Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University...
-
Upload
ilene-terry -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University...
- Slide 1
- Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University of Chemistry and Technology Prague
- Slide 2
- 2 Aim: to compare branded foodstuff in the Czech Republic and Germany Partners: Olga Sehnalov MEP and Ahold Czech Republic Evaluator University of Chemistry and Technology PragueProject
- Slide 3
- 3Purchase Germany Dresden (EDEKA, REWE, Kaufland) 25/2/2015 Czech Republic - Prague(Tesco, Kaufland, Albert) 27/2/2015 Proper storage during transport
- Slide 4
- 4 Physico-chemical testing Analysis of qualitative features allowing to assess the difference Accredited laboratories Results submitted to the commission for further consideration
- Slide 5
- 5 Sensory assessment Different kinds of examination 30 trainted evaluators participed in the assessment o Participating in the evaluation regularly o Trained on the principles of sensory evaluation
- Slide 6
- 6 Products assessment Evaluate compliance / non-compliance in qualitative characteristics Set the hypothesis which may cause difference in findings Information available to the commission: o Results of the physico-chemical testing o Results of sensory assessment o Packages
- Slide 7
- 7Results 24 products submitted 1 product not included in the final evaluation due to doubts about the identical marketing 8 products classified as different = 35% of products involved Assessment of the overall "quality" has not been studied
- Slide 8
- 8 TrademarkProduct Sensory assessment Preference Chemist ry Declaration Conclusio n Price per unit GERPrice per unit CZ MovempickBourbon VanillaC-CCC0,42 /100 ml0,52 /100 ml Pfanner100% orange juiceDCZCCC1,40 /1 l1,33 /1 l Pepsi cola C-DDD0,63 /1 l0,31 /1 l Sprite DNoDDD0,65 /1 l0,73 /1 l NesteaIce Tea lemonDGERDDD0,86 /1 l0,87 /1 l JacobsKronungDNoDCD3,95 /100 g1,91 /100 g SegafredoEspresso CosyC-DCC1,50 /100 g1,23 /100 g MlerBox blueberryDGERCCC0,45 /100 g0,39 /100 g DanoneActivia strawberryDCZDDD0,40 /100 g0,33 /100 g Leerdamer original DNoCCC1,42 /100 g1,38 /100 g UnileverRamaDGERDDD0,32 /100 g IgloFish fingersDGERCDD0,39 /100 g0,87 /100 g Rio mareTuna tinDCZCDD1,68 /100 g3,09 /100 g TULIPLuch meatDNoCDD0,44 /100g0,86 /100 g PICKSalamiDNoCCC2,12 /100 g2,46 /100 g MeicaSausagesDGERCCC0,99 /100 g1,27 /100 g CarbonellExtra virginC-CCC0,96 /100 ml0,98 /100 ml HeinzKetchupC-CCC0,46 /100 ml0,32 /100 ml SchawartauStrawberry jamDCZCCC0,61 /100 g0,69 /100 g Kinder C-CCC0,69 /1 ks StorkToffifeeC-CCC0,95 /100 g1,16 /100 g BountyChocolate barC-CCC0,72 /100 g0,76 /100 g BarillaArrabbiataC-CCC0,37 /100 g0,75 /100g BonduelleGold sweet cornDNoCCC0,35 /100 g0,43 /100 g C Conformity D - Difference
- Slide 9
- Different colorants, however both on natural basis Different content of fat o CZ: 2,43 g/100 g; GER: 2,93 g/100 g CZ: milk protein added 9 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZDDD C=conformity D=difference Analysis Colorants, sugar, protein, fat ProducerProduct DanoneActivia strawberry
- Slide 10
- 10 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MlerBox blueberry Analysis Colorants, sugar, protein, fat
- Slide 11
- 11 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERDDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct UnileverRama Analysis Fatty acids, fats, preservatives, vitamins CZ fat content 60%; GER fat content 70 %
- Slide 12
- 12 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DNoCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Leerdamer original Analysis Fat, dry basis
- Slide 13
- 13 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DnoCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct PICKSalami Analysis Meat content, Na
- Slide 14
- CZ main component mechanically separated poultry meat GER main component pork meat 14 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion D noCDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct TULIPLuch meat Analysis Meat content, Na
- Slide 15
- 15 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Kinder Analysis Fat, milk fat, protein..
- Slide 16
- 16 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCDC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct SchawartauStrawberry jam Analysis K, Mg, Ca, colorants, fruit content, sugars profile
- Slide 17
- 17 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BarillaArrabbiata Analysis Na, K, Mg, tomatoes content
- Slide 18
- 18 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct CarbonellExtra virgin Analysis presence of other oils, presence of refined oil
- Slide 19
- 19 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MeicaSausages Analysis Meat content, Na
- Slide 20
- 20 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DNoCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BonduelleGold sweet corn Analysis Solid, Na
- Slide 21
- 21 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Pfanner100% Orange Juice Analysis K, Mg, Ca, aroma recovery index, fruit juice content
- Slide 22
- 22 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct HeinzKetchup Analysis Tomatoes content
- Slide 23
- CZ coffee has almost 1/3 higher caffeine content 23 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion Dno DCD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct JacobsKrnung Analysis caffeine
- Slide 24
- CZ product sweetened with glucose-fructose syrup; GER sugar 24 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-DDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Pepsi cola Analysis caffeine, sugars content, phosphorus
- Slide 25
- CZ sweetened fructose-glucose syrup, aspartame and acesulfame GER sugar 25 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DnoDDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Sprite Analysis Sugars content
- Slide 26
- CZ product sweetened with sugar, fructose, and steviol glycosides;GER only sugar CZ product contains 40 % less tea extract 26 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERDDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct NesteaIce Tea lemon Analysis caffeine, theobromin, sugars content
- Slide 27
- 27 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-DCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct SegafredoEspresso Casa Analysis burned and broken grains
- Slide 28
- 28 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Rio mareTuna tin Analysis solids, protein, fat Nejedn se o stejnou znaku.
- Slide 29
- 29 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BountyChocolate bar Analysis vegetable fats, cocoa solids, sugar content, chocolate content
- Slide 30
- 30 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct StorkToffifee Analysis Cocoa content, nuts content
- Slide 31
- Products vary in meat content. CZ product contains about 7% less meat than Germany. The raw material used is the same. 31 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct IgloFish fingers Analysis Fish meat content
- Slide 32
- 32 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MovempickBourbon Vanilla Analysis Other fat, fat
- Slide 33
- 33Summary TrademarkProduct Sensory assessmentPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion Pepsi cola CnoDDD Sprite DnoDDD NesteaIce Tea lemonDGermanyDDD JacobsKronungDnoDCD DanoneActivia strawberyDCZDDD UnileverRamaDGermanyDDD IgloFish fingersDGermanyCDD TULIPLuch meatDnoCDD 8 products classified as different = 35% of products involved