RULES ' CE

Let Laguna Vote1960 Glenneyre St Laguna Beaf ,. CA 92651ZI 0C 2-9 P 15

December 18, 2014

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission /Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

In response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's request for comment on Southern CaliforniaEdison's decommissioning plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, in the last 20 dayswe have gathered the signatures of 487 people, mostly residents of Laguna Beach, on a letter askingthat the spent nuclear fuel on the site be moved to a secure location as soon as possible (seeattached letters). In addition we have collected 383 signatures on an online petition. You can viewthe petition at www.LetLagunaVote.com

The City of Laguna Beach, CA is located in the 20 mile dead zone of the San Onofre Nuclear Powerplant. The Laguna Beach City Council passed a Resolution last night to address the gravity of anycareless handling and storage of this deadly waste (see attached Resolution).Laguna Beach city leaders and residents are concerned that an exposed site on an ocean bluff nearan interstate highway, adjacent to the train tracks where there is the risk of an accident due toearthquakes, tsunamis, fire, and terrorism, is no place to store highly radioactive materials for anindefinite period of time. We urge you to do everything you can working the relevant agencies, tomake sure this nuclear waste is moved to a safe interim repository rather than remaining in placeuntil a permanent repository is identified.

Sincerely,

Rita ConnChairperson, Let Laguna Vote

www.LetLagunaVote.com

Ph 949-497-5148

RULKO-f KKX i" %-WTIVES

MU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Ne

Sign U

Email address

KU Lx.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey . ':Office of Administration, NRC ___ KC 9- 5 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RP- 7

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Emailk ef t.)sEmail address

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey znlt : 29 Pu ,.5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFr-f!, /,R0

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

PL.4- -]t, (5Print Name

Sign

Email address

RULES Dr ; RyEC IVES

2 14OT~ 2D 9 F~ M,4: 5 5

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFC rVPFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Email addressCr4'~ch) I 01U4

RU LL-', A'* t1 L -iRLCIVES

7Oq1A 2, R1, 155

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R FC'\EAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Email address

RULES Nd\U I C•-C.SBIPANJCH

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?UI' n 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFCH\, FlVAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

IA' J'd SPrint Name•

Sign

Emai address

RU7 L LE 6`- i ,.,.! L,,7 •uCTVE S

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 701 29 Pt'l 4: 55Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R . VEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Email address

RULES !-o.. 1i.,ECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 10Dr 29 Pil 41: 55Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF2F1\1-V\EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Emailaddress ,]

RULE5:.,.. liVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 00JJ flFC29 PI:l q:

Office of Administration, NRC

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, F '

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Narme--

Sign

Email address.

RULEL , C IVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20Ui1 C55•9Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name-,

Email address

RULES ,A,. UElrUTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 0L! [1V0C 29 PH 4I: 55Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF C R ", F D\ /! D-- / D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

a•, a

61ail ddU

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R ULE 9 +CT iV E Sd 'n

201 HC 2 9 Nr 5: 55

RFCEI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print lamn_

Sign/ .

f

Email adff

RULE . , -' 3h iES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 501L• f 9 ?Vi 14:5

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R FI\/!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Email address

RULES Ai C TIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 EC 29 9 : 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R F F !\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign.

Email address

RULES ,,!D b!FIICTiVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC "U1'4 GEC 22 P•1 t: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, 'QF( -\!KD

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

EmaildEmail address -

RUL i-l- /-S

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, ,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

E iladdress

RULES AIJ' ,CTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC NA rg•{ 2° p[j LI: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R-7!\

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print e

Si ld

Email address

HU ; L I''_ ES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 K C 2)? On' R: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Namess

SigF

Email address

RULES F~UU~IVE~

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC d, PC 2 9 P•= V 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, REOF,, F -,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print 'me

Si l I

4AJ~qa6ixý?AAbi1/ (o AllEmail address

RULES -' .. ., i ; F1!- , TIVES-'H

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 LDEC 29? P' " 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFC..I\/FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration.activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Nam

Sign

Email address

RULE, C! L.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC " 1LC2 , P• L: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, FC:F\/FD

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

/ffS p i n t, e '

/

RULES /\N"L); ?CTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 4,114 DEC 2-9 P 5 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, Ra'CFI,/-D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Email address

RULES /-)D-RIECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2• f• 9 0PI C F : 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, fj3 f- - '

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Printý,m,/

Sign AEmail address

R U ,L , 1.1.0-nL , T 1t VEO

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 07- 292 9 •Y 4: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R--.i-\

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name

Sign

Email address

RULES - 7"CTE-

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701 DIT 229 Pil f: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFCH\/W-RP- N-ED

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Pri t Name

Sign

Email address .

RULES •• RIECTIIES

NOI

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 9P.'R 14: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF-__\, --

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Print Name I

Sign d'

Email address

RUL/,; ;t °,•CTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .9 . "'l 56Office of Administration, NRC r 7 9 r 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, \F. 'F \/FD

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to 'climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

1"-. aa- 60rc-(:ý &Name

Street Address

City 5 State

RULES/,N LE DRECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC C • 29 Y f 1 L-: 56

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R F F IVF-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincer ly,

Name

CiStreet Address

RULES i 'ECTIVES*YANF-i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC •i7 'C 9 P' LI: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R1F2 IVF\FD

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Str dres

City State

RULES ii,, Q)iKC-TIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Kit5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 4: 56Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R\ nAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

City State

RULL E L, . L'

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7:Office of Administration, NRC ..... 5 ' " 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,F, -,1 ,'!D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sir , e•

Street Address r

City ctt4

RULES £;,3 L),RLlVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey rlrc- 29 114 q4: 56Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, rmF.. v\!--nAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name 9

Street Address

City-'3 State

RULES ) /,-ýJ DBECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201Q 5 C 29 PIN 14: 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R F-. IV.. .D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name U

Street Addres,

5 •/'•JState

RULES /,',;:J V mTjE

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey T4,: 57Office of Administration, NRC 14 29 F 5

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

City 'State

RULES ,-, - VES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 271•- r 2 ; Li-57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RN 2.. \/!=DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

~4-Cw, 'kCCccý CACity SState

RULE; i 1 K2OTLVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201'i 0Z1 29 FM V-: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFO; t\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

Cit9-J State

RULLP). bKH7CHVE

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 9. N 5 7Office of Administration, NRC Lu. L-: 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF- C-....

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

9( 2-- tALD6P 11VStreet Address

City State

RUL1 A.. L...I CTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 _ 29 PH LI: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFO -\/ED

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name 5l

Street Addr,-

LdL~ v~f~tCity State

RIJULES -. CTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Z_01 F' 2 9 P. N .- 5 7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, rF-,-!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

. ý K VýJ- ob' m nn v IStreet Address

Cit VCity State

vk

HU~lS ~+CTI E

2014 FTýE 29 R1 V: 57

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF.2. F-\!FD©As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as lonWas the spent fuel rods remain there.

Street Address

CityCSA- te 124e5State

RULS K) L) ýECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111 OFT, 29 P1 4I: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R [ F\/.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

A Y- -Name

Street Address

city 1ý'State

RULES , TIV.,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 V 9 el q: 5 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF-i'i\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Street Address

Stv 91Q30 CA qZto1City State

RULES 011 ,,ECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20tl11 [EC 29 RI : 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, F F(7,..\.. ..

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

NameIZ (ý o C- lkvStreet Address

5 '-) & 1~City State

RULES i u.L !3•uLTVESR U L E , v. s.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70LI.V 9 pj L: S7Office of Administration, NRC

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, I

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

L 71D C I coStreet Address

City State 61--ýCity State

RULES .. T.- /

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20N• 219 Nil L1 57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RiF--, /ED

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

S ee

City State

HUIL; i( SlvE

2014 OrC90 Pl~ 57

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFC~F~1N I T

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

~4~eA4c4Name QJ "

Street Address

City IState

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FRULL5! _ CToE

oO'~v: 2p ~ 57

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

ýghzcol R elSrme

Street Addres4b

Cit IState

RULES fi i) I-.,TI' VES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20lN BEC 29 PH 4: 5 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R[FC NVEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address(

City') State

FIU..:- .,,7 .L i :-i:TiVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20t14 D 2 V : 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, _

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

it Address

City State •

ULB) Ah. L;:ETJIVESRULS . L ' 11 57

201Iq RI ,"C 2 9 5i Li7U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFC7R/~DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

MCPVMX \kcýName

S\!WQe ~Street Address

CitycA C Zos

State

RULES /%.:`D L /- S

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Mt[Lj P'- 9,) ?• L-, 57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R FOrF1 D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

City State

RULE.'i- DF,"CTIVESN•CH

. C2 9 P M, 57

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, D E EI HI. \ .r

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

6R 6im 10- --- ý16( mhjýýIName

~i yStreet Address

city ttAo'd (0

ýtate

7 0i 13K D 2 E ~ C1 F 4: 5 7

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R F-- r.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

-1.A P

A

Name . I

CityCA 5Z(6 T I

State

FU L L, L) I) I 1Q, E CF71 E S

20flU7C 29 F,% LI: 57U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RrFCF,-t\,'WAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

f-11,01:11T44tý'e-- - ' '

770 t() A

5SrtAddress

ity State

RU - .

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission . , -. 57Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

1 cAName

Street Address

Cit SatCity State

RULES i", li-.ECIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70N DEC 29 PH 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, REOF', /FD

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

, CName

I-`S-6 0Street Address

City State

H ULE7 E ,N LTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC lit4 ri F9 r; Li: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF FC F• E/As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Nam4

Street Address)

City "t St-cAcity ' State

RULES PV..ii" -

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey "Office of Administration, NRC 2014 '.•C 29 1:Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R F F FQIV )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

ýýwvjC-ACity SState

RULES /\AiD LW::!ECIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70,1l1 KEC 29 PM 1-: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R FCF.I\!D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

SincereK;),

6y/

HULLS) .

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2Oi- Fi"- 29 I'I : 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,Dl,(" \ Q \1

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincer y,

Name

Street Address

t -State/

Ru .F -. '.f , 11-

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2OVT DEC 29 PHi 4: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, FCF- - D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

LA676ro& PCH CA 2sCity State

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20YH F-P" 1 i: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, 'i9 .\ D- :-, , ....! V , 1 ... )

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

trlee A

q ty State

RULLS iD UF.U:ECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC L2 - "K '7; ,U i: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R .. H\V'D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Andrs

Cityi State

RULE" L., CTNES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC %O!4 L 29 4u: 58

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RVC>H ,_.,D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Naii t-

Street Address

-Ci •State

RULE• ,, v--

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70f4 D_ C 2 (1) PN 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, ... i'!./V'.

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely Stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincere

Name

Street Address

City State

RULES ,S J 'F.j-E.fIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 C 29 P0 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, REQ FC..E./ )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SON S as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Si 6ce y,

ree dres

ty State

RULESYi,, Di:iCTVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC u Z9 L: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF2V'c \/1FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

ame

Street Address

City I State

RULE

2T1 2 Pl !': 5

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, FlZQ) FEA IVF.)

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

D6I ell71 ~~5-)< I/oName

Street Address

CiLt "3a C StatCitJ State

RULES -I L I . tVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 2,1, 2 9 4 -: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, F --IVFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted n-site-restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison si le for safety and securityat SONGS as long as ths spt fuel rods re ee.

Name/ . "

Street Address €••

City •Statep& •,

RULES e.-,;.. J ; ii.• -,-! TV S

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C,> 1 0, IN Ll

Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

tret Address

City State

HU L- A -, - C-,-, S

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 79iq TT 2 1? PM 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF .'.\/ D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Name

Address

Cty State" C.-

City State

.( ' . - , ' • r ,i rRULE ,) L.1,;-ECTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey t HC 22 i~I : 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, F I F I\/D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

*ame

Street Address \ IC-

city :7'State

RULE 1Ji,, ii.'. CT1/ES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 PU L: 58Office of Administration, NRC [C P 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF Fr--- 1V- )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; a (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SON long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sinc r y,

4ame

q2j(), (j,0,0V6W VAStreet Address .

City State

RULES A,•",I E DiTnVt -

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Fil LIP. 5Office of Administration, NRC - i,' 79 Pu L.: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, ,Fr' \11D

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Stre

Street Address

city/ State"

RULK S~LRCIE

2011, IEC 219 10d 4: 591

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF(.f'!V!FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

et ddress

City SttState

LULESý I\ I CVIES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 701"G' DEC 9_9 P'i 4: 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Stree 7 Adre jStreet Address

Keg ( M- 190(Q3City State

%UL , ,.`mCT1 ESRULES • it.'.•i i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 PHOffice of Administration, NRC 2 O 21 F 41: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFC "\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people Of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for.safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

-?-- -- --0 ="&4 --. 1

Street Address

State

HULE ,L . \Lb

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Q9-:5

Office of Administration, NRC 29 P0 4: 5/Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF 1V\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as. soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

City State

hULW id u E IJECTIVESI• ,.',/ , • -.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ?9 NO LV 59Office of Administration, NRC LIt _:Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, r F .

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name J

Street Address

City State

RULE'U'f!(ii

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701A C 29 PO 4, 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Namer-

Street Address

Ci Stae

HULEL , 'VES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2011 'E'"C 9 R-1 4j: 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, . .....

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

C642tS7city State

RULES . " 'LC""-iE

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 270q DEC 2 9 Pti 4: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RFCrFI\/!-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

L,12 . 4City State

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RULES piUTI\!ES

254 F 29 Pjl 4: 59

REOH ,F ý V/F.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

6/ 1 fM41?A1Name

Street Address

ý_,q 1 U OA K;74City State

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 99 t. 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its, spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated inarecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

City J State

RULE ' b-U ICTIVES

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7011L L 2I,Office of Administration, NRC

Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF -i....\/ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street dress

ity State

R!,- J JNE

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 Y ?- / P9 ', 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, F7 E--!\V)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

city XState

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC '/Jlf 5¶Nl 29 Pi1 L_: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, R F. -D,!, _

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If.there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,.

Name.)

Sleet Address

City State

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2_Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, _-

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

Name

Street Address

City State

RULES ;~ TVIES'

7 0 4 0 D2'2 29 P H LI: 591U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

RVCFV/WDear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

CA/

Name

Street Ad ss

i4ty

TP hA J-,1 ýý <

N

State '

BULEi5 "&T.. ".. .. SR L _ ,_ ,t % , ý ' [ -' 'L. I , C ý_.

U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey R, Q- 55Office of Administration, NRC - 2 ? ; : 55Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners, RF""I\/Fi)

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.

It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.

The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.

I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.

Sincerely,

(iIe~hfl mq'12ýe,&

Sign

Elail address