Quality in Healthcare Organizations

Post on 24-Apr-2015

1.096 views 1 download

description

 

Transcript of Quality in Healthcare Organizations

Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, MD, PhDHealth Informatics Division

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol University, Thailand

January 9, 2013

Parts of this material were based on materials developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under Award

Number IU24OC000013 (Health IT Workforce Curriculum v.3.0, Component 12/Units 1-12).

TMHG 541: Fundamentals of Health Care and Medical Terminology

Introduction to Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety The Culture of Safety Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and

Analysis and HIT

Introduction to Quality Improvement

This material (Comp12_Unit1a) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013.

First, Do No Harm

Primum non nocere

(IOM, 2001)(IOM, 2000) (IOM, 2011)

To Err is Human (Institute of Medicine, 1999) Reported that:

• 44,000 to 98,000 people die in hospitals each year as a result of preventable medical mistakes

• Mistakes cost hospitals $17 billion to $29 billion yearly

• Individual errors are not the main problem• Faulty systems, processes, and other conditions

lead to preventable errors

6Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture d

Affected 1 in 3 hospital patients in one study In 2008, harms to patients from medical

errors cost $17.1 billionErrors can result in medical malpractice

lawsuits• 42% of doctors are sued at some point• Hospital malpractice suits alone could top $8.6

billion in 2011Suffering from medical errors: not

measurable

7Health IT Workforce Curriculum

Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US

Regulating Healthcare Lecture d

Humans are not perfect and are bound to make errors

Highlight problems in the U.S. health care system that systematically contributes to medical errors and poor quality

Recommends reform that would change how health care works and how technology innovations can help improve quality/safety

Health IT plays a role in improving patient safety (but it may also carry risks to safety in certain ways)

“Healthcare reform without attention to the nature and nurture of healthcare as a system is doomed …It will at best simply feed the beast, pouring precious resources into the overdevelopment of parts and never attending to the whole — that is care as our patients, their families and their communities experience it.” (Berwick, 2009)

“The performance of a system — its achievement of its aims —depends as much on the interactions among elements as on the elements themselves. (Berwick, 2009)

“The improvement of health and healthcare depends on systems thinking and systems redesign… ‘Reform’ without systems thinking isn’t reform at all.” (Berwick, 2009)

9Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture a

MEANINGFUL USEProviders show they're using certified EHR technology in ways that can be measured significantly in quality and in quantity.

PATIENT-CENTERED MEDICAL HOMEProviders organize care around patients, working in teams,coordinating care, and tracking over time.

ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONProvider reimbursements are tied to quality metrics and reductions in the total cost of care for assigned population of patients.

10Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture a

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009“…authorizes the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to provide reimbursement incentives for eligible professionals and hospitals who are successful in becoming ‘meaningful users’ of certified electronic health record technology …” (The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009)

• The HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health) Act establishes programs under CMS in coordination with the Office of the National Coordinator to accomplish this charge.

11Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture a

Improve quality, safety, & efficiencyEngage patients & their families Improve care coordination Improve population & public health;

reduce disparitiesEnsure privacy & security protections

12Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture a

13Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture a

The quality of care received needs improvement.

In the current healthcare environment there are a number of initiatives that aim to improve the care in the U.S. context through the use of HIT.• Meaningful Use

• Patient Centered Medical Home

• Accountable Care Organization

14Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture a

“Quality”

“Quality of care is the degree to which health services for individuals and

populations increase the likelihood of desired outcomes and are consistent with

current professional knowledge.” (IOM, 2001)

16Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Better patient outcomes (patient health)Better system performance (patient care)Better professional development

(clinician learning)Scientific evidence + particular context =

measured performance improvement

17Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US

Lecture c

18Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

National Quality Forum (NQF) www.qualityforum.org National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) www.ncqa.org Provider organizations

• AMA’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (PCPI) www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/clinical-practice-improvement/clinical-quality/physician-consortium-performance-improvement

Joint Commission (JC) www.jointcommission.org Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI)

19Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Joint Commission certifies medical care facilities• Oldest and largest healthcare accrediting body• Independent nonprofit organization• Evaluates more than 18,000 US healthcare

organizations and programs of all types Goal is to improve effectiveness, safety, and value

of healthcare Organizations must undergo periodic site visits to

identify and resolve problems

20Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Delivering Healthcare (part 1)

Lecture c

1910: The forerunner of JC is called the “end-result” system

1951: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) is created and starts accrediting and certifying healthcare organizations

1987: Name changed to Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)

2007: Name simplified to Joint Commission (JC); currently accredits and certifies more than 18,000 organizations and programs in the US

21Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture a

“To continuously improve healthcare for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating healthcare organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.”(The Joint Commission, 2011)

22Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture a

Earned by an entire healthcare organization (hospital, nursing home, office-based surgery practice, etc.)

Tools the JC uses to measure performance• Integrated Survey Process (ISP): Evaluates

performance across organization• ORYX: System for healthcare organizations to report

to the JC about patients with certain conditions (core measure sets) The core measure sets reported depend on the type and size

of the organization

23Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture a

Examples• Heart attack• Pneumonia• Inpatient psychiatric care• Children’s asthma• Stroke

Each core set has performance measures• For example, the JC looks at whether children

with asthma received certain drugs in the hospital and were sent home with a management plan

24Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture a

JC-accredited organizations and providers of healthcare staffing services can also earn certification for specific programs or services• For chronic diseases and conditions Examples: asthma, diabetes, heart failure programs

• Programs can be within the medical center or in the community

25Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture a

National Patient Safety GoalsUniversal ProtocolOffice of Quality MonitoringSpeak Up™ programSentinel Event Policy

26Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture a

Sentinel Event Policy• Unexpected death, unexpected serious physical

or psychological injury, or the risk of such an event

Patient Safety Advisory Group• Panel of experts who recommend National

Patient Safety Goals• Also address newly developing safety issues

27Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture d

• Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure and Wrong Person Surgery– Pre-surgery verification– Site marking– “Time out” before an incision is made

• The Speak Up Initiative– Encourages patients to participate in their care– Free patient education materials

28Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US Regulating Healthcare

Lecture d

29Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US

Lecture c

Part of Department of Health and Human Services

Mission: “to improve quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of healthcare for all Americans”• Safety and quality: Reduce risk of harm• Effectiveness: Improve healthcare outcomes• Efficiency: Transform research into practice

The Healthcare Accreditation Institute (Public Organization) www.ha.or.th Joint Commission (JC) www.jointcommission.org International Organization for Standardization (ISO) www.iso.org Provider & professional organizations

• University Hospital Network (UHOSNET) www.uhosnet.com

• The Medical Council of Thailand www.tmc.or.th

• Thai Medical Informatics Association (TMI) www.tmi.or.th

• Other professional councils and organizations Regulatory organizations

• Ministry of Public Health

• Ministry of Education Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF:HEd)

Payer organizations

• National Health Security Office (NHSO) www.nhso.go.th

• Social Security Office (SSO)

• Comptroller-General Department Other quality frameworks

• Thai Quality Award (TQA) www.tqa.or.th30

Needs to be improved, especially for the uninsured

Patient safety & healthcare-associated infections warrant urgent attention

Quality is improving, but pace is slow, especially in preventive care & chronic disease management

Disparities are common and lack of insurance is a contributor

Many disparities are not decreasing; those that warrant increased attention include care for cancer, heart failure, and pneumonia

31Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

National study of physician performance for 30 medical conditions plus preventive care: physicians provided only 55% of recommended care.

(McGlynn et al. NEJM 2003; 348:2635)

66% of people with hypertension are inadequately treated. (JNC 7, JAMA 2003;289: 2560)

63% of people with diabetes have HbA1c levels greater than 7.0%. (Saydah, et al. JAMA 2004;291:335)

62% of people with elevated LDL cholesterol have not reached lipid goals.

(Afonso, Am J Man Care 2006;12:589)

50-70% of healthcare-associated infections are preventable.(Umscheid et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):101-14.)

24.7% of Medicare patients admitted to the hospital for heart failure are readmitted within 30 days.

(CMS, 2009)

32Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Only 27% of adults with a regular primary care physician (PCP) could easily contact their physician over the telephone, obtain care or medical advice after hours, or experience timely office visits.

Only 57% of adults rate the information they get about their health issues as very good; only 43% find it easy to get an appointment; and only 56% find the physician’s office to be well-organized and feel their time is not wasted.

33Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Given the current sub-optimal quality of care received by patients, the introduction of QI initiatives is imperative.

HIT has an important role to play in QI initiatives.

34Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

“Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the results it achieves.”

(Paul Batalden, M.D, 2008)

So, the answer must lay in the system redesign.

35Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

36Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Make it specific• Assign it a number if possible

Assign it a timelineMake it measurableMake sure it is challenging but doable

37Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

PROCESS MEASURE: Are we doing what we must to get the improvement we seek?

OUTCOME MEASURE: Are we getting what we expect?

BALANCING MEASURE: Are we causing new problems in other parts of the system?

38Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Hospital• AIM: we will reduce the number of

ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP) in the ICU from the current 23% to under 10% in 4 months

• MEASURES: Process measure: Ventilator days Over-sedation hours Oral care performed

Outcome measure: Number of VAP

Balancing Measure: Cost of care Re-intubation rates

Ambulatory• AIM: we will reduce the amount

of time it takes our patients to get an appointment (request to appointment) from 23 days to 0 days in 6 months

• MEASURES: Process measure: Supply Demand No-show rate

Outcome measure: third next available appointment

Balancing Measure: Patient satisfaction

39Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

Concepts and strategies: decide on the overall changes that will lead to the desired improvement.

Specific changes: • Make them small• Make them fast• Make them frequent

You may need to include additional measures specifically to decide if a change you have tested is worth keeping or did not lead to improvement.

Consider using pre-existing change packages.

40Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

• One of the most important aspects of QI is to understand how your systems actually perform, under a range of conditions.

• Deming’s theory of profound knowledge is based on the principle that each organization is composed of a system of interrelated processes and people.

• The improvement of the system depends on the capability to organize the balance of each component to enhance the entire system.

• Understanding and learning about your system is essential to improve it.

41Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

• PDCA (Deming Cycle)

42

Plan

Do

Check

Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shewhart_cycle

• Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continual_improvement_process

Quality improvement is an ongoing, continuous effort

• Total Quality Management (TQM)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_quality_management

Quality of products and processes is the responsibility of everyone involved in the products or services

• Six Sigmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma

Seeks to improve quality by removing causes of defects and minimizing variability in manufacturing and business processes

43

• Leanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_manufacturing

Considers expenditure of resources that does not create value a waste -> “Preserving value with less work”

Including tools such as Value Stream Mapping, 5S, Kanban (pull systems), Just in time (JIT), etc.

• Routine to Research (R2R)http://home.kku.ac.th/kitsir/research/html/download/news/r2r.pdf

Improves the routine work processes through research

• Risk Managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_management

Identification, assessment, prioritization , prevention, mitigation, monitoring, and control of risks

44

Image source: Senoo et al. (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601060710776725

Nonaka SECI Model

The quality of care received needs improvement.

Quality improvement is an ongoing process that includes the setting of an aim and a progressive measurement, change test, and understanding of the system.

There are various complementary approaches to quality improvement

46Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture b

47Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Introduction to QI and HIT

Lecture c

Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

This material (Comp12_Unit2a) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013.

49Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture a

In U.S. Healthcare system7% of patients suffer a medication error44,000- 98,000 deaths100,0000 death from hospital-acquired

infectionsPatients receive half of recommend

therapies $50 billion in total costs

Similar results in UK and Australia

50Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture a

How can this happen?

We need to view the delivery of health care as a science

51Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture a

1. Accept we are fallible—assume things will go wrong rather than right.

2. Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the results it gets.

3. Understand principles of safe design. • Standardize• Create checklists• Learn when things go wrong

4. Recognize these principles apply to technical and team work.

5. Teams make wise decision when there is diverse and independent input.

Caregivers are not to blame

52Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture a

53Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture a

54Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture a

Standardize. • Eliminate steps if possible.

Create independent checks.Learn when things go wrong.

• What happened?• Why did it happen?• What did you do to reduce risk?• How do you know it worked?

55Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture b

56Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture b

57Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture b

58Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture b

Assume things will go wrong Develop lenses to see systems Work to Mitigate Technical and Teamwork

Hazards• Standardize work• Create independent checks• Learn from mistakes

Make wise decisions by getting input from others

Keep the patient the north star

59Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture b

In this unit we’ve learned about the ways that teams make wise decisions with diverse and independent input. We’ve also explored the importance of communication and especially the place of critical listening.

60Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Principles of Quality and Safety for HIT

Lecture b

The Culture of Safety

This material (Comp12_Unit4) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013.

Video 1

62Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

Pointing the finger at people rather than systems.

63Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

64Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

Limits learning Increases likelihood of repeat errorsDrives self-reporting underground

65Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

66Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

67Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

68Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

69Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

In this unit we explored the characteristics of high reliability organizations and learned more about establishing an organizational culture of safety.

70Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Reliability, Culture of Safety, & HIT

Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and

Analysis and HIT: Part 1

This material (Comp12_Unit12a) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013.

“A new delivery system must be built to achieve substantial improvements in patient safety – a system that is capable of preventing errors from occurring in the first place, while at the same time incorporating lessons learned from any errors that do occur.”(IOM,2004)

72Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis

and HIT─Lecture a

73Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis

and HIT─Lecture a

74Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis

and HIT─Lecture a

Admit that providing health care is potentially hazardous

Take responsibility for reducing risks Encourage error reporting without blame Learn from mistakes Communicate across traditional hierarchies and

boundaries; encourage open discussion of errors Use a systems (not individual) approach to analyze

errors Advocate for multidisciplinary teamwork Establish structures for accountability to patient safety

75Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis

and HIT─Lecture a

76Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis

and HIT─Lecture a

Near Miss Harm

77Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis

and HIT─Lecture a

Swiss cheese model of errorA culture of safetyThree HIT mechanisms to help control

error• surveillance systems, on-line event reporting,

and predictive analytics/data modelingRisk assessment model (near-miss VS

harm)

Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and

Analysis and HIT: Part 2

This material (Comp12_Unit12b) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013.

79Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture b

80Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture b

81Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture b

Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and

Analysis and HIT: Part 3

This material (Comp12_Unit12c) was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013.

83Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Structured problem-solving process

Considers all potential causal or contributing factors Human factors System factors

Detailed chronological list of events surrounding incident

Premise: one can learn from one’s mistakes

84Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

85Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Healthcare Example: Mrs. A. received blood in the Emergency Department. Within 15 minutes, she experienced a bad reaction. Her nurse realized that she had received blood intended for another patient. She was transferred to the intensive care unit to be stabilized. The ED staff wanted to know how this could have happened so they assembled a team to identify possible causes.

86Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Briefly describe event Identify affected areas/servicesAssemble a team Diagram the process (flow chart) Identify potential root causes Prioritize root causes Develop action plan Evaluate results!

87Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

88Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Story: Before I had children, I invited one of my high school friends and her family, including a toddler, to dinner. I was worried that her toddler would somehow manage to hurt himself in my house, which was designed for a childless couple.

89Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Select a high risk process, one that is

known to have problems, and assemble a

team.

90Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

91Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

92Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

The higher the number, the more urgent the need to prevent a failure.

Event: After reading several articles about laboratory specimen errors that result in lab tests being done on the wrong patients, doctors at a community office practice decide to examine the potential for this problem to happen in their office laboratory.

93Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Select a high risk process (patient identification):• Affects a large number of patients• Carries a high risk for patients• Has known process problems identified by other

organizations (e.g., Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert!) Assemble a team

• People closest to issue involved• People critical to implementation of potential changes• Respected, credible team leader• Someone with decision-making authority• People with diverse knowledge bases

94Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

95Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

The higher the number, the more urgent the need to prevent a failure.

96Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

97Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

98Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012

Quality Improvement Learning From Mistakes: Error Reporting and Analysis and

HIT─Lecture c

Tools• Root Cause Analysis (RCA)• Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)• Hazard Analysis• Flow Charting