Include similar type of data for every window that has a DOE Logo on the bottom right cornerA => 6 or more HS also Grad. Info.AA => At Least 1B => At Lease 1C = > At Least 1

1

AAchievement Data

ttendance

Behavior

Course Marks

Accountability

DDemographic Data

2

Link to Various Reports – Recommend Print Link to Various Reports – Recommend Print a Copy of each (# 9, selected reports) for a Copy of each (# 9, selected reports) for your records. your records.

1. HSSRA Report - Early Childhood = Pick school > Hawaii State School Readiness Assessment

2. KMR Enrollment Counts by Grade.doc 3. MySchool = Enrollment Count for Subgroups > Go to your

school > School Status Report (individual school’s My School Page)

4. School Quality Survey (SQS)5. Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports6. NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind7. Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report 8. SSIR – School Status and Improvement Report 9. LDS – Longitudinal Data System

3

Sample Subgroup – DisadvantagedSample Subgroup – Disadvantaged Trend Profile Against State, School Trend Profile Against State, School

Example of file with both Chart and Table

1.Right CLICK on any chart2.Select OBJECT > Open3.Chart will open editable 4. spreadsheet5.Change data to reflect your schools information 6.Copy into your Dashboard Powerpoint

4

AAchievement Data

______

School Performance Dashboard Quarter ____

Principal: ___Data Coordinator: ___

School Name Here

5

Annual Yearly Progress Annual Yearly Progress ReportReport

6Accountability Resource Center >AYP & NCLB Status > NCLB Ind. TrackingFn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

Accountability

Complete once a year in first Quarter

% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

100

90

80

70

60

HSA Math

HSA Reading

The Way Forward – RTTT The Way Forward – RTTT TargetsTargets

Know your Know your TaTargrgetsets (Race to the Top)(Race to the Top)

64

75

85

64

80

95 95

97 97

100 100

85 85

90 90 90 90 90

8285

92 92

82

90

Graduation Rate

___ School’s Vision & ___ School’s Vision & Mission Mission

Vision:

8

Accountability

Mission:

Sample RHS Profile SY 2011-Sample RHS Profile SY 2011-20122012Enrollment: 1426 (Official Enrollment Count)

Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch: 580(40.67%)

Students in Special Education programs: 123 (8.63%)

Students with limited English proficiency: 118 (8.27%)

LDS – Longitudinal Data Systemor SSIR

– School Status and Improvement Report

9

DDemographic Data

School Profile SY 2011-School Profile SY 2011-20122012

Enrollment: __Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost

lunch: __(__%)Students in Special Education

programs: __(__%)Students with limited English

proficiency: __(__%)

Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports

10

DDemographic Data

Multi-year School Demographic Multi-year School Demographic ComparisonComparison

SY 09-10 SY 10-11 SY 11-12 % Change from last year

Enrollment __ __ __ -_ (-0.__%)

Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch

__ (_%) __ (_%) __ (_%) __ (_%)

Students in Special Education programs

__ (_%) __ (_%) __ (_%) -__ (-__%)

Students with limited English proficiency

__ (_%) __ (_%) __ (_%) -__ (-__%)

Retrieved (SSIR 2010, Retrieved 12/10/10)

(LDS, Retrieved 12/14/10)

(LDS, Retrieved 9/2011)

% change = [(SY11-12) –(SY10-11)] / (SY10-11)

DDemographic Data

School Accountability Trend Report11

Sample RH School Multiyear Sample RH School Multiyear Demographic Demographic ComparisonComparison

SY 09-10 SY 10-11 SY 11-12 % Change from last year

Enrollment 1385 1424 1417 -7 (-0.49%)

Students Receiving Free/Reduced-cost lunch

436(31.5%)

544 (38.2%)

609 (42.98%)

65 (11.9%)

Students in Special Education programs

135 (9.7%) 126 (8.8%)

121 (8.54%)

-5 (-4%)

Students with limited English proficiency

99 (7.1%) 130 (9.1%)

118 (8.33%)

-12 (-9.23%)

Retrieved (SSIR 2010, Retrieved 12/10/10)

(LDS, Retrieved 12/14/10)

(LDS, Retrieved 9/2011)

% change = [(SY11-12) –(SY10-11)] / (SY10-11)

School Accountability Trend Report

12

DDemographic Data

3 Year Enrollment By Grade 3 Year Enrollment By Grade

KMR Enrollment Counts by Grade 13

DDemographic Data

School Subgroup Profile School Subgroup Profile TrendsTrends

14

AAchievement Data

SY07-08 SY08-09 SY09-10 SY10-11 SY11-12Disadvantaged 26 29.5 31.5 38.2 43SPED 10.8 10.8 9.7 8.8 8.5ELL 7.3 11.1 7.1 9.1 8.3

To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

ARCH >Proficiency Math and ARCH >Proficiency Math and Reading > By Grade & YearReading > By Grade & Year

15Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By Grade and YearFn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

AAchievement Data

ARCH >Proficiency> Data Grid> By ARCH >Proficiency> Data Grid> By Grade – Proficiency LevelGrade – Proficiency Level

16

AAchievement Data

Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By Grade – Prof. LevelData Grid button > Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

ARCH >Proficiency> By Subgroup ARCH >Proficiency> By Subgroup & Year Gap Analysis & Year Gap Analysis

17Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By subgroup and YearFn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

AAchievement Data

18

ARCH >Proficiency> Data Grid>By ARCH >Proficiency> Data Grid>By Subgroup & YearSubgroup & YearA

Achievement Data

Accountability Resource Center >Proficiency> By subgroup – Prof. LevelData Grid button > Fn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

LDS – Math Proficiency of All LDS – Math Proficiency of All Students by QuarterStudents by Quarter

19

AAchievement Data

DS – Longitudinal Data System

Monitoring changes in targeted subject (Math). Indicating proficiency by Quarters. This example is showing that the MP is increasing and the DP is decreasing with each quarter

HSA % Proficient by Year & HSA % Proficient by Year & Content Content

Reading: SY 07-10: 58%Targets SY 10-12: 72%

Math Targets: SY 07-10: 46%SY 10-12: 64%

School Accountability Trends Reports20

AAchievement Data

HSA Trends for HSA Trends for (Disadvantaged) Subgroup (Disadvantaged) Subgroup by Year Databy Year DataReadingSY 2010-2011: 65%SY 2009-2010: 72%SY 2008-2009: 79%SY 2007-2008: 75% (NCLB School Report, retrieved 12/10/10)

Proficiency Objectives:

SY 07-10: 58%SY 10-11: 72%

(Current)

MathSY 2010-2011: 42%SY 2009-2010: 46%SY 2008-2009: 43%SY 2007-2008: 41% (NCLB School Report, retrieved 12/10/10)

Proficiency Objectives:

SY 07-10: 46%SY 10-11: 64%

(Current)(DOE memo “Hawaii State Assessment/Adequate Yearly Progress FACT SHEET - dated July 15, 2010)

Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports21

AAchievement Data

HSA Trends for HSA Trends for (Disadvantaged) Subgroup by (Disadvantaged) Subgroup by

YearYearReading Math

Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports22

AAchievement Data

LDS - DIBELS Nonsense Word LDS - DIBELS Nonsense Word Fluency – K-2 indicatorFluency – K-2 indicator

23

AAchievement Data

Dashboard:

CPS Dashboard W1

View: DIBELS - Nonsense Word FluencyDate: 10/4/2011Organization:

All Schools

Current Grade:

All

Race: AllIEP: AllF/R L: AllGender: AllELL Classification:

All

LDS – Longitudinal Data System > DIBELS (old verision)

HSA SupportHSA SupportNew HSA format – electronically

tested so scores are instantHSA data – New database allows

teachers (planned in future rollout) / coordinators to pull data◦students exceed, meets, approaching,

not proficient◦Standards strands breakdown

3 Tests allow students to show progression over time

Teachers are practicing and aligning curriculum to match HSA blueprint.

24

AAchievement Data

Student Level SupportsStudent Level Supports AVID – Supports Gap Group (C-students) with

academic/study skills/tutoring/peer support Summer Bridge – Supports incoming Freshmen

Approaching group in Reading/Math Ignition – Peer mentoring Freshmen Cisco Phone System – Automatically calls

guardians to inform them about child’s daily attendance

Home Visits– Counselors visit child’s home regarding truancy

IMUA – Supports struggling students to recover credits (~SMP)

NovaNet – Supports during/after-school credit recover

LDS – Provides background data (academic, behavioral, attendance) on students from when they entered DOE system

25

College Enrollment College Enrollment SupportSupport Navigation 101–College exploration/readiness.

College profiling against your criterions. CRASH (College Readiness and Success Hawaii) –

Activities promoting a college going culture. AP Program– Supports high-achievement students to

academically challenge themselves. IB Program – Starting process to become an IB school

to offer a rigorous college-prep program to our students similar to AP Program.

AVID – Supports Gap Group (C-students) with academic/study skills/tutoring/peer support to attend college.

Running Start – Supports students that wish to take courses at the University. (dual credit program)

Step-Up Program – Students pledge to do the BOE recognition diploma for more rigorous high school graduation standards.

26

College Remediation in UH College Remediation in UH SystemSystem

EnglishSY 2009-2010: 34 (215)SY 2008-2009: 46 (267)SY 2007-2008: 56 (251) (P20 Hawaii Report <www.p20hawaii.org> , retrieved

9/2011)

Percent of Students enrolled in UH System

SY 2009-2010: 19% SY 2008-2009: 20% SY 2007-2008: 49%

MathSY 2009-2010: 46 SY 2008-2009: 79SY 2007-2008: 63 (P20 Hawaii Report

<www.p20hawaii.org> , retrieved 9/2011)

Percent of Students enrolled in UH System

SY 2009-2010: 26% SY 2008-2009: 35% SY 2007-2008: 55%

KMR Complex Benchmark: 5% decrease27

College Remediation College Remediation SupportSupportCompass Test – Running test at

school for placement exams. Students can see what areas they are proficient in.◦Teachers took exam to see what is

expected of students.

28

HSA Disaggregated HSA Disaggregated ProfilesProfilesRHS Subgroups

◦Male / Female◦Disadvantaged / Not Disadvantaged◦Native Hawaiian / Non-Native

HawaiianState Subgroups

◦Male / Female◦Disadvantaged / Not Disadvantaged◦Native Hawaiian / Non-Native

Hawaiian29

Roosevelt HighRoosevelt High Reading All Students: 72.2%

Native Hawaiian: 68.1% Non-Native Hawaiian: 73.4% Reading Achievement Native

Hawaiian Gap = 5.3%

Female: 75% Male: 69.2% Reading Gender Gap =-5.7%

Not Disadvantaged: 54.3% Disadvantaged: 86.2% Reading Achievement Economic

Gap =31.9%

Math All Students: 47%

Native Hawaiian: 24.6% Non-Native Hawaiian: 54.2% Reading Achievement Native

Hawaiian Gap =29.6%

Female: 47.7% Male: 46.9% Reading Gender Gap =-.8%

Not Disadvantaged: 40.2% Disadvantaged: 53% Reading Achievement Economic Gap

=12.9%

30

AAchievement Data

All Schools (gr. 10)All Schools (gr. 10) Reading All Students: 66.3%

Female: 54.3% Male: 62.1% Reading Achievement Gender

Gap =7.8%

Not Disadvantaged: 55% Disadvantaged: 76.1% Reading Achievement

Economic Gap =21.1%

Native Hawaiian: 54% Non-Native Hawaiian: 70.8% Reading Achievement Native

Hawaiian Gap = 16.8%

Math All Students: 39.7%

Female: 42% Male: 37.5% Math Achievement Gender Gap

=-4.5%

Not Disadvantaged: 31% Disadvantaged: 47.4% Math Achievement Economic

Gap =16.4%

Native Hawaiian: 24.6% Non-Native Hawaiian: 45.2% Reading Achievement Native

Hawaiian Gap = 20.6%

(LDS, 9/2011)31

AAchievement Data

Sample Subgroup – Disadvantaged Sample Subgroup – Disadvantaged

Trend Profile Against State, SchoolTrend Profile Against State, SchoolSchool Profile Indicators

RHS Female Male DisadvantagedNot DisadvantagedNative HawaiianNon Native HawaiianMath 47.28% 47.68% 46.85% 40.16% 53.01% 24.64% 54.22%Reading 72.20% 75.00% 69.23% 54.33% 86.23% 68.12% 73.45%Science 24.73% 20.98% 28.79% 16.67% 30.63% 12.90% 28.17%

32

AAchievement Data

Sample School Trends – Subgroup Sample School Trends – Subgroup GenderGender

School Profile Indicators (Gender)

33

AAchievement Data

Sample Subgroup – Gender Sample Subgroup – Gender Trend Profile Against State, Trend Profile Against State,

SchoolSchoolSchool Profile Indicators (Gender)

34

AAchievement Data

Middle or High School Middle or High School K K MM RR Success IndicatorsSuccess Indicators

5% annual decrease in 9th grade 5% annual decrease in 9th grade retentionretention

35

Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> Academic Achievement

Looking to decrease the 9ty grade retention rate by 5% each year.

AAchievement Data

Average Daily AttendanceAverage Daily Attendance

SY 2010-2011: 95.4% (LDS, 9/2011)

SY 2009-2010: 94.1%SY 2008-2009: 92.5%SY 2007-2008: 94.5% (Trend Report, Retrieved 12/10/10)

State Benchmark: 95%

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

Average Daily Attendance

SY 2007-2008

SY 2008-2009

SY 2009-2010

SY 2010-2011

36

LDS – Longitudinal Data System

ttendance

Average Daily AttendanceAverage Daily Attendance

SY 2010-2011: 95.4% (LDS, 9/2011)

SY 2009-2010: 94.1%SY 2008-2009: 92.5%SY 2007-2008: 94.5% (Trend Report, Retrieved 12/10/10)

State Benchmark: 95%

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

Average Daily Attendance

SY 2007-2008

SY 2008-2009

SY 2009-2010

SY 2010-2011

37

LDS – Longitudinal Data System

ttendance

LDS - Behavior LDS - Behavior Offenses for 3 Years Offenses for 3 Years

ChartChart

LDS – Longitudinal Data System38

Discipline Offenses Attributes Offense Type

Behavior

LDS - Behavior LDS - Behavior Offenses for 3 Offenses for 3

YearsYears

LDS – Longitudinal Data System39

Dashboard:c CPS Dashboard W1

View:Discipline Offense Trend by Class

Date: 10/4/2011

Time:2008-2009,2009-2010,2010-2011

Race: AllF/R L: AllIEP: AllGender: AllCurrent Grade: All

Organization:Honolulu\Kaimuki-McKinley-Roosevelt

ELL Classification: All

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

Discipline Offense Attributes Offense Type, Discipline Offense Attributes Offense Group State, Measures

Active Active Active

All Class A Offense Count 206 312 502 Class B Offense Count 690 894 1076 Class C Offense Count 719 896 1687 Class D Offense Count 2499 1813 2325

Discipline Offenses Attributes Offense Type

Behavior

Dashboard: CPS Dashboard W1View: GLO 1: Self-Directed LearnerDate: 10/4/2011Organization: All SchoolsCurrent Grade: AllRace: AllIEP: AllGender: AllF/R L: AllMark Year: 2010-2011ELL Classification:

All

LDS – Longitudinal Data System

LDS > GLOBehavior

Dashboard: CPS Dashboard W1View: GLO 1: Self-Directed LearnerDate: 10/4/2011Organization: All SchoolsCurrent Grade: AllRace: AllIEP: AllGender: AllF/R L: AllMark Year: 2010-2011ELL Classification:

All

LDS – Longitudinal Data System

LDS > GLOBehavior

LDS - Course Marks by LDS - Course Marks by Content and SubgroupContent and Subgroup

Elem = % of St. receiving MP or ME in Math and/or LA,Mid. = % of St. receiving C or Better in Math and/or LAHigh = % of St. receiving C or Better in Math and/or LA

42

Course Marks

LDS – Longitudinal Data System

Teacher Quality - Teacher Teacher Quality - Teacher Qualifications - Qualifications - if HQ issue at your if HQ issue at your

schoolschoolPercent of Highly Qualified Teachers

Percent of New Teachers Assigned a Mentor

43NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind

Percent of Teachers (HQT) Percent of Teachers (HQT) Teaching in Assignments they Teaching in Assignments they are Qualified Forare Qualified For

44NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind

HIGH SCHOOL & BEYONDHIGH SCHOOL & BEYONDData Points (Indicators)Data Points (Indicators)

Graduation RateAttendanceHSA (Hawaii State Assessment)

gr. 10◦Total School◦Subgroup – Disadvantaged

Dropout RateRetention RateCollege Enrollment RateCollege Remediation Rate

45

KK MM RR Task -- Task -- Success Success IndicatorsIndicators5% annual increase in graduation 5% annual increase in graduation raterate5% annual decrease in 9th grade 5% annual decrease in 9th grade retentionretention

46

Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports> Academic Achievement

KK MM RR Task -- Task -- Success Success Indicators Indicators 5% annual increase in college-going 5% annual increase in college-going raterate5% annual decrease in % of students 5% annual decrease in % of students enrolling in remedial courses in collegeenrolling in remedial courses in college

47

Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report

College Enrollment RateCollege Enrollment RateSY 2009-2010: 69% (215/312)SY 2008-2009: 73% (267/366)SY 2007-2008: 69% (251/365) (P20 Hawaii Report

<www.p20hawaii.org> , retrieved 12/14/10)

KMR Complex Benchmark: 5% increase

48

Hawaii P20 > College and Career Indicators Report

HS ONLY HS ONLY --ARCH>AYP>--ARCH>AYP>Graduation Rate ResultsGraduation Rate Results

49

Accountability Resource Center >AYP & NCLB Status > Grad/RetFn+Print Scrn > control + V (paste)

HS ONLY - HS ONLY - Graduation Graduation Retention RateRetention Rate

SY 2010-2011: 87%SY 2009-2010: 86%SY 2008-2009: 89%SY 2007-2008: 87% (NCLB School Reports, Retrieved 12/10/10)

State Benchmark: 80%State Avg: 80%

Note: Grad rate is for previous school year’s. Ex: 2010-2011 is for Class of 2010

50ARCH > NCLB

HS ONLY - HS ONLY - Graduation Graduation RateRate

SY 2010-2011: 87%SY 2009-2010: 86%SY 2008-2009: 89%SY 2007-2008: 87% (NCLB School Reports, Retrieved 12/10/10)

State Benchmark: 80%State Avg: 80%

Note: Grad rate is for previous school year’s. Ex: 2010-2011 is for Class of 2010

51

NCLB Report – No Child Left Behind

HS ONLY - HS ONLY - School Dropout School Dropout RateRate

SY 2009-2010: 10.3%SY 2008-2009: 10.4%SY 2007-2008: 8.8% (SSIR, retrieved 12/10/10)

SSIR SY 2010-2011 will be released in Nov 2011. No way to calculate at school.

52S

SSIR – School Status and Improvement Report

HS ONLY - HS ONLY - Grade Retention Grade Retention RateRate

SY 2010-2011: 15.6% (State Retention List via School Registrar,

9/2011)

SY 2009-2010: 13.3%SY 2008-2009: 14.7%SY 2007-2008: 18.5% (Trend Report, retrieved 12/10/10)

KMR Complex Benchmark: 10% decrease

Trends Report: School Accountability Trends Reports>

53