Post on 24-Feb-2016
description
Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates
April 16, 2014Jana Schreiner, Accountability and
State Assessment Consultant
Agenda, Webinar #10
• Accountability– Final decisions
ACCOUNTABILITY
2014 Development
• Final decisions• ELL inclusion• Accountability sessions www.region10.org
2014 Ratings Labels
Rating based on 4 Indexes
Index 1: Student AchievementIndex 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students.
2013
Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.
Student Groups: All Students. Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II
(Satisfactory).
STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments(15 total): Reading I; Reading II; Reading III Writing I; Writing II; Writing III Algebra l; Geometry; Algebra ll Biology; Chemistry; Physics World Geography; World History; US History
English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): ELLs in US schools Years 1-3 excluded ELLs in US schools Year 4 or more included
2014
Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.
Student Groups: All Students. Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II
(Satisfactory).
STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments (5 total): English l; English ll Algebra l Biology US History
English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): ELLs in US schools Year 1 excluded ELLs in US schools Year 2 and
beyond included
Index 1: Student Achievement English I and II from Spring 2014 + Include Reading I and II from July 2013 and December
2013• Substitute Assessments EOCs (PSAT, PLAN, SAT, ACT, AP)
Standard at Meeting Final Level II (CCR Standard) Counted as PASSER for Index I Counted as Meeting CCR Standard for Index IV Not used in Index 2 and 3
• Add STAAR M, STAAR ALT, ELL progress measure
• Implementation Schedule (no English at HS)
Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.
By Subject Area: Reading and Mathematics
One point for Met progress levelTwo points for Exceeded progress level
Progress Measures by Subject Area and School Type
New for 2014:No Index 2 for High Schools (9-12 campuses)Inclusion STAAR-Modified, STAAR-AltInclusion of ELL Students
Index 2: Student Progress
Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.
New for 2014: Students who skip grades included
Students who transition from Spanish to English in mathematics included
ELL Denials: Students whose parent(s) have denied ELL services included Considered as Non-ELL student for Index 2
Index 2: Student Progress
2013
Points based on STAAR performance:
Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II
By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.
Student Groups: Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from
2012
Index 3: Closing Performance GapsIndex 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups.
2014
Points based on STAAR performance:
Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II
Level III advanced performance:Two points for each percent of tests at the Level III advanced performance standard.
By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.
Student Groups: Economically Disadvantaged Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from 2013…
groups must have 25 tests in reading AND math
Inclusion of ELL Students
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
2013 Graduation Score: Combined performance across
the graduation and dropout rates for: Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All
Students and all student groups; or Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All
Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.
RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school.
2014 Graduation Score: Combined performance across the
graduation and dropout rates for: Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students
and all student groups; or Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students
and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.
RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.
STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.
College ready graduates.
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
Indicator All Students
African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander WhiteTwo or MoreRaces
ELL Special Ed.
Total Points
Max.Points
STAAR ScoreSTAAR % MetFinal Level ll onTwo or More Tests
29% 16% 40% 23% 38% 36% 182 600
STAAR Score (STAAR total points divided by maximum points) 30
Graduation Score (Gr. 9-12)4-yr. graduation rate 84.3% 78.8% 78.8% 91.6% 86.0% 44.2% 69.8% 533.5 700
5-yr. graduation rate 85.1% 78.8% 80.0% 92.1% 84.0% 48.9% 77.5% 546.4 700
Highest Graduation Total 546.4 700Graduation Score (best of total graduation points divided by maximum points) 78.0
RHSP/DAP Score4-yr. graduationPercent RHSP/DAP 82.7% 76.4% 83.6% 83.0% 325.7 400
RHSP/DAP Score (best of total RHSP/DAP points divided by maximum points) 81.4
Postsecondary/College-Ready Graduates ScoreCollege-Ready Graduates subject (ELA & Math)
82.0% 72.0% 78.0% 89.0% 321.0 400
College-Ready Score (total points divided by maximum points) 80.2
Overall Index ScoreSTAAR Score 30.0
Multiplyby
Weight
Graduation Score 78.0RHSP/DAP Score 81.4College-Ready Score 80.2Index Score (sum of weighted index scores)
55%
5th percentile 5th percentile
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Level II Final Performance Percent Met Final Level II on Two or More Assessments
Weighting of Indicators:
Post-Secondary Indicator: Percent Met Criteria on ELA AND MATH
Indicator WeightSTAAR Component 25%Graduation 25%Graduation Plan 25%Post-Secondary Indicators 25%
Rating Labels: AEA2014 System Standard accountability labels:
Met Alternative StandardImprovement Required
30%5th percentile5th percentile
Index 4 Targets
• Elementary-12• Middle School-13• High School-18• District--13
• Districts, high schools, and multi-grade campuses-56…..changed to 57 per April 25th posting.
STAAR Component All four components
Distinction Designations2013 Distinction Designation
Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent: Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparisongroup earn a distinction designation. Student Progress
based on Index 2 Academic Achievement in:
Reading/ELA Mathematics
2014 Distinction Designation
Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent:Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparison group Student Progress (based on Index 2) Closing Performance Gaps (based on Index 3)
Academic Achievement in: Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies
Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness:House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) expanded distinctionsfor districts and campuses for attainment of postsecondary readiness
Criteria must include indicators based on percentages of students who: Achieve college-readiness standards on STAAR; Earn nationally/internationally recognized business/industry
certification; Complete a coherent sequence of CTE courses; Complete dual credit or a postsecondary course for local
credit; Achieve college readiness standards on SAT, ACT, PSAT, or
ACT-PLAN; Earn college credit based on AP/IB performance.
Accountability Ratings and Distinction Designations
2013 and 2014 Accountability Rating(Districts and Campuses) 2013 Distinction Designations 2014 Distinction Designations
Met Standard
Campuses Only
Student Progress
Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA Mathematics
Districts and CampusesPostsecondary Readiness
Campuses Only
Student Progress Closing Performance Gaps
Academic Achievement: Reading/ELAMathematics
ScienceSocial Studies
Improvement Required N/A N/A
System SafeguardsSafeguard Measures and Targets:
Reporting system disaggregates performance by student group, performance level, and subject area.
Performance rates are calculated from the assessment results used to calculate Index 1: Student Achievement.
2013 targets for the disaggregated system-safeguard results: STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (50%); STAAR participation target required by federal accountability (95%); Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for 4-year rate
(78%) and 5-year rate (83%); and Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%).
26
Indicator Entity All Students
African Amer.
Amer. Indian Asian Hispanic Pacific
Islander White Two or More Races
Eco.Disadv. ELL Special Ed.
Performance Rates*
ReadingState 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%
Federal 79% 79% n/a n/a 79% n/a 79% n/a 79% 79% 79%
MathematicsState 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%
Federal 79% 79% n/a n/a 79% n/a 79% n/a 79% 79% 79%
Writing 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%
Science 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%
Social Studies 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55% 55%
Participation RatesReading 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%Mathematics 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
Federal Graduation Rates (including improvement targets)4-year 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80%5-year 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85% 85%
District Limits on Use of Alternative Assessment Results
ReadingModified 2% Not ApplicableAlternate 1% Not Applicable
MathematicsModified 2% Not ApplicableAlternate 1% Not Applicable
Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting
2014 Accountability System Safeguard
Measures and Targets
* Targets for 2014 correspond to the performance target for Index 1: Student Achievement.
Secure Environment
• Staging Data Validation Monitoring in ISAM• Campus pairings for accountability available in
late April
STUDENT ASSESSMENT