement is an international treaty
administrated by WIPO that serves the purpose of
facilitating the filing of design applications at international
level. It was adopted in 1925 and entered into force in
June 1928.
It was later revised by 3 Acts:
– the 1934 Act (The London Act) in force 1939
– the 1960 Act (The Hague Act) in force 1987
– the 1999 Act (The Geneva Act) in force 2004
EU Accession: 01/01/2008
65 Hague Union Members
Geneva Act (1999): African IP Organization (AIPO), Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, European
Union, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, Iceland, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia,
Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Monaco, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Namibia, Norway, Oman, Poland,
Korea, Romania, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Serbia, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland,
Syria, Tajikistan, F.Y.R. of Macedonia, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United States of
America (50)
Hague Act (1960): Belgium, Belize, Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, D.P.R. of Korea, Gabon, Greece, Italy,
Luxembourg, Mali, Morocco, Netherlands, Niger, Senegal, Suriname (15)
Who may use it
a. Be a national of a Contracting Party or a member State of an
intergovernmental organization which is a Contracting party,
such as the European Union or the African Intellectual
Property Organization,
b. Have a domicile in the territory of a Contracting Party,
c. Have a real and effective industrial or commercial
establishment in the territory of a Contracting Party
Special Features
• Protection of designs cannot be obtained in countries
which are not members of the Hague Agreement.
Notable exceptions: China, Russia, Brazil, India, most
Latin American Countries, Canada.
• Only members of the same Act can be designated. Self-
designation is possible.
• No prior national application or registration necessary.
A design can be protected for the first time at the
international level through the Hague Agreement system
(contrary to Madrid Protocol system for trade marks).
• Direct filings to WIPO by the applicant or his representative. The
application can also be filed electronically.
• The application can be filed in any of the 3 languages: FR, EN, ES
• Fees payable to WIPO (in Swiss francs). An international application is
subject to 3 types of fees:
basic fee
publication fee
individual fee for each designated Contracting Party
Fee calculator available in http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/fees
• Multiple applications: max 100 designs of the same Locarno Class
• Deferment of publication may be requested for a period that cannot
exceed 30 months (under 1999 Act) from the date of filing or the date of
priority.
Special Features
WIPO examines formal requirements such as those relating to the quality
of the representations of the design(s) and the payment of the required
fees. The applicant is informed of any deficiencies and is given a time limit
of 3 months to correct them. If he fails the application is considered
abandoned.
Where the application complies with the formal requirements the design is
recorded to the International Register and published in the Bulletin (unless
deferment of publication has been requested).
Substantive examination falls within the exclusive competence of the
Office of each designated Contracting Party (6 to 12 months for refusal).
Scope of protection, duration and renewal according to the domestic
legislation of Contracting Parties.
Invalidity only at the Contracting Party level.
• EUIPO: examination on grounds for non-registrability:
- no compliance with design definition
- against public policy and morality
6 months to communicate to WIPO the outcome of examination
• EUIPO charges 62€ per design
• No republishing in the Registered Community Designs Bulletin,
only providing a link to the Hague Express Bulletin
• 47% of International applications contain EU designation
EUIPO procedure
Additional information about the Hague System http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/
http://www.wipo.int/haguebulletin/?locale=en
Statistics (29/02/2016)
INDIA
111
• EUIPO website:
https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/
• Statistics:
statistical travel pack EUIPO
• Search sources:
https://euipo.europa.eu/eSearch/
112
Design Protection in Europe
113
The traditional route, i.e. applying for a Design in each
country
Using the Hague system to obtain designs in the
territory of the Member States
Applying for a European Union Registered Community
Design for the whole territory of the European Union
The Unregistered Community Design
National Protection for Designs
114
File individual
applications
at each of the
National
Industrial
Property Offices
of the EU
International Protection for Designs
115
A single fee is
paid to WIPO • An individual fee is
payable
to some National
Offices
• No single unitary
right is
granted - ‘bundle’
of rights’
• Each Trade Mark or
Design is subject
to the national laws
of each country
Protection for Designs in the European Union
116
• Unitary character
• One Office for all
• One fee for all
• Use is not compulsory
in all Member states
• Fast-track options
available
• E-filing and e-payment
available
• Online search engines
to perform pre-checks
• Status of applications
available online
• Applications can be
filed in any of the 24
languages
Fees for Designs
117
https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimp
ortal/en/rcd-fees-directly-
payable-to-euipo
Language regime at EUIPO
118
EUIPO working
languages:
French
German
English
Spanish
Italian
Bulgarian
Czech
Danish
German
Estonian
Greek
English
Spanish
French
(Gaelic)
Croatian
Italian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Hungarian
Maltese
Dutch
Polish
Portuguese
Rumanian
Slovak
Slovenian
Finnish
Swedish
Official languages of the European Union
Expert´s name: Christophe Gimenez
former EUIPO IP Attaché in Beijing,
China
European Union Intellectual Property
Office (EUIPO)
Thank You
119