Post on 04-Jul-2015
description
Human Centered Computing
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 1
IFI7172, Lesson 5
Objective
• The objective of this lesson is to
– Present reading key concepts; (1:30 h)
– Gather groups and design concept maps. (30m)
– Sum up (15m)
• Address the notion behind the technology acceptance model;
• Basic Concept underlying the model; and
• Explain it different variation and construct definitions.
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 2
READING ASSIGN 3
Technology acceptance model
STS Common understand
– Group of 4 work on a common understand
• 30 minutes– go to TAM Key concepts
– build a Concept map or Mind map base on those concepts and your previous reading
» you can use Cmaps tools
» or you can use this online tools
• http://www.wisemapping.com/
• http://www.mindmeister.com/
– Present
• 10 minutes
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 4
Fundamental notions
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 5
Main idea behind model
• Technology acceptance model
– is an attempt to better understand the process of technology acceptance within organizations
• It includes 4 versions
– TAM 1
– TAM 2
– TAM 3
– UTAUT
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 6
Basic Concept underlying the model
Technology acceptance model
• Main Idea behind the model
– 2 key factors affects their adoption/acceptance decision
• HOW and WHEN they they will use it
• It replaces TRA’s attitude measures with
– technology acceptance measures
• ease of use, and usefulness
Models that support TAM
• Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) – Motivational Model (MM)
• this models aims to predict behavioral intention
• Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)– Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB)
– Links beliefs and behaviors; and was made to improve TRA
• Technology Acceptance model (TAM)– Is an extension of theory of reasoned action (TRA)
– Also combines TRA and TPB
Motivational Model (MM)
Attitude TowardsBehaviour
Subjective Norm
BehaviouralIntention
Behaviour
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)
Need, Desire, Expectancy, Anticipation
Behaviour Action Goal Incentive
Behaviour Modification
Model Core Constructs Definitions
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
Attitude TowardBehavior
Adapted from TRA
Subjective Norm Adapted from TRA
Perceived BehavioralControl
• the perceived ease or difficulty of performing the behavior• In context of IS research, perceptions of internal and external constraints on behavior
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 10
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)
Attitude TowardBehavior
individual’s positive or negative feelings about performing the target behavior
Subjective Norm
the person’s perception that most people who are important to him think he should or should not perform the behavior in question
Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour
1995
AttitudeTowards
Behaviour
Subjective Norm
BehaviouralIntention
Behaviour
PerceivedBehavioural
Control
Ease-of-Use
Perceived Usefulness
Compatibility
Peer Influence
Superior’s Influence
Self-efficacy
Resource facilitating condition
Technologyfacilitating condition
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 11
Technology Acceptance Model• Cmbines TRA and TPB
– Replaces TRA’s attitude measures with
• technology acceptance measures– Perceived usefulness (PU)
– Perceived ease-of-use (PEOU)
1989
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 12
Attitude Towards Using
Perceived Ease of Use
Perceived Usefulness
Behavioural Intention Actual Use
Subjective norm
Perceived Behaviour control
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, 46, 2000, 186-204.
Social influence process
Cognitive process
TAM2Technology Acceptance Model
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 13
TAM3Technology Acceptance Model
Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. “TAM 3: Advancing the Technology Acceptance Model with a Focus on Interventions,” Manuscript in-preparation.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2)
Model Core Constructs Definitions
Combined TAM and TPB (C-TAM-TPB)
Perceived Usefulness
the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance job performance
Perceived Ease of Use
the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free of effort
Subjective Norm Adapted from TRA/TPB. Included in TAM2 only
Attitude Towardusing
Adapted from TRA/TPB
Perceived BehavioralControl
Adapted from TRA/TPB
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 15
UTAUT Research Model • Integrates elements across the above models
– 4 core determinants of intention and usage,
– 4 moderators of key relationship
PerformanceExpectancy
EffortExpectancy
SocialInfluence
FacilitatingConditions
Gender
BehavioralIntention
UsageBehavior
Age ExperienceVoluntariness
of Use
Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology UTAUT
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 17
PerformanceExpectancy
EffortExpectancy
SocialInfluence
FacilitatingConditions
Gender
BehavioralIntention
UsageBehavior
Age ExperienceVoluntariness
of Use
Construct Definitions
• Attitude: – Individual's positive or negative feeling about performing the
target behavior (e.g., using a system).
• Behavioral intention: – The degree to which a person has formulated conscious plans to
perform or not perform some specified future behavior.
• Computer anxiety: – The degree of an individual’s apprehension, or even fear, when
she/he is faced with the possibility of using computers.
• Computer playfulness:– The degree of cognitive spontaneity in microcomputer
interactions.
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 18
Construct Definitions
• Computer self-efficacy: – The degree to which an individual beliefs that he or she has the
ability to perform specific task/job using computer.
• Effort expectancy: – The degree of ease associated with the use of the system.
• Facilitating conditions:
– The degree to which an individual believes that an organizational and technical infrastructure exists to support use of the system.
• Image:
– The degree to which use of an innovation is perceived to enhance one's status in one's social system.
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 19
Construct Definitions
• Job relevance:
– Individual's perception regarding the degree to which the target system is relevant to his or her job.
• Objective usability:
– A comparison of systems based on the actual level (rather than perceptions) of effort required to complete specific tasks.
• Output quality:
– The degree to which an individual believes that the system performs his or her job tasks well.
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 20
Construct Definitions
• Performance expectancy:
– The degree to which an individual believes that using the system will help him or her to attain gains in job performance.
• Perceived ease of use: – See the definition of effort expectancy.
• Perceived enjoyment: – The extent to which the activity of using a specific system
is perceived to be enjoyable in it’s own right, aside from any performance consequences resulting from system use.
• Perceived usefulness: – See the definition of performance expectancy.
Construct Definitions
• Perception of external control: – See the definition of facilitating conditions.
• Result demonstrability: – Tangibility of the results of using the innovation.
• Social influence: – The degree to which an individual perceives that important
others believe he or she should use the new system.
• Subjective norm: – Person's perception that most people who are important to him
think he should or should not perform the behavior in question.
• Voluntariness: – The extent to which potential adopters perceive the adoption
decision to be non-mandatory.
@ Sónia Sousa, 2014 22