Revised skipper presentation

Post on 09-May-2015

334 views 0 download

description

This is the presentation Michael Skipper, Executive Director of the Metropolitan Planning Office, delivered to the Transit Citizen Leadership Academy of Septemb

Transcript of Revised skipper presentation

nashvillempo.org

Other than economic factors, what do you think communities are most concerned about as they consider transit issues?

1 2 3

40%

48%

12%

1. Safety & Security2. Health &

Environment3. Quality

growth/Sustainable land development

Mayor Karl Dean, Chairman

Planning for the Future with Mass Transit

Middle Tennessee Transit AcademySeptember 14, 2011

nashvillempo.org

What percentage of employees across the 10-county area commute to another county to work?

1 2 3 4

0%

48%44%

8%

1. 10%2. 25%3. 33%4. 66%

nashvillempo.org

Transportation is Regional Issue

WORK in Downtown Nashville, LIVE in…..

nashvillempo.org

Transportation is Regional Issue

Live in Hendersonville/ Gallatin Area, WORK in…..

nashvillempo.org

MPOs in Tennessee

nashvillempo.org

Nashville MPO

Clarksville MPO

Mayors Caucus

Metropolitan Statistical Area

(MSA)

Regional Geographies in Middle TN

nashvillempo.org

Population Growth, Middle Tennessee

Robertson

Sumner

Wilson

Rutherford

Williamson

Maury

Dickson

Cheatham

Montgomery

Davidson

nashvillempo.org

How will our Region Grow?

nashvillempo.org

Development Pattern, 1965-2035

Properties affected by development

1965750,000

20001,450,000

20352,600,000

(In 2035, the Nashville region will be about the size of the Denver region today)

Population

nashvillempo.org

Market and Policy Driven Forecasting

Environmental Constraints Land Use Policy

Suitability Analysis Growth Policy

nashvillempo.orgSource: U.S. Census Bureau, Woods & Poole Economics

Increasing Diversity

15%

17%

19%20% 20%

1%

3%

7%

11%10%

11%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

1990 2000 2010 2035

Non-White, Non-Hispanic Hispanic 65 Years of Age or Older

Race, Ethnicity, Age

nashvillempo.orgCensus for 1960 and 2000, 2025 adapted from Martha Farnsworth Riche, How Changes in the Nation’s Age and Household Structure Will Reshape Housing Demand in the 21st Century, HUD, 2003.

Increasing Diversity

48%

33% 28%

52%

67% 72%

13%26% 28%

1960 2000 2025

With Children Without Children Single Person

Household Composition

nashvillempo.org

Growth’s Impact on Mobility & Quality-of-Life

nashvillempo.org

Resiliency in Urban Congestion

Daily Recurring Congestion on Major Roadways.

TODAY2035

w/ Short-Term Improvements2035

After Long-Term Improvements

Congestion in Urban Areas Cannot Be Treated with Roadway Capacity Alone.

nashvillempo.org

How much does traffic congestion cost the region annually in wasted fuel and lost time?

1 2 3 4 5

17%

9%

17%17%

39%1. $200 million to $300 million

2. $300 million to $400 million

3. $400 million to $500 million

4. $500 million to $600 million

5. More than $600 million

nashvillempo.org

Texas Transportation Institute (TTI)Urban Mobility Report, 2009

Nashville-Davidson Urbanized AreaCost of Congestion (wasted fuel and time):

$ 426 Million, Annually $ 10.65 Billion, over next 25 years

nashvillempo.orgSource: Driven Apart (CEO for Cities)

nashvillempo.orgSource: Driven Apart (CEO for Cities), TTI Urban Mobility Report, 2009

nashvillempo.org

What percentage of Middle Tennessee households spend 20% or more of their income on transportation costs?

1 2 3 4 5

0%

50%

12%15%

23%

1. Less than 30%2. 30% to 50%3. 50% to 70%4. 70% to 90%5. More than 90%

nashvillempo.org

On average, Americans spend about 18% of their

Household Income on Transportation-

Related Expenses

Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology Housing + Transportation Affordability Index (http://www.htaindex.org/)

nashvillempo.org

Public Attitudes toward Transportation Policy

nashvillempo.org

I have no choice but to drive as much as I do.

1 2

30%

70%1. Strongly agree2. Strongly disagree

nashvillempo.org

I would like to spend less time in my car.

1 2

21%

79%1. Strongly agree2. Strongly disagree

nashvillempo.org

(National telephone survey of 800 registered voters: 700 landline interviews & 100 cell phone interviews.)

No Other Options than Driving

nashvillempo.org

(National telephone survey of 800 registered voters: 700 landline interviews & 100 cell phone interviews.)

Transit a Preferred Solution

nashvillempo.org

“I have traveled all over this country…and everywhere I go, people want better options. Options that offer reduced greenhouse-gas emissions. Options that offer reduced fuel-consumption. Options that offer better health. Options that bring communities together. Now, let me make this absolutely clear: I never said we would stop repairing, maintaining, and –yes– even expanding roadways. I said only that it's time to stop assuming that putting more cars on more roads is the best way to move people around more effectively.”

– U.S. DOT Secretary Ray LaHood

U.S. DOT Responding to Public Demand

nashvillempo.org

Middle TN Public Opinions

Middle Tennessee residents are most satisfied with: the maintenance of roadways in their area (63%)overall levels of roadway congestion in their area (54%)

Middle Tennessee residents are least satisfied with:how walkable their community is (49%)how safe it is to ride a bicycle in their community (42%)availability of mass transit services in their area (29%), with

lack of transit options considered the greatest problem in Middle TN, followed by lack of walking & bicycling options.

Of several issues mentioned, the most important to solve was to provide alternatives to driving.

nashvillempo.org

Of these three strategies for improving transportation, which do you feel is most important?

1 2 3

79%

0%

21%

1. Improve and expand mass transit options

2. Make communities more walkable and bike friendly

3. Build or widen existing roadways

nashvillempo.org

MPO Area Public Opinions

Three strategies provided for improving transportation in Middle Tennessee; respondents then asked to prioritize– 1st choice: improve and expand mass

transit options2nd choice: make communities more

walkable & bike-friendly3rd choice: build new or widen existing

roadways

nashvillempo.org

How Should We Invest in Our Future?

nashvillempo.org

#1 A Bold, New Vision

for Mass Transit

#2 Support for Active

Transportation & Walkable Communities

#3 Preservation & Enhancement

of Strategic Roadways

nashvillempo.org

A Bold, New Vision for Mass Transit

nashvillempo.org

WHY MASS TRANSIT?Traffic Congestion, Energy Costs,

Environmental Burden

Changing Demographics & Market Demand

Quality of Life &Economic Development Tool

nashvillempo.org

Existing Services

Bus ServiceCommuter RailPark & Ride Not Shown:

• Regional Vanpool Service• ADA Paratransit Service• Rural Intercity Bus Service

nashvillempo.org

A Bold, New Vision for Mass Transit

FUTURE REGIONAL CORRIDOR SERVICE

FUTURE LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE

Clarksville

Nashville

Franklin

Murfreesboro

Columbia

Dickson

Gallatin

Lebanon

Springfield

nashvillempo.org

Rapid Transit Corridors

nashvillempo.org

A History with InterUrban Rail

nashvillempo.org

existing

proposed

Light Rail Transit Alternative

Source: American Public Transportation AssociationMapping: Nashville Area MPO (2007)

nashvillempo.org

Rapid Rail Transit – Peers

nashvillempo.org

Bus Rapid Transit Alternative

nashvillempo.org

BUS Rapid Transit – Peers

nashvillempo.org

existing

proposed

Heavy Rail Transit Alternative

Source: American Public Transportation AssociationMapping: Nashville Area MPO (2007)

nashvillempo.org

Regional Rapid Transit Corridors

nashvillempo.org

Denver – Urban/ Suburban Rapid Transit

nashvillempo.org

13 Potential Station Sites

Music City Central

Cleveland Street

Trinity

Dickerson/ Skyline

Old Hickory

Conference DriveCenter Point

New Shackle IslandIndian Lake

Saundersville

Big Station Camp

Harris

Gallatin

nashvillempo.org

Music City Central Station

Land Use Issues:• Needed density/intensity increases must come from

high density office and residential redevelopment in downtown core.

• Will be driven by policy decisions (focusing high density regional employment and residential opportunities) more than land use decisions.

Station Context:

Urban Downtown Center, Regional employment destination

nashvillempo.org

Music City Central Station

nashvillempo.org

Saundersville Station

Land Use Issues:• Single-use categories – need to permit a mix of

uses adjacent to station

• Significant industrial and public facilities land uses limit TOD opportunities in station area

• Vertical mixed-use development not permitted

• New street connectivity will be needed to maximize access to station area

Future Land Use

Station Context:Suburban interchange with significant

industrial and institutional uses

nashvillempo.org

Saundersville StationThe Streets at Indian Lake Village

Traditional Office Park

Transit Oriented Development

nashvillempo.org

Saundersville Station

nashvillempo.org

Regional Rapid Transit Corridors

nashvillempo.org

Regional Commuter Rail Corridors

nashvillempo.org

existing

proposedSource: American Public Transportation AssociationMapping: Nashville Area MPO (2007)

Commuter Rail Transit Alternative

nashvillempo.org

Regional Commuter Rail Corridors

nashvillempo.org

Regional Commuter Rail Corridors

nashvillempo.org

Regional Commuter Rail Corridors

nashvillempo.org

Regional Express Coach Service

nashvillempo.org

Regional Express Coach Service

nashvillempo.org

Denver Regional Express Coach

DOWNTOWNDENVER

AIRPORT

BOULDER

nashvillempo.org

Regional Express Coach Service

nashvillempo.org

Local Circulators

nashvillempo.org

Local Circulators

nashvillempo.org

Local Circulators

nashvillempo.org

Urban Fixed Route Service

nashvillempo.org

Frequent, Safe & Comfortable Bus Service

nashvillempo.org

Frequent, Safe & Comfortable Bus Service

nashvillempo.org

Return of the Urban Streetcar

Year Number Cost in Return onRecent Projects Opened Miles of Cars Millions Economic Development InvestmentKenosha 2000 2 5 $5.2 $150,000,000 2885%Tampa 2002 2.4 11 $53.0 $2,000,000,000 3774%Little Rock (2 phases) 2004-2007 3.4 5 $28.5 $260,000,000 912%Memphis (3 phases) 1993-2006 6.5 20 $24.0 $137,000,000 571%Portland (2 phases) 2003 6 5 $73.0 $2,399,000,000 3286%

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RESULTS FOR STREETCAR PROJECTS

nashvillempo.org

Nashville Urban Streetcar

nashvillempo.org

Lower Broadway/ West End

nashvillempo.org

The 2035 Plan Provides:

A bold, new vision for mass transit to communicate the region's intentions for the long-term;

Funding for upcoming corridor and circulator studies to layout more specific strategies to implement the vision;

A call to re-organize the existing RTA to take advantage of new legislation;

A call to establish dedicated funding for transit to improve operational capacity of existing agencies and to help build the vision;

$950 million in federal transit funds for the continued maintenance and modest expansion of urban transit, ridesharing, and vanpool services;

$30 million for continued support for the JARC and New Freedom programs;

10% of future U-STP for transit projects.

nashvillempo.org

Support for Active Transportation & Walkable Communities

nashvillempo.org

System Preservation & Enhancement

nashvillempo.org

Show me the Money

nashvillempo.org

Average Costs per Mile

TRANSPORTATION OPTION AVG COST / MILE (Million)

Heavy Rail Transit $139 - $323

Light Rail Transit $45 - $85

Bus Rapid Transit $3 - $49

Electric Streetcar $3 - $30

Commuter Rail $1 - $15

4-Lane Highway $32 - $60

nashvillempo.org

Sources of Funding for Transit

nashvillempo.org

What do other things cost?

2030 Regional Plan adopted in 2005 = $3.5 BAnnual Payroll for NFL Players = $3.6 BCentral Texas Turnpike around Austin = $3.6 BSan Francisco/Oakland Bridge Replacement = $6.3 BDenver FasTracks System = $6.9 BLas Vegas City Center (mixed-use) = $11 BBig Dig (Boston) = $14.6 B

TTI Cost of Congestion for Nashville Metro between now and 2035 = $15+ B

nashvillempo.org

Funding/ Financing Issues

2035 Plan estimated to provide approx $4.9 B Federal The cost of NEEDS/ VISION is at least triple the

anticipated revenues Lack of dedicated funding for transit to ensure

stability and to compete for federal transit funds Sprawling land development pattern creates

unsustainable demand for infrastructure Declining fuel tax revenues and buying power means

fewer projects, slower progress, less benefit

nashvillempo.org

2035 Cost-Feasible Road Projects

nashvillempo.org

Highway Trust Fund Balance

DEFICIT

nashvillempo.org

Gasoline Prices, Last 5 Years

nashvillempo.org

Thinking Beyond the Gas Tax…

Public Private PartnershipsTolling & Congestion PricingDistance-Based User FeesMulti-Modal District Impact FeesNew Dedicated Funding for Mass Transit

Align Current Dollars with Real PrioritiesInvest Now to Save LaterBuild More Sustainable Communities

Livability. Sustainability. Prosperity. Diversity.