ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

14
ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    220
  • download

    3

Transcript of ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

Page 1: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES

Ronald Miller

ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002

Page 2: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

Outline Target Fabrication Cost -> COE Simple Power Loop Model Modifications required to for thick-

liquid case (cf. HYLIFE-II)

Page 3: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

IFE Target Fab Cost -> COE Introduced at April ARIES-IFE

Meeting (UW-M) based on remarks made at ISFNT-6. No recent activity on this topic. Need to reconcile with results of

IAEA-TM (GA, June 17-19) for closure.

Page 4: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

Simple Power Loop Model Gain curve depends on driver (KrF, HI) Solved using iDecideTM COTS

-influence diagram set-up -used in deterministic (not MC) mode -workaround for recursion Thought to scale with Rep Rate (subject to question from G. Logan at April

Meeting)

Page 5: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

HYLIFE-II Ref. R. W. Moir, et al., Fusion

Tech., 25 (Jan. 1994) 5. Pumping power does not

contribute to useful thermal power.

Page 6: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

HYLIFE-II

Page 7: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

HYLIFE-II Pumping Power Logan, Moir, Hoffman, Fusion Tech., 28 (Nov. 1995) 1674. Logan, Moir, Hoffman, UCRL-ID-117334 (May 1994) MathCAD model document Meier, Peterson, personal

communication (June 12) updated MathCAD model

Sze, personal communication (June 20)

Page 8: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

PROMETHEUS

Page 9: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

Impact on COE Generally seek to minimize

recirculating power fraction, ε Meier result (next chart) does not

show a strong effect…

Page 10: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

The 6.4 MJ, 5.9 Hz point gives near optimum COE

0 2 4 6 8 10

2

4

6

8

Repetition rate (Hz)C

OE

(C

ents

/kW

eh)

3 4 5 6 7 80

2

4

6

8

Driver energy (MJ)

CO

E, c

ents

/kW

eh

COE vs Driver energy COE vs Rep-rate

Net power = 1000 MWe

Page 11: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

HI Conventional Target (full-sized) distributed radiator

Gain Curve ref. D. Callahan-

Miller and M. Tabak, Phys. Plasmas, 7, 5 (May 2000) 2083.

Near HYLIFE-II ref. R. Moir, et al., Fusion Tech., 25 (Jan. 1994) 5.0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 2 4 6 8 10

Conventional, distributed-radiator (LLNL)

Ga

in

Driver Energy (MJ)

Page 12: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

HI Driver [efficiency = f(ED)] DR 5 Hz: PE

Page 13: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

HI Driver [efficiency=f(ED)] DR, 5 Hz: Recirc. Pow. Frac., ε

Page 14: ARIES-IFE SYSTEMS ISSUES Ronald Miller ARIES-IFE Project Meeting General Atomics July 1-2, 2002.

Common Assumptions Auxiliary power fraction = 0.05 Thermal conversion eff. = 0.45,0.55 5-Hz rep. rate is scalable to other PE

(MWe) Recirculating power fraction does not

depend on rep. Rate Last two assumptions are in dispute.