Post on 18-Jan-2017
EXTERNCONFERENCE
4/11/2559Ext. Praetip Praikaew
Case scenario
ผปวยหญงไทยโสดอาย 16 ป นกเรยนชน มธยมศกษาปท 5
ขอเทาขวาพลกมา 1 ชม.
Primary survey◦ A Patent airway, no C-spine injury ◦ B Normal chest wall movement, normal breath sound
equal both lung, CCT- negative◦ C BP 124/71 mmHg, Capillary refill < 2 sec◦D E4V5M6, pupil 3 mm RTLBE ◦ E No external wound, tender at Rt. ankle
Secondary survey ◦ A no drug allergy ◦M no current medication ◦ P no underlying disease◦ L last meal 4.00 pm ◦ E ขอเทาขวาพลกมา 1 ชม
1 ชม.กอนมารพ. ขณะลงบนไดสะพานลอยหนาโรงเรยน พลดลนตกจากบนได 4 ขน เทาทงสองขางกระแทกพน รสกปวดขอเทาขวาทนทจนตองนงลง ผปวยพยายามลกขนเดนแตเดนไมไหว เพราะปวดขอเทามาก ไมมศรษะกระแทกพน ไมหมดสต
Secondary surveyHead to Toe examination Vital sign BP 124/71 mmHg, P 84 bpm, RR 20 /min, T 36.2 ºC
SpO2 99 %HEENT not pale conjunctivae, anicteric scleraHeart normal s1s2, no murmur Lung normal breath sound equal both lung, no
adventitious sound Abdomen soft, not tender
Secondary survey Extremities Affected part (Rt. foot) :
abrasion wound 1x3 cm above Rt. ankle marked swelling and tender at medial and lateral
malleolus limit ROM of Rt.ankle due to pain intact PPS DPA and PTA – 2+ capillary refill < 2 sec
Secondary survey
Adjunctive to secondary survey
Film Rt.ankle AP, Lateral, Mortise
AP view
Lateralview
Mortise view
Diagnosis?Closed Bimalleolar Fracture of Rt. ankle
Management at ER◦Pain control◦ Immobilize : Posterior short leg slab◦Pre-op
NPO 5%D/N/2 1000 ml IV rate 80 ml/hr CBC, Anti HIV CXR Cefazolin 1 g to OR
AP view
Lateralview
Mortise view
Post-operative film
ANKLE FRACTURE
AnatomyThree bonesTibia FibulaTalus
Anatomy
Anatomy
Anatomy : Vascular
Cause Twisting or rotating the ankle Rotating the ankle Tripping or falling Impact during a car accident
*Common associated fracture : - 5th Metatarsal base fracture- Calcaneal fracture
Clinical manifestation Immediate and severe pain Swelling Bruise/ecchymosis Tender on palpation Inability to bear weight on the injured foot Deformity
Physical examination Inspection Palpation Neurovascular function
Special testRelated to sysdesmotic injuryAnterior drawer test Talar tilt Squeeze test External rotation stress test
Do not test if suspeted fracture!
Special test Anterior drawer test Talar tilt Squeeze test External rotation stress test
Special test Anterior drawer test Talar tilt Squeeze test External rotation stress test
Special test Anterior drawer test Talar tilt Squeeze test External rotation stress test
Special test Anterior drawer test Talar tilt Squeeze test External rotation stress test
Mechanism◦Lauge-Hansen
◦ based on foot position and force of applied stress/force◦ has been shown to predict the observed (via MRI)
ligamentous injury in less than 50% of operatively treated fractures
Lauge-Hansen Class Sequence
Supination - Adduction (SA) 1.Talofibular sprain or distal fibular avulsion2.Vertical medial malleolus and impaction of anteromedial distal tibia
Supination - External Rotation (SER) 1.Anterior tibiofibular ligament sprain2.Lateral short oblique fibula fracture (anteroinferior to posterosuperior)3.Posterior tibiofibular ligament rupture or avulsion of posterior malleolus4.Medial malleolus transverse fracture or disruption of deltoid ligament
Pronation - Abduction (PA) 1.Medial malleolus transverse fracture or disruption of deltoid ligament 2.Anterior tibiofibular ligament sprain3.Transverse comminuted fracture of the fibula above the level of the syndesmosis
Pronation - External Rotation (PER)
1.Medial malleolus transverse fracture or disruption of deltoid ligament 2.Anterior tibiofibular ligament disruption3.Lateral short oblique or spiral fracture of fibula (anterosuperior to posteroinferior) above the level of the joint4.Posterior tibiofibular ligament rupture or avulsion of posterior malleolus
Ottawa ankle rulePatient should have plain films if there is malleolar tenderness and at least one of following
Tenderness along the posterior surface of the distal fibula or tibia
Inability to walk with weight-baring after trauma
PEARLS/PITFALLS◦ The Ottawa ankle rule were derived to aid in the efficient use
of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries.◦ Rules have been prospectively validated on multiple
occasions in different populations and in both children and adults.
◦ Sensitivities for the Ottawa ankle rule range from the high 90%-100% range for “clinically significant” ankle and midfoot fractures. This is defined as a fracture or an avulsion greater than 3 mm.
◦ Specificities for the Ottawa ankle rule are approximately 41% for the ankle and 79% for the foot, though the rule is not designed/intended for specific diagnosis.
◦ The Ottawa ankle rule are useful in ruling out fracture (high sensitivity), but poor for ruling in fractures (many false positives).
Investigation◦ Plain films AP view Lateral view Mortise view
Radiographic measurement◦ AP view Tibiofibular overlapIf < 10 mm Syndesmotic injury Tibiofibular clear spaceIf > 5 mm Syndesmotic injury Talar tiltIf > 2 mm Abnormal
Radiographic measurement◦ AP view Talocrural angleIf > 75-87 ° or difference from opposite site > 3 ° Shortening
Radiographic measurement◦ Lateral view Posterior malleolus fracture Subluxation of the talus Angulation of distal fibula Talus fracture Associated injury - Calcaneous fracture- 5th metatarsal fracture
Radiographic measurement◦Mortise viewAbnormal finding Tibiofibular overlap < 1 mm Medial clear space widening > 4mm Lateral shift of talar
Classifications◦ Classification of distal fibular fracture level related to
syndesmosis ◦Weber classification
Mortise view
Treatment non-operative : short-leg walking cast/bootIndications◦ Isolated nondisplaced medial malleolus fracture or tip
avulsions◦ Isolated lateral malleolus fracture with < 3mm displacement
and no talar shift◦ Posterior malleolar fracture with < 25% joint involvement or
< 2mm step-off
Treatment Operative : ORIFindications •Any talar displacement •Displaced isolated medial malleolar fracture •Displaced isolated lateral malleolar fracture•Bimalleolar fracture and bimalleolar-equivalent fracture •Posterior malleolar fracture with >25 % or > 2 mm step- off •Open fractures
Complication
◦ Wound problems (4-5%)◦ Deep infections (1-2%) up to 20% in diabetic
patients◦ Post-traumatic arthritis
Thank you