Surface ozone in Poland related to weather types

Post on 06-Jan-2016

16 views 1 download

description

Surface ozone in Poland related to weather types. Magdalena Bogucka Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland Email: magdalena.bogucka@imgw.pl. D ata examined against the circulation/weather types according to 27 WTC’s recommended by WG2 for 1996- 2002. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Surface ozone in Poland related to weather types

Surface ozone in Poland related to weather types

Magdalena Bogucka

Institute of Meteorology and Water Management

Warsaw, PolandEmail: magdalena.bogucka@imgw.pl

Data examined against the circulation/weather types according to 27 WTC’s recommended by WG2 for 1996- 2002

Surface ozone data from Poland

4 stations (3 EMEP/GAW-WMO + 1 urban/suburban site)

8hO3 values for 1996-2005

WTC’s ranked according to AV index [in %], which was recommended by WG3

Surface ozone data from Poland

Calculations performed for two domains:

D-00

D-07 Central Europe

Results

D_07_YEAR SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60

CE

C

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30

EZ

500C

10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2

NN

W

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D07_YEAR JARCZEW_D07_YEAR

LEBA_00 AV [%] JARCZEW_00 AV [%] CEC 50,49 CEC 55,07

SANDRAS 20,88 SANDRAS 22,91 SANDRA 20,59 SANDRA 20,48

PCAXTRKM 17,06 PCAXTRKM 20,30 PCACA 15,53 PCACA 18,03

Year – 5 best WTC’sD_00_YEAR SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60C

EC

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30E

Z50

0C10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2N

NW

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D00_YEAR JARCZEW_D00_YEAR

LEBA_07 AV [%] JARCZEW_07 AV [%] CEC 50,92 CEC 58,45

SANDRAS 14,42 SANDRAS 21,72 SANDRA 13,65 NNW 17,86 HBGWL 9,34 SANDRA 16,09

NNW 8,40 HBGWL 12,47

AMJJA – 5 best WTC’sD_00_AMJJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60C

EC

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30E

Z50

0C10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2N

NW

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D00_AMJJA JARCZEW_D00_AMJJA

D_07_AMJJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60

CE

C

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30

EZ

500C

10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

DLW

T2

NN

W

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

ST

PC

AV

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D07_AMJJA JARCZEW_D07_AMJJA

LEBA_00 AV [%] JARCZEW_00 AV [%] HBGWL 18,31 WLKC733 20,72

WLKC733 15,86 OGWL 18,81 SANDRAS 15,81 HBGWL 18,50

OGWL 14,36 ZAMG 18,07 SCHUEPP 13,07 SCHUEPP 16,99

LEBA_07 AV [%] JARCZEW_07 AV [%] HBGWL 18,31 WLKC733 28,19

CEC 15,90 CEC 21,11 OGWL 14,36 OGWL 18,81

WLKC733 14,16 HBGWL 18,50 SANDRAS 13,73 ZAMG 18,07

JJA – 5 best WTC’sD_00_JJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60C

EC

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30E

Z50

0C10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2N

NW

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D00_JJA JARCZEW_D00_JJA

D_07_JJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60

CE

C

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30

EZ

500C

10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2

NN

W

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D07_JJA JARCZEW_D07_JJA

LEBA_00 AV [%] JARCZEW_00 AV [%] WLKC733 22,62 WLKC733 23,23 HBGWL 20,75 ZAMG 22,83 OGWL 18,29 OGWL 21,19

PERRET 16,40 HBGWL 20,51 ZAMG 13,82 PERRET 17,81

LEBA_07 AV [%] JARCZEW_07 AV [%] HBGWL 20,75 WLKC733 31,61 OGWL 18,29 ZAMG 22,83

PERRET 16,40 OGWL 21,19 P27 16,40 HBGWL 20,51

WLKC733 16,00 SANDRAS 20,51

Conclusions, comments and remarks:

• For both domains, results for preferred Litynski classifications: LITADVE and LITTC, acc. to AV index were not satisfying.

• The additional calculations have to be undertaken and the results verified.

• For air pollution like ozone, having tendency to increase during summer months, ie. with seasonal character, the best classification should be WTC taking into account seasonality, like eg. CEC

• The new method for surface ozone for the background air conditions for Poland should be applied (???)