Post on 01-Feb-2016
description
page 1 of 1
GradingrubricforaGroupProjectProject Proposal and the System Analysis and Design Deliverable Rubric
Teamwork (25 Points)
Theteamworkedwelltogethertoachieveobjectives.Eachmembercontributedinavaluablewaytotheproject.Alldatasourcesindicatedahighlevelofmutual respectandcollaboration.
The teamworkedwell togethermostofthetime,withonlyafewoccurrencesofcommunicationbreakdownorfailuretocollaboratewhenappropriate.Membersweremostlyrespectfulofeachother.
Teamdidnotcollaborateorcommunicatewell. Somememberswouldworkindependently,withoutregardtoobjectivesorpriorities.Alack of respect and regardwasfrequentlynoted.
Contribution (25 Points)
Allrequirementsandobjectivesareidentified,evaluatedandcompeted.Thedeliverableofferednewinformationorapproach tothe topic under discussion.Likewise,the applicationisbasedonstatedcriteria,analysisandconstraints.
All requirementsareidentifiedandevaluatedbutsomeobjectivesarenotcompleted.The deliverable offered somenew informationorapproachtothe topicunderdiscussion.Theapplicationisreasonable;further analysis of someof thealternativesorconstraints mayhaveledtoadifferentrecommendation.
Manyrequirementsandobjectivesarenotidentified,evaluatedand/orcompleted.The deliverable offered nonewinformationorapproachtothetopicunderdiscussion.Fewapplicationconsiderationsareanalyzedandotherfactorswereignoredorincompletelyanalyzed.
SubjectKnowledge (25 Points)
Thedeliverabledemonstratedknowledgeofthecoursecontentbyintegratingmajorandminorconceptsintothe response.Thedeliverablealsodemonstrated evidenceofextensiveresearcheffortandadepthofthinkingaboutthetopic.
Thedeliverabledemonstrated knowledgeofthecoursecontentbyintegratingmajorconceptsintotheresponse.Thedeliverablealsodemonstrated evidenceoflimited researcheffort and/orinitialofthinkingaboutthetopic.
Thedeliverabledid notdemonstrateknowledgeofthecoursecontent,evidenceof the researcheffortordepthof thinkingaboutthetopic.
SupportingMaterial (20 Points)
Allrelevantinformationwasobtainedandinformationsourceswerevalid.Analysisanddesignconsiderationswerewellsupportedbytheinformation.
Sufficientinformationwas obtainedandmostsourceswere
valid.Analysisanddesign
considerationswere mostlysupportedbytheinformation.
Insufficientinformationwasobtainedand/orsourceslackvalidity.Analysisanddesignconsiderationswere notsupportedbytheinformationcollected.
Composition (5Points)
Thedeliverablewas wellorganizedandclearlywritten.Theunderlyinglogicwasclearlyarticulatedand easy to follow.Wordswere chosen that preciselyexpressedtheintendedmeaningandsupported readercomprehension.Diagramsoranalysesenhancedandclarified presentationofideas.Sentenceswere grammatical and freefromerrors.
The deliverablewas organizedandclearlywritten for themostpart. In some areas the logicand/orflowofideaswere difficult to follow. Wordswerewellchosenwithsomeminorexpectations.Diagramswere consistentwiththetext.Sentenceswere mostlygrammatical and/or only a fewspellingerrorswerepresentbuttheydidnothinderthereader.
Thedeliverablelacked overallorganization.Thereaderhadtomakeconsiderableefforttounderstand theunderlyinglogicandflowofideas.Diagramswere absentorinconsistent withthetext.Grammaticalandspellingerrorsmade it difficult forthe readertointerpret thetextinplaces.
NotYetCompleteComponent Sophisticated Competent
page 1 of 1
ApplicationDemonstrationRubric
Component Sophisticated Competent NotYetComplete
Teamwork (30 Points)
Theteamworkedwelltogethertoachieveobjectives.Eachmembercontributedinavaluablewaytotheproject.Alldata sources indicated ahighlevelofmutualrespectandcollaboration.
Theteamworkedwelltogethermostofthetime,withonlyafewoccurrencesofcommunicationbreakdownorfailuretocollaboratewhennecessary.Membersweremostlyrespectfulofeachother.
The teamdidnot collaborateorcommunicationwell.Somememberswouldworkindependently,withoutregardtoobjectivesorpriorities.A lackofrespectandregardwasfrequentlynoted.
Contribution (30Points)
Thedemonstrationofferednewinformationorapproachabouttheapplication .Thedemonstrationalsoshowedstrongeffortwasmadeinbreakingnewgroundandbuilding excitement about theapplication.
The demonstrationoffered somenewinformationorapproachabouttheapplication. Thedemonstrationalsoshowedinitialeffortwasmadeinbuildingexcitementabouttheapplication.
Thedemonstrationwasnotcomplete andoffered nonewinformationorapproachabouttheapplication.Thedemonstration also showed thatlittleeffortwasmade inbuildingexcitementabouttheapplication.
Contentand
(40Points)
Thedemonstrationwas
imaginativeandeffectiveinconveyingideastotheaudience.
Thedemonstration techniquesusedwereeffectiveinconveyingmainideas,butabitunimaginative.
Thedemonstration failed tocapturetheinterestoftheaudience and/orisconfusing inwhatwascommunicated.
Creativity
page 1 of 1
Component Sophisticated Competent NotYetComplete
Content andCreativity (40Points)
Thepresentationcontainedanabundanceofmaterialwhichclearlyrelatedtothemainarguments.Externalresearchwasusedtojustifyargumentsor solutions.Thepresentationofthematerialwasoriginalandpresentedinacreativewaythatheldaudienceattention.
Thepresentationcontainedmaterial tosupport the main arguments, but: 1)not all material clearly related to themainarguments; 2) limited externalresearchwasused to justify
orsolutions;and/or3)thepresentationofthe material was appropriate,
but
onlysomewhat heldaudience
attention.
Theaudiencehadtomakeconsiderableefforttounderstandtheunderlyinglogicaland flowof ideas.Majoraspectsoftheanalysisorrecommendationswereabsent.Noexternalresearchwasusedtojustifyargumentsorsolutions.Thepresentationlackedcreativityanddidnotholdaudienceattention.
CoherenceandOrganization
(30Points)
Thethesis,argumentandsolutionwereclearlystatedandexampleswereappropriate.Thetransitionsand flowwereeasyto follow.Slideswereerror- freeandlogicallypresented.
Thethesis,argumentandsolutionwereclearly stated,but: 1)not allexampleswere supportiveillustrations; 2) thetransitions and /or flowweresomewhatdifficultto follow;and/or3)slideswereerror-freeandlogicallypresented.
The thesis,argument,solutionandexampleswerenotclearlystated.Theconclusionwasunclear.Thetransitionsandflowwerenotlogical.Slidescontainederrorsandalackoflogicalprogression.
SpeakingSkillsandParticipation (30Points)
Teammemberswerepoisedandhadcleararticulation.Everyteammemberspokeandparticipatedatavery highandbalancedlevel.Speakersdemonstratedgoodvolume,and eyecontact.Enthusiasmandconfidencewasexuded.
Thepresentationfitintothetimeallotmentof10minutes.
Team membersweremostlyaudibleand/orfluenton thetopic,but:1)notallteammembersspokeand/orparticipatedinahighandbalancedlevel;2)speakersdemonstratedfairvolumeand/oreyecontactwasbrokenwithaudience;3)lightdiscomfortwithpublicspeakingwasexuded;and/or4) thepresentationslightlywentover the10minuteallotment.
Teammemberswereofteninaudibleand/orhesitantandreliedheavilyonnotes.Speakersmadedistractinggestureswithlittleornoaudienceeyecontact.A highlevelof discomfortwithpublicspeakingwasexuded.
Thepresentationwentoverthe10
minuteallotment.
FinalPresentationRubric
IndividualReflectionEssayRubric
Component Sophisticated Competent NotYetComplete
Contributions (50Points)
The individualcontributed inavaluablewaytotheproject.The individualisalsoabletoarticulate thekeyperformancecriteriaofsuccessfulteams
andevaluatethegroupperformanceaccordingly.
Theindividualdidnotcontributeasheavilyasothersbutdidmeetallresponsibilities.Theindividual isalsoable to identifysomekeyperformance criteriaofsuccessfulteamsand/ordrawrelatedconnectionsthegroupperformance.
Theindividualdidnotcontributetotheprojectandfailedtomeetresponsibilities.Theindividualdoesnotidentifykeyperformancecriteriaofsuccessfulteamsordrawinferencetoownexperience.
LessonsLearned (50Points)
Theindividualhadalevelofengagementthatdemonstratedastrongcommitment to the classandthelearningoutcomes.Thevoiceofthe individualwriter isevident.
Theindividualhadalevelofengagementthatdemonstratedacommitmentto theclassand/orthelearningoutcomes.Thelevelofanalysisandreflectioncouldhavebeendeeper.
Theindividualhadalevelofengagementthatdidnotdemonstrateacommitmenttotheclassorthelearningoutcomes.Conclusionssimplyinvolvedrestatinginfo rmationwithoutreflectivethought.
arguments