Let Laguna Vote - NRC: Home PageLet Laguna Vote 1960 Glenneyre St Laguna Beaf ,. CA ZI 0C 926512-9 P...
Transcript of Let Laguna Vote - NRC: Home PageLet Laguna Vote 1960 Glenneyre St Laguna Beaf ,. CA ZI 0C 926512-9 P...
RULES ' CE
Let Laguna Vote1960 Glenneyre St Laguna Beaf ,. CA 92651ZI 0C 2-9 P 15
December 18, 2014
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission /Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
In response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's request for comment on Southern CaliforniaEdison's decommissioning plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, in the last 20 dayswe have gathered the signatures of 487 people, mostly residents of Laguna Beach, on a letter askingthat the spent nuclear fuel on the site be moved to a secure location as soon as possible (seeattached letters). In addition we have collected 383 signatures on an online petition. You can viewthe petition at www.LetLagunaVote.com
The City of Laguna Beach, CA is located in the 20 mile dead zone of the San Onofre Nuclear Powerplant. The Laguna Beach City Council passed a Resolution last night to address the gravity of anycareless handling and storage of this deadly waste (see attached Resolution).Laguna Beach city leaders and residents are concerned that an exposed site on an ocean bluff nearan interstate highway, adjacent to the train tracks where there is the risk of an accident due toearthquakes, tsunamis, fire, and terrorism, is no place to store highly radioactive materials for anindefinite period of time. We urge you to do everything you can working the relevant agencies, tomake sure this nuclear waste is moved to a safe interim repository rather than remaining in placeuntil a permanent repository is identified.
Sincerely,
Rita ConnChairperson, Let Laguna Vote
www.LetLagunaVote.com
Ph 949-497-5148
RULKO-f KKX i" %-WTIVES
MU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Ne
Sign U
Email address
KU Lx.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey . ':Office of Administration, NRC ___ KC 9- 5 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RP- 7
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Emailk ef t.)sEmail address
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey znlt : 29 Pu ,.5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFr-f!, /,R0
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
PL.4- -]t, (5Print Name
Sign
Email address
RULES Dr ; RyEC IVES
2 14OT~ 2D 9 F~ M,4: 5 5
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFC rVPFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Email addressCr4'~ch) I 01U4
RU LL-', A'* t1 L -iRLCIVES
7Oq1A 2, R1, 155
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R FC'\EAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Email address
RULES Nd\U I C•-C.SBIPANJCH
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?UI' n 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFCH\, FlVAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
IA' J'd SPrint Name•
Sign
Emai address
RU7 L LE 6`- i ,.,.! L,,7 •uCTVE S
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 701 29 Pt'l 4: 55Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R . VEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Email address
RULES !-o.. 1i.,ECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 10Dr 29 Pil 41: 55Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF2F1\1-V\EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Emailaddress ,]
RULE5:.,.. liVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 00JJ flFC29 PI:l q:
Office of Administration, NRC
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, F '
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Narme--
Sign
Email address.
RULEL , C IVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20Ui1 C55•9Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name-,
Email address
RULES ,A,. UElrUTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 0L! [1V0C 29 PH 4I: 55Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF C R ", F D\ /! D-- / D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
a•, a
61ail ddU
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ULE 9 +CT iV E Sd 'n
201 HC 2 9 Nr 5: 55
RFCEI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print lamn_
Sign/ .
f
Email adff
RULE . , -' 3h iES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 501L• f 9 ?Vi 14:5
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R FI\/!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Email address
RULES Ai C TIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 EC 29 9 : 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R F F !\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign.
Email address
RULES ,,!D b!FIICTiVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC "U1'4 GEC 22 P•1 t: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, 'QF( -\!KD
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
EmaildEmail address -
RUL i-l- /-S
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, ,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
E iladdress
RULES AIJ' ,CTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC NA rg•{ 2° p[j LI: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R-7!\
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print e
Si ld
Email address
HU ; L I''_ ES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 K C 2)? On' R: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Namess
SigF
Email address
RULES F~UU~IVE~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC d, PC 2 9 P•= V 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, REOF,, F -,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print 'me
Si l I
4AJ~qa6ixý?AAbi1/ (o AllEmail address
RULES -' .. ., i ; F1!- , TIVES-'H
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 LDEC 29? P' " 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFC..I\/FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration.activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Nam
Sign
Email address
RULE, C! L.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC " 1LC2 , P• L: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, FC:F\/FD
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
/ffS p i n t, e '
/
RULES /\N"L); ?CTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 4,114 DEC 2-9 P 5 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, Ra'CFI,/-D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Email address
RULES /-)D-RIECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2• f• 9 0PI C F : 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, fj3 f- - '
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Printý,m,/
Sign AEmail address
R U ,L , 1.1.0-nL , T 1t VEO
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 07- 292 9 •Y 4: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R--.i-\
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name
Sign
Email address
RULES - 7"CTE-
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701 DIT 229 Pil f: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFCH\/W-RP- N-ED
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Pri t Name
Sign
Email address .
RULES •• RIECTIIES
NOI
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 9P.'R 14: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF-__\, --
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Print Name I
Sign d'
Email address
RUL/,; ;t °,•CTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .9 . "'l 56Office of Administration, NRC r 7 9 r 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, \F. 'F \/FD
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to 'climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
1"-. aa- 60rc-(:ý &Name
Street Address
City 5 State
RULES/,N LE DRECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC C • 29 Y f 1 L-: 56
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R F F IVF-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincer ly,
Name
CiStreet Address
RULES i 'ECTIVES*YANF-i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC •i7 'C 9 P' LI: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R1F2 IVF\FD
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Str dres
City State
RULES ii,, Q)iKC-TIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Kit5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 4: 56Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R\ nAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
City State
RULL E L, . L'
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7:Office of Administration, NRC ..... 5 ' " 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,F, -,1 ,'!D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sir , e•
Street Address r
City ctt4
RULES £;,3 L),RLlVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey rlrc- 29 114 q4: 56Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, rmF.. v\!--nAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name 9
Street Address
City-'3 State
RULES ) /,-ýJ DBECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201Q 5 C 29 PIN 14: 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R F-. IV.. .D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name U
Street Addres,
5 •/'•JState
RULES /,',;:J V mTjE
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey T4,: 57Office of Administration, NRC 14 29 F 5
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
City 'State
RULES ,-, - VES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 271•- r 2 ; Li-57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RN 2.. \/!=DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
~4-Cw, 'kCCccý CACity SState
RULE; i 1 K2OTLVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201'i 0Z1 29 FM V-: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFO; t\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
Cit9-J State
RULLP). bKH7CHVE
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 9. N 5 7Office of Administration, NRC Lu. L-: 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF- C-....
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
9( 2-- tALD6P 11VStreet Address
City State
RUL1 A.. L...I CTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 _ 29 PH LI: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFO -\/ED
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name 5l
Street Addr,-
LdL~ v~f~tCity State
RIJULES -. CTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Z_01 F' 2 9 P. N .- 5 7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, rF-,-!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
. ý K VýJ- ob' m nn v IStreet Address
Cit VCity State
vk
HU~lS ~+CTI E
2014 FTýE 29 R1 V: 57
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF.2. F-\!FD©As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as lonWas the spent fuel rods remain there.
Street Address
CityCSA- te 124e5State
RULS K) L) ýECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111 OFT, 29 P1 4I: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R [ F\/.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
A Y- -Name
Street Address
city 1ý'State
RULES , TIV.,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 V 9 el q: 5 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF-i'i\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Street Address
Stv 91Q30 CA qZto1City State
RULES 011 ,,ECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20tl11 [EC 29 RI : 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, F F(7,..\.. ..
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
NameIZ (ý o C- lkvStreet Address
5 '-) & 1~City State
RULES i u.L !3•uLTVESR U L E , v. s.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70LI.V 9 pj L: S7Office of Administration, NRC
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, I
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
L 71D C I coStreet Address
City State 61--ýCity State
RULES .. T.- /
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20N• 219 Nil L1 57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RiF--, /ED
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
S ee
City State
HUIL; i( SlvE
2014 OrC90 Pl~ 57
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFC~F~1N I T
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
~4~eA4c4Name QJ "
Street Address
City IState
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FRULL5! _ CToE
oO'~v: 2p ~ 57
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
ýghzcol R elSrme
Street Addres4b
Cit IState
RULES fi i) I-.,TI' VES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20lN BEC 29 PH 4: 5 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R[FC NVEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address(
City') State
FIU..:- .,,7 .L i :-i:TiVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20t14 D 2 V : 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, _
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
it Address
City State •
ULB) Ah. L;:ETJIVESRULS . L ' 11 57
201Iq RI ,"C 2 9 5i Li7U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFC7R/~DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
MCPVMX \kcýName
S\!WQe ~Street Address
CitycA C Zos
State
RULES /%.:`D L /- S
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Mt[Lj P'- 9,) ?• L-, 57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R FOrF1 D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
City State
RULE.'i- DF,"CTIVESN•CH
. C2 9 P M, 57
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, D E EI HI. \ .r
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
6R 6im 10- --- ý16( mhjýýIName
~i yStreet Address
city ttAo'd (0
ýtate
7 0i 13K D 2 E ~ C1 F 4: 5 7
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R F-- r.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
-1.A P
A
Name . I
CityCA 5Z(6 T I
State
FU L L, L) I) I 1Q, E CF71 E S
20flU7C 29 F,% LI: 57U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RrFCF,-t\,'WAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
f-11,01:11T44tý'e-- - ' '
770 t() A
5SrtAddress
ity State
RU - .
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission . , -. 57Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
1 cAName
Street Address
Cit SatCity State
RULES i", li-.ECIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70N DEC 29 PH 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, REOF', /FD
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
, CName
I-`S-6 0Street Address
City State
H ULE7 E ,N LTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC lit4 ri F9 r; Li: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF FC F• E/As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Nam4
Street Address)
City "t St-cAcity ' State
RULES PV..ii" -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey "Office of Administration, NRC 2014 '.•C 29 1:Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R F F FQIV )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
ýýwvjC-ACity SState
RULES /\AiD LW::!ECIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70,1l1 KEC 29 PM 1-: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R FCF.I\!D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
SincereK;),
6y/
HULLS) .
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2Oi- Fi"- 29 I'I : 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,Dl,(" \ Q \1
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincer y,
Name
Street Address
t -State/
Ru .F -. '.f , 11-
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2OVT DEC 29 PHi 4: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, FCF- - D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
LA676ro& PCH CA 2sCity State
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20YH F-P" 1 i: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, 'i9 .\ D- :-, , ....! V , 1 ... )
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
trlee A
q ty State
RULLS iD UF.U:ECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC L2 - "K '7; ,U i: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R .. H\V'D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Andrs
Cityi State
RULE" L., CTNES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC %O!4 L 29 4u: 58
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RVC>H ,_.,D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Naii t-
Street Address
-Ci •State
RULE• ,, v--
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70f4 D_ C 2 (1) PN 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, ... i'!./V'.
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely Stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincere
Name
Street Address
City State
RULES ,S J 'F.j-E.fIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 C 29 P0 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, REQ FC..E./ )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SON S as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Si 6ce y,
ree dres
ty State
RULESYi,, Di:iCTVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC u Z9 L: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF2V'c \/1FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
ame
Street Address
City I State
RULE
2T1 2 Pl !': 5
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, FlZQ) FEA IVF.)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
D6I ell71 ~~5-)< I/oName
Street Address
CiLt "3a C StatCitJ State
RULES -I L I . tVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 2,1, 2 9 4 -: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, F --IVFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted n-site-restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison si le for safety and securityat SONGS as long as ths spt fuel rods re ee.
Name/ . "
Street Address €••
City •Statep& •,
RULES e.-,;.. J ; ii.• -,-! TV S
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C,> 1 0, IN Ll
Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
tret Address
City State
HU L- A -, - C-,-, S
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 79iq TT 2 1? PM 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF .'.\/ D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Name
Address
Cty State" C.-
City State
.( ' . - , ' • r ,i rRULE ,) L.1,;-ECTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey t HC 22 i~I : 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, F I F I\/D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
*ame
Street Address \ IC-
city :7'State
RULE 1Ji,, ii.'. CT1/ES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 PU L: 58Office of Administration, NRC [C P 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF Fr--- 1V- )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; a (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SON long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sinc r y,
4ame
q2j(), (j,0,0V6W VAStreet Address .
City State
RULES A,•",I E DiTnVt -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Fil LIP. 5Office of Administration, NRC - i,' 79 Pu L.: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, ,Fr' \11D
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Stre
Street Address
city/ State"
RULK S~LRCIE
2011, IEC 219 10d 4: 591
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF(.f'!V!FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
et ddress
City SttState
LULESý I\ I CVIES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 701"G' DEC 9_9 P'i 4: 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Stree 7 Adre jStreet Address
Keg ( M- 190(Q3City State
%UL , ,.`mCT1 ESRULES • it.'.•i i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 PHOffice of Administration, NRC 2 O 21 F 41: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFC "\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people Of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for.safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
-?-- -- --0 ="&4 --. 1
Street Address
State
HULE ,L . \Lb
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Q9-:5
Office of Administration, NRC 29 P0 4: 5/Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF 1V\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as. soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
City State
hULW id u E IJECTIVESI• ,.',/ , • -.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ?9 NO LV 59Office of Administration, NRC LIt _:Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, r F .
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name J
Street Address
City State
RULE'U'f!(ii
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701A C 29 PO 4, 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Namer-
Street Address
Ci Stae
HULEL , 'VES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2011 'E'"C 9 R-1 4j: 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, . .....
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
C642tS7city State
RULES . " 'LC""-iE
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 270q DEC 2 9 Pti 4: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RFCrFI\/!-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
L,12 . 4City State
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RULES piUTI\!ES
254 F 29 Pjl 4: 59
REOH ,F ý V/F.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
6/ 1 fM41?A1Name
Street Address
ý_,q 1 U OA K;74City State
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 99 t. 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its, spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated inarecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
City J State
RULE ' b-U ICTIVES
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7011L L 2I,Office of Administration, NRC
Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF -i....\/ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street dress
ity State
R!,- J JNE
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 Y ?- / P9 ', 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, F7 E--!\V)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
city XState
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC '/Jlf 5¶Nl 29 Pi1 L_: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, R F. -D,!, _
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If.there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,.
Name.)
Sleet Address
City State
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2_Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, _-
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
Name
Street Address
City State
RULES ;~ TVIES'
7 0 4 0 D2'2 29 P H LI: 591U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
RVCFV/WDear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
CA/
Name
Street Ad ss
i4ty
TP hA J-,1 ýý <
N
State '
BULEi5 "&T.. ".. .. SR L _ ,_ ,t % , ý ' [ -' 'L. I , C ý_.
U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey R, Q- 55Office of Administration, NRC - 2 ? ; : 55Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners, RF""I\/Fi)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.
The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Sincerely,
(iIe~hfl mq'12ýe,&
Sign
Elail address