Lauge Hansen Redone: A Cadaveric Study Revisiting …...

Post on 21-Apr-2018

220 views 2 download

Transcript of Lauge Hansen Redone: A Cadaveric Study Revisiting …...

Lauge Hansen Redone: A Cadaveric Study Revisiting the Original

Methodology

John Y. Kwon, Leah Gitajn, Phillip Walton, Timothy Miller, Edward K.

Rodriguez, Paul Appleton

Lauge Hansen Redone: A Cadaveric Study Revisiting the Original

Methodology

John Y. Kwon My disclosure is in the Final AOFAS Mobile App. I have no potential conflicts with this presentation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Also which logo do you want for the background on the slides?

Purpose

• To recreate Lauge-Hansen’s experiments for the supination external rotation (SER) mechanism

• To determine whether the predicted sequence of bony and soft-tissue injury are reproducible using his originally described methodology.

Methods • 10 fresh-frozen above knee

amputated specimens were utilized.

• The foot placed in position of neutral dorsiflexion, supination and axially loaded.

• External rotation was applied manually per Lauge-Hansen’s description until bony and/or soft-tissue injury occurred.

• Fluoroscopic images and anatomic dissection was performed.

Results • No specimen demonstrated

the complete sequence of predicted bony and soft-tissue injury pattern.

• Several specimens exhibited findings consistent with certain stages of the SER injury pattern

Oblique Fibula Fx & Deltoid Ligament Injury I

Results

Results

Discussion

• Strengths: - Protocol as described by Lauge-Hansen for his

supination external rotation experiments was strictly followed

Weakness: - Only tested SER mechanisms

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Do we want to list as such or say Limitations only?

Conclusion

• Loading cadaveric specimens with a SER mechanism utilizing a methodology similar to Lauge-Hansen’s original experiments does not reliably produce the complete predicted sequence of bony and soft-tissue injury.

• The Theory of Mental Association may explain the continued use of this classification system despite questions of validity.

11. DeSouza Dias L, Foerster TP. Traumatic lesions of the ankle joint. CORR 1974;100:219—24. 12. Stiehl, et al. Experimentally produced ankle fractures in autopsy specimens, CORR 1992 (285):244-9 13. Gardner et al. The ability of the Lauge-Hansen classification to predict ligament injury and mechanism in ankle fractures: an MRI study. JOT 2006;20:267-272 14. A novel methodology for the study of injury mechanism: ankle fracture analysis using injury videos posted on YouTube.com. Kwon JY, Chacko AT, Kadzielski JJ, Appleton PT, Rodriguez EK.J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Aug;24(8): 477-82 15. Correlation of AO and Lauge-Hansen classification systems for ankle fractures to the mechanism of injury. Rodriguez EK, Kwon JY, Herder LM, Appleton PT. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Nov;34(11):1516-20. 16. Lauge-Hansen classification of malleolar fractures. An assessment of the reproducibility in 118 cases. Nielsen JO, Dons-Jensen H, Sørensen HT. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990 Oct;61(5):385-7. 17. Observer variation in the Lauge-Hansen classification of ankle fractures. Precision improved by instruction. Rasmussen S, Madsen PV, Bennicke K. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Dec;64(6):693-4. 18. Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures. Thomsen NO, Overgaard S, Olsen LH, Hansen H, Nielsen ST. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jul;73(4):676-8. 19. Ankle fracture classification: an evaluation of three classification systems : Lauge-Hansen, A.O. and Broos-Bisschop. Alexandropoulos C, Tsourvakas S, Papachristos J, Tselios A, Soukouli P. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010 Aug;76(4):521-5. 20. Classification of ankle fractures: the Lauge-Hansen or AO system? Lindsjö U. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Oct;(199):12-6. 21. Aristotle, De Memoria et Reminiscentia, trans. H. Reid. 22. Examination of Hamilton's Philosophy, 2nd ed., p. 191

1. Fractures of the ankle. II. Combined experimental-surgical and experimental-roentgenologic investigations. LAUGE-HANSEN N. Arch Surg. 1950 May;60(5):957-85 2. Ligamentous ankle fractures; diagnosis and treatment. LAUGE-HANSEN N. Acta Chir Scand. 1949 Mar 23;97(6):544-50. 3.Fractures of the ankle. III. Genetic roentgenologic diagnosis of fractures of the ankle. LAUGE-HANSEN N. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1954 Mar;71(3):456-71. 4. Fractures of the ankle. IV. Clinical use of genetic roentgen diagnosis and genetic reduction. LAUGE-HANSEN N. AMA Arch Surg. 1952 Apr;64(4):488-500. 5. Fractures of the ankle. V. Pronation-dorsiflexion fracture. LAUGE-HANSEN N. AMA Arch Surg. 1953 Dec;67(6):813-20 6. Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Daly PJ, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Melton LJ, Ilstrup DM. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987 Oct;58(5):539-44. 7. Epidemiology of ankle fractures. A prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Jensen SL, Andresen BK, Mencke S, Nielsen PT.Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Feb;69(1):48-50. 8. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Feb;51(1):181-92. The Lauge Hansen classification of malleolar fractures. 9. Michelson et al. Ankle fractures: The Lauge-Hansen classification revisited. CORR 1997;345:198-205 10. A new interpretation of the mechanism of ankle fracture. Haraguchi N, Armiger RS. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):821-9.

REFERENCES