Mike Knapp, Ph.D.General Manager – Integrated SolutionsKristy Holnaider Director – Educational TechnologiesRon PunakoSoftware Architect – PRE Simulation May 15, 2009

Searching for REAL Training

CTC Overview

• 501(c)(3) nonprofit established in 1987• Staff of 1,400+ professionals• More than 50 locations• 900,000 sq. ft., including labs & demonstration space• Top 100 Government Contractor • Award-winning education and training solutions team• Quality/EH&S Management System comprised of industry-

best models: ISO 9001 (Quality) and 14001 (Environmental), AS9100 (Aerospace), and CMMI-SE/SW (Systems/Software Engineering)

• Nationally recognized security capabilities with 300,000+ sq. ft. of Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility Space, JWICS, SIPRNet, and NIPRNet access

Education and Training Solutions

• Human Capital Strategic Planning

• Curriculum and Content Development and Distribution• Learning, Education and Training Assessment and Evaluation• Learning Technologies

• Modeling, Gaming and Simulation

• Knowledge Engineering

• Collaborative Environments

• Exercise Support

Our simulation software helps test the training retention of Corrections Officers

Real-time Avatars and Environments Learning Technology

Our simulation software helps test the training retention of Corrections Officers

Corrections Officers are immersed in real-life scenarios in a virtual corrections facility

Corrections Officers experience the simulation as CO Don McCabe

A supporting cast of characters influence the Student

Corrections Officers’ senses are engaged by realistic environments

Corrections Officers act as detectives to identify signs of prison rape by observing and making choices

Corrections Officers arepresented with sets of dialog choices

The choices made by Corrections Officers impacts story progress

Search Bag?

Yes

No

Mini-games engage Corrections Officer’s “left-brain”

“Cell Mate Match-Up” “Inmate Commissary Bag Inspection”

Test results are reviewed by Corrections Officers to identify strengths and weaknesses

Simulation provides Corrections Officer with performance feedback

Simulation scores the Corrections Officer’s choice

Corrections Officer makes a choice

Score is averaged by objective

 1. I think we should pay him a visit.2. I’m not sure there’s anything

else we can do.3. I guess we’ll just keep watching

him on the block.

Final score is averaged across objective scores

 Objective 1: 50%Objective 2: 100%…

 Final: 75%

Correction Officer’s score is sent for storage in a LMS

Conclusion andPRE Simulation video demo

Contact Information

Kristy HolnaiderDirector, Educational Technologies(814) 269-6545holnaidk@ctc.com

Amy MorrisonCLE Program Manager(814) 269-2879morrisoa@ctc.com

Putting ideas into action.SM

1-800-CTC-4392www.ctc.com