Post on 18-Jan-2019
Presentation to the JPTMPresentation to the JPTMThe International Charter
for Space and Major Disastersfor Space and Major Disasters
Hide YamazakiHide YamazakiES for the International Disaster Charter
The Charter
The Charter was initiated by CNES/ESA at the occasion of the UNISPACE III Conference in Vienna (July 1999)
the Charter is an international cooperation between space agencies, making their resources available to emergency operationsmaking their resources available to emergency operations
the Charter is a global mechanismt t k t llit i it ti dto task satellites in emergency response situations, and to provide rush access to EO data in case of natural or man made disaster.
Charter members
CSACSACanadaCanada20002000
ESAESAEuropeEurope JAXAJAXA
BNSC BNSC UKUK2005200520002000
CNESCNESFranceFrance20002000
20002000
NOAA/USGSNOAA/USGSUSAUSA
JAXAJAXAJapanJapan20052005
CNSACNSAChineChine20072007
20052005
20002000ISROISROIndiaIndia200200
USAUSA20012001
20012001
CONAEArgentineArgentine2003
Charter SatelliteCharter Satellite
Country SPACE Agency Satellite y g yEurope ESA ERS ENVISAT
France CNES SPOT C d CSA RADARSAT 1&2Canada CSA RADARSAT 1&2India ISRO IRS
USA USGS POES, GOES, LandsatUSA USGS POES, GOES, Landsat
Argentina CONAE SAC-C
J JAXA ALOSJapan JAXA ALOS
UK BNSC DMC (Disaster Monitoring Constellation)Constellation)
China CNSA FY, SJ, ZY satellite
Principles of the co-operation
• The Charter is open to – space agenciesspace agencies – and space system operators
• The members participateThe members participate – on a voluntary basis, – with no exchange of funds
• The Charter aims to supply emergency organizations – With a free and co-ordinated access to space systems and to resulting
data from all available participating satellite sourcesdata, from all available participating satellite sources, – Including acquisition planning– Without delay
Beyond specific data policy restrictions of providers– Beyond specific data policy restrictions of providers– Without administrative or procedural blockage– During the crisis phase of disasters
Scope of the Charter
The Charter is in operation since operation since November 2000
The charter: - addresses ‘only’
the response phase
- provides a unified system of space data
i iti d acquisition and delivery
services the entire - services the entire world
Player of the Charter
1. Authorised Users (AU) :Ch t ti tCharter activater
2. On-Duty Operator (ODO) : 24 hours Window
3. Emergency On-Call Officer ( ECO ) : Planer of a initial satellite data acquisition plan
4. Space Agencies Satellite data provider
5. Project Manager (PM) :Acquisition plan refiner and distributer of crisis information ( Value add product ) to End User
6. Value Add Reseller (VAR) : Supporter for PM to make crisis information ( Value add product )pp ( p )
7. End UserUser of crisis information ( Value add product )
Charter operational loop
Emergency on-Call Officer CSA RADARSAT-1
On-Duty Operator
(ECO)ESA
CNES
ERS-2 and ENVISAT
SPOT 2, 4 & 5
NOAA NOAA-12 14 15 16 On-Duty Operator (ODO)
NOAA USGS
ISRO
NOAA 12, 14, 15, 16 & 17, POES and GOES LAndsat
IRSProject Manager
Authorized User (AU)
(PM) CONAE SAC-C
JAXA ALOS
CNSA CBERS
Disaster DMC DMC Constellation
End User (EU) Value-Added Reseller (VAR)
Out of Charter definition
Limitations for activation
Charter cannot be activated for:
Non emergency situations :� Oil spill monitoring operations� Ice monitoring operations except for specific event� Ice monitoring operations except for specific event
Emergencies falling out of Charter scope :War or armed conflictsHumanitarian actions not linked to a specific disasterpSearch and rescue support not linked to a specific disaster
Calls beyond emergency periodAs a rule of thumb, a Charter activation occurring more than 10 days after theactual crisis start should be rejected.In addition the duration of a Charter call should be limited to a maximum of 15 days after activation and the request should be rejected if the size of the disaster is not compatible with the resolution of the available satellites.disaster is not compatible with the resolution of the available satellites.
Charter Activations up to 2009 May 26up to 2009, May 26
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TotalSub-totals2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total
Earthquake 3 1 3 5 3 2 5 4 1 27Landslide 1 2 2 1 2 8Volcano 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 15
Sub totals
Solid Earth 50Volcano 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 15
Storm/hurricane** 1 2 3 6 1 8 8 1 30Ice/snow hazard 1 1Fl d/ * 4 8 4 9 13 16 22 23 9 108
217Weather / Atmospheric 154
Flood/ocean wave* 4 8 4 9 13 16 22 23 9 108Fire 5 1 2 4 2 1 15
Oil spill 3 2 4 3 12
Atmospheric
Technological 13Others 1 1
Total / year 1 13 13 18 21 25 25 45 40 16
Technological 13
*includes solid earth related phenomenon of a tsunami**includes all wind type storms (hurricane, cyclone, typhoon and tornado)
Charter activations
Eart hquakeOil spill
7%
Hazardous mat erial1%
7% Up to the end of May 2009 : 14%
Landslide4%
Forest f ire8% 25%8%
7%217 activations dealing with a large variety of disasters
Volcanic erupt ion6%
disasters
The Charter not only id di t
St orm/ hurr icane12%
provides disaster-response services to its members but also to other countries
Ice/ snow hazard1%
Flood/ ocean wave47%
world-wide.
More than 80 countries
60%
More than 80 countries benefited so far (55 without AU)
Charter activations
Manitoba Austria 1&2
Czeck Republic 1&2Germany 1,2&3British Columbia, Canada
Lena River, Russia
Northern FranceSaône & Rhône France
Denmark
Slovenia
North Ossetia, Russia
SwedenBritish Columbia, Canada
LuxembourgCanada
FranceCaucassus, RussiaManitoba,
Canada
Etna, IT
Yucatan, MexicoGujarat, India
Saône, & Rhône France SloveniaLago Maggiore, IT
Lebanon 1&2
Galicia, Spain
Morocco
Stromboli, ITBingol, Turkey
Assam, India
Algeria 1&2
Portugal
Nepal
USA
D i i R bli
Al Hoceïma, Morocco Hindu Kush, Afghanistan 1&2
North Korea
Canary Islands, Spain
Tehran, Iran3
Gonaives, HaitiIran 1,2&4
Romania 1,2&3Bulgaria
ChinaIndia
Louisiana, USA
Florida, USA
Switzerland
Kashmir, PakistanKashmir, India
English Channel 1&2
Hungary
Pakistan 1&2
Afghanistan 3&4
New York, USA
Nyiragongo, CongoGalapagos, Ecuador
El Salvador 1&2
Gujarat, India
Nias Island, Indonesia
Gulf of Aden, YemenCentral America
Soufrière, Montserrat
Dominican Republic
Philippines 1&3
Nabire, Indonesia
Hispaniola, Haiti
Sudan 1&2
Georgetown, Guyana
Grenada IslandPhilippines 2&5
Guaranda Municipe, Colombia
Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Cuddalore, India
Sri Lanka 1&2Colombia 3&4
Rarotonga, Cook Islands
Ethiopia 1
Kenya 1&2
Suriname
Venezuela
Philippines 4Ethiopia 2&3 Somalia
Indonesia 6
Volcanic EruptionEarthquake
LandslideFlood/ocean wave
Santa Fe, Argentina 1
Bolivia
Caprivi,Namibia
Bolivia 2Comoros
Java, Indonesia 3&4Indonesia 5
Argentina 3
Bolivia-Paraguay-Argentina Mozambique
SolomonIslands
UruguayChile 2
MadagascarBolivia 3
Oil Spill
Flood/ocean waveStorm/hurricane
Forest FireOther
Patagonia, Argentina 2
Argentina 3Chile
Chile 2
Summary
å A successful case of international cooperation :å A successful case of international cooperation :
– The Charter provides a «one-stop shop» for civil protection and emergency organizationsg y g
– The Charter is triggered by Civil Protections or Emergency & Rescue Services, & UN specialized agencies.
– It is an efficient data delivery mechanism, relying on existing resources.– It is free of charge for the Users– It has improved its resources over the years: new Space Agencies
became Charter partners, new satellites have been progressively i t t d i t th ‘Ch t t ll ti ’integrated into the ‘Charter constellation’..
– It has been activated over all continents for a variety of disasters– Deals only with emergency
å There is no other capacity playing this role on a world-wide basis
Proposal to the SA
• To establish a cooperative relation between 2 initiatives
International Charter Sentinel Asia
International Charter for Space and Major Disasters
Comparison between Charter and SA Comparison between Charter and SA in each phasein each phase
Phase Charter SAResponse ・Activation right : AU ・Activation right : JPT andResponse ・Activation right : AU
・Participating Agency :10 ・Achievement : more
than 200 times
・Activation right : JPT and ADRC members・Participating Agency :53 entities and 8 international orgnisations・Achievement : 32 times
Pre-Disaster
Out of scope
Implement “success story”・Philippine ・Thailand ・IndonesiaSentinel Asia SystemOperation Training : 4 times
Post-DisasterDisaster
Out of scope Out of scope
Data Provider Node (DPN)
JAXA
ISROGISTDA
ADRCADRC
RequestRequestDATADATA
JPT ADRC
Data Analysis Node (DAN)Data Analysis Node (DAN)
JPTmember
ADRCmember
E d UE d U
DisasterDisaster
LR LR LR LR
End UserEnd UserProductProduct
Draft Interface between IDC and SA
International Disaster CharterInternational Disaster CharterSentinel AsiaSentinel Asia
International Disaster CharterInternational Disaster Charter
ECOECO CSACSA
ESAESA
RADARSATRADARSAT--11
ERSERS--2 and 2 and
JPT memberJPT memberSA SA activationactivation
interfaceinterfaceODOCNESCNES
NOAANOAA
ISROISROPMPM
ENVISATENVISAT
IRSIRS
SPOTSPOTADRCADRC
ADRC memberADRC memberDPN
RequestRequest
LandsatLandsat
DMC ConstellationDMC Constellation
CONAECONAE
JAXAJAXA
USGSUSGS
DMCDMC
ALOS
SACSAC--CC DPN
ISRO
JAXA
GISTDA
VVAARR DisasterDisasterDATADATA
DANDAN
End UserEnd User
ProductProductDataDataRequestRequest
The role of DAN in SA and IDC
In Charter, Project Manager is nominated in each disaster and its guideline is defined by PM procedure (PR0419E). If the g y p ( )cooperation between SA and IDC established, data management must be changed in line with PM procedure of IDC.
• The AIT, CRISP and ADRC as DAN will take the PM responsibility as follows.a) To conduct data analysisb) To Product distribution to the end usersb) To Product distribution to the end usersc) To complete the Dossier, if necessary
• The AIT as Principal Data Node (P-DAN) will take a the followinga) To make a local researcher list (PM list) in DAN for data analysis) ( ) yb) To maintain a local researcher list (PM list) for data analysisc) To ensures local researcher in DAN to utilize the data in accordance with PM
procedured) To investigate end user how to utilize the product and make 2 reports ( preliminaryd) To investigate end user how to utilize the product and make 2 reports ( preliminary
and final report) with local researcher in DAN
The expected synergy through Charter and Sentinel AsiaSentinel Asia
• Charter’s contribution to Sentinel Asia– Satellite data (product ) from Charter member to Sentinel Asia member (
Local end users )– Sentinel Asia identityy
→More available satellite data for end users in SA• Sentinel Asia’s contribution to Charter
– Quick response in Asia Pacific region – Bring the satellite data with local information to end user– PM activity– PM activity – Capacity building & outreach
→More user feedback to the Charter
ADRC status in Charter
ADRC h b d “ ti b d ” ith• ADRC has been approved as “cooperation body” with a privilege to activate the Charter in cooperation with JAXA.
ADRC is a gateway for JPT and ADRC members– ADRC is a gateway for JPT and ADRC members– ADRC is able to outreach activity about Carter via ADRC network.
• Their network is very strong in the Asia-Pacific region, inTheir network is very strong in the Asia Pacific region, in particular, Central Asia.
– Original activation in SA member (JPT and ADRC), not ADRC i lfitself.
ACCESS FOR ASIA/PACIFIC REGIONREGION
The Sentinel Asia (SA) initiative will be linked to the Charter trough ADRC (Asian disaster Regional Centre)(Asian disaster Regional Centre)JAXA will implement a coordination to allow channel SA requests from Asia-Pacific users.Th B d i ti ADRC th i ilThe Board is granting ADRC the privilege to submit requests on behalf of SA users provided that SA members formally report to the Chartermembers formally report to the Charter Board that they adopt this mechanism to link the Charter and Sentinel-Asia.
After confirmation by SA members, the Charter procedures will be modified to accommodate for the operational link with SA (escalation process).