English Phonology and Morphology · Typology of consonant clusters Onset clusters: TR, rising...

English Phonology and Morphology

Phonological processes and constraints

Processes turn something into something else (dynamic, alternations)

Constraints are bans prohibiting certain combinations (static, phonotactics)

types of phonological rules:- assimilation rules: dogs – cats, loves – hates, loved –

laughed - dissimilation rules: modal, rural, feudal but lunar,

muscular- feature addition rules e.g. aspiration- segment deletion e.g. vowel-zero alternation (syncope):

camera- segment addition (insertion): bushes, buzzes, butted- movement (metathesis) rules: Hu teher~terhek, terhet

‘burden nom.sg.~pl., acc.sg.’, terhel ‘to burden’

Assimilation rulesregressive place assimilations, e.g.:

- dentalisation of /t d n l/ when followed by /θ/: e.g. quite thick

- labial assimilation of /t d/: hot pudding [-p p-], Hyde Park [-b p-]

- velar assimilation of /t d/: that car [-k k-], bad composition [-g k-]

- nasal place assimilation: green peas, raincoat, ink, hunger

Assimilation rules: voicing

Hungarian: neutralisation

Assimilation rules

Fricative Devoicing

Neutralisation vs. e.g., aspiration

Deletion rules

Syncope(post-stress) syncope

possible in: every not possible in: phonology

family venison

camera Melanie

Brittany benefit

Barbara vanity

battery pelican

Deletion rules

Syncope(pre-stress) syncope

Deletion rules

Certain processes only apply across (certain) morphological boundaries:

Also cf. e.g. kicking, betting

Lexical rules: within words onlyPost-lexical rules: within words and across word

boundaries in the same way

The domain of application of lexical rules is the word, that of post-lexical rules is the utterance (a stretch of language between two pauses).

Post-lexical rules are insensitive to morphological and syntactic boundaries.

Hungarian voicing assimilation?

L-darkening?

R-dropping?

Aspiration?

Tapping/flapping?

English palatalisation

Within words

Across words

That is, palatalisation in English is optional as a post-lexical process, but obligatory as a lexical one

Rule ordering

breaking

Btw, is Breaking lexical or post-lexical?

(Broadening)

Is Broadening lexical or post-lexical?

(Broadening)

Rule ordering

Syllable structure and phonotactics

phonotactics

reminder

Cross-linguistic observations

Beginning of the word: consonant/vowel?

Beginning of the word: consonant/vowel?Consonant-only languages (e.g., German,

Czech)

Czech)Vowel-only languages??

Czech)Vowel-only languages??End of the word

Czech)Vowel-only languages??End of the world :-)

Czech)Vowel-only languages??End of the word: consonant/vowel?

Czech)Vowel-only languages??End of the word: consonant/vowel?Vowel-only languages (e.g., Italian)

Czech)Vowel-only languages??End of the word: consonant/vowel?Vowel-only languages (e.g., Italian)Consonant-only languages??

Czech)Vowel-only languages??End of the word: consonant/vowel?Vowel-only languages (e.g., Italian)Consonant-only languages??Mirror-image situation!

Consonant clusters at word edges

Consonant clusters at word edges:Similar mirror-image situation

English vowel length and phonotactics

Open vs. closed syllable

English vowel length and phonotactics

Stress placement in English nouns

Conclusions

The rhyme

Heavy vs. light rhyme

Timing, timing slots, timing tier (vs. melodic tier)Heavy/light syllable/rhyme, open/closed syllable

hiatus

Affricates?

Hungarian

standard colloquial

Hungarian

standard colloquial

Compensatory Lengthening

Possible associations between timing and melody

Autosegmentalism

AutosegmentalismLiaison = linking

French:

(non-rhotic) English:

The English onset

any English consonant can begin a word if immediately followed by a vowel, e.g., bin, pin, zeal, sit, have, key, node, ray, yet, way, etc.

one exception: the velar nasal, which never occurs in initial position

The English onset

Remove the initial /s/!

The English onset

/stw-/: accidental gap

The English onset

2-member onsets

Generalisations

Sonority, sonority scale

Generalisations

Sonority, sonority scaleSonority Sequencing Principle (SSP)

Generalisations

Sonority, sonority scaleSonority Sequencing Principle (SSP)Ban on homorganic clusters

SC clusters

They are NOT onsets!

The nucleus

Simplex or complexComplex nuclei in open syllables onlySyllabic consonants

Binarity

Each syllabic constituent may dominate a maximum of two timing positions

Binarity

The nucleus is obligatory: it must dominate a minimum of one X

Binarity

The nucleus is obligatory: it must dominate a minimum of one X

The coda may dominate a maximum of one X

Binarity

Superheavy rhymes?

A long Nucleus is possible in a closed syllable if it is followed by:

a homorganic coronal cluster consisting of a sonorant and an obstruent, or

Syllabification

=/= word division in spelling!

Syllabification

Of intervocalic consonants: animal

Syllabification

Of intervocalic consonants: animalOnset Maximisation Principle

Syllabification

Of intervocalic consonants: animalOnset Maximisation Principle: agenda, algebra;

attractive vs. Atlantic

Syllabification: problems

athlete, lovely, Bentley

athlete, lovely, Bentley: bogus clusters

Typology of consonant clusters

Onset clusters

Onset clusters: TR, rising sonority profile, homorganicity ban, found initially and medially (but marked finally – cf. French), usually represented as branching onset

Coda-onset clusters

Coda-onset clusters: RT, falling sonority profile, typically homorganic (least marked: ND – the universally least marked cluster!), found medially and finally (but marked initially – cf. SC – Magic Licensing), usually represented as heterosyllabic sequence

Implication: onset cluster > coda-onset cl.

Onset clustersCoda-onset clusters

Onset clustersCoda-onset clustersBogus clusters: found medially only, traditionally

not distinguished from coda-onset clusters, in models operating with empty positions: CVC with no

athlete, lovely, Bentleystayextra

athlete, lovely, Bentleystayextraword-final consonants

Word-final consonants

Verb stress

are NOT codas (do NOT make their syllables heavy/closed)

Instead: they are onsets

Instead: they are onsetsThere are no onsets without nuclei :-)

Instead: they are onsetsThere are no onsets without nuclei :-)Words end in Final Empty Nuclei (FEN)

The ECP

Non-rhoticity

Hiatus breaking

English: /j/ /w/

Hungarian: /j/hi[j]átusdi[j]óte[j]aJózsi[j]é

„Hány j-vel írják, hogy Siófok?” :-)

Practice

sprint

Practice

sprint

Practice

source

Practice

source

Practice

an act

Practice

an act

Practice

one act

Practice

one act

- the last bits -

The two final topics

stress

stress: (Kristó Ch.7; on Wednesday)

stress: (Kristó Ch.7; on Wednesday)Words and meanings (Kristó "Ch.8"): the nature

of lexical storage in the mind

Arbitrariness

SaussurePinker (1994): the sound string dog does not

resemble the animal it denotes: it does not have four legs, it isn’t furry, it doesn’t bark or wag its tail, and so on. The sole reason why English speakers think of Canis familiaris when hearing the string dog is that in their childhood, they learnt to associate the concept with that string

Arbitrariness

SaussurePinker (1994): the sound string dog different languages have different signs for the

same concept

Arbitrariness

same conceptthe denoted concepts are conventional, too:

asztal, get

Arbitrariness

asztal, getSigns: symbols

Arbitrariness

asztal, getSigns: symbols and icons: catlike

Arbitrariness

asztal, getSigns: symbols and icons: catlike –

polymorphemic, semantically transparent

Transparent vs. opaque

Dog vs. catlike

Dog vs. catlikeCuriosity : I entered a shop which turned out to be

full of old curiosities

full of old curiositiesPersonalness vs. personality

full of old curiositiesPersonalness vs. personality Hu. macskaszerű 'catlike' vs. népszerű 'popular'Opaque polymorphemic words

+ meaningless morphemes

"huckles and ceives"

+ meaningless morphemes

"huckles and ceives"Hu. kérd-ez 'ask', folt-oz 'patch', etc. vs. üld-öz

'chase'

Radford et al. (1999:146):

our intuitive, everyday notion of the word corresponds to several linguistically significant entities

the orthographical word

the orthographical wordword forms

the orthographical wordword formslexeme

the orthographical wordword formslexemeparadigm

the orthographical wordword formslexemeparadigmgrammatical words

syncretism

Inflection vs. word-formation

Sources of words

lexicon: storage (and retrieval)

Sources of words

lexicon: storageno ready-made item is available?

Sources of words

lexicon: storageno ready-made item is available? - nonce forms

Sources of words

lexicon: storageno ready-made item is available? - nonce formsMy son adores Tarzanlike heroes

Sources of words

lexicon: storageno ready-made item is available? - nonce formsMy son adores Tarzanlike heroesOh, my son loves Jabbalike ones

Sources of words

(online) word-formation (grammar)

Listing and arbitrariness

classical Generative Grammar: "minimize storage, maximize mileage": the lexicon is the storehouse of arbitrary information, and the rest — whatever is predictable — is provided by the grammar (the phonology, the morphology, and the syntax)

recent psycholinguistic research: the memory can easily cope with a much larger amount of stored information than assumed before

plus: lexicalisation

Lexicalisation

a form is lexicalised if it could not be produced by the application of regular morphological processes

Lexicalisation

how do lexicalised forms arise? (i. e., how do originally transparent forms get lexicalised?)

Lexicalisation

how do lexicalised forms arise? (i. e., how do originally transparent forms get lexicalised?)

compounds and derived words which were at some point transparent can lose their transparency and become arbitrary signs (cupboard, playwright, Hu. egyház; building, Hu. tojás)

Lexicalisation

why?consequence of the arbitrariness of the linguistic

Lexicalisation

sign: If the relationship between form and meaning is a matter of mere convention, there is no reason why this relationship ought to be constant — in other words, arbitrariness implies the possibility of change, either in the form, — or the meaning. It is arbitrariness that sanctions linguistic change.

Lexicalisation

signOnce listed, words “persist and change”

Lexicalisation

signOnce listed, words “persist and change”but then: why do non-arbitrary items change (i.e.,

become lexicalised)? are only arbitrary items listed?

Lexicalisation

signOnce listed, words “persist and change”but then: why do non-arbitrary items change (i.e.,

become lexicalised)? are only arbitrary items listed?

non-arbitrary (regular) forms need not be listed: if something is listed, it will sooner or later become lexicalised, no matter if it’s arbitrary or not at the point when it’s listed

Lexicalisation

But what is, then, listed, from the set of non-arbitrary forms?

Lexicalisation

memory and the role of frequency

Lexicalisation

memory and the role of frequencycf. irregular inflection

Lexicalisation

memory and the role of frequencycf. irregular inflectionwhat are the ten most frequent verbs in English?

Lexicalisation

memory and the role of frequencycf. irregular inflectionwhat are the ten most frequent verbs in English?the “top ten” (with decreasing frequency): be,

have, do, say, make, go, take, come, see, get

Sources of words - summary

Phonology – morphology interface in English

English Phonology and Morphology · Typology of consonant clusters Onset clusters: TR, rising...

Documents

Transcript of English Phonology and Morphology · Typology of consonant clusters Onset clusters: TR, rising...

Sonority Is Different - Free

SONORITY-DRIVEN STRESS AND VOWEL REDUCTION IN …(1) Asymmetric augmentation of high vowels is due to sonority, which is encoded as a moraic weight distinction • High vowels are

Immediate E ects of Medially Posted Insoles on Lower Limb ...

SONORITY AND SYLLABICITY: ACOUSTIC CORRELATES OF ......The terms "prominence" or "sonority" have been ied to various aspects of speech: as an overall feature of voice quality (see,

Atomic & Molecular Clusters 6. Bimetallic “Nanoalloy” Clusters

CS626 : Natural Language Processing/Speech, NLP …pb/cs626-sem1-2012/cs626...2012/11/01 · Introduction to sonority theory “The Sonority of a sound is its loudness relative to

Polyhedral Clusters - ERNETmet.iisc.ernet.in/~lord/webfiles/clusters/polyclusters.pdf · In an R-phase the triacontahedral clusters are centered at bcc positions. Neighbouring clusters

strap straw - Speech-Language Therapy · PDF fileOne approach to classifying two-element consonant clusters according to markedness is to rank them according to their sonority difference

Sonority and Reduplication in Hadotiroa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/1781_gulab_chand...DOI 10.22425/jul.2017.18.2.1 eISSN 2508-5344 / pISSN 1598-6381 Sonority and Reduplication

Robotic Clusters: Multi-Robot Systems as Computer Clusters

From clusters of particles to 2D bubble clusters

Sonority Contour Preferences in Philippine Languages · Sonority Contour Preferences in Philippine Languages * K. David Harrison, Katharine Merow, and Rachel Shorey Swarthmore College

Industry clusters 1 Background Controversy Cluster drivers Identifying clusters Clusters and economic performance Clusters and policy.

Interpreting sonority-projection experiments: the role of phonotactic modeling Bruce Hayes Department of Linguistics UCLA.

Atomic & Molecular Clusters 3. Rare Gas Clusters

Grand Solo Op.14 & Rondo Op2. N3: The Sonority of the ...

Sonority as a Basis for Rhythmic Class Discrimination

Groups, Clusters and Clusters of Clusters

Sonority variation in Stochastic Optimality Theorymoreton/Papers/SmithMoreton2012.pdf · Sonority variation in Stochastic Optimality Theory: Implications for markedness hierarchies

The relationship between sonority and glottal vibration - …linguistics.ucla.edu/people/keating/Risdal-etal_CUNY2016_final.pdfThe relationship between sonority and glottal ... Introduction