Post on 31-Mar-2015
Collaborative peer review Collaborative peer review of teaching (CPRT)of teaching (CPRT)
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 1
http://mavdisk.mnsu.edu/parsnk/Archive%202007-8/POL371/website/Course%20Website_files/image003.jpg
Session overviewSession overview
WelcomePeer review – why do we need it?What is peer review?The Faculty’s CPRT programWhat is good teaching?Feedback – how to give and receive itForming review teams
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 2
Peer review – why do we Peer review – why do we need it? need it?
Developments in peer review in Australian higher education
Purposes served by peer review processes
Approaches to peer review
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 3
We must do something alien to academic culture: we must talk to each other about our inner lives -risky stuff in a profession that fears the personal and seeks safety in the technical, the distant, the abstract.(Parker J. Palmer) Source: Palmer, P.J. 1998 The Courage to Teach Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, p. 12.
What is peer review?What is peer review?
Approaches to peer reviewPeer observation versus peer
reviewTeaching practices that can be
reviewed ◦Lectures◦Tutorials◦DSO sites◦ Assessment practices◦Other?
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 4
Faculty’s CPRT program: Faculty’s CPRT program:
Aims◦Quality to teaching and learning◦Collaboration and discussion◦Dissemination of good practice◦Self-reflection and scholarship◦Recognition of effective practices
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 5
Faculty’s CPRT program:Faculty’s CPRT program:
Approach◦Developmental◦Accessible ◦Supportive◦Confidential ◦Flexible◦Reflective◦Sustainable
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 6
Faculty’s CPRT program:Faculty’s CPRT program:
Flexible models
Person A
Person B
Person C
Person A
Person B
3-person or 2-person model
peer or ‘expert’ reviewer
within or across discipline
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 7
Faculty’s CPRT program: Faculty’s CPRT program:
The review cycle:◦Introductory session – today◦Pre-observation/review session◦Observation or review◦Post-meeting◦Reflection◦Group feedback and evaluation – 30
October
04/11/23 Faculty of Business and Law 8
What isn’t good teaching?What isn’t good teaching?
Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 9
…………good teaching isgood teaching is
peer review of teaching needs a focus on learning which occurs as a result of teaching
peer review of teaching needs a focus on learning which occurs as a result of teaching
Teachers open the door. You enter by yourself.
Chinese ProverbSource: http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/29226.html accessed 23 February 2009
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:I3mEhepcznaC1M:http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7dPK9ryQY_s/RtJxbF4B6QI/AAAAAAAAAVw/1ci0JK_OkYo/s320/kkid.jpg
Judging “good” teachingJudging “good” teaching
You be the judge! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY
. http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:pmNL1E7nU_rxqM:http://cooldinners.com/images/qalogo.gif
..or..or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3ae9w4yQr0
http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:KQuLOLICUgpDOM:http://www.insidesocal.com/tomhoffarth/judge.jpg
Have you reached a verdict?
……. or. or
04/11/23 Faculty of Business and Law 13
student focused student diversityactive and challenging learningup to date knowledge assessment and feedback used strategicallyreflects on teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/itl/pd/tl-modules/schorly/framework-peer-review09.pdf
HANDBOOK
What’s next?What’s next?Decide what you
would like reviewed.Decide which method
of review you prefer.If appropriate - form
a review teamDiscuss within your
team ‘what’ each members wants reviewed.
Set dates and times for reviews.
Other issues?Faculty of Business and Law 04/11/23 14