PARCC RESULTS: Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District...COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL...

Post on 07-Aug-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of PARCC RESULTS: Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District...COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL...

Measuring College and Career Readiness

PARCC RESULTS:

Spring 2017 ADMINISTRATION

Matawan-AberdeenRegional School District

September 25, 2017

1

◼ 2017 marks the 3rd administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).

◼ Students took PARCC English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11.

◼ Students took PARCC Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

2

◼ Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations

◼ Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations

◼ Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations

◼ Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations

◼ Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

3

Students TestedMARSD

2016 to 2017 Variance

2015 State

2016 State

2017 State

2015 MARSD

2016 MARSD

2017 MARSD

Grade 3 95,932 99,846 100,007 280 264 283 19

Grade 4 94.484 97,620 101,358 248 278 263 15

Grade 5 95,293 96,449 99,447 242 251 285 34

Grade 6 93,128 97,546 98,357 233 233 262 29

Grade 7 87,300 93,114 96,096 216 225 228 3

Grade 8* 58,078 60,768 63,769 172 164 200 36

Algebra I 91,740 106,118 110,285 163 244 292 48

Algebra II 58,026 74,643 75,021 155 152 139 13

Geometry 71,137 84,589 88,141 120 205 238 33

TOTAL 745,118 810,693 832,481 1,829 2,016 2,190 174

COMPARISON OF STUDENTS TESTEDSPRING 2015 - SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATHEMATICS

4

Students TestedMARSD

2016 to 2017 Variance

2015 State 2016 State 2017 State 2015 MARSD

2016 MARSD

2017 MARSD

Grade 3 95,227 99,846 98,896 281 263 283 20

Grade 4 93,769 97,620 100,314 251 279 262 17

Grade 5 94,599 96,449 98,489 246 251 284 33

Grade 6 92,578 97,546 97,417 233 229 262 33

Grade 7 90,227 93,114 98,961 241 240 239 1

Grade 8 88,421 60,768 98,856 239 226 282 56

Grade 9 81,574 106,118 98,847 185 259 261 2

Grade 10 71,659 74,643 88,332 170 228 251 23

Grade 11 61,768 84,589 70,856 124 158 137 21

TOTAL 769,822 810,693 850,968 1,970 2,133 2,261 128

COMPARISON OF STUDENTS TESTEDSPRING 2015 - SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

5

COMPARISON OF NEW JERSEY’S SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

6

COMPARISON OF NEW JERSEY’S SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATHEMATICS

7

8

Math PARCC Performance

COMPARISON OF STATE VS. MARSDSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATHEMATICS

Grade Level MARSD Meeting/Exceeding

Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

STATEWIDEMeeting/Exceeding

Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

2017 2017

Grade 3 65.4% 52.5%

Grade 4 65.4% 47.3%

Grade 5 55.8% 46.2%

Grade 6 53.3% 43.6%

Grade 7 45.6% 39.6%

Grade 8* 57.5% 27.7%

Algebra I 56.8% 41.4%

Algebra II 41.0% 26.6%

Geometry 39.9% 29.7%

9

10

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Meeting/Exceeding Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

3 3.0 5.3 2.1 9.0 7.2 8.8 21.6 17.4 23.7 50.3 45.8 41.0 15.7 24.2 24.4 66% 70% 65%

4 1.0 3.2 5.7 14.0 12.6 8.4 28.0 27.3 20.5 49.0 48.6 54.8 7.0 8.3 10.6 56% 57% 65%

5 3.0 2.8 3.5 14.0 12.4 13.0 27.0 26.3 27.7 44.0 45.4 48.1 12.0 13.1 7.7 56% 59% 56%

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSMATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES

11

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Meeting/Exceeding Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

6 1.0 3.4 3.4 16.0 16.4 17.2 28.0 31.9 26.3 44.0 40.1 40.1 11.0 8.2 13.0 55% 48% 53%

7 4.0 4.4 3.9 12.0 13.8 13.2 30.0 34.7 37.3 52.0 42.7 39.9 2.0 4.4 5.7 54% 47% 46%

8 10.0 6.7 11.5 21.0 11.6 9.0 32.0 26.2 22.0 37.0 54.9 53.5 1.0 0.6 4.0 38% 56% 58%

MS ALG 1

0 2 0 0 0 0 7 4 1 79 78 79 15 16 20 93% 94% 99%

MS GEO

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 38 7 79 63 94 100% 100% 100%

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSMATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES

12

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Meeting/Exceeding Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

HS ALG I

10.0 11.3 9.0 36.0 17.9 18.6 38.0 36.4 31.9 15.0 34.4 40.5 0 0 0 15% 35% 41%

HSGEO 7.0 3.9 4.5 23.0 24.3 18.4 38.0 43.1 41.3 32.0 28.2 35.4 0 0.6 0.5 32% 29% 36%

HSALG II

12.0 18.4 10.1 23.0 24.3 30.2 27.0 19.7 18.7 37.0 34.2 38.8 1.0 3.3 2.2 38% 38% 41%

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSMATHEMATICS - PERCENTAGES

HISPANIC or LATINO SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATH- PERCENTAGES

13

ASIAN SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATH- PERCENTAGES

14

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATH- PERCENTAGES

15

WHITE SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATH- PERCENTAGES

16

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATH- PERCENTAGES

17

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATH- PERCENTAGES

18

COHORT ANALYSISSPRING 2015, SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

MATHEMATICS- PERCENTAGES

19

ELA PARCC Performance

20

COMPARISON OF STATE VS. MARSDSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

English Language Arts

Grade Level MARSD Meeting/Exceeding

Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

STATEWIDEMeeting/Exceeding

Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

MARSD 2017 STATE 2017

Grade 3 67.5% 50.4%

Grade 4 63.7% 55.9%

Grade 5 68.7% 59%

Grade 6 69.1% 53.4%

Grade 7 64% 59.2%

Grade 8 74.5% 59.1%

Grade 9 61.7% 50.9%

Grade 10 57% 45.2%

Grade 11 63.5% 37.6%21

22

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN’s SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Meeting/Exceeding Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

3 7 8.4 4.6 12.3 6.5 7.4 20.7 19.4 20.5 46 48.3 51.9 13.3 17.5 15.5 59% 66% 68%

4 3 5.7 5.3 9.0 9.0 8.0 22.0 24.0 22.9 48.0 43.4 38.2 18.0 17.9 25.6 66% 61% 64%

5 4.0 2.8 1.4 13.0 12.7 9.2 23.0 25.1 20.8 53.0 51.4 52.5 8.0 8.0 16.2 61% 59% 69%

23

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN’s SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Meeting/Exceeding Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

6 5.0 4.4 4.6 11.0 15.7 8.8 21.0 22.3 17.6 49.0 42.4 46.2 14.0 15.3 22.9 64% 58% 69%

7 12.0 7.1 3.8 9.0 11.7 8.4 20.0 19.6 23.8 39.0 37.1 33.9 20.0 24.6 30.1 59% 62% 64%

8 5.0 6.2 6.4 11.0 8.8 7.1 24.0 23.9 12.1 39.0 42.5 42.9 20.0 18.6 31.6 59% 61% 75%

24

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN’s SPRING 2015, SPRING 2016, & SPRING 2017

PARCC ADMINISTRATIONSENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY - PERCENTAGES

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

Meeting/Exceeding Expectations (Levels 4 & 5)

Grade 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

9 6.0 7.0 7.7 16.0 8.5 11.9 24.0 23.3 18.8 44.0 43.0 42.1 11.0 18.2 19.5 55% 61% 62%

10 10.0 7.5 11.6 10.0 11.8 11.6 22.0 26.8 19.9 39.0 40.8 36.7 20.0 13.2 20.3 59% 54% 57%

11* 2.0 6.3 3.6 9.0 8.2 10.9 19.0 20.9 21.9 50.0 48.1 48.9 20.0 16.5 14.6 70% 65% 64%

*Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

HISPANIC or LATINO SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

25

ASIAN SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

26

BLACK or AFRICAN AMERICAN SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

27

WHITE SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

28

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

29

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES SUBGROUP ANALYSISSPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

30

COHORT ANALYSISSPRING 2015, SPRING 2016 AND SPRING 2017 PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/ LITERACY- PERCENTAGES

31

NJ ASK Science Results Grades 4 & 8

32

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT2016 & 2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

GRADE 4NJASK SCIENCE

Count of Valid Test

Scores

PartiallyProficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Proficient +Advanced

2016

Proficient +Advanced

2017*New 2014 Standards

Total Population 271 8.1 34.7 57.2 93% 92%

General Education 229 5.7 30.6 63.8 96% 94%

Students with Disabilities 38 18.4 57.9 23.7 77% 82%

White 161 1.9 32.9 65.2 95% 98%

Black or African American 34 23.5 38.2 38.2 98% 76%

Asian 30 3.3 16.7 80.0 100% 97%

Hispanic or Latino 41 22.0 48.8 29.3 88% 78%

Other4 25.0 75.0 0.0 78% 75%

Economically Disadvantaged Students

85 16.5 44.7 38.8 95% 8433

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT2016 & 2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

GRADE 8NJASK SCIENCE

Count of Valid Test

Scores

PartiallyProficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Proficient +Advanced

2016

Proficient +Advanced

2017*New 2014 Standards

Total Population 301 23.6 49.8 26.6 81% 76%

General Education 256 13.3 55.9 30.9 89% 87%

Students with Disabilities 44 81.8 15.9 2.3 33% 18%

White 190 15.8 52.6 31.6 86% 84%

Black or African American 43 41.9 51.2 7.0 75% 58%

Asian 19/12 10.5 36.8 52.6 100% 89%

Hispanic or Latino46 43.5 41.3 15.2 65% 57%

Economically Disadvantaged Students 78/33 38.5 44.9 16.7 72% 62%

34

35

NJ Bio Results

COMPARISON OF MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT2017 SPRING PARCC ADMINISTRATIONS

HIGH SCHOOLNJ BIOLOGY COMPETENCY EXAM

Count of Valid Test

Scores

PartiallyProficient

Proficient Advanced Proficient

Proficient +Advanced

2016

Proficient +Advanced

2017

Total Population 266 31.2 51.1 17.7 54% 69%

General Education 225 24.4 55.6 20.0 60% 76%

Students with Disabilities 37 73.0 21.6 5.4 13% 27%

LEP 9/3 33.3 55.6 11.1 100% 67%

White 152 21.7 58.6 19.7 63% 78%

Black or African American 50 52.0 42.0 6.0 40% 48%

Asian 17 11.8 52.9 35.3 45% 88%

Hispanic or Latino 44 50.0 31.8 18.2 45% 50%

Economically Disadvantaged Students 78 41.0 47.4 11.5 34% 59%

36

37

District Initiatives

C&I Goal # 1 - Increase Achievement for all Students - 2017-2018

Objective 1: Provide students with greater access to rigorous coursework with an emphasis on research and creative problem-solving

➔ Preschool Expansion to Full Day Inclusion model

➔ Updated curriculum guides to align with 2014/2016 NJ Student Learning Standards and revised QSAC curriculum indicators

➔ Aligned Star Assessment benchmarks to PARCC Proficiency levels (1-5)

➔ Adopted Literacy by Design - Grades 4 & 5

➔ Implementation of Defined STEM to support cross-content project-based learning

➔ Expanded “Sneak Peek” summer course offerings at MAMS

◆ Sneak Peek Honors English

◆ Sneak Peek Honors Mathematics

C&I Goal # 1 - Increase Achievement for all Students - 2017-2018

Objective 2: Develop and implement interventions for struggling students to ensure mastery of foundational / basic skills to reduce the number of students needing remediation later in their academic career.

Objective 2a: Provide time within the 2017-18 high school schedule to provide targeted academic supports for identified students in ELA and Math.➔ Formalized a tiered system of intervention supports and progress monitoring at the K-5

level ➔ Purchase of Achieve3000 for Title 1 students at Cliffwood and Lloyd Road ➔ Integration of Wilson Fundations into Preschool HighScope Curriculum➔ Adoption of Wilson Fundations for grades K & 1 ➔ Expanded Summer Literacy Program

◆ 118 K-5 Students (10 homerooms + 3 Push-in Literacy Interventionists)➔ Implemented a Summer Algebra Readiness Program for rising high school students

entering Algebra 1➔ Developed new Foundational ELA and Math Courses at MRHS for 2017-18

◆ Purchased Achieve3000 Differentiated Literacy Solutions for MRHS for 17-18

C&I Goal # 1 - Increase Achievement for all students 2017-2018

Objective 4: Provide all students with 21st Century College & Career Technical Education and transition opportunities

Objective 4a: Develop and implement programs to foster the social and emotional development of all students.

➔ Expand partnerships with local colleges and universities➔ Implementation of Positive Behavioral Supports (PBS)- Prek-12

Objective 4b: Research and plan the implementation of an Early College High School program for implementation in 2018-2019 designed to provide students the opportunity to receive a high school diploma and an associate degree, by taking a mixture of high school and college classes in a small class size learning environment in partnership with Brookdale

C&I Goal 2 - Develop and Implement Targeted Professional Development for Prek-12 Teachers - 2017-2018

Objective 5: Provide targeted professional development focused on literacy and math intervention strategies/programs to support students in the areas of reading comprehension, writing, phonics, phonemic awareness, sight word recognition, and vocabulary.

◆ Lindamood Bell - Visualizing and Verbalizing◆ Orton Gillingham◆ Wilson Reading ◆ Fundations (K&1)◆ Sheltered English Instruction (SIOP)◆ HighScope Preschool Training◆ Achieve3000 Literacy Differentiation (9/5)

42

THANK YOU!