Preliminary WRAP Haze Modeling Results

Post on 12-Jan-2016

31 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Preliminary WRAP Haze Modeling Results. Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association January 10, 2005 Tucson, AZ. Caveats. Results are preliminary Became available last week Minor emission errors identified Other issues identified in CENRAP emissions Further QA planned - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Preliminary WRAP Haze Modeling Results

Preliminary WRAP Haze Modeling Results

Lee Alter

Western Governors’ Association

January 10, 2005

Tucson, AZ

Caveats

• Results are preliminary– Became available last week– Minor emission errors identified– Other issues identified in CENRAP emissions– Further QA planned

• The following emissions are held constant– Sources outside the U.S.– CA nonroad sources and ocean-going vessels– Biogenics, wb dust, and smoke (Wx, Rx, ag)

Caveats

• Emission changes limitted to known / certain controls on stationary, area, and land-based mobile sources. In WRAP region, this equates to annual change of:

- 51,000 tons of SO2 (-5%)

- 1,040,000 tons of NOx (-28%)

635,000 tons of PM10 (31%)

424,000 tons of VOC (14%)[Results include AK, but do not include expected increases in OGVs and expected decreases in CA nonroad.]

Caveats

• Each Class I area projection based on modeled differences during ~22 days in 2002

Uniform Rate of Reasonable Progress Glide PathSan Gorgonio Wilderness - 20% Worst Days

21.5420.58

18.17

15.77

13.36

10.95

8.547.10

19.91

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056 2060 2064

Year

Ha

zin

ess

In

de

x (D

eci

vie

ws)

Glide Path Natural Condition (Worst Days) Observation Method 1 Prediction

Uniform Rate of Reasonable Progress Glide PathSaguaro NM - 20% Worst Days

14.87 14.3413.00

11.6610.32

8.987.64

6.84

14.41

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056 2060 2064

Year

Ha

zin

ess

In

de

x (D

eci

vie

ws)

Glide Path Natural Condition (Worst Days) Observation Method 1 Prediction

Percent of URP Achieved by 2018 Base Case

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

BR

CA

1

CA

NY

1

GR

CA

2

ME

VE

1

SA

PE

1

WE

MI1

ZIO

N1

BA

ND

1

BO

AP

1

CH

IR1

GIC

L1

GR

SA

1

IKB

A1

SA

CR

1

SA

GU

1

SIA

N1

WH

IT1

WH

PE

1

Pe

rcen

t o

f D

eci

view

s A

ch

ieve

d

Colorado Plateau Desert Southwest

Percent of URP Achieved by 2018 Base Case

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

BA

DL1

CA

BI1

GA

MO

1

LOS

T1

ME

LA1

MO

NT

1

SU

LA1

TH

RO

1

UL

BE

1

WIC

A1

CR

MO

1

JAR

B1

SA

WT

1

BR

ID1

NO

AB

1

RO

MO

1

WH

RI1

YE

LL2

Pe

rcen

t o

f D

eci

view

s A

ch

ieve

d

North Great Basin Rockies

Percent of URP Achieved by 2018 Base Case

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%H

EC

A1

KA

LM1

MO

HO

1

MO

RA

1

NO

CA

1

OLY

M1

PA

SA

1

SN

PA

1

ST

AR

1

TH

SI1

WH

PA

1

AG

TI1

BLI

S1

DO

ME

1

HO

OV

1

JOS

H1

LAV

O1

PIN

N1

RE

DW

1

SA

GA

1

SA

GO

1

YO

SE

1

Per

cen

t o

f D

eciv

iew

s A

chie

ved

Pacific Northwest California

See Spreadsheet Handout for Class I Area Resultsfor 20% Worst Days