Surface ozone in Poland related to weather types

Magdalena Bogucka

Institute of Meteorology and Water Management

Warsaw, PolandEmail: magdalena.bogucka@imgw.pl

Data examined against the circulation/weather types according to 27 WTC’s recommended by WG2 for 1996- 2002

Surface ozone data from Poland

4 stations (3 EMEP/GAW-WMO + 1 urban/suburban site)

8hO3 values for 1996-2005

WTC’s ranked according to AV index [in %], which was recommended by WG3

Surface ozone data from Poland

Calculations performed for two domains:

D-00

D-07 Central Europe

Results

D_07_YEAR SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60

CE

C

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30

EZ

500C

10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2

NN

W

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D07_YEAR JARCZEW_D07_YEAR

LEBA_00 AV [%] JARCZEW_00 AV [%] CEC 50,49 CEC 55,07

SANDRAS 20,88 SANDRAS 22,91 SANDRA 20,59 SANDRA 20,48

PCAXTRKM 17,06 PCAXTRKM 20,30 PCACA 15,53 PCACA 18,03

Year – 5 best WTC’sD_00_YEAR SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60C

EC

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30E

Z50

0C10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2N

NW

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D00_YEAR JARCZEW_D00_YEAR

LEBA_07 AV [%] JARCZEW_07 AV [%] CEC 50,92 CEC 58,45

SANDRAS 14,42 SANDRAS 21,72 SANDRA 13,65 NNW 17,86 HBGWL 9,34 SANDRA 16,09

NNW 8,40 HBGWL 12,47

AMJJA – 5 best WTC’sD_00_AMJJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60C

EC

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30E

Z50

0C10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2N

NW

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D00_AMJJA JARCZEW_D00_AMJJA

D_07_AMJJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60

CE

C

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30

EZ

500C

10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

DLW

T2

NN

W

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

ST

PC

AV

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D07_AMJJA JARCZEW_D07_AMJJA

LEBA_00 AV [%] JARCZEW_00 AV [%] HBGWL 18,31 WLKC733 20,72

WLKC733 15,86 OGWL 18,81 SANDRAS 15,81 HBGWL 18,50

OGWL 14,36 ZAMG 18,07 SCHUEPP 13,07 SCHUEPP 16,99

LEBA_07 AV [%] JARCZEW_07 AV [%] HBGWL 18,31 WLKC733 28,19

CEC 15,90 CEC 21,11 OGWL 14,36 OGWL 18,81

WLKC733 14,16 HBGWL 18,50 SANDRAS 13,73 ZAMG 18,07

JJA – 5 best WTC’sD_00_JJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60C

EC

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30E

Z50

0C10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2N

NW

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D00_JJA JARCZEW_D00_JJA

D_07_JJA SURFACE OZONE 8hO3

0

20

40

60

CE

C

ES

LPC

10

ES

LPC

30

EZ

500C

10

EZ

500C

30

GW

T

LIT

AD

VE

LIT

TC

LUN

D

LWT

2

NN

W

P27

PC

AC

A

PC

AX

TR

KM

PC

AX

TR

PE

TIS

CO

SA

ND

RA

SA

ND

RA

S

TP

CA

V

TP

CA

O7

WLK

C73

3

HB

GW

L

OG

WL

PE

CZ

ELY

PE

RR

ET

SC

HU

EP

P

ZA

MG

AV

[%

]

LEBA_D07_JJA JARCZEW_D07_JJA

LEBA_00 AV [%] JARCZEW_00 AV [%] WLKC733 22,62 WLKC733 23,23 HBGWL 20,75 ZAMG 22,83 OGWL 18,29 OGWL 21,19

PERRET 16,40 HBGWL 20,51 ZAMG 13,82 PERRET 17,81

LEBA_07 AV [%] JARCZEW_07 AV [%] HBGWL 20,75 WLKC733 31,61 OGWL 18,29 ZAMG 22,83

PERRET 16,40 OGWL 21,19 P27 16,40 HBGWL 20,51

WLKC733 16,00 SANDRAS 20,51

Conclusions, comments and remarks:

• For both domains, results for preferred Litynski classifications: LITADVE and LITTC, acc. to AV index were not satisfying.

• The additional calculations have to be undertaken and the results verified.

• For air pollution like ozone, having tendency to increase during summer months, ie. with seasonal character, the best classification should be WTC taking into account seasonality, like eg. CEC

• The new method for surface ozone for the background air conditions for Poland should be applied (???)