Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates March 07, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and...

Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates

March 07, 2014Jana Schreiner, Accountability and

State Assessment Consultant

Agenda, Webinar #7

• Double Testing• Accountability

– Federal • Priority/Focus/Reward• 1003(a) grant• Federal Report Card

– State • Final decisions in March• DVM

• Assessment– Questions from the field

DOUBLE TESTING

Two letters…

• Press release• TAA letter• To Administrator Addressed letter gives more

information….

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=25769809893

Bottom line…

• No incentive to double test• Commissioner discourages double testing• Algebra I score will count at campus where

student tests• No plans to count as non-participants

Lingering Question

• SSI?

FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY

SIP

Title I, 1003(a) Priority and Focus School Grant • Application

– Scheduled to open in eGrants on 2-13-14– Closing date in eGrants 3-17-14– Amendment deadline 6-16-14– Grant ends on 9-30-14

• Allocations– Non-TTIPS Priority Schools $160,000– Focus Schools $20,000

Copyright © Texas Education Agency 2014. All rights reserved.

8

NCLB Report Card

• Renamed• Different timeline this year

Questions?

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY

2014 Developmenthttp://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/materials.html

• ATAC preliminary recommendations—with targets…this posted 02/28/14

• Final decisions in March… the “end” of March

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/materials.html

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/materials.html

Performance Based Monitoring

Data Validation Monitoring

Staging for DVM-Leavers was posted in ISAM on Friday, January 31, 2014.

Staging for DVM-Discipline will be posted during the week of February 20th.

DVM-State Assessment reports were released to districts on February 21st. Staging is coming.


13

• Districts at stage 3 or 4 will submit all interventions activities and documents, including supporting documentation and the improvement/corrective action plan, to TEA on or before April 9, 2014.


14

DVM-Leavers and Discipline

Performance Based Monitoring

Important to Remember

Key difference between

DVM And PBM

PBMAS indicators yield a definitive result.

DVM suggests an anomaly that needs to be reviewed to determine whether the anomalous data are accurate--- raising a red flag


15

DVM-Student Assessment

• Student assessment data validation indicators have been implemented annually since 2005 (except for 2011).

• The 2013 student assessment data validation indicators are very similar to previous years’ indicators, with some minor changes.– A new indicator has been added


16

DVM-Student Assessment

• STAAR 3-8 Absent and “Other”– These are accountability system safeguard

indicators that are aligned with the student groups included in the state accountability system’s student performance results.

– They evaluate all subject areas.


17

ASSESSMENT

Q: Are online TELPAS Reading rosters considered confidential & secure materials before or after proctor caching? (It lists PEIMS numbers and user id before proctor caching & adds authorization codes after). A: Yes to both.

Q: If a student’s years in schools was reported incorrectly last year, can we make a correction? This is not a recalculation based on 60 day rule, but a clerical error that that we’d like to resolve.A: Per TEA, you cannot correct last year, but enter the correct years this year and keep local documentation.

Q: A student eligible for special provisions has retested twice in English 1 EOC’s. However, the student has not earned credit for the 1st half of English 1 yet. Should the student retest in English 1 EOC once credit for the class has been earned (during fall 2014)?A: Since part of the provision is passing the class, the student would retest in the fall, after which (assuming credit is earned) he/she can take advantage of the provision and no longer retest.

Q: Where can we find the percentage of passing for new EOC English tests at Level 2 satisfactory (phase-in 1)?A: It is not yet postedQ: Are the compositions being graded by 2 scorers? If so, how are they arriving at the 1-4 score for students?A: Yes, two scorers. See next slides.

STAAR Writing Rubric

Score Point 1—VERY LIMITED

Score Point 2—BASIC

Score Point 3—SATISFACTORY

Score Point 4—ACCOMPLISHED

Teachers and students need to have anin-depth understanding of the writing rubric for each type of writing!

21

Scoring Model for STAAR

22

SCORE 1 SCORE 2

SUMMED

SCORE CSR RATING

0 0 0 Nonscorable Performance1 1 2 Very Limited Performance1 2 3 Between Very Limited and Basic Performance2 2 4 Basic Performance2 3 5 Between Basic and Satisfactory Performance3 3 6 Satisfactory Performance3 4 7 Between Satisfactory and Accomplished Performance4 4 8 Accomplished Performance

• [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates March 07, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and...

Documents

Transcript of Region 10 Accountability and Assessment Updates March 07, 2014 Jana Schreiner, Accountability and...