Post on 27-Jan-2015
description
phot
o cr
edit:
like
your
hand
le o
n fli
ckr.c
om
Challenges and opportunities in mobile site delivery in higher and secondary education
ON YOUR MARK,GET SET,
MOBILE
Monday, October 24, 2011
After the presentation
doug.gapinski@mstoner.com
Download this presentation:
clients.mstoner.com/highedweb11/doug
The backchannel:
Doug Gapinski Tiffany Broadbent
#heweb11
@thedougco
tlbroa@wm.edu
Talk to us:
@tb623
#tnt8
Monday, October 24, 2011
College of William & Mary mobile site(built internally)
Monday, October 24, 2011
m.trincoll.edu m.uic.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
Challenges and Opportunities
I. The mobile opportunityII. The content challengeIII. The design opportunityIV. The coding challengeV. The measurement opportunity
Monday, October 24, 2011
THE MOBILE OPPORTUNITY
phot
o cr
edit:
Eric
Laf
four
ge o
n tw
itter
Monday, October 24, 2011
Mobile technology ishelping people
find what they need,wherever they are,when they need it.
Monday, October 24, 2011
source: http://www.slideshare.net/kleinerperkins/kpcb-top-10-mobile-trends-
feb-2011
Sale of smartphonesand tablets has eclipsed
the sale of desktop computers in Q4 2010
Monday, October 24, 2011
~9% of institutions of higher ed have mobile
~91% don’t higher ed don’t have mobile
source: dmolsen.com
Monday, October 24, 2011
Mobile includes things you’re already
good at:
StrategyDesignContent
Technology
Monday, October 24, 2011
What has growth looked like for m.wm.edu?
m.wm.edu launch in August, 24 2010 to now
• 129,094 visits visits
• 106,101 unique visitors
• ~1 minute average stay on the site
• 2.31 page views on average
• September 2011 saw a 79% increase
in mobile traffic over Sept 2010
m.wm.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
m.wm.edu launch in August 2010
to October 2010
• 37% iPhone (+6% from December 2010)
• 11% iPod (-4%)
• 31% Android (+2%)
• 7% Blackberry (-4%)
• 1% other mobile platforms
• 13% desktop computers
m.wm.edu
Platform statistics for m.wm.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
How does that compare to main site traffic?
wm.edu
Main site traffic
August 2010 to
mid-October 2011
• 8,175,000+ visits
• 2,500,000+ unique visitors
Mobile device visits
to www.wm.edu
• 9/2009 - <0.1% of total traffic
• 9/2010 - 2%
• 9/2011 - 5%
Mobile site is the 2nd largest
traffic source to the main
site (after Google) from
mobile devices.
Monday, October 24, 2011
phot
o cr
edit:
m
ike
rohd
e on
flic
kr.c
om
THE CONTENTCHALLENGE
Monday, October 24, 2011
source: w3.org
Best practices for mobile page content according to the WC3
...suitable.
Ensure that content
is suitable for use in
a mobile context.
...clear.
Use clear and
simple language.
... an appropriate
length.
Limit content to
what the user has
requested.
Mobile page content should be...
Monday, October 24, 2011
APPS SITESvs.
Monday, October 24, 2011
Immersion of mobile apps
Immediacy of mobile sites
•no special download required
•best suited for transactional and
timely content
• probably the first place “casual”
users will look
• more robust interactive possibilities
(games, utilities, etc.)
• files stored on phone
• probably better suited for “diehard” users
who will seek it out or take the time to
download
•cannot provide robust
interactive experiences
•bandwidth limited by both phone
and current network
•unless there is a reason to check
back, unlikely to see repeat visits
• special download needed
• multiple apps required for different
platforms (iPhone, Android, etc.)
• casual users such as the “new prospective
student” unlikely to seek it or take time to
download
PRO
SC
ON
S
Monday, October 24, 2011
DRESS THE GRIFFIN APP
“Pants problem solved.”
Monday, October 24, 2011
iOS downloads: 5,000 Android downloads: 2,750As of October 2011:
Monday, October 24, 2011
Keep it simple: College of William & Mary’s content strategy
Monday, October 24, 2011
Timely information via RSS
News RSS Athletics RSS &@TribeAthletics
Alumni news RSS
m.wm.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
William & Mary branding content via RSS
Ideation stories RSS Student Blogs RSSFlickr RSS
m.wm.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
YouTube RSS Twitter RSS Foursquare mobile
Social media via RSS and links
m.wm.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
Utility basics
m.wm.edu
Maps via Google
Basic Facts & Links
Campus directorysearch
Full website search
Monday, October 24, 2011
Responsive design: the simplest content is to keep it the same
nd.edu luc.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
Prospective students’ mobile site: FIT’s content strategy
masthead >
task navigation >
gateways and
announcements
for everyone
prospective
student
information
>
>
secondary
information
for broad
audiences
>
Monday, October 24, 2011
Multiple publishing targets
Multiple publishing targets allows you to manage
media like tagged galleries on both sites at once.
Opentext CMSFIT main site galleries
FIT mobile site galleries
Monday, October 24, 2011
A vast majority
of this content
works for both
prospective students
and for current
audiences.
It’s like stripping
the behemoth
of a main university
site down to the
most useful information
and utility.
Pulling back from the maze
m.trincoll.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
THE DESIGNOPPORTUNITY
phot
o cr
edit:
ah
hyea
h on
flic
kr.c
om
Monday, October 24, 2011
source: w3.org
It’s all still HTML
and CSS.
It’s just smaller.
What you know
about html applies,
but it needs to be
adjusted for size.
Color still needs
to be compliant.
Use an HTML
color–checking site
to ensure your
designs are
compliant.
Descriptive links
begin or end every
page.
People will look at
the top or bottom;
and the user needs
to understand what
they are getting.
Good news: many of the same best practices
for web design still apply for mobile web design.
Monday, October 24, 2011
source: w3.org
Avoid very small
clickable areas.
Keep anything
clickable above
30–40 pixels in size
because people use
their fingers as the
interface.
Avoid large
images.
Counting on a
mobile browser to
size images down
means the visitor
will be waiting.
Be ready to serve
a text-only mode.
Avoid image-centric
pages.
What to avoid: there are some things
that simply don’t work in mobile design.
Monday, October 24, 2011
How College of William & Mary approached design
Monday, October 24, 2011
How College of William & Mary approached design
Monday, October 24, 2011
Design opportunity: integrate with the main site
Monday, October 24, 2011
Design opportunity: big type works for mobile—
and it happens to be in vogue on the internet
m.usc.edu m.oregonstate.edu
Monday, October 24, 2011
phot
o cr
edit:
D
J Lei
n on
flic
kr
Design opportunity: do usability tests
1) Assign critical tasks
2) Open-ended feedback
3) Comparative feedback
Also: listen to your
audiences post-launch.
Monday, October 24, 2011
Design opportunity: don’t depend on web fonts to work correctly,
but understand support is increasing (iOS 5 supports web fonts)
blog.typekit.com
zeldman.com
Monday, October 24, 2011
THE CODINGCHALLENGE
Monday, October 24, 2011
A few best practices in coding for mobile
Standards-based
code
Follow standards-
based coding
practices.
Keep it simple
Eliminate any line
of code that isn’t
absolutely
necessary.
Optimization
Utilize tools like
YSlow (from Yahoo)
or Page Speed to
determine where to
improve code.
Good standards-based coding practices for regular websites are even
more important for mobile, since your bandwidth is even more limited.
Monday, October 24, 2011
Technical tricks
Use the viewport meta tag to control device zoom
Include browser detection to offer different layouts
HTML5 form input types date, tel, email and url
invoke the appropriate virtual keyboard on many devices
link target tel:1115551234 opens the number in the
phone application on iOS and Android
Monday, October 24, 2011
sourceforge.net/projects/mitmobileweb/
Coding resource: MIT open source web framework
Monday, October 24, 2011
mobilewebosp.pbworks.com
Coding resource: Mobile OSP
Monday, October 24, 2011
Recommended blog
dmolsen.comMonday, October 24, 2011
THEMEASUREMENTOPPORTUNITY
Monday, October 24, 2011
Tracking the types of mobile devices used to visit our site confirm
our decision to develop mobile content for a broad range of devices
(iPhone, iPod, iPad, Android, Blackberry)
Measuring traffic to the various content areas will be used to
prioritize future enhancements
William & Mary mobile: measuring and adjusting
Monday, October 24, 2011
William & Mary mobile: measuring and adjusting
14% Map
6% About
6% Athletics
5% Directory
4% News
0.6% Search
(added late Sept. 2011)
32% About/Admission/
Academics/Campus Life
6% Search
1.5% Athletics
Mobile content vs. main site content
Monday, October 24, 2011
Special event spikes
Specialized content for school-wide events
(commencement, orientation, homecoming)
and emergencies (hurricane evacuation).
Most popular content is event schedules.
Monday, October 24, 2011
What people
are not visiting:
0.74% Flickr
0.54% YouTube
0.48% Twitter
0.16% Facebook
The geography
puzzle:
Main site traffic from
on-campus = 33%
Mobile traffic from
on-campus= 11%
Williamsburg
main site: 42%
Williamsburg
mobile: 14%
William & Mary mobile: metric mysteries
! ?Monday, October 24, 2011
Remember that only 9% of higher ed institutions have mobile sites.
That means the future is about
YOUMonday, October 24, 2011
Thanks
doug.gapinski@mstoner.com
Download this presentation:
clients.mstoner.com/highedweb11/doug
The backchannel:
Doug Gapinski Tiffany Broadbent
#heweb11
@thedougco
tlbroa@wm.edu
Talk to us:
@tb623
#tnt8
Monday, October 24, 2011