Slides by Yong Liu1, Deep Medhi2, and Michał Piro3

Post on 19-Jan-2018

218 views 0 download

description

Outline Fair sharing of network resource Max-min Fairness Proportional Fairness Extension

Transcript of Slides by Yong Liu1, Deep Medhi2, and Michał Piro3

1

Slides byYong Liu1, Deep Medhi2, and Michał Pióro3

1Polytechnic University, New York, USA2University of Missouri-Kansas City, USA

3Warsaw University of Technology, Poland & Lund University, Sweden

October 2007

Routing, Flow, and Capacity Design in Communication and Computer

NetworksChapter 8:

Fair Networks

2

Outline Fair sharing of network resource

Max-min Fairness

Proportional Fairness

Extension

3

Fair Networks Elastic Users:

demand volume NOT fixed greedy users: use up resource if any, e.g. TCP competition resolution?

Fairness: how to allocate available resource among network users. capacitated design: resource=bandwidth uncapacitated design: resource=budget

Applications rate control, bandwidth reservation link dimensioning

4

Max-Min Fairness: definiation Lexicographical Comparison

a n-vector x=(x1,x2, …,xn) sorted in non-decreasing order (x1≤x2 ≤ …≤ xn) is lexicographically greater than another n-vector y=(y1,y2, …,yn) sorted in non-decreasing order if an index k, 0 ≤k ≤n exists, such that xi =yi, for i=1,2,…,k-1 and xk >yk

(2,4,5) >L (2,3,100) Max-min Fairness: an allocation is max-min fair if its

lexicographically greater than any feasible allocation

Uniqueness?

5

Other Fairness MeasuresProportional fairness [Kelly, Maulloo & Tan, ’98] A feasible rate vector x is proportionally fair if for every

other feasible rate vector y

Proposed decentralized algorithm, proved propertiesGeneralized notions of fairness [Mo & Walrand,

2000] -proportional fairness: A feasible rate vector x is

fair if for any other feasible rate vector y

Special cases: : proportional fairness : max-min fairness

0)(

i

iii x

xyw

0)(

i

iii x

xyw

),( p

1

6

Capacitated Max-Min Flow Allocation

Fixed single path for each demand

Proposition: a flow allocation is max-min fair if for each demand d there exists at least one bottle-neck, and at least on one of its bottle-necks, demand d has the highest rate among all demands sharing that bottle-neck link.

7

Max-min Fairness Example

Max-min fair flow allocation sessions 0,1,2: flow rate of 1/3 session 3: flow rate of 2/3

C=1 C=1

Session 1Session 2 Session 3

Session 0

8

Max-Min Fairness: other definitions Definition1: A feasible rate vector is

max-min fair if no rate can be increased without decreasing some s.t.

Definition2: A feasible rate vector is an optimal solution to the MaxMin problem iff for every feasible rate vector with , for some user i, then there exists a user k such that and

9

How to Find Max-min Fair Allocation?

Idea: equal share as long as possible Procedure

1. start with 0 rate for all demand2. increase rate at the same speed for all

demands, until some link saturated3. remove saturated links, and demands using

those links4. go back to step 2 until no demand left.

10

Max-min Fair Algorithm

11

Max-min Fair Example

B

CA

link rate: AB=BC=1, CA=2

demand 1,2,3 =1/3 demand 4 =2/3

demand 5=4/3

12

Extended MMF lower and upper bound on demands weighted demand rate

13

Extended MMF: algorithm

14

Deal with Upper Bound Add one auxiliary virtual link with link

capacity wdHd for each demand with upper bound Hd

15

MMF with Flexible Paths one demand can take multiple paths max-min over aggregate rate for each demand potentially more fair than single-path only more difficult to solve

16

Uncapacitated Problem Max-min fair sharing of budget Formulation

17

Uncapacitated Problem max-min allocation

all demands have the same rate each demand takes the shortest path

proof?

18

Proportional Fairness Proportional Fairness [Kelly, Maulloo & Tan,

’98] A feasible rate vector x is proportionally fair if for every

other feasible rate vector y

formulation

0)(

i

iii x

xyw

19

Linear Approximation of PF

20

Extended PF Formulation

21

Uncapacitated PF Design maximize network revenue minus

investment