Transcript of Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University...
- Slide 1
- Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the
Czech Republic and Germany University of Chemistry and Technology
Prague
- Slide 2
- 2 Aim: to compare branded foodstuff in the Czech Republic and
Germany Partners: Olga Sehnalov MEP and Ahold Czech Republic
Evaluator University of Chemistry and Technology PragueProject
- Slide 3
- 3Purchase Germany Dresden (EDEKA, REWE, Kaufland) 25/2/2015
Czech Republic - Prague(Tesco, Kaufland, Albert) 27/2/2015 Proper
storage during transport
- Slide 4
- 4 Physico-chemical testing Analysis of qualitative features
allowing to assess the difference Accredited laboratories Results
submitted to the commission for further consideration
- Slide 5
- 5 Sensory assessment Different kinds of examination 30 trainted
evaluators participed in the assessment o Participating in the
evaluation regularly o Trained on the principles of sensory
evaluation
- Slide 6
- 6 Products assessment Evaluate compliance / non-compliance in
qualitative characteristics Set the hypothesis which may cause
difference in findings Information available to the commission: o
Results of the physico-chemical testing o Results of sensory
assessment o Packages
- Slide 7
- 7Results 24 products submitted 1 product not included in the
final evaluation due to doubts about the identical marketing 8
products classified as different = 35% of products involved
Assessment of the overall "quality" has not been studied
- Slide 8
- 8 TrademarkProduct Sensory assessment Preference Chemist ry
Declaration Conclusio n Price per unit GERPrice per unit CZ
MovempickBourbon VanillaC-CCC0,42 /100 ml0,52 /100 ml Pfanner100%
orange juiceDCZCCC1,40 /1 l1,33 /1 l Pepsi cola C-DDD0,63 /1 l0,31
/1 l Sprite DNoDDD0,65 /1 l0,73 /1 l NesteaIce Tea lemonDGERDDD0,86
/1 l0,87 /1 l JacobsKronungDNoDCD3,95 /100 g1,91 /100 g
SegafredoEspresso CosyC-DCC1,50 /100 g1,23 /100 g MlerBox
blueberryDGERCCC0,45 /100 g0,39 /100 g DanoneActivia
strawberryDCZDDD0,40 /100 g0,33 /100 g Leerdamer original
DNoCCC1,42 /100 g1,38 /100 g UnileverRamaDGERDDD0,32 /100 g
IgloFish fingersDGERCDD0,39 /100 g0,87 /100 g Rio mareTuna
tinDCZCDD1,68 /100 g3,09 /100 g TULIPLuch meatDNoCDD0,44 /100g0,86
/100 g PICKSalamiDNoCCC2,12 /100 g2,46 /100 g
MeicaSausagesDGERCCC0,99 /100 g1,27 /100 g CarbonellExtra
virginC-CCC0,96 /100 ml0,98 /100 ml HeinzKetchupC-CCC0,46 /100
ml0,32 /100 ml SchawartauStrawberry jamDCZCCC0,61 /100 g0,69 /100 g
Kinder C-CCC0,69 /1 ks StorkToffifeeC-CCC0,95 /100 g1,16 /100 g
BountyChocolate barC-CCC0,72 /100 g0,76 /100 g
BarillaArrabbiataC-CCC0,37 /100 g0,75 /100g BonduelleGold sweet
cornDNoCCC0,35 /100 g0,43 /100 g C Conformity D - Difference
- Slide 9
- Different colorants, however both on natural basis Different
content of fat o CZ: 2,43 g/100 g; GER: 2,93 g/100 g CZ: milk
protein added 9 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion
DCZDDD C=conformity D=difference Analysis Colorants, sugar,
protein, fat ProducerProduct DanoneActivia strawberry
- Slide 10
- 10 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MlerBox blueberry
Analysis Colorants, sugar, protein, fat
- Slide 11
- 11 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERDDD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct UnileverRama Analysis
Fatty acids, fats, preservatives, vitamins CZ fat content 60%; GER
fat content 70 %
- Slide 12
- 12 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DNoCCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Leerdamer original
Analysis Fat, dry basis
- Slide 13
- 13 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DnoCCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct PICKSalami Analysis Meat
content, Na
- Slide 14
- CZ main component mechanically separated poultry meat GER main
component pork meat 14
SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion D noCDD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct TULIPLuch meat Analysis
Meat content, Na
- Slide 15
- 15 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Kinder Analysis Fat, milk
fat, protein..
- Slide 16
- 16 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCDC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct SchawartauStrawberry jam
Analysis K, Mg, Ca, colorants, fruit content, sugars profile
- Slide 17
- 17 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BarillaArrabbiata
Analysis Na, K, Mg, tomatoes content
- Slide 18
- 18 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct CarbonellExtra virgin
Analysis presence of other oils, presence of refined oil
- Slide 19
- 19 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MeicaSausages Analysis
Meat content, Na
- Slide 20
- 20 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DNoCCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BonduelleGold sweet corn
Analysis Solid, Na
- Slide 21
- 21 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Pfanner100% Orange Juice
Analysis K, Mg, Ca, aroma recovery index, fruit juice content
- Slide 22
- 22 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct HeinzKetchup Analysis
Tomatoes content
- Slide 23
- CZ coffee has almost 1/3 higher caffeine content 23
SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion Dno DCD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct JacobsKrnung Analysis
caffeine
- Slide 24
- CZ product sweetened with glucose-fructose syrup; GER sugar 24
SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-DDD C=conformity
D=difference ProducerProduct Pepsi cola Analysis caffeine, sugars
content, phosphorus
- Slide 25
- CZ sweetened fructose-glucose syrup, aspartame and acesulfame
GER sugar 25 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DnoDDD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Sprite Analysis Sugars
content
- Slide 26
- CZ product sweetened with sugar, fructose, and steviol
glycosides;GER only sugar CZ product contains 40 % less tea extract
26 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERDDD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct NesteaIce Tea lemon
Analysis caffeine, theobromin, sugars content
- Slide 27
- 27 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-DCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct SegafredoEspresso Casa
Analysis burned and broken grains
- Slide 28
- 28 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCDD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Rio mareTuna tin Analysis
solids, protein, fat Nejedn se o stejnou znaku.
- Slide 29
- 29 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BountyChocolate bar
Analysis vegetable fats, cocoa solids, sugar content, chocolate
content
- Slide 30
- 30 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct StorkToffifee Analysis
Cocoa content, nuts content
- Slide 31
- Products vary in meat content. CZ product contains about 7%
less meat than Germany. The raw material used is the same. 31
SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCDD
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct IgloFish fingers Analysis
Fish meat content
- Slide 32
- 32 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC
C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MovempickBourbon Vanilla
Analysis Other fat, fat
- Slide 33
- 33Summary TrademarkProduct Sensory
assessmentPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion Pepsi cola
CnoDDD Sprite DnoDDD NesteaIce Tea lemonDGermanyDDD
JacobsKronungDnoDCD DanoneActivia strawberyDCZDDD
UnileverRamaDGermanyDDD IgloFish fingersDGermanyCDD TULIPLuch
meatDnoCDD 8 products classified as different = 35% of products
involved