Post on 20-Dec-2015
ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES
Ronald Miller
ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002
Outline Target Fabrication Cost -> COE Simple Power Loop Model Modifications required to for thick-
liquid case (cf. HYLIFE-II)
IFE Target Fab Cost -> COE Introduced at April ARIES-IFE
Meeting (UW-M) based on remarks made at ISFNT-6. No recent activity on this topic. Need to reconcile with results of
IAEA-TM (GA, June 17-19) for closure.
Simple Power Loop Model Gain curve depends on driver (KrF, HI) Solved using iDecideTM COTS
-influence diagram set-up -used in deterministic (not MC) mode -workaround for recursion Thought to scale with Rep Rate (subject to question from G. Logan at April
Meeting)
HYLIFE-II Ref. R. W. Moir, et al., Fusion
Tech., 25 (Jan. 1994) 5. Pumping power does not
contribute to useful thermal power.
HYLIFE-II
HYLIFE-II Pumping Power Logan, Moir, Hoffman, Fusion Tech., 28 (Nov. 1995) 1674. Logan, Moir, Hoffman, UCRL-ID-117334 (May 1994) MathCAD model document Meier, Peterson, personal
communication (June 12) updated MathCAD model
Sze, personal communication (June 20)
PROMETHEUS
Impact on COE Generally seek to minimize
recirculating power fraction, ε Meier result (next chart) does not
show a strong effect…
The 6.4 MJ, 5.9 Hz point gives near optimum COE
0 2 4 6 8 10
2
4
6
8
Repetition rate (Hz)C
OE
(C
ents
/kW
eh)
3 4 5 6 7 80
2
4
6
8
Driver energy (MJ)
CO
E, c
ents
/kW
eh
COE vs Driver energy COE vs Rep-rate
Net power = 1000 MWe
HI Conventional Target (full-sized) distributed radiator
Gain Curve ref. D. Callahan-
Miller and M. Tabak, Phys. Plasmas, 7, 5 (May 2000) 2083.
Near HYLIFE-II ref. R. Moir, et al., Fusion Tech., 25 (Jan. 1994) 5.0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 2 4 6 8 10
Conventional, distributed-radiator (LLNL)
Ga
in
Driver Energy (MJ)
HI Driver [efficiency = f(ED)] DR 5 Hz: PE
HI Driver [efficiency=f(ED)] DR, 5 Hz: Recirc. Pow. Frac., ε
Common Assumptions Auxiliary power fraction = 0.05 Thermal conversion eff. = 0.45,0.55 5-Hz rep. rate is scalable to other PE
(MWe) Recirculating power fraction does not
depend on rep. Rate Last two assumptions are in dispute.